*just read the whole game with said headache*
*has a worse headache now*
*proxies opinion to Lackay Luck*
*
Hence why my vote is on you.Jack wrote:Well...we could just, you know,the silent speaker wrote:You consider the question of "who would you lynch, right now, if the decision were yours and yours alone?" a time waster?VOTEfor people.
HackerHuck wrote:QFTJack wrote:Well...we could just, you know,the silent speaker wrote:You consider the question of "who would you lynch, right now, if the decision were yours and yours alone?" a time waster?VOTEfor people.
I really don't see how this will accomplish consensus and save us time. If everyone provided a list of their top two/three scum, that might narrow it down to a few suspects that most people have on their list, rather than the broad group we'll get if everyone just puts out one name.
Besides, who wants to join the group if you're going to let the scum join too?
My top two are LL and CES.
I was just telling my roommate that today. I have a 19" widescreen monitor on 1900x1260 resolution, and I have to scroll 4 pages worth just to read one post. That's way overkill. You're playing mafia, not writing a novel.Mariyta wrote:This game is very hard for me to follow. Posts that are so long I have to scroll on a 19" monitor make me very unhappy....
So far all I see are annoying people who type long posts, and one scummy person who is "blindly" following someone else in order to put blame on them when they lynch a town.
Small screen doesn't have much to do with it, although that probably makes it worse, lol.IH wrote:= P Sorry Mariyta, I know the pains of a small screen. Hiding your taskbar helps, as does holding down control, and rolling your wheel down.
But thats beside the point.
Mmmm, I count two lines.M wrote:Saying "hey let's do whatever he says today" counts as strongly supporting, I would think.
This post is intetionally one line long.
oh em gee.
hrmm?Ether wrote:...
Seriously, people,
Canuckle claimed COP
Seriously, people,
This wagon should STOP.
I do see the deadline
But we needn't put away the noose
There are other candidates
But a cop? No excuse!
Jack? Other people? Off. Personally, I'm cool with an IHlynch. I wouldn'tminda Twitolynch, but I'd much prefer IH. There's one more option here.
Post 443, Pooky wrote:Guys
this game is going to last a long time
plus its 12 people to lynch.
so we obviously need some unity in order to get anything done.MoS has displayed the same kind of double-standard I've disliked from IH, really.Post 488, MoS wrote:Post 466, Huck wrote:I really don't see how this will accomplish consensus and save us time. If everyone provided a list of their top two/three scum, that might narrow it down to a few suspects that most people have on their list, rather than the broad group we'll get if everyone just puts out one name.unvote, vote: HackerHuck
Town shouldn't really be concerned about "saving time", since the longer the days are with reasonable activity, the better. Only scum want to hurry along the game, so they can rush people into decisions that aren't beneficial to the town.
I agree with this analysis.Zindaras wrote:Woah, didn't notice this game restarting.
No real surprise there.Canucklehead17 wrote:Maz came back innocent.
This is very OMGUSsy, Jackyboy. And I don't see why you're so aggressive against claimed cops.Jack wrote:Well isn't thatConvenientwith a capital C. Let's see:
1) You're scum
2) You know when I'm lynched I'll turn up townie
3) Therefore you can't have a guilty on me or you'll be lynched
4) So you invent an "caught during the night" gimmick to explain why you didn't investigate me and try and lynch me anyway.
My first instinct was right,Vote:Canucklehead
Actually, when I replaced into this game I seem to recall that LL was being quite prolific and offering his own opinions on things, rather than just following someone for no reason at all.Canucklehead17 wrote:Wait, wait. My apologies, I see what MoS meant. LL is blindly following Pooky.
Still, doesn't seem like an extremely strange or horrible strategy considering how LL has played this whole game.
Just because I thought someone was town before doesn't require me to continue thinking he was town. I am specifically voting himthe silent speaker wrote:I already wrote:That said I stand by my current vote for now. LL is clearly town, seems to me (at this moment); and when someone is agitating to lynch the clearly town, I get suspicious of them. Particularly someone who was very supportive of the clearly-town person, to the point of proxying his vote, early on. (One throwaway line about a proxy vote in the beginning of the game could be a joke, I'm aware. But MOS also accused Jack on LL's dime, and continued to accuse Jack the next day, so it isn't just the proxy vote that makes me think he was cozying up to him before.)
Not to mention that we haven't confirmed the cop's sanity (have we?), and even if we had, there's a good chance that a game this size has scum that come up innocent to investigation.HackerHuck wrote:Just a reminder, but Pooky's innocence doesn't make him right. It just means that he won't be deliberately sending us down the wrong path.Canucklehead17 wrote:Pooky was innocent one my first night's investigation, so I would like to trust that he's actually got something here. My only fear is that my sanity might not be straight yet, as I haven't gotten a guilty return on any player. IH, I've soooo GMEOY.Pooky wrote:Of course it's the truth
he has lovely eyes.
unvote, vote: Thok
HoS: Jack
We still have a ways to go before deadline, so I don't really like how Luckay's pushing for a lynch. Especially now that he's abandoned the spreadsheet of doom.
I'm not saying that you haven't repeatedly said that IH is town (because you have, over and over again). However, that's only half the battle, and that's the half that scum find really easy to pull off in order to make themselves look good while the town bandwagons a townie. The more difficult half of the battle is sniffing out the real scum in order to provide a better suspect than the person you believe to be innocent. This is something that, until now, you were failing to do. While I greatly appreciate the effort you now put into it, I still want an explanation of why you followed Pooky blindly instead of putting in this sort of effort in the first place.LuckayLuck wrote:Really? I thought I had put more effort into it...If you really think IH is townie, why are you putting so little effort into saving him from lynch?
Why do you have a problem with my points against LL? Are you sucking up to LL so he'll unvote you, or do you actually condone blindly following other players who have presented little to no reasoning for someone to be scum?Thok wrote:Not a fan of MOS attack on LL. He hasn't been saying much.
OK, a look over things makes me want to reconsider the IH wagon; I'll go with anunvote, vote MOS
Ether, I never renounced my case against LL. In fact, I think anyone that says my case against him was bullshit or bad or whatever is full of shit themselves, because I had a very reasonable case that no one has yet to provide a good reason against. The fact that you believe I renounced my case against LL shows that you either did not understand the case against him, or you just weren't paying attention at all. Either way, LL has now begun acting in a more protown manner and has presented a case that I find somewhat agreeable, especially since I don't think IH is that scummy. Since he has corrected his manner of play, I see no reason to push for his lynch at this juncture of the game. As long as he continues to be helpful and reasonable, he deserves to live for now.Ether wrote:IH wrote:especially concerning Canuckle. I am doubting his claim more and more.So! Is someone going to remind me what the case on Jack was?IH wrote:a Jack lynch would be the most preferable
MoS wrote:I think that his points against Fritzler have some merit as well.o.ODude. I could perfectly understand, say, "Twito didn't bring Fritzler up aside from that" ('cept that then you'd have to explain the difference between Fritzler and other such people), but a case based on a traitor being making friendly points thatweren't related to actual gameplayis bullshit. Luckay starts the case, admits that it's light: you hop on (renouncing your attack on Luckay, which no one particularly liked). Nothing else.
Deadline in mind, a Fritzlynch today is unlikely and an IHlynch is pretty secure. I'm rather confused about this, but it doesn't change his Luckay behavior. To answer Luckay's question: if IH is town, I think I'd go for MoS next.
(Italics mine)Ether wrote:o.ODude. I could perfectly understand, say, "Twito didn't bring Fritzler up aside from that" ('cept that then you'd have to explain the difference between Fritzler and other such people), but a case based on a traitor being making friendly points thatweren't related to actual gameplayis bullshit. Luckay starts the case, admits that it's light: you hop on (renouncing your attack on Luckay, which no one particularly liked). Nothing else.
Deadline in mind, a Fritzlynch today is unlikely and an IHlynch is pretty secure.I'm rather confused about this, but it doesn't change his Luckay behavior.To answer Luckay's question: if IH is town, I think I'd go for MoS next.
Yet here, you claim that you didn't really mind me attacking and then unvoting him, but that in fact you found me scummy more because of the fact that I voted Fritzler.Ether wrote:I said that the case on Fritzler as stated by Luckay and supported by you was bullshit, and I don't feel that this has ever been adequately denied. I don't particularly mind the Luckayunvote in and of itself (as for the original case's validity, I think I'll want to read Fairytale at some point), but I strongly disliked your immediate entry onto the Fritzwagon and complimenting the points that Luckay himself admitted were slight.MoS wrote:In fact, I think anyone that says my case against him was bullshit or bad or whatever is full of shit themselves
You don't say? Funny how that works. Personally, I think it's very possible that Twito knew who the scum were, because that's how a Traitor generally works. I don't think that because his flavor was "Lost Prince" that they changed the mechanics of the role. Lost Prince can merely imply that the Royal FamilyAdmittedly, there's something in the defense that Fritzler used that I also dislike. "Twito couldn't have known what he was talking about!" is a silly assumption to make; it's as though he's already admitted that there's a connection that would otherwise be incriminating. Bah.
Good, that was the response I was hoping to get. Had you replied any differently, I might've thought you scum. At least this way, I know that if you're scum, you're at least being careful and smart about it.It wouldn't be "off the basis" at all. If IH is town, every conspiracy theory that ever crossed my mind will go down the drain and I won't really have much direction anymore. Independently, you'd still be up there. Dunno how I'd feel about Thok. Cogito would be just gone.MoS wrote:I am amused that you would lynch me off the basis that IH is town, Ether. Care to explain why IH coming up town would make you want to lynch me?
Right now, probably one of you, Thok and Cogito. I currently find you/Thok together unlikely, though. Curse that "there are at least four scum" clause.MoS wrote:Out of curiousity, who would you want to lynch if IH came up scum?
Why does IH voting Jack clear Jack? If IH is town, why can't he vote scum? If IH is scum, what's keeping him from voting his partner? Ever hear of distancing tactics?LuckayLuck wrote:IH, this is terrible...I know you're a villager, and everyone will know you're a villager when you die, but I can't stand your main suspicion of Jack...
IH, answer this. How is this Twito-Jack interaction possible?
LL wrote:and then Twito 180 degrees his opinion of me (if I was a scum partner, this would be pure craziness)? He makes about 10 or so more posts about explicitly following me and me being his god or whatever. Btw, the fact that he 180 degreed me and followed me onto JACK tells a lot of tales about Jack too, it clears Jack as a townie pretty heavily.Twito wrote:If I can't get rid of LL and his headhurting posting style I better just agree with it and follow him like a god. Should be interesting game.
Unvote
VOTE: JACK
Coz LL said so!
You weren't reading very well, then. If you look at LL's posts, you can see his play take a vast change in style, and I find him more useful than he was before. I didn't just change my vote on a whim or without good reason.Ether wrote:MoS, I read your vote choice as "Yeah, yeah, that's cool, Luckay. (Whatever.) Now let's all go out for scones!"
So, it's relevant that I mention distancing tactics as I attack Fritzler,I don't really get the approach everyone seems to be taking to the Fritzwagon, anyway; this is one of those times where Twito's knowledge seems nigh-irrelevant. Two side-comments that don't involve scumhunting? Please. Especially when MoS saysthis:as he attacks Fritzler.Post 1123, MoS wrote:Ever hear of distancing tactics?
This right here doesn't make any sense to me, and I'd like Jack to give an explanation for it. If he can't come up with a satisfying reason, I'll be upgrading my FoS shortly.Thok wrote:I asked what I wanted to see. I'm also giving my intepretation of your choices. I think I'm perfectly within my rights to be suspicious of you claiming that you believe C-Head is protown when your actions (repeatedly voting C-Head, and in fact voting him today) don't correspond with that claimed belief.Jack wrote:Jesus christ. You ask me for three pro town players and I give you a list of the three players I feel are most likely to be pro town. What did you want?So, you've given me the two obvious choices (claimed cop plus investigation target), one of whom you've voted repeatedly, and the other person you gave is the one of the few people today who has said "don't lynch Jack!". Again, this gives an example of how you're not really analyzing people and just calling people scum if they vote for you.