In post 1256, Flubbernugget wrote:Sonic's vote change is also ew
no
In post 1256, Flubbernugget wrote:Sonic's vote change is also ew
In post 1265, Cerberus v666 wrote:I feel about being on the same wagon as vezok and Flubber.
In post 1296, mastin2 wrote:Frankly, I don't care about Flubber's response.In post 1261, Ankamius wrote:Substantiate this. I'm not interested in anyone else's answer before Flubber's by the way.In post 1255, Flubbernugget wrote:Mastin's posting is ew
It'sSonictaking the same stance that is.
In post 1314, mastin2 wrote:And therein lies the problem:
If you were town, I'm having extreme,difficulties comprehending how you WOULDN'T be trusting me.extreme
In post 1354, mastin2 wrote:but having a talk about. If I have a read which is 96-100%, then even the talk shouldn't happen; it should just be an, "Okay, Mastin, if you're wrong, this one's on you" thing.
mastin2 wrote:TOWNBLOC:
TellTaleHeart (TTH is town, period)
Bulbazak
Titus
Shadoweh
TOWN:
Oversoul/Tammy
GuyInFreezer (GIF off of Titus-trust)
ChanelDeliBird (I fully believe CDB's claim)
ActionDan (I hated the wagon on him)
WEAK TOWN:
Gammagooey (here 'cause Nacho)
Vezokpiraka (same)
Untrod Tripod
Espeonage (off of meh wagons)
REST:
Aronis
Formerfish/Marquis
SCUM:
Cheetory (pure gut)
DeasVail
singersigner/Empire/Zar
/still doing basic VCA.
In post 1353, mastin2 wrote:Well I can understand not being THE favorite, but not being *a* favorite, I can't.In post 1324, Sonic Boom wrote:Mastin is not sonic's favorite brand names
In post 1380, Ankamius wrote:MS: Why post #1379? That's remarkably useless when you consider hiplop has a lot more votes and deadline is approaching, especially just to say that you're keeping your vote on hiplop anyway.
In post 1383, Shakira Confirmed wrote:Mastin, if you're town, can you please stop making every post a rave about how good you are at this game and actually post something meaningful or relevant?
In post 1388, Shakira Confirmed wrote:That wasn't Marq, the sorriest.
In post 830, Sonic Boom wrote:In post 829, Metal Sonic wrote:lmfao, hiplop's vote is terrible as fuck, kill it
VOTE: hiplop
In post 841, Antihero wrote:
A transition metal’s ionization energy is related to the energies of its d orbitals, its ease of oxidation, and its basicity. In simplest terms, the greater a metal’s ionization energy, the harder it is to pull an electron from it. Thus, metal centers with high ionization energies exhibit low basicity (or nucleophilicity) and are resistant to oxidation. Trends in ionization energy are more complex than atomic size trends, as the plot below amply demonstrates.
The first thing we may notice is that in general, ionization energy increases as we move from left to right across a row. Notable dips occur at row 1, group 10 (Ni) and row 3, group 7 (Re). However, the general trend is consistent with our previous notion that electronegativity increases as we move left-to-right across a row. As for trends down a group, it’s difficult to discern anything useful in the graph above. What we can say (considering second and higher ionization potentials, not shown) is that higher oxidation states are more accessible to third-row metals. Easy way to remember this: OsO4 is a stable reagent that reacts only with alkenes; RuO4 is prepared in situ and ravages alkenes and alcohols; FeO4 has never been observed.
We’ll touch on trends in acidity/basicity again in a later post on hydride ligands, but they tend to follow the trends in bond strength described below: basicity increases (and acidity decreases) as we move down a group, generally.
Vote Count 1.8
Cerberus v666 - 2 (Lying Cat, Flubbernugget)
Flubbernugget - 1 (Wickedestjr)
hiplop - 1 (Sonic Boom)
Shakira Confirmed - 1 (Mac)
Sonic Boom - 6 (mastin2, Ankamius, Shakira Confirmed, Tere, Jaqen Hghar, hiplop)
vezokpiraka - 1 (ZZZX)
Not Voting: Bins, Cerberus v666, ika, Kari, vezokpiraka
mastin2 is LA until June 16th.
9 to lynch. Deadline is in (expired on 2015-06-17 23:00:25)
In post 1436, Jaqen Hghar wrote:A man is further finding it no coincidence vezok's vote is bookended by scum-Sonic (who is moving their vote to the end of the wagon to be less obvious and play up "hydra dissonance" out of desperation for a town read) and ZZZX who is also certain scum because that one is probably the easiest player on site to read once you analyze his <town PR, vanilla, scum> plays as he is having a unique style for playing each role.
Lynch Binscum today
Lynch ZZZX scum tomorrow
When a man is right on those (in particular Z)- lynch Sonic D3
Someone else can find #4. A man isn't too sure about his initial read on Cerberus and is seeing a couple of other, better options.
Yes, before it is being asked, a man is definitely lining up lynches. As such, he is much and more content in being flashed lynched if the town is finding that necessary- so long as it is coming with the solemn promise to then follow a man's lineup when he is flipping town.
In post 1429, Jaqen Hghar wrote:In post 345, Antihero wrote:
Vote Count 1.3
Bins - 2 (Wickedestjr, Jaqen Hghar)
Cerberus v666 - 1 (ZZZX)
ika - 1 (ika)
Mac - 3 (Shakira Confirmed, Flubbernugget, Sonic Boom)
mastin2 - 1 (hiplop)
Shakira Confirmed - 3 (Flames682, vezokpiraka, Mac)
Sonic Boom - 3 (mastin2, Bins, Ankamius)
A man is well aware of that which is transpiring and though the votes are vanishing, the pressure is not. Bins is still the first wagon with hiplop being the counter and coming with opportune timing so that when the Bins wagon is reforming it can be misrepresented as a counter to hiplop when just the opposite is true. Thanks for stepping up to claim starting that counterwagon, Titusscum.
In post 100, Antihero wrote:
An atom (assuming its atomic number is greater than 2) has core electrons that are extremely attracted to the nucleus in the middle of the atom. However the number of protons in the nucleus are never equal to the number of core electrons (relatively) adjacent to the nucleus. The number of protons increase by one across the periodic table, but the number of core electrons change by periods. The first period has no core electrons, the second has 2, the third has 10, and etc. This number is not equal to the number of protons. So that means that the core electrons feel a stronger pull towards the nucleus than any other electron within the system. The valence electrons are farther out from the nucleus, so they experience a smaller force of attraction.
Shielding refers to the core electrons repelling the outer rings and thus lowering the 1:1 ratio. The nucleus has "less grip" on the outer electrons and are shielded from them.
Shielding describes the amount of screening from nuclear charge that one electron can do with respect to its neighboring electrons. Electrons that have greater penetration can get closer to the nucleus and effectively block out the charge from electrons that have less proximity. For example, Zeff is calculated by subtracting the magnitude of shielding from the total nuclear charge. The value of Zeff will provide information on how much of a charge an electron actually experiences.
Because the order of electron penetration from greatest to least is s, p, d, f; the order of the amount of shielding done is also in the order s, p, d, f.
Since the 2s electron has more density near the nucleus of an atom than a 2p electron, it is said to shield the 2p electron from the full effective charge of the nucleus. Therefore the 2p electron feels a lesser effect of the positively charged nucleus of the atom due to the shielding ability of the electrons closer to the nucleus than itself, (i.e. 2s electron).
These electrons that are shielded from the full charge of the nucleus are said to experience an effective nuclear charge (Zeff) of the nucleus, which is some degree less than the full nuclear charge an electron would feel in a hydrogen atom or hydrogenlike ions. The effective nuclear charge of an atom is given by the equation:
Zeff=Z−S
where
Z is the atomic number (number of protons in nucleus) and
S is the shielding constant
We can see from this equation that the effective nuclear charge of an atom increases as the number of protons in an atom increases. Therefore as we go from left to right on the periodic table the effective nuclear charge of an atom increases in strength and holds the outer electrons closer and tighter to the nucleus. This phenomena can explain the decrease in atomic radii we see as we go across the periodic table as electrons are held closer to the nucleus due to increase in number of protons and increase in effective nuclear charge.
Vote Count 1.1
ika - 1 (Sonic Boom)
Mac - 1 (Ankamius)
mastin2 - 3 (Wickedestjr, hiplop, Gorkington)
Shakira Confirmed - 4 (Flames682, vezokpiraka, ZZZX, Mac)
Sonic Boom - 3 (mastin2, Shakira Confirmed, Flubbernugget)
Not Voting: Cerberus v666, ika, Jaqen Hghar, Lying Cat, Tere
9 to lynch. Deadline is in (expired on 2015-06-17 23:00:25)
In post 1442, Jaqen Hghar wrote:Dissect this "fantasy" so a man can slam you with evidence, vezok.
In post 1444, Jaqen Hghar wrote:Sonic was an RVS wagon, Bins was not. Try again.
In post 841, Antihero wrote:
Vote Count 1.8
Cerberus v666 - 2 (Lying Cat, Flubbernugget)
Flubbernugget - 1 (Wickedestjr)
hiplop - 1 (Sonic Boom)
Shakira Confirmed - 1 (Mac)
Sonic Boom - 6 (mastin2, Ankamius, Shakira Confirmed, Tere, Jaqen Hghar, hiplop)
vezokpiraka - 1 (ZZZX)
Not Voting: Bins, Cerberus v666, ika, Kari, vezokpiraka
mastin2 is LA until June 16th.
9 to lynch. Deadline is in (expired on 2015-06-17 23:00:25)[/color]
In post 1448, Jaqen Hghar wrote:A man is conceding he should have picked up on the "fool" keyword when skimming the pedit
In post 1429, Jaqen Hghar wrote:In post 345, Antihero wrote:
Vote Count 1.3
Bins - 2 (Wickedestjr, Jaqen Hghar)
Cerberus v666 - 1 (ZZZX)
ika - 1 (ika)
Mac - 3 (Shakira Confirmed, Flubbernugget, Sonic Boom)
mastin2 - 1 (hiplop)
Shakira Confirmed - 3 (Flames682, vezokpiraka, Mac)
Sonic Boom - 3 (mastin2, Bins, Ankamius)
A man is well aware of that which is transpiring and though the votes are vanishing, the pressure is not. Bins is still the first wagon with hiplop being the counter and coming with opportune timing so that when the Bins wagon is reforming it can be misrepresented as a counter to hiplop when just the opposite is true. Thanks for stepping up to claim starting that counterwagon, Titusscum.
In post 1434, vezokpiraka wrote:Also you can't seriously call 2 votes on someone a wagon.
In post 1456, ZZZX wrote:In post 1434, vezokpiraka wrote:In post 1432, Jaqen Hghar wrote:Hiplop wagon is forming just as votes slide off Bins originally (though Bins pressure is continuing with more and more voicing concern for that slot). A man is thinking that is the perfect time for scum to be forming a counter to the suspicion on their scum partner. Hiplop isn't scum. The speed and ease of the until push as well as reasons a man is already giving are showing that one is town.
Scum aren't easy to build a wagon on
Scum don't bounce their vote all over the place on D1 (it's counterintuitive for scum to draw attention to themselves, especially in D1, in such a manner)
His ISO is screaming easy mislynch
And you think bins is actually scum?
Also you can't seriously call 2 votes on someone a wagon.
The thing is that ~4 people has given intent to join that wagon which makes it a future - buildable - wagon and can be treated as such.
In post 1428, Jaqen Hghar wrote:In post 1419, Antihero wrote:
Bins - 4 (Lying Cat, mastin2, Jaqen Hghar, Wickedestjr)
hiplop - 6 (vezokpiraka, ZZZX, Flubbernugget, Cerberus v666, Shakira Confirmed, Sonic Boom)
Lying Cat - 1 (Bins)
Shakira Confirmed - 1 (Mac)
Sonic Boom - 2 (Ankamius, Tere)
ZZZX - 1 (hiplop)
Not Voting: ika, Kari
Ank, Tere, hiplop must needs be fixing their vote. Kari and ika must needs be making one. Mac- is a vanity vote really the place to be?
In post 1411, Tere wrote:I kind of feel if Bins has a useful and proveable day action, she should consider claiming
That one is using her day power- unoriginally on the first member of her wagon.