vote: Ellibereth
More comment on content in a few...
ranmaru wrote:Actually, I was asking because before he has been set to visible. I told him I would be checking his recent posts to make sure he is following up with the game, but I didn't want to sound like a creeper. He usually jokes around and I'm fine with throwing some sillyness toward him. He knows that I have called him out and multiple others and still do. I am sad at him being invisible.
Hiraki wrote:This is your reasoning for a vote?Ameilasay wrote:As to reasons for my current votes, I haven't really been fond of the tone of Hiraki's posts.. he seems pretty excitable early game.
Why me amci. Why are you so scummy?
Hiraki wrote:Damn.
Damn Empking.
You voted on both sides of the argument.
Ranmaru wrote:Ameliaslay wrote:unvotevote: Hiraki, Ranmaru
To answer the questions asked of my votes, by Empking. I initially placed only one vote and randomly to give myself the opportunity to look over the thread. I hadn't yet decided how I wanted to use both votes, although I thought in tandem is a little strange, as second votes might be more useful to place pressure.
To comment on one of the wagons, I was initially a bit confused by the smalls wagon-- to me he reads very newb, but not necessarily newb scum. But as the latter end of the thread progresses he seems very willing-- almost falling over himself to accomodate requests for outside of game activity on other sites.That over-eager to please mentality strikes me wrong. I also really didn't like the comment in post #198, where he mentions that we should look tomorrow for those attacking him hardest. That being said, I don't know that this sways my balance toward a vote.
As to reasons for my current votes, I haven't really been fond of the tone of Hiraki's posts..he seems pretty excitable early game. However, I really haven't liked either Lowkey or Ranmaru'smethod of scum-hunting. Both of them seem to rely on a form of metagaming, that forgive me as I haven't played in a while seems like going beyond the pale. As in this post by Ranmaru:
ranmaru wrote:Actually, I was asking because before he has been set to visible. I told him I would be checking his recent posts to make sure he is following up with the game, but I didn't want to sound like a creeper. He usually jokes around and I'm fine with throwing some sillyness toward him. He knows that I have called him out and multiple others and still do. I am sad at him being invisible.
The only time I remember ever watching who's visible/not-- timestamps, etc. was as scum looking for justifications to point fingers at other players. Lowkey and Ranmaru seem to use similar logic to point fingers at smalls and redcoyote, on what I think of as weak cases, especially given my preference towards only looking in game at in game behavior.
Purple text I agree with. He was never scummy to me. *To Hiraki, I posted that quote to ask for thoughts on Smalls to see if he was doing the same or not.
Your Hiraki vote, is based on how he was excited to play? That is not good, at all. Why does that make you think he is scum?
The quote you bring up is not scum hunting, it's a clarification.
If you don't like meta-ing, why haven't you spoken of Crazy? Here is a quote:
Crazy wrote:VOTE: Ranmaru
Not really a first post I'd expect from you... I thought you'd come out guns blazing, especially with all this NK-WIFOM talk. What's up?
@Amrun - A-ight, I can believe the cell phone thing. UNVOTE: Amrun
He used it for scum hunting.
I also call out activity all the time, so I don't see how that makes me scum. (It's a null tell)
Anyways, my scumhunting isn't heavily based on meta. Currently i'm voting you and Kunkstar, both of which I have never played with. How is this meta-ing?
I never pointed fingers at RC nor Smalls. If I say "Hey RC, I see you there!" It doesn't mean I think he's scum for it, it means I want him to post.
Why did you vote Elli?