FINALLY DONE CATCHING UP! (
I can use caplocks too so STFU with the caplocks )
Now for content:
Seacore's reasoning for voting Fur bare some validity. However, I find it very interesting that Seacore and BabySpice still thinks Fur was lying while unvoting/ calling him likely investigator.
Seacore, your argument about you being a realist doesn't add up at all. If you still really thought Percy's clarification was an indicator of Fur lying then I see no pro-town motivation to back off him at all, since he's obv scum in your perspective, which again, seems not to be the case with the following inconsitencies:
-->
Seacore post 976 wrote:
Vote:AV
Seems the
scummiest out of my list
. But I'll jump to any of them should the deadline approach.
Seacore post 979 wrote:
I've seen the arguments for Furc not lying, to me, they don't stand up. My fundamental issue is that I can't believe Percy wouldn't confirm.
I will not let go of my belief that Furc is lying.
But no, that won't jeopardise my posts for the rest of the day, because even if Furc isn't, his arguments are utter shit.
Seacore post 911 wrote:Furcolow wrote:unvote;
vote: seacore
even if this guy is town, he will not help us
he obviously is incapable
Wow, just wow. What exactly have you brought to the game Furc? Your list of certain scum? Please wait until I'm lynched and revealed as somebody with 0 insanity points before you answer that.
I would expect a different reaction if you thought Fur was scum. This is by all means, talking to Fur-town.
Seacore post 1002 wrote:Furc,
See what I mean, you're so stuck in tunnel land that you aren't being consistent in your logic. If you truly are town, stop and consider this.
This once again have me question your stance on Furcolow. I find it fickle and mostly directed at what you should do in your situation rather than what you really believe in.
Note:The same argument can apply to BabySpice and his stance on Furcolow.
kunkstar7 wrote:
@nopoint: What are you getting at with:
nopointinactingup ISO#0 wrote:And notice as soon as Magna left the wagon a whole bunch of other people jumped off despite their former insistence.
Are you implying Magna is scummy for "leading" the unhopping, or what? It looks like an unnecessary distinction to me.
7 Cults is a big enough number for them realize the organizational benefit of having a leader don't you think? I also find Furcolow's wagon disappearing to thin air quite alarming, especially when some people still think Fur was lying.
I'm pretty convinced by the arguments against Reaper of Trilobite and Magna. However, Seacore's arguments against Reaper also have me question my idea of Cult [Seacore-Reaper]. Up to this point, Reaper has been doing nothing but fluff posts and actively buddying attempts. Not until someone mentioned that Reaper-town is lazy did Reaper started to be lazy, saying he's being lazy and thus he's town. I don't like the way Reaper has been trying to establish that he is town with no concrete credential. I can understand that he likes to joke but it was turning more into fluffs to fly under the radar than having fun. Immediately after he was accused, he deflected to a number of people [Bowser, Xvart] Reaper's push on xvart feels very half hearted despite his assertion.
ReaperCharlie post 1253 wrote:cool story bro.
vote: xvart
ReaperCharlie post 1257 wrote:
xvart is lying.
Immediately after, he went on to ask where Bowser is and showcase his meta instead of more content on Xvart. Sorry "bro", you gotta hit the dirt, though the Awesome Alliance sounds pretty cool and all
Unvote.Vote:Reaper
.
+@XVart: Though your counter-argument refuted Reaper's case in its entirety, there's one thing I'm concerned with: Why didn't you claim warding Magna immediately after Baby Spice did? Naturally, our tendency to recognize familiar details would certainly have raised thoughts in yourself about whether or not to claim Warding Magna when you see Baby Spice did so.
+@Furcolow: I don't think attacking everyone who attacks/disagrees with you is good scum-hunting.
+ GraveDigger should either be hito or Furcolow, whoever likes it best.
+ I agree with VV that we should only be claiming our numbers of Insanity, not our specific Insanity. Of course, no one should pick what's in Hito's list of Banned Insanity. If we find out you do, you're in for a world of trouble.
+ Probably a lot more things while reading this thread I can't recall, which will come out eventually.
