Road to Wrestlemania: Game over - WWF wins - BANG BANG!

Scott Brosius · Post Post #70 (isolation #0) » Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:22 am

Lowell will not lurk his way to the belt.

Ankle Lock:Lowell
Powerbomb:Lowell

Scott Brosius · Post Post #114 (isolation #1) » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:47 pm

Scott Brosius is talking trash to Lowell when he gets seized from behind and launched across the ring with a German Suplex!

Lowell is a chronic lurker. It was based on past games not this game in particular.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #175 (isolation #2) » Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:37 am

I pretty much agree with IS's sentiments. There is no need for scum to worry at this point. I'm fine just breezing through this and getting to the actual game.

Tombstone Piledriver: Lowell
Canadian Destroyer: Lowell

Scott Brosius · Post Post #223 (isolation #3) » Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:35 am

Yeah we should get more people on the list.

Forearm drop: Erratus Apathos
Backhand chop: Debonair Danny DiPietro

Scott Brosius · Post Post #243 (isolation #4) » Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:41 am

I have nothing to explain. I stand by the comment. I feel like this is a giant round of RVS in which there will be a lot of null tells thrown around and probably made too much of. So no I'm not going to put much effort into scumhunting while we are rumbling.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #286 (isolation #5) » Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:34 am

Tombstone Piledriver: sottyrulez
Canadian Destroyer: sottyrulez

Scott Brosius · Post Post #294 (isolation #6) » Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:11 pm

IS has been eliminated already.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #316 (isolation #7) » Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:19 am

Walls of Jericho: VasudeVa
Piledriver: VasudeVa

Scott Brosius · Post Post #371 (isolation #8) » Tue Feb 22, 2011 6:45 am

Clothesline: BabySpice

Scott Brosius · Post Post #386 (isolation #9) » Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:12 pm

The plan was to put people at E-1 little by little and then decide who gets the belt. You just knocked people out.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #429 (isolation #10) » Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:25 am

Chokeslam: AurousVox
Chokeslam: AurousVox

Scott Brosius · Post Post #509 (isolation #11) » Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:07 am

support:sottyrulez

if still possible

Scott Brosius · Post Post #684 (isolation #12) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 8:45 pm

Why is that vote-worthy though? Seems like an innocent mistake.

Spear: SnakePlissken

Scott Brosius · Post Post #734 (isolation #13) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:29 pm

When did I vote chess Nero?

Scott Brosius · Post Post #786 (isolation #14) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:26 pm

My vote is completely confirmed by 757.

I don't really see Thor or BS or CK doing anything overtly scummy and the votes on them seem to be based in playstyle more than content. Trendall's 774 reads scummy as trying to appease those voting by agreeing with it. But I like my vote where it is.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #793 (isolation #15) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 4:04 pm

At the moment, I mentioned Trendall as a slight scum read. Otherwise nothing has caught my eye.

Sotty: My impression was that his instigation was the basis for the case.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #907 (isolation #16) » Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:24 pm

I'll read up.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #965 (isolation #17) » Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:25 am

I don't care who Snake was voting for. It's the fact that he voted him for using quotes which is laughably weak reasoning. It's a rule that most are not used to. It's not the target of the vote that I have an issue with. It's the lame reason that reads as scum to me.

But a snake wagon is not going to take off today so Trendall looks better.

Unvote
Spear: Trendall

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1026 (isolation #18) » Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:26 am

How is that antitown? Why waste a vote on a wagon that isn't going to take off today since deadline is approaching?

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1063 (isolation #19) » Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:26 am

Snake conveniently appears in thread an hour after sotty votes him. If the wagon on snake will actually take off today, I fully support it, but I do not see that happening.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1084 (isolation #20) » Mon Mar 07, 2011 5:10 pm

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1269 (isolation #21) » Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:34 pm

Yikes I'll read up

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1319 (isolation #22) » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:52 am

My initial scum reads are both dead. Kise's defense is WIFOMy but borders on complete stupidity if he is scum so I tend to believe he was targeted.

Nero Cain completely tunneling on IS for weak reasons reads scummy. I feel like people vote IS for his brash attitude rather than content. He's not overly town, but I think it's an easy wagon for scum to jump on at this point. VV's case on GMan looks solid and given he is also on the IS wagon I feel is unwarranted, thats where my vote goes.

I do not see why DDD did not name claim immediately.

Headbutt: GMan

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1360 (isolation #23) » Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:46 pm

Yes I was referring to Trendall and Snake. I'm not going to make up cases on people just for the sake of having cases.

As for 1339 I always love the HERES A GROUP OF PPL. I BET THERE ARE SCUM IN HERE. Obviously. I can pick any random group of 8 people from this game and say that there is scum in here. It appears like you are doing something when it actually accomplishes nothing and is fluff.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1363 (isolation #24) » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:07 pm

I fail to see how my reads were original. I was the FIRST person on Snake IN 684 but I realized I wasn't going to get a wagon going on him D1. That is the definition of being original. Trendall, not so original but completely scummy. So Primate's point is weak.

Can you show me where I said your list was random? I was suggesting that providing that list is as useful as me picking off 8 random names from the alive players and saying there are scum in here. Based on probability we are going to find scum in any group of people you list. It is an ineffective way to scumhunt while giving the guise that you are actually doing something productive.

In conclusion, you are a misrep machine.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1414 (isolation #25) » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:04 pm

Nero your 1362 referred to Primate's response to my ideas being original. You said he summed it up well. Which means you agreed enough with it to mention it again, and perpetuate the misrep.

@KK: I see the case is based on rolefishing? I'm in the camp that DDD should at least nameclaim. So I don't feel that asking for the full claim is completely unreasonable. I realize the case isn't entirely based on his playstyle, but I feel especially given people's opinions on him in the rumble, that style is a part of this and it's easy for scum to jump on. Hence my skepticism of the wagon.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1599 (isolation #26) » Fri Mar 18, 2011 9:00 am

bri: Why only point out Primate specifically for lurking? There are plenty of people lurking in this game (yes, myself included) seems scummy to just pick one person for lurking and point them out when there are others.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1687 (isolation #27) » Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:29 am

@KK: before the claim yes 1319 was still how I stood.

I don't like the claim. My vote stays. If that wagon does deteriorate because of the claim, I'm looking at bristep next. I need to look overall, but the latest interactions with AV are scummy, voting for him for tunneling on him and essentially just voting him.

I don't think hearing more details about the vig claim is going to convince me that's its genuine. The lack of mentioning affiliation also bothers me.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1771 (isolation #28) » Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:37 am

"Proving" Gman's claim can be manipulated by scum (if in fact GMan is town and scum have some blocking power) at night and just lead to WIFOM tomorrow if we let him live.

Scott Brosius · Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:34 am

@1871: I said at minimum name-claim. To lock him into a name instead of being able to wiggle his way out of a situation if indeed DDD is scum. To say I called for a full claim is misleading.

As yesterday my vote stays on Gman. IS is most likely town especially after emp's flip and Gman's attempt to deflect onto IS citing gloating is weak. THAT is the problem I had with the original IS wagon. People vote because of brash playstyle not content.

Spear: Gman

Scott Brosius · Post Post #1913 (isolation #30) » Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:41 pm

I assume votes just means total votes in a day not EOD votes?

Scott Brosius · Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:57 pm

Not saying we should nail down who he will shoot, but you want to know if it's you? That reeks of scum to me.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #2127 (isolation #32) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:09 pm

BS's 2119 is really grasping at straws and is scummy. To me the longer we let gman live, the bigger of a distraction it becomes. Not to mention the great probability he is scum.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #2261 (isolation #33) » Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:28 am

You missed the deadline but have been actively posting in other games the past 2 days? That looks like scum giving belt to scum and excusing it by claiming you missed deadline.

Scott Brosius · Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:52 am

Sotty needs to hang today, but CK3 looks quite scummy with the whole belt forgetting ordeal and Nero mysteriously dying. I'm not placing my vote on Sotty because I believe she is at L-2 and I'm sure IS is hanging around somewhere.