Thank god for Post 60.
BM's Mystery Mafia!! GAME OVER???
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Fishing would be saying "Who's the double voter". Oman was theorizing (falsely) that the number of votes to lynch was affected by an outside force, in this case, a double voter.
The whole premise is wrong, though - a double voter in a game rarely changes the number of votes to lynch, it just drops the number of people who have to be on a wagon for someone to be lynched (usually by one).
Fishing would be "So, does anyone have the ability to double vote?" - which Oman didn't say.
And if there WAS reason to think someone could double vote, what would be the harm in asking about that now, anyways? This is day, the time where votes are cast, and it would become quite apparent as soon as they voted regardless.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Well, let's look at the options as to why NV9 may consider JDodge indisputably town:
A) He's a cop with an innocent. FALSE! There hasn't been a night phase yet.
A.2 - He could be a DAY COP. Possible.
B) He and JDodge are Masons together. NV9 would thus know JDodge's innocence based on pre-game information.
C) NV9 and JDodge are mafia. NV9 unintentionally formed a link by protecting JDodge and fossing everyone else.
D) NV9 is mafia buddying up to JDodge and JDodge is town along for the ride.
E) NV9 is a townie who thinks he's found another townie in JDodge and is stepping up to protect him, perhaps without quite realizing how much of his opinions he is basing on the assumption of JDodge's innocence.
F) SSF is mafia fishing for power roles and Nelly created a powerful point to draw attention away from that. >.>
There are other options but that's what I see, right now.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Well, looking at Bobby's posts in isolation, I am not seeing any reason to think that he was a cop. I don't think ABR intentionally meant to kill a cop, but he did intentionally kill someone, day one, with no warning. THAT is the big problem. So, I guess, we should look to find what the purpose of the vig was for.
He was threatening Jordan to either claim or die (with a side note that his buddy bobby was also in danger). He make a very grandiose claim to force Jordan to claim and then - when jordan refuses to claim, he kills Bobby instead. Bobby, who he didn't ask to claim.
What was the result of this? Huge distancing between jordan and ABR, maybe. Killing someone not in your scum team makes the person you are accusing of being scum look more town. It's hard to say, for sure, but that is what I see it as. ABR made no overt plays to hide he was the vig, so I doubt that he needed it to be a secret. So why do it A) without asking anyone or B) without asking Bobby to claim or C) the huge turn around from one to the other? The apologetic attitude "Sorry if you are town, Jordan", right as eh sends in the vote to kill a townie, just makes it more likely that this is a big gambit, to me.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
This reminds me of Post Restriction Mafia, where the mafia don't have post restrictions like townies do. Are you suggesting that your rolename IS normal? (I'm saying flavor, not role).Oman wrote: Also, I'd like to take a look at the fact that ABR claimed Hydrogen and Bobby was Michael Jordan, I don't think we're in for normal rolenames here.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
I wonder how Erg0 can say that we will get no information from an Albert lynch, when apparently, at least three people (on this page anyways) have decided that Albert is a bad lynch, for NO apparent reason.Erg0 wrote:I guess I'm back.
I still don't like the Albert lynch. If that was a scum gambit then he just gave up a free daykill (which he could have used later in the game to kill, say, aclaimedcop) to kill some random townie and distance himself from a player that nobody was linking him with?
Next theory, please.
Revenge is good and all, but there are one hundred drawbacks to this lynch:
1. He's probably town.
2 through 100.We get no information from the wagon.
Seriously, Albert is the easiest lynch in the world right now, and the scum can just run him up without fear of reprisal. I don't like that idea.
I also find it really weird that nobody even noted my unreasoned vote on MoS. Monomaniacal much?Oman wrote: I am disagreeing with the Albert lynch because he vigged Bobby as far as I can tell (he might have just said he did to draw out a claim, but its unlikely he fake-killed Jordan and Bobby died at the approx time). I don't see a day scumkill, and if they did have it I doubt they'd waste it just yet.
Ergo is also right, even if he's scum, we get no info from the wagon except maybe Xdaamno as town, but then he could be bussing I guess we don't get any.
Also, Ergo mentions the bit I mentioned above: " If that was a scum gambit then he just gave up a free daykill" which I see as wrong move also.
Albert may be wrong, but I doubt he's scum. Xdaamno, I guess your answer is yes.
Considering he daykilled a cop with no warning, I see no reason for him to be town, and I see no reason for scum, if he is town, to want to go after him. Like Erg0 said - he's an easy lynch. 'Why lynch someone scummy right now', I can picture scum thinking, 'if he's going to be an easy lynch later on, when one of us are in trouble'.Kison wrote:Ok, seeing as we're still pretty much where we were when I last posted, I'll just give a run down.
I still don't agree with an Albert lynch. His play was foolish, but I really don't see how it could be some mastermind scum plan(it seemed rushed and randomly decided). As Erg0 has said, the wagon isn't going to be very informative, and at this point, it really looks like people are being stupid and simply trying to get revenge for a dumb move. Not good for the town.
I eagerly await content from N9V's replacement.
Anyways the point of this post is to discredit Ergo's 1/100 chance he's town vs 99/100 he's scum but it would be an infoless lynch. There's three people right there who think that what he did was townish, which I don't really see a town having any reason to do. It was NOT town to do what he did in the fashion he did it. People are saying it's too scummy to be scum, that's ridiculous.
Now, mind you, me and Albert are BOTH voting xdaamno, so...-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
So, too scummy to be scum. Okay. Very wifom, okay. On the other hand, saying that you said your post before the others sounds like you are ceding that information could NOW be had from his lynch.Erg0 wrote: I said Albert was a bad lynchbeforethe other two spoke up, so I could hardly take that into account when stating that we got no information. To be clear, I absolutely think Albert is town, anything else I say on the subject is merely an attempt to persuade others who think he's scum not to vote for him.
As for having no apparent reason to think that Albert's a townie - my reason is in the post you quoted. I don't see what he did as a good scum gambit. It's not good play for a townie either, but it's a worse play for scum.
Again, too scummy to be scum, which almost makes it a perfect scum gambit, apparently, because if you are town, and he's not, you'd be falling for it.Oman wrote: The reason I think he's town atm is that it would be rediculous for him to be scum.
Also, if he is scum (which I'll grant is a possibility) he's failing badly, so I see no harm is keeping him around.
Skruffs: example 1) Albert comes up scum: who are his scumbuddys?
I think we'd be much more likely to see who is scum by if he turns up town than if he turns up scum.
Whoa. No way. You do NOT get to fos me for questioning your motives. You just daykilled a cop without giving him ANY chance to claim, defend, etc, for the sole reason that the other person you were so suspicious of, bobby, refusing to claim for you. Why did he refuse to claim? PRobably because he had no real idea that you were dayvig, or, because you are his buddy and knew you wouldn't actually kill him. It could so easily have been staged, and you can not deny that, unless you are still as blind as you were before you killed the cop.Albert B. Rampage wrote:Skruffs, its very simple. I could have simply told the mod who I wanted dead without revealing my hand. That's what I would do if I were scum. The fact I made myself so wrong discredits a scum Rampage.
FoS Skruffs
So, uh, sorry, no.
Which reminds me : Albert - one shot or not?SirWario wrote:
erg0, if he's scum, then he is definitely succeeding at the moment. He just killed our cop. We don't know how much more damage he's capable of inflicting on the town.
He would have known if he had waited for half a minute, and asked him like he had asked hiw original 'target'. HE didn't. Your excuse is saying "Well he can't be held ACCOUNTABLE because he didn't KNOW who he was killing"... when a day vig has the option of being more successful than a night vig because he can use that ability WITH town's help/guidance or to solve options like solving counter claims, etc. Using it for personal pleasure is a gross neglect of responsibilities, at best.Oman wrote:Regardless of who said it, its right. He killed our cop, yes, but he didn't KNOW bobby was cop (unless mafia have a rolecop?). Also I can think of a few reasons he shouldn't have killed bobby:
Secondly - role cop? WHen would the role cop have been able to use their ability? Or do you mean day-role-cop with a the ability to day-talk? No. Albert would have Known if he had given bobby a chance to claim, which he didn't.
What made Bobby look suspicious to you?Oman wrote:Bobby looked scummy at that point (IIRC) scum like to keep suspicious townies alive.
By your very previous statement, killing the most suspicious player was okay for the vig to do - but it's not okay for the town to do? You seem to be sayign that Albert should NOT be responsible for his actions, and that's just wrong.Oman wrote:It drew waaay to much heat to Albert. In fact, he's the top vote atm
You haven't seen any defense of albert?Oman wrote:More damage? ATM no-one beleives anything he says, so directing lynches is out. Also, I doubt there is a multiple mafia assasin in this game. One shot is about the limit.
AGain, I am not necessarily saying that ALbert is scum, but his actions are a heck of a lot more useful to scum if he is going to continue playing this way than they are for town, and I wouldn't be surprised if scum was defending him regardless of his role.
Trio? Do you know something about the size of hte mafia(s) that we don't, GodofWine? I had used the 25% rule with the 18 player roster to determine there is likely a 4 player scum group with maybe an SK, lyncher, or survivor in the group.GodOfWine wrote:Oman thats just stupid. Hes the best lynch, you know it and you're just struggling to keep the mentally insane member (ABR) of your evil mafia trio alive. (you and erg0 are the others, naturally) you manipulative little hound.
we must lynch ABR because I said so, and I am King.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Erg0 wrote:Give me a good case on Albert and I'll vote him. I've already rebutted the existing argument, and nobody seems interested in debating it.
I believe ABR has provided his own case against himself.Oman wrote: The arugment on ABR as stated so far is nonexistant
You have taken it on yourself to assume he is town and defend him from the evil persecuters who wish to stop him from recklessly randomly dayvigging in the future.
The main defense that I have seen for ABR being town is that what he did was too scummy to be scum, which is a pointless, useless case, because it effectively means as long as ABR stays acting as scummy as possible he'll be above suspicion. I'll call this "The Battle Mage" defense.
Lastly - you wonder why GodofWine has tried to piece the three of you together. Parroters.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
This is getting frustrating.
For some reason, threads are being 'unwatched', and I do not realize it until I get a prod.
My apologies, I will catch up.
I'm going to start off with a very long, opinionated attack against Albert. Since I missed the tail end of it, I want to refresh everyone's memory on what happened and how I feel things 'went down'.
Albert B. Rampage wrote:In my defense,
"Politics is the ability to foretell what is going to happen tomorrow, next week, next month and next year. And to have the ability afterwards to explain why it didn't happen." -Winston Churchill
And, uh, at least we know he was going to waste an investigation on me. Right guys ?
The thing is, Albert gave bobby no chance to TELL him he was a cop. Considering it was (supposedly) a one-shot, (and by the way, a recent scumchat game I was in had scum as a one-shot day vig followed by normal nightkills), he was completely reckless with it, choosing to just outright kill bobby - who actually made some good points about Albert's game-playing - rather than defending them as most other people would. Instead of recognizing Bobby's interactions as scum hunting, he saw bobby as a threat, and killed him for it. The whole thing directed towarsd jordan before hand made no sense then and makes NO SENSE now:JordanA24 wrote:I doubt Albert is scum, I mean, it's not like he knew Bobby was a cop, and as Erg0 said, why would he kill a random town player rather than save it for later (presuming it's 1-shot if he's scum).
Unvote Vote: GOW, for pushing an easy scumwagon, using stupid reasoning.
Why is Albert being left off the hook?Albert B. Rampage wrote:Jordan, jordan, jordan. What will I ever do without you, my friend ? All that killing you stuff, it was bullshit. It was a test, Jordan. A test that you passed.What, you really think that if I were a day-vig I would kill you like that, without evidence ? Just because that you accused me ? Come on, I am not that OMGUSsy. I can take a hit, even from you. I wouldn't kill you in plain day like that just for one little case that you deposed against me.Remember back in Hacker Mafia, when we had just met ? I left you alive the whole game, remember ? Didn't even shoot you at the end, although we both lost. C'mon man, I thought you knew me better than that. Unless you knew this was just a joke, and played along perfectly. Hey, maybe your a smart scum than feigned being pissed. I'd be so impressed with you, you know ?Dude, Jordan, I didn't kill you. I wouldn't dream of killing you, you got nothing to fear. I was just fooling around with you.Yeah, this makes me look terribly scummy. I know that. I know that I may be lynched today, but there is one thing that might save me; its my trump card, you see ? No, I'm not going to claim, because nobody would believe me. But, the one thing that can hold off my death, is, well...I killed bobby.
And killing bobby allowed albert to escape the (more) valid points bobby raised, now that we know he was town - why was albert defending people (Jdodge and others) for them? Why was Albert so afraid of those accusations that he outright killed bobby for stating them, rather than talking about them? Right after bobby started stating them, albert accused bobyd of being scum - then, when jordan defended him, he turnedh is attention to jordan with a very well staged series of 'pressure posts', and then switched back to bobby with the actual kill. I can honestly believe that bobby did things the way he did to get rid of an enemy, distance from jordan, and wind up looking like a careless one-shot vig rather than scum, because it's justtoo outrageousto think that scum would do what he did.
Second to Lastly: After that incredibly scummy move, Albert got (from what I can see by vote counts) five votes on him, and about as many people declaring that he was probably not scum. For using a one-shot vig. Without warning. On someone that was posting good analysis against him.
Now look at GOW, who, saying with certainty that Albert was definitely scum for his action, received SEVEN VOTES, at least three of them were in consecutive posts. A good bunch of people had no problem defending Albert's scummy play - how many of these people were easily jumping onto GOW, some times for the very reasons that GOW was using in his attack on Albert.
Here's the vote count at the time Bobby was killed:
N9V 6 (Erg0, GodofWine, Nelly632, Jdodge, Quinnster, BobbyPlump)
Bobby 5 (Xdaamno, Albert B. Rampage, Somestrangeflea, Pulsewidth, oman)
Somestrangeflea 1 (N9V)
Xdaamno 2 (Skruffs, Oman)
Albert B. Rampage 1 (SirWario)
AlSleet 1 (Kison)
N9V, who more people was on (6 vs 5) was ignored.
Look at the players who haev defended albert since he killed bobby. How many of them were voting bobby at that time? So their opinions are biased because to go otherwise would be to say that they themselves were mistaken, which they for some reason, do not want to do.
And lastly: No there is no theme to the flavor as of yet but I would like Albert to do a full flavor claim as to why hydrogen is a one-shot vig.
Anyways, mooooving on...
I was already voting XDaamno for earlier plays, but I love this post:Xdaamno wrote:In reponse to a question that somehow appeared out of the totally unrelated 503, I feel the God of Wine wagon does have some strength. Looking back, there isn't much concrete evidence but there are some of the gut tells I look out for (And apparently missed beforehand). I'm just not jumping onto it at the moment, and I'm not commenting because anything I'd say would be repeating what everyone else has said.
Plus I'm not entirely up-to-date with what's happening -_-'
Continuing to read, Oman made a slip-up I think disbelieving GOW's claim. Flavor slip ups are the hardest to recover from, please keep an eye on Oman later. Later on (I've read on) he claims a power role.
That was dumb, Oman, I don't know how many power roles there are but I doubt there's more than one cop or vig (if albert is a vig, something I am *not* willing to accept at face blank)that doesn't leave many options for you. That may have been a spectacularly stupid move if you are the doctor. I hope you aren't.
I have finished reading, and again, I apologize for not beign around, but for some reason the thread was 'unwatched'. This is the third or so game this has happened to me on, and that's aggravating.
My vote on XDaamno stays, for now, for the small, scummyish things he's been doing all game.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Xdaamno - you are far less likely to be lynched if you put yourself at risk by actually scum hunting. The reason I am suspicious of you (Well, one of them) is the rather... sneaky way you are playing this game.
Why are you accusing me of backseat driving? What's your point of reference to make that assertion?-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Heather, welcome to the game! Make yourself comfy, pull up a chair, stay a while. I like your intro post.
Flea said earlier that he thought everyone was a townie. I don't get scum vibes from NV9, he is not playing like he did in the other two games we played where he was scum. He could be, but i believe he is being voted for doing jdodge's'defending for him. The basis for my vote much earlier in the game on xdaamno was for, if i recall correctly, his actions regarding the early wagons. That is not the official statement, but it is the reasoning for it. I find it a hard pill to swallow that people have cleared albert for no apparent reason. With deadline so close and NV9 not here, it looks like he'll be lynched, though.could someone, preferrably someone not voting NV9, re-explain the case against it?-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
I can only assume that the SK killde hte broccolli and thus the mafia (or another SK) killed the first SK. Hmm.
why would Jordan be killed? The obvious connection is ABR, I suppose.
Heather - usually when I vote someone based on suspicions it is because they are coming accross as oppurtunistic or under the radar. Your posts seem like neither, but SirWario's does. The deadline happened before I really thought about unvoting you.
I'm really curious why people are 'blaming' other people for a mislynch? Is there a reason behind that?-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Mr flays cool. The mod did not say that anyone else got new role pms, so if any of them are mafia, i am guessing the other mafiates will find out tonight. I would have no problem lynching TCS, though, to check and see if the three of them make up a second mafia.
Even if they aren't a second mafia, i wouldnt mind lynching TCS, just to save town some trouble down the road.
Hi guys.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Good call. We didn't get a successful lynch in, yesterday. There may have been four dead players when these three replaced in, rather three, which maybe would have meant four players.somestrangeflea wrote: A few notes:
1. Only3new players have joined. This means that, if I understand correctly, there will be another player joining us.
2. Whilst players entering the game as aconceptis far from spontaneous, thetimingmay be...
DX I am too tired to overreact to this.The Central Scrutinizer wrote: You only need to hide if you're scum. I always assume Skruffs is innocent until nearly proven guilty.
Setael may have been misguided regarding Jordan, but his theory is not 'scummy'. It's just based on misunderstood principles.
I find it interesting that two of the newly entered players immediately set their sights on Oman. Fritz, who claims that everyone else must be killed as fast as possible, SHOULD have voted for Xdaamno, who was closer to a lynch at that point. Instead, he started a new wagon.
I don't see the wagon on Oman. He's playing like I would expect a moogle to.
xdaamno - Would you prefer if I didn't react so much? I can tone it down, a bit. But to say I over react but to vote for me for back seat driving.. leaves me with no options.
Vote : Albert B. Rampage
Even if you consider yourself cleared, you aren't, and saying that killing you would be senseless is very careless on your part.
Fritz: The trick is to kill the right people, which is why it's a game of mafia and not "Bad Idea" or somesuch.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Okay, so now all three additions are pushing an OMan wagon. o.o
Trinity, indeed.
I doubt it's a three player l yncher team, but that WOULD be kind of awesome.
I believe Xdaamno was kind a fishing the first day as well. Nobody else seemed to think much of it.
Fritz - I've tried your method as scum to keep town off balance.
My method usually works for me, as town, unless I die, in which case, not so much.
If I don't vote for Oman right now, is everyone going to say I'm his scum buddy, too?-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Oddly enough, Flay, your opinion of TCS - who you ere just distancing from in your last post - was that he is just a lurker. I can only assume you are voting Oman because he's not scum hunting or posting an opinion - or voting - but isn't that exactly what TCS is doing?
Mr Flay, and TCS 's relationship is intriguing.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
I doubt that Anyone should be held accountable for not voting someone that maybe they don't see as scummy, regardless of what Fritzler says. Other wise, mafia would just pile up on townie after townie while fossing everyone who didn't follow them. That's a bad idea.
And Oman is definitely not the voice of reason. That would be a stupid, stupid role name.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Oman - are you perpetually unlynchable? If so, we can just make ABR hammer you this time.
Shanba - Wow. So aggressive, completely unBelgian of you, and completely unlike the townieshanba I've seen in other games. Why the Skruffs hate? Unless you think I can see through your little guise?
I do not understand why a power role would risk themselves like that (TCS), but I rarely understand TCS's manner of playing.
ABR had no problem taking someone out of hte game buyt balked at being asked to risk the same to prove someone's role claim. Instead, he let TCS claim - another power role dead because of ABR's action or nonaction. And no, it's nto explicitly ABR's fault that TCS died, TCS is a moron.
For the record, ABR, I have no perception of you other than the one you are portraying in this game. It sounds like you are trying to make yourself out to be a new battle mage, or something. Drop the hubris, and help the town,for once.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Oman has demonstrated his role. He's'not a supersaint, even if the role is similar, because a supersaint would have died. Jesus as a role name fits with michael jordan, broccoli, and others.
Oman, you probably wouldnt have been nightkilled anyways - but at least not the doctor - if there is one - can protect a non-townie. On the other hand, look at who's'attitudes towards you have changed since you completed claiming...
If i am reading correctly, mos was goading someone else into hammering but refusing to himself? Spicy!
unvote
vote : mos-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Also - hydrogen doesn't burn, it explodes, and it doesn't produce smoke.
Occam's'razor could be used in different ways. It seems to me the simplest answer would be that oman is telling the truth. The cop, if any, waits until night 3 and inspects him. Course, we've lost one inspection role Per Day, which isn't looking too good.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
It was down to ABR's replacement (who was floundering) and Oman, who's role had been proven. ABR killed without warning - Oman alerted everyone as to what would happen, and town (and most likely his scum buddies) pushed it anyways.
Vote : Shanba... CES was a mislynch but it wasn't a badlynch. I considered it more likely that mafia would start off with a day kill and then go strictly to night than it would that mafia would kill the first person to kill them. I'm surprised you are playing so self-righteously about this.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Shanba, you were totally against Oman being lynched. Your reasoning - that a super saint unlynchable scum was punishing town for lynching scum - preceded by a vote on CES - is not much different from mine.
Bitching about the crappy wagon options while wagoning and not starting a better one of your own does not count as pro-town activity. Everyone was disgruntled and confused because when we tried to lynch someone, a power role died (STUPID TCS!!!) and pretty much all the current options were used up.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Erm, but, I don't see ABR's play as AT ALL conducive to town. He made his own decision and used a one time ability to kill someone that he personally wanted to kill in a grand, dramatic scene. The player was not given a chance to defend themselves, to claim, and wasn't even the subject of ABR's post when he sent in the kill.
This, compared to Oman, who had claimed Jesus. Oman played a better game than ABR or CES did, and I gave him the benefit of the doubt over the two.
Oh wait, insinuation time!
I'm glad you were so sure that ABR was town, but I don't have that luxury.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
I *thought* ABR was scum. All day, and before the Oman wagon. HE acted scummy, that read scum to me. Who was the other option - Setael? You were on the ABR wagon not because you thought he was scum, but because you thought Oman was town, and you are attacking me for actually believing in the ABR wagon. I understand now.
Maybe we should ALL name claim.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
For the record - I did think Albert was scum.
PRevious posts back that up.
I also thought Fritzler was scum (adn I'm not saying I don't know), mostly for his "Lynch before you think" playstyle. Shanba has sense said (I think it was shanba) that we shouldn't expect any more than that from FRitz, and I think that's just... ingratiating.
I switched to CES because I thought he was scum - and I thought Fritz was scum, so I thought Fritz would not switch over. CES turned out to be town, so, Fritz wagonning doesn't really prove anything, because he was going to wagon anyways.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Yagami unvoted Flay.
UNVOTE
Skruffs unvoted Shanba.
I'm going to look at Zu Faul, Fritzler, SSF, Setael, Paradoxombie, and Mr Flay to see who has good/bad reasons for their votes. Endorsing someone else's reasons as a reason for their own vote means (in my post) That that player endorses the first person's line of reasoning - so hopefully I'll be able to figure out what's going on.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
SHanba, I am confused. If you voted CES because you were 'too lazy' to form your own wagon, you don't have any rights to bitch about it being a mislynch. You are basically bitching because your options weren't wide enough. THat's not how it works. You either build a c ase or you shut up and wagon. You chose to wagon, which means you don't get hte luxury of complaining about the wagon. Or, if you choose to fight the wagon, you explain why BEFORE you help lynch someone you feel is town.
vote : shanba-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
MOS is acting very badly.
Someone else did this in antoher game, so maybe I'm just sensitive, but stating that you have no interest in a game - and then asknig when the day is close to end - seems fishy.
FISHY. Like salmon, only without the butter.
MOS is too good a player to do something so blatantly scummy, right? Or is he? BEcause he's always scum in large games. Always.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
vote : setael
I feel fritz is playing honestly and openly.
I think that 14 days is not three weeks. I feel that town is being rushed which is allowing aggressive scum to lead mislynches. The biggest emphasis behind fritz's wagon is that we need a lynch rather than a nolynch. Fritz has been proven to be effective at voting wagons. Shanba repeating process from mishammer yesterday.
BM you have to risk stagnation to allow thoughts and opinions to ripen. If you want a mcdonalds happy meal, you'll get it. Expect game to devolve quickly into random wagons and mass claims.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
?Mastermind of Sin wrote:
It's not me, so that narrows your choices...mith wrote:Bah, I was really hoping someone would kill me so I won't have to finish rereading.
I'm thinking either Shanba or MoS at the moment.
Skruffs, I got a quick question for you, kinda coming out of nowhere, though.
Why do you think the scum didn't do something last night, instead of killing Mr Flay? It seems that Mr Flay was an odd kill choice. I'll admit I thought he was more likely to be protown, though. He faked a post restriction, so I'm not sure where he was going with that. If he had ever broken the post restriction, I would've lynched him immediately and he would've won. But either way, I didn't see Mr Flay as a likely kill. Why do you think he died?
Umm...
I have absolutely no clue? With only one death, I assumed that the mafia targetted him.
A theory would be that mayhaps the theory from yesterday, or the day before, that the three replacements were 'replacements' of the first three to die. One of the first three to die was an SK? One was a cop, one was a mafia.
I'm not sure why the mafia would kill the corresponding 'sk' role (turned out to be a jester, which is similar in alignment). Maybe they didn't?
That would implicate multiple power roles which I will not be ruminating on.
I am not going to bother checking, but there's no reasonable indication to think that he was a jester based on his role - so the idea that the mafia killed him to prevent him from being lynched because theyknewhe was a jester seems ridiculous.
Thinking that the mafia would NOT know that Mr. Flay was a jester, maybe they wanted to kill someone they thought of as a townie - in order to cast suspicion on someone that he was suspicious of... at the end of the day, he was suspicious of Mith, it looks like, but he jumped around on so many people...
What do YOU think happened, Zindaras? And why did you ask me, specifically, that question? Is it because you want my opinion? Or some darker reason?
Paradox-Sure I would be. As would Shanba! Except in the game I am referring to, I was scum, and the town was the one shooting off balls.-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel