Reason shall be disclosed later.
/buddyofSleepyKrew
I like your attitude, but why do you think we would have a better idea than Sleepy Krew of whether it's best to specify his role?In post 40, PeaceBringer wrote:you do not need a reason... feel free to vote me without pretend reasons why
You did actually say it.In post 41, PeaceBringer wrote:we need to know what the "negative utility" is because he/she/it boldy proclaimed having it...
Hmm, I'm worried you may be right about that, but I can't really get over how he continued to stand by SKrew needing to be pressured after it was revealed that no one was really interested in that.In post 87, Rail Tracer wrote:i'm reading it as a playstyle thing more than an alignment thing. and when i read it this way, his posts make sense as town (just misguided).dv wrote:I think that this is because he was scum under the impression that this is what the townies were doing
In post 88, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:*blinks*In post 86, DeasVail wrote:Neroandmollie is not a bad vote either.
I think I got mixed up and joined a newbie game.
So, you yourself can't even think of a good reason to read you as town, but at the mention of you not being a bad vote, you accuse me of being a newbie?In post 93, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:the mod told us we were town.In post 91, DeasVail wrote:Neroandmollie, what is so town about you so far?
+
we are attacking your biggest scumread so its really nonsensical that you'd have scumreads on us both. Its maybe some potential hedging on your part.
Explain why you even have a scum read on us.
I'm not going to assume that PeaceBringer is scum before a scumslip. If I think someone else is scummy too, I'll say so, regardless of how well I think you work together. I feel that multiball is reasonably likely here anyway.In post 101, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:Well, I have a tendency to not scum read the folks that are attacking my scumreads. So when you called us scummy I floored and shocked. I was "WTF?!? I'm scumreading his scumread and he's hedging his bets?"In post 97, DeasVail wrote:So, you yourself can't even think of a good reason to read you as town, but at the mention of you not being a bad vote, you accuse me of being a newbie?
Before, I thought that your scumhunting was superficial and that you didn't really look very town
And now you're claiming that I'm faking aTOWNattitudeSCUMHUNTING.
So I could understand being accused of thinking it's multiball because I'm part of one of the groups or whatever, but as much as I wish I was a cereal killah, I don't understand how it makes sense of me to think that it's multiball as one.In post 104, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:In a 17 player game? Hello cereal killah.In post 102, DeasVail wrote:I feel that multiball is reasonably likely here anyway.
Why have you not taken the two seconds to figure out who it is?In post 173, Viera Assassin wrote:The person suggesting multiball is likely the Serial Killer.
PeaceBringer thinks his matches more with Katsuki-scum than Katsuki-town. I haven't looked into his meta completely, but I also feel that he's just fake and I was a scumbuddy of his before and he matches up with what I'd expect him to do as scum. I think 305 seems to be a big deal for people too.In post 330, SleepyKrew wrote:Hello my brain is broken why is Katsuki scum
I think that PeaceBringer has been pretty town despite also thinking that he was scum at the beginning. I think scum are more likely to pretend that they think who they're voting for is scum to be honest.In post 331, Nani wrote:Why isn't Peace Bringer dead yet?
He voted a player who he thought he was town after he was pressured to make a stance, how obvious this can be?
Well the confidence in his Katsuki townread doesn't match all that well with his reasoning, given the high level of suspicion against Katsuki. I can think of town reasons for this (else I'd be tunneling them), but I can think of scum reasons too.In post 439, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:In post 434, DeasVail wrote:Andy, at the moment I get the feeling that your Katsuki read is an attempt to go against the trend rather than actually being genuine. And before someone asks, this is quite independent of Katsuki's alignment.
Kind of, but I think you're town now, so it's ok!In post 569, PeaceBringer wrote:so your suspicion was essentially based on thinking I am a clues noob, not someone who has been playing one form of the game or another for about a decade?In post 560, DeasVail wrote:My suspicion was based on PeaceBringer as scum thinking that the SleepyKrew votes were serious and trying to fit in, basically thinking that the townies were seeing something in SK's post so he should too. The reason I thought this was less likely to be a town reaction to the wagon was because it took him a while to actually react to the negative utility claim, which I felt didn't mesh with his strong stance later on when no one was actually very interested in running SKrew up.
I think it's fine actually.In post 687, PeaceBringer wrote:that kind of claim is spurious and cuts out the town from further evaluation. It is bad precendence to let anyone off on "comfirable power role." Period.
You can't complain about both me voteparking and moving my vote. It doesn't work that way.In post 690, Shadowy Poison wrote:Yeah you'd much rather votepark on someone getting replaced. I look forward to your analysis of Mitillos' replace in.
Sorry, this is not true, but the others are.In post 759, DeasVail wrote:3) There is nothing in my posts to indicate that there is someone I would want to lynch more than dopog
Sometime during Day 1.
Awesome. I will probably end up fine with Ooba being a townread. I'm just more picky with experienced players. (I so wish I read you as town Luna )In post 818, Rail Tracer wrote:this is mostly in line with my current reads. except add ooba to that list and replace my name with yours.dv wrote:Townreads (note that some are weak):
Dante
Shadowy Poison
Rail Tracer
PeaceBringer
Nani
MuM
Diabolik
This seems awfully unnecessary for someone hesitant to reveal their townreads.In post 819, Diabolik wrote: @DV Ooba is bov town, dont' be silly.
Fair enough. You seemed to have more townreads than 3 (both MuM and Ooba seemed to be strong townreads from Day 1 for you), but it doesn't matter.In post 823, Diabolik wrote:what? my town reads are well known.. you know the meaning of sarcasm?In post 820, DeasVail wrote: This seems awfully unnecessary for someone hesitant to reveal their townreads.
In post 851, BBmolla wrote:I'm a naive cop with a guilty on RadiantCowbell, so she should be fairly confirmed town unless anyone claims to have framed her.
Can you clarify the truthfulness of this? I mean, your lack of vote makes me struggle to take this seriously, but others seem to think it possible you're serious.In post 830, RadiantCowbells wrote:I got a guilty on Peacebringer last night >:(
Well, now that it's out, this is what my problem has been.In post 857, PeregrineV wrote:In post 851, BBmolla wrote:I'm a naive cop with a guilty on RadiantCowbell, so she should be fairly confirmed town unless anyone claims to have framed her.Naive means always gets innocent regardless of actual alignment.In post 854, BBmolla wrote:I guess there could be a Sanity Switcher that gives me an alternate result or some bullshit.
How can you, as a naive cop, get a guilty at all?
To be honest, I thought it might have been some weird gambit.In post 862, BBmolla wrote:It says my result will always be innocent.
But I have a guilty on RadiantCowbells.
@mod: If a framer framed someone, and a naive cop investigated that player, what would happen?
I'm taking this seriously for now, but it's not too important.In post 868, Diabolik wrote:more the fact radiant claims cop?
I don't have time to check, but I thought you said you were naive when you first posted the result, so this doesn't sound too believable.In post 908, BBmolla wrote:Yeah, I have, I'm honestly not sure if even on EM cop sanity goes above framer though.In post 902, DeasVail wrote:The thing is though, I'm pretty sure BBmolla's played on EM a fair bit (I could be wrong though) and I think anyone from there would be quite familiar with the different kinds of cop, but again, I don't know.
I'm not stupid guys, I just forgot I was naive and assumed I was paranoid because of the guilty result. That's where you're getting the lapse in logic.
Can you explain?
Is there anything town about you?
What I am asking is, look at yourself from an outside perspective (without the knowledge that you are town). Is there anything more town about you than there is about PV?In post 993, mnemonicdevice wrote:Yup. I'm town. More town then you in fact. because I know for certain that I am town
I would not assume a frame instead because I don't think there'd be both a town framer and a scum one, but you have my reaction to BBmolla's claim as evidence of what I would think. My first thought was the normalizer and if not that, then some other wacky role combination (which didn't seem too unlikely with this setup?), and it's not like I assumed that BBmolla would ask if it was a mod error or not either. BBmolla was one of my less town reads in the game before this, so I could see him being scum, but I don't think he's scummy from this naive cop thing. I think you are.In post 1033, Luna Lovegood wrote:You would assume a frame instead?
What do you think of Molla in general?