Trilobyte’s 1085 is my exact problem with Seacore. Advocating lynching someone who MIGHT be a murderer 5 days from now doesn’t seem like a very solid tactic.
AV wrote:Compounding this misunderstanding was the fact that MoI (and lots of others) still believed Furc was scum (and so I assumed no logical arguments had yet been made to the contrary); and even further, that MoI accepted that he was 99.999% town after I had made my argument. I don't know, but MoI should be able to explain why my argument convinced him and Hito's didn't - that's what
Let’s clear up a few things about this before it gets any more inaccurate.
1. Do I believe Furc is 99.9999% Town? No way in hell. I think, based on the Noises evidence, his clear lack of focus, and Percy’s debatable answer regarding ambiguity that I don’t see evidence based on Furc’s mind-boggling play that he is Cult. I’m willing to ignore his bad play for the moment.
2. Was it your arguments that swayed me? No, not really. Hito’s argument laid out the case first. What you said that triggered my change was pointing out that Ward in SAII caused the performer to hear noise. I had been operating under the incorrect assumption that Ward did not operate that way in SAII. When you made it clear it did I double checked the facts. Thus my change of read on Furc’s actions to regular VI.
Reaper wrote:2. I am fine w/being lynched, as long as the town KILLS who I want them to kill after I die.
3. Whoever is citing town-RC vs scum-RC meta needs to clean out their brain housing group. You're saying that I'm always useless as town and always super pro-town and "try to lead the town" as scum.
2. The classic “I’m fine with being lynched” tell. You don’t see that from Town this early in the game. Perhaps when PoE takes over well down the line … but not Now.
3. This is fantastic. Please tell my you aren’t trying to oversimplify my statements. Please. Because I don’t ever recall saying ALWAYS. But let’s discuss. Did Reaper, as Town, in Mad World try to attract attention? Nope. Did Reaper as scum in Harry Potter revel in the limelight after he cleared himself? Yep. Did Reaper as Cultscum in Supernatural go out of his way to look as Proactive as possible? Heck yes. I see enough similarities that I’m not letting you wave your hand and dismiss it out of sorts.
Reaper wrote:7. Magna is likely scum w/Triglav/Seacore.
Hey look, let’s play ReaperCharlie ..
WHERE’S THE PROOF … THAT’S RIGHT THERE IS NONE YOU IDIOT.
Reaper wrote:Quick Update
Scum: Seacore, Lost Butterfly, MagnaofIllusion, SpyreX <--i.e. LYNCH THESE MOFOS
Look, how convienant that the people who MUST be scum are all those people voting for you. Scumtastic.
That said you’ve inspired me to ISO with that post.
Incoming ISO of RC –
Note for the record .. these are my interpretations of Reaper’s postings. Disagree? That’s fine but I’m not going to play ‘Fair and Balanced’ and argue both sides of any grey area. And if an ISO isn’t listed it is sufficiently fluffy or non-alignment based it doesn’t deserve mention.
ISO 1 – “Ima gonna die … make it a good one”. Why on earth, so early in the game, would Town start screaming that they were an obv-target for death? No clue.
ISO 3 – Buddying begins – Furc is “a valuable Town asset” and “an unlikely Nightkill”. Why is he an unlikely Nightkill Reaper? Because he’s such a craptastic Town player he makes himself an inevitable and obvious lynch later in the game? Town doesn’t worry about a player being an unlikely kill
ISO 4/5 – Call’s xvart’s list sexy but then backtracks to agree with Triglav that is looks like obv-scum trying to earn Town cred but he “doubt’s xvart will be today’s lynch.
ISO 6 – Votes Benmage and fans the flames of the early conflict between Ben / Fate.
ISO 7 wrote:Yeah, except Percy LISTED ALL THE CHOICES IN THE NIGHT ACTION SOLICITATION PM HE SENT EACH OF US.
/FACEPALM
oh wait I found something quite juicy. Stand by, Ion Control.
Fire.
Doesn’t look like a comment I’d expect towards a ‘valuable asset’. And why the “I found a juicy tidbit” in this post while actually posting it in ISO 8?
ISO 8 – Seacore is obvscum for being annoyed at the Ben / Fate conflict.
ISO 9 – Budding up to Trilobyte, Furc, and hito.
ISO 10 – More buddying to me (my 187 was win), Furc again, Andrius and Plum.
ISO 16 – Some pic related fluff and deflection of my question regarding Bowser and LB.
ISO 19 – More reinforcement that Furc is a godly scum-finder (how could he not be, just by chance he’s called half the playerlist today scum LOL) . Questions SSBF’s intro post (which means it’s not solid Town), more argument with Benmage
ISO 26 – Buddy’s AV, saying 568 was pure win and he should sheep that. Despite tons of ‘Seacore is obvscum’ rhetoric after ISO 8 jumps ship to vote BabySpice for no other reason that AV’s post. Yes that’s right … despite never mentioning BabySpice in his ISO we get this … PAYING ATTENTION VV?
ISO 29 – Advises Feysal to “stop tunnelling and start scum-hunting”, which is ironic given his tunnelling with little content on Seacore.
ISO 31 – More buddying to Plum and hops back on Seacore.
ISO 35 – Buddies up to VP Baltar
ISO 38 – Calls VV scummy for requesting Furc not chain spam. Where is this accusation to the many other players who did the same? And where is the scum motivation?
ISO 41 – Calls Benmage cult
ISO 42 – Questions SSBF’s plan regarding Fate / Benmage and suggests his own is better.
ISO 46 – FOS of Hito for the whole graverob scenario. Note that he distances himself from the suspicion by saying “which will probably earn me a few tomatoes in the face”. If Town why would you worry that your suspicion was wrong and immediately distance yourself?
ISO 51 – Buddies up to SSBF for post 779, and welcomes him to his ‘group’. Why does 779 override the issues he addressed in his previous posts about SSBF in ISOs 19 and 42?
ISO 56 – Another argument that Furc’s posts have been useful in ‘a number of ways’. No explanation of what a single way is.
ISO 57 – Responds to Trig’s questions about his inconsistent views on Hydra’s with a pic and a statement to not impugn his honor.
ISO 58 – Votes once again for Seacore. With the same reasoning (hint .. it’s rhetoric).
ISO 61 – Bemoans that SSBF calls him one of a group of potential scum on SSBF’s replace-out.
ISO 62 – ‘I don’t know the rules regarding Cult kills. See, I’m totally Town’
ISO 65 – Asks for claims against him to be substantiated.
ISO 66 – Buddies up to NoPoint saying his posts (even thought he made only one) drip Town.
ISO 67 – Show me the quotes I’m ignoring because I’m Lazy Town. Believe me!!!
ISO 70 – 10 point defense of self post that is wrapped in OMGUS and WIFOM.
ISO 71 – Buddies up to Trilobyte
ISO 72 – Everyone who attacks me is Scum!!! (Isn’t that one of Seacore’s sins?) And what happened to Benmage being cult?
So we have a ton of buddying, lots of rhetoric and OMGUS trying to pass itself off as scum-hunting and a good amount of deflecting of suspicion. I’m happy with my vote at the moment.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.