Fate, 96 wrote:Oh xvart. I had such high hopes for you fellow survivor buddy.
How could you.... how...could you...
Don't worry. We shall return to glory soon.
iamausername, 97 wrote:xvart wrote:Well... the game is called Pick you Power. The novelty of this game is that you get to... wait for it... pick your power. Someone who signed up for pick your power and wanted to be at the bottom of the list signed up for the wrong game.
Either that, or has other motives; and by other motives I mean scum motives.
Seriously, did anyone in this game want to be the last to pick their role?
Please elaborate on the bolded. What scum motives? Why would scum want to be lower on the list any more than town?
Okay. Let me try this again. This is PICK YOUR POWER. A game where we all get to PICK OUR POWER. Even if someone wanted to be at the bottom of the list, that means he/she wanted to pick after scum, allowing scum to pick some power roles before him/her. And my concern is not that someone might prefer VT to PRs but it is such an interesting statement about landing in the list where llama wanted to be.
- can you go into more detail about why you picked the numbers and the decision making process to land you where you wanted to be? Did you want to be dead last? Or somewhere near the bottom? Why specifically did you want to be located where you are?
iamausername, 97 wrote:xvart wrote:DrippingGoofball, 65 wrote:Pomegranate is town!
Scum can't not submit a role?
Unvote
VOTE: xvart
^ If you're looking for scum on the slowsilver wagon, it's here, btw.
Am I scum for my comment to DGB or the other things you mentioned?
Hoopla, 100 wrote:Here's an interesting stat from the last two PYP games. Of the 7 players who have landed unique numbers in the draft, 4 of them have been scum.
Do you mean completely unique or unique to other scum? Because I don't see how scum could play to have unique numbers since they can't predict what individual town members are going to pick.
Benmage, 107 wrote:Anywhose I agree about the increased likelyhood of a scum in the top 4. I like hooplas reasoning to exclude chk. I'd also want to rule out Guideran. I while I see scum going for top picks I don't see them desiring cop. And going 1,1 seems like and all or nothing move.
Why is cop the number one pick across the board? Wouldn't scum want vig? Role cop? And maybe scum could want cop to prevent town from having it.
Sajin, 112 wrote:I also absolutely hate wanting to introduce Wifom to Pomegrantes claim of did not sumbit a role. (In fact the way you posted strikes me as more of the "hey, do not clear a player because of some stupid technical thing" rather then the she is lying about not submitting a choice) Also the fact that you quoted DGB to refute her, rather than quote Pom to refute the motivation of the actual comment makes me think you are more interested in preventing a town read then critizing the player for their comment.
I wasn't refuting Pom's claim or motivation at all. I was questioning DBGs town read of Pom for something anyone could have done regardless of alignment. I'm trying to preventing a town read? That is laughable considering the stability and solidness of the town read to begin with.
Hoopla
- generally speaking, when scum pick numbers, do you think they pick to get roles or to prevent roles from being picked?
Hoopla, 134 wrote:Sure, there's a bunch of reasons for one scum to go for 1,1 or something similar. My post was dispelling the logic that scum would come out and go 'HEY I SUBMITTED MY NUMBERS, AND CHANGED THEM BECAUSE I GOT A SCUM ROLE AND MY BUDDIES TOLD ME TO DO IT'. I wasn't saying there aren't any good reasons as scum to go 1,1.
But he obviously didn't say "MY BUDDIES TOLD ME TO DO IT," and I don't think you can discount someone being scum based on an innocuous comment.
Sajin, 138 wrote:Not willing to change my vote yet. It is also kinda close to lynch threshold (too lazy to do an actual count, but, its high) and a couple people have not posted yet.
Kind of close to lynch threshold? On who? The person you are voting or the person's wagon you are considering switching to? We need 12 votes and I doubt anyone even has seven votes yet.
vollkan, 140 wrote:There is absolutely no pro-town reason for pointing this out.
xvart+5
There is no bus driver role to pick from, so I was either making a joke or an idiot.
(For those who are unaware, I have recently decided to rescale my points system so that the numbers become bigger. A 5 is now equivalent to a former 2 or 3. It's just that because I've gotten more skeptical about scumtells over time, my scores have tended to be compressed between 50 and 65, so I have begun to rescale in all my new games)
vollkan, 140 wrote:xvart wrote:I really don't know.
Nobody said you knew. What do you think is more likely?
Well... I can see the value in doing it either way, but I think it would depend on the scum team membership and how much time they actually spent coordinating and whether or not they thought that it would be beneficial to subvert suspicion by having two people pick identical numbers.
vollkan, 140 wrote:xvart wrote:
slowsilver, 67 wrote:He probably just didn't want to be a target which he would be if he was higher up - unless he is scum in which case he is trying to cover up his mistake with LIES and even worse ACCEPTANCE.
Nice fence sitting, but I'll respond the portion where you assume he is town. There is a term that gets used with people that want to avoid suspicion: Scum.
Queue the beginning of a crappily reasoned "Let me on the bandwagon" post by xvart.
How on earth is the above fence-sitting? The evidence available didn't point one way or the other, so the basis for suspicion wasn't made out/
Instead of fence sitting I should have said playing both sides of the fence. He's "defending" (used loosely) against my comment while at the same time acknowledging exactly what I was saying as being plausible. And why was he answering for llama?
vollkan, 140 wrote:xvart wrote:
slowsilver, 68 wrote:xvart and Fate are the most active vote-wise - with 2 votes each, which isn't really enough to tell anything yet seeing as we are only just coming out of RVS.
So why make this comment if you can't tell anything from it? Are you just hoping that someone else will pick up this subtle suspicion and run with it?
What "subtle suspicion"? I hate BW analysis, but for the people who don't, it makes sense to keep tabs on BWing.
It isn't even BW analysis. He is talking about how Fate and I had both cast two votes (at the time) with no follow up to why this is important. Maybe subtle suspicion isn't the way you read it, but I am a more cynical reader and comments like this look to me like he is saying "these two people are voting more than anyone else. Since I'm not going to comment on this, does anyone else think anything of this?"
vollkan, 140 wrote:
Better question. Where did he say that jealousy is a scumtell.
You're right. He didn't. I was trying to get him to expand on his lack of commentary about his posted observations in that post.
xvart.