In post 3035, theamatuer wrote:actually it should be sykedoc (by least amount of posts), or Chevre (with longest time w/o posting).
At least funkybikes active
You were voting me, and now all of a sudden you want a sykedoc or Chevre lynch?
In post 3035, theamatuer wrote:actually it should be sykedoc (by least amount of posts), or Chevre (with longest time w/o posting).
At least funkybikes active
In post 3064, DeltaWave wrote:Hey UN and Kondi, what do you think about tech sheeping you guys?
In post 3157, UberNinja wrote:somebody make a list of all of the vote counts with flip colors for me?
petapan, i choose you
In post 3155, petapan wrote:In post 3109, YYR wrote:Without Amrun, this game isn't as fun anymore.
^this but he barely spoke with amrun that's why it bugs me
In post 3161, petapan wrote:it just reads BS to me, seem to remember something like that happening once before but have absolutely no way to remember the thread and i'm not about to pull a psyche to try to support my gut on this
In post 3365, kondi2424 wrote:Also, if BB is town, TeCh is 100% scum, and Trevor/theam are town.
In post 3433, SpyreX wrote:Ok ok ok I'll actually not be lazy and do the VC this gameday.
In post 3440, SpyreX wrote:hrm. I'm thinkin about angel or whatever in the greater context. Especially with the NKs
In post 3541, Trevor wrote:The fact that if even only 1 person claims angel, we get another person clear of being mafia and that you are not some solo-3rd party/scum bluffing.
In post 3573, syndromeofadown wrote:Let me see if I understand this correctly:
(1) if his lynch is redirected then that indicates DW is town since that would mean he has angel partners (and he wouldn't have to out them)
(2) if his lynch isn't redirected and DW is scum... we lynch scum
The problem I find with this is there's no point in testing (1) right now. I would agree maybe if there were fewer people alive, but there's 21 alive. There's still plenty of time to wait out and see if an angel gets nightkilled or has to claim later on to prove (1) without having to waste a redirect.
We should be focusing our efforts on lynching scum. Period. If you think DW is scum then go ahead, but if you're only voting him to confirm what could easily be confirmed naturally over the course of the game then just stop.
In post 3574, petapan wrote:if he's town then it's a town-directed kill
aka there is literally no drawback to doing so
In post 3053, TeChNoWC wrote:How so Delta? OMGUS much? Worried im catching on to an angel scumteam? You know that will look bad for you when i flip town, right?
Vote: funkybike1
responded to pressure with wishy washy flying under the radar posts. Much more likely to be scum than sykedoc.
In post 3321, TeChNoWC wrote:@petapan: yeah, my sample size is small. I'm not convinced you are scum or anything. I just think you play a hell of a scumgame and there are some similarities between your play in this game and your play in NY 152, so it seems risky to keep you around until lylo.
And I realise that zdenek/zajnet/staeg aren't popular lynch options, but you kind of threw them in after your main post and didn't give reasoning (reasoning would be nice here). The fact that you did and the fact that you are mentioning them now makes me think that POSSIBLY you saw your lynch options were too generic and you needed a few out-of-the-ordinary reads to make yourself look genuine.
I realise I'm reaching here and I by no means am calling you out as scum, but if you were in a three man lylo in this game I would be hell worried that history was repeating itself and those in NY 152 hadn't learnt from previous mistakes.
Pedit: I think BB is likely town, but I see what he did as a POSSIBLE (yet very unlikely) scumgambit. Either way it's that little niggling possibility + the fact he shouldn't be going to lylo anyway after what he did. I actually think funky is scum; kondi didn't want me to vote him earlier but I am kind of breaking my sheeping rule a bit here, but I feel pretty strongly that he is scum (mostly gut). Just the way he posts is a lot of fluff, and yet he quickly wanted out of the lurker pool when we started to cast doubt on it, and now he wants all the lurkers lynched. I feel he could be the one scum (maybe there is more) that saw the words 'lurker lynch' and picked up his game so he could survive.
In post 3610, DeltaWave wrote:In post 3609, kondi2424 wrote:But then you can kill who you want each time.
It's useless to have vig shot after vig shot without any meaningful scumhunting.
In post 3747, DeltaWave wrote:In post 3741, Ellibereth wrote:I think we're definitely going to lose if the angel group is allowed to do whatever they want.
they need to be outed.
so we need to just convince one of them to out the rest.
Hey, before we stopped my lynch, we only used our power once to shoot a mime. My lynch was stupid and I explained why beforehand. People need to start taking responsibility for their actions.
In post 3883, petapan wrote:hahaha yeah you're confirmed town which is why you've lived for 7 straight nights and kondi2424 was shot dead, okay cool great thanks awesome
theamatuer wrote:no. DW should be last, if at all.
they all need to go at this point
In post 3886, petapan wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: MoS
this is probably going to get redirected to obvtown again but i'm so fucking done with arguing about this
In post 3908, Mastermind of Sin wrote:In post 3884, TeChNoWC wrote:In post 3883, petapan wrote:hahaha yeah you're confirmed town which is why you've lived for 7 straight nights and kondi2424 was shot dead, okay cool great thanks awesome
theamatuer wrote:no. DW should be last, if at all.
they all need to go at this point
MoS first. I feel he is more likely scum for
1. Active lurking
2. Kondi was on to him (though he also wanted all the angels dead)
3. Avoids that redirect shit
Kondi's death suggests to me either the angels are being set up or they or one of them is scum killing off the main people wanting to lynch them. WIFOM but they need to go sooner or later.
@theam: your point is complete WIFOM. What about the fact that all the people who I have been sheeping have been basically killed in succession? Are mafia trying to set me up? WIFOM WIFOM WIFOM lovely WIFOM cakes with milk and cream.
1. Define active lurking. Really. Like, I want you to justify my play as active lurking.
2. LMFAO. Kondi barely mentioned me at all this game (literally 3 times, you can look it up), and he wasn't even one of the ones trying to lynch me yesterday...your argument has absolutely NO factual basis.
3. You not wanting to give the town a chance to stop your mislynches from going through isn't a good reason to think I'm scum. In fact, that's not even a logical conclusion and it in no way has any bearing on your "case".
Wait, so kondi's death is WIFOM but because it's WIFOM the angels have to die, whereas we should NOT try to lynch you because the deaths of people you were sheeping is a WIFOM point? You're just throwing around the term haphazardly without actually making any reasonable conclusions. I don't think you actually understand the point of WIFOM.
Seriously, just because I called you scum yesterday doesn't mean you have to make it so obvious now. I was going to try and enjoy the chase for a while...
In post 3913, Timeater wrote:since when do you have to explain a vote
In post 3922, Mastermind of Sin wrote:In post 3912, TeChNoWC wrote:
1. You turned up when people were voting you to spout your 'I'm an invincible angel, so town it's not funny' crap. Then you dissapeared. Unless you've been posting it up in the QT I don't see much evidence of scumhunting nor commenting on bandwagons, town/scum reads etc. Ok, so I concede it's more lurker or inactivity than active lurking. But why haven't you been engaged? Zajnet and Delta are, so PR is no excuse.
2. Uh, he was trying to lynch you. He wanted all the angels dead. He conceded to voting Zor after the bandwagon was massive.
3. I don't understand what you are trying to say here. What case? I never had a case on you. My case is on the angels, and you seem scummiest simply by lack of input and gut. WHAT CASE??
I never said you shouldn't try to lynch me because kondi died. I said MY statement was WIFOM, but I felt like saying it anyway, because I know I am town and I feel like part of the reason kondi was killed was to set me up. I don't expect anyone else to believe this.
1. I've been pretty much ignoring this game in its entirety and prod-dodging the whole time. That's because I don't give a fuck about this game and I'm only in it because I made a deal with myko. That alone pretty much confirms my town meta.
2. He mentioned me 3 times. Three times the entire game. There were a host of people who wanted me dead far more than kondi did, and far more vocally. Trying to pin his death on me is fucking retarded, especially since I was V/LA the entire night phase and didn't have computer access (actually, now that I think of it I've been V/LA for *every* night phase in this game...).
3. I'm glad you admit that you have no case on me. Good to be on the same page.
You're the only one who thinks kondi's death implicates you as scum...so why the fuck are you bringing it up? Sounds more like you killed kondi and planned to WIFOM your way out of it...except you started spouting your crap too early when no one actually thought kondi's death made you scum.
In post 3930, Mastermind of Sin wrote:You can't just say a bunch of shit to back up your vote and then couch it with "WIFOM" so that you can back away from it later. WIFOM doesn't work like that.
In post 3932, Mastermind of Sin wrote:You're scum for postulating a bunch of reasons why I might be scum and then quickly backing away from all of them and trying to hand-wave them when I debunk your actions.
In post 3951, Mastermind of Sin wrote:In post 3933, TeChNoWC wrote:In post 3932, Mastermind of Sin wrote:You're scum for postulating a bunch of reasons why I might be scum and then quickly backing away from all of them and trying to hand-wave them when I debunk your actions.
I never called you scum. I said you were the most 'scummy' out of delta and zajnet. If you weren't an angel, we wouldn't even be having this conversation.
So now you're saying you don't think I'm scum, but you want to lynch me anyway? If you're *not* calling me scum and you think that my angel partners are more town than I am, why the FUCK would you want to lynch any of us? Keep flailing, scum.
In post 3952, SpyreX wrote:Good gravy you angels make me want to bash my head against a wall.
If there is a scum in the angels I would put all the monies on it being Zaj
In post 2957, funkybike1 wrote:In post 2955, DeltaWave wrote:Mmmm delicious WIFOM
That's a sufficiently townish reply, isn't it? It is certainly WIFOM, though I can't say anything about its taste. (Either that or scum stupidity.)
Furthermore, this game's mechanics are such that the best way to stay alive would be to stay under the radar. If nobody on the scum team thinks you're a threat, it naturally means the scum won't kill you, and vice versa. This logic also partly holds true for towns as a whole, in that we tend to want to lynch someone we have strong feelings about. That logic dominates the current meta, and provides opportunities for the scum to effectively control the entire game.
PEdit: Nobody really wanted to lynch Delta except for possibly TeCh, and I even have doubts about him. I agree; let's move on.