Two-Headed Mafia 2 - GAME OVER!

[themanhimself]

vote:MR BUDDY LEE

I'm a dog person.

[themanhimself]

Sorry for having lurked, but stressful times have overtaken me. I agree with lordy for saying that we need to move beyond the random voting stage. On that note I'm going to

unvote

. When it is so random there is no way to choose who is really acting scummy. Now that H2 da Tizzle and I are back, and no longer lurking, I say people give good voting reasons, or unvote us. For some random craplogic reason we are the majority vote.

[themanhimself]

As mini already said he wanted to hang around until the randomness was over. As for me The reason I kept my random vote was because Glork is the only one I'd vote. As for the joke the crap logic wasn't referring to this game...it was referring to the time I was glorked in some other mini which I forget the number of but is too lazy to check for.

As for lurking...this is the first big game I've been in and all this randomness is just too hard to keep up with. I'll try but I honestly don't know what to say or do. So yea I'm as clueless as mini with this.

For now I'm going to

unvote
vote: Yosarian2

as OMGUS as well as lurker hunting.

This is a huge bleep on my scumdar! It starts out as stupid, moves into craplogic, and has a big finale of overdefensiveness. It's a 3 act scum post.

vote:sprontalic

[themanhimself]

Why aren't more people voting obvious H2 da tizzle/themanhimself scum?

If you'll explain why you think I'm scum, I would be more than glad to answer your accusations.
Right now though, I'm good with my vote. I think I'm going to prod my partner to try and get him a bit more active.

[themanhimself]

Why aren't more people voting obvious H2 da tizzle/themanhimself scum?

They aren't voting us because they know the truth. My other head is speaking for us both. There you have it.

SCUM

Uhhh... please don't vote for us because my other head is a complete n00bxor. It's his first game. He means well.

[themanhimself]

Hmm. Vague claim there. The trouble isn't that crap (or weak) logic

is

, but that it has a dangerous tendency to masquerade as truelogic. No logic is defiantly indefensible. Craplogic... you're waiting for someone to pick up on it, and it seems essentially dishonest in its nature. If it were upfront, followed by a "/craplogic" tag, that'd maybe be different...

Sounds like a good idea...I hadn't really been introduced to the idea of tagging though. Maybe I should use it more.

But I figured that it looked obvious enough that the logic was weak due to its delivery (if I had meant it properly, I wouldn't have needed to say vote for OMGUS at all and simply deliver the reason by itself).

Just for the record I messaged my other head...haven't got a reply yet.

This seems a bit like weak overdefensiveness. Obv scumtactic, but maybe not worth a vote.

FoS:Sprontalic

[themanhimself]

Overdefensive = scum
No defense = scum

What is the perfect defense ShadowLurker?

Wow. I'd vote my other head for this. Please don't. Sprontalic seems to have dropped the overdefensive vibe, so for now

unvote

But I don't understand shadowlurkers vote. It seems that he is just trying to push any lynch, which is almost always a scum tactic.

FoS: Shadowlurker

I'm now going to send a PM to my other head explicitly outlining what

not

to do.

[themanhimself]

Dengue fever?!
Are you somewhere in Africa? Watch out for the Tsetse flies.