In post 18, Robotnick2 wrote:VOTE: Amrun because I've always wanted to say that.
And why is that? I'm curious.
VOTE: 2birds
ShadowGirl is town.
In post 18, Robotnick2 wrote:VOTE: Amrun because I've always wanted to say that.
In post 87, Oversoul wrote:You remaining alive for the very sake of your role will be detrimental to the town even if you truly were town. You would realize this if you were town and accept that your lynch is the best thing to do.
Good night scum.
Mod, did the scum get pregame time to talk in their QT?
In post 89, 2birds1stone wrote:
Molla is scum. An experienced player requesting a quicklynch is, well, very obviously scummy. He may be a lyncher, but he's certainly not pro-town.
In post 126, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Wow...That was lucky
I am Fritzler's Favorite Role
I had a 1-shot Daykill ability that I had to use on Day 1 within the first five pages or I would lose my vote.
Elmo has always been on of those people that I have had a hard time reading, so rather than keep him around to mind screw with my head the entire game, I took a chance and shot him, hoping he was scum. I was close.
In post 185, Amrun wrote:I really, seriously think we'll have misleading flips. Is it a possibility? Yes.
Is it likely? No. 2birds was turned into a Survivor, which was the usual yellow. Jester was the usual purple.
In post 2860, izakthegoomba wrote:You areThe cause of much confusion.
While you are alive, role names will not appear in the normal colours, but will be randomly selected as either green, red, brown, purple, orange, or grey.
You win if you survive to the endgame.
In post 230, Phillammon wrote:Your given reason or thinking that he's scum and that the shot was good was selfish- you said you found it hard to read him. I would vote you here and now, but it's not worth the effort on this device to get square brackets up. Also, you're basically confirmed innocent, which is another good reason not to lynch you. Wait. Damn.
In post 278, danakillsu wrote:In post 276, Amrun wrote:I don't see the point in lynching Chimera until there's an actual reason to think one of the masons are scum.
How about the fact that this is worst roles mafia and there's no point for masons unless there's something terrible about them. I'm guessing that the terrible part is that they're confirmed town to each other when one or both is actually scum.
As a side note, I've been a mafia mason in a bastard mod before.
In post 313, Teleporting Speed Hippos wrote:Because town would want to be altruistic, not selfish.
In post 327, Phillammon wrote:Gmorning. My role supremely messes up anybody who has a decent role and tries to use it on me. I'm not gonna nameclaim, but trust me- cops, docs, vigs? You don't want to target me.
In post 373, ShadowGirl wrote:So why would he claim it?
In post 377, Captain Haddock wrote:Putting normal masons in this game is bastardly so no I don't think so.
In post 395, Captain Haddock wrote:I was speaking hyothetically, I was saying that it would be bastard because any masons is bastard in a game where you can't trust "confirmations".
In post 330, Amrun wrote:In post 327, Phillammon wrote:Gmorning. My role supremely messes up anybody who has a decent role and tries to use it on me. I'm not gonna nameclaim, but trust me- cops, docs, vigs? You don't want to target me.
Ergh, this post really strikes me the wrong way.
That's one strike too many for Phillamon.
VOTE: Phillamon
In post 367, Amrun wrote:Then you should know better than to assume town isn't selfish, tSH.
Phillamon's role makes me uncomfortable and I think he's scummy in his own right. LYNCH PLZ
In post 514, Tierce wrote:Why are you asking me to defend a townread this early? Do you intend to vote him? Why?
In post 562, Phillammon wrote:In post 555, Amrun wrote:
WHY didn't you vote Oversoul when you made a case on him, Oversoul? You WEREN'T already voting him, and that's crap.
Who was that meant to be aimed at?
In post 567, IceGuy wrote:Having a role that allows players to bring non-players into the game is already bad enough; there's no need to worsen it.
This is a terrible case.
In post 574, BBmolla wrote:In post 568, Amrun wrote:In post 567, IceGuy wrote:Having a role that allows players to bring non-players into the game is already bad enough; there's no need to worsen it.
This is a terrible case.
How is it bad? It's good, if they're the same alignment as you. BB doesn't know they are, supposedly, but used it anyway.
I find it highly implausible that I could imbalance the game that much by using 1-shot.
I do find it plausible that my second shot would bring in scum.
Saul I don't know what to tell you, I changed my mind. The "Worst" part is that I'm recruiting someone from outside the game, which is obviously bastard.
Also Tierce as town is a force to be reckoned with.
In post 619, Phillammon wrote:Right, fair enough, the heat is on, time to claim the restriction:
It's 1 shot.
I have one shot ditto'ing, then I'm effectively a VT. My role name is Green Slime, but that doesn't help much given it appears not to be in the original thread. I'll admit my posts have looked fairly scummy. I'll freely admit I've been extra speculative/paranoid because of the nature of the game. So yeah. My fault.