Kingmaker II-Game Over

StallingChamp · Post Post #530 (isolation #0) » Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:48 pm

Checking in and reading game. At page 9 now, will post when I finish (today or tomorow).

StallingChamp · Post Post #597 (isolation #1) » Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:00 am

CrashTextDummie wrote:
Vote: StallingChamp
, for his one post of substance, which was unfortunately lost to the crash. In it, he complimented PJ on a good decision, while admitting a bit later that he has no idea why exactly Rosso was under so much scrutiny. Due to the circumstances, I can't prove that he really said that, but I suggest at least keeping an eye on him.

I will try to make more posts of substance in the future. As for your other point, I said I think that under the circumstances PJ made a good decision, but later said that I did not understand the Rosso execution at all.

I don't have time for more now, expect more in the next few days.

StallingChamp · Post Post #659 (isolation #2) » Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:38 pm

Ok, sorry for the lack of content, I've been really busy. I will post more by Sunday at the latest.

Also, PAblito, some explanation for your vote on me would be nice.

StallingChamp · Post Post #661 (isolation #3) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:33 am

Ok, have a bit for now (re-reading Day 2, made it up to Pooky and Glork's argument about "bandwagonning in kingmaker is tech")

Vote: Pooky, Fritz, MoS

All three have not posted much content at all. I realize I haven't been the most active poster either, but they are much more experienced than me, and so I expect more from them. If they are always like this, I might withdraw my vote but I have never played with them. Can someone confirm or deny if this fots their normal playstyle?

Specifically, I dislike Pooky for post 570, and dont like his insuing debate with Gork either. To be honest, when I read it first, I read it as a general statement, NOT meaning specifically in this Day of this game.

MoS has also made me worry about him, because twice now (bird and Pheobus) has he come out and instructed the King not to execute someone under large fire without giving reasons for his defense of them. Again, if this is normal, please tell me.

This is all I have time for at the moment, I will finish my re-read later this weekend and comment further then.

StallingChamp · Post Post #666 (isolation #4) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:59 am

Fritz, note that I agknowledged the "double-standard", and explained why.

StallingChamp · Post Post #913 (isolation #5) » Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:17 pm

Uhh...yeah, i'm here. To be honest, I forgot about this post-chrashes, so i got some catching up to do.

Unvote: All

for now while i catch up.

StallingChamp · Post Post #973 (isolation #6) » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:57 am

Ok, I completely forgot about this game. Expect a content post by this weekend. Sorry for inactivity.