I think we either have a large scum group and some small third parties (in which case I'd put the figure of scum at 8 and the third parties at 2), or two middling scum groups (in which case I'd say 5 each).Albert B. Rampage 56 wrote:Setup speculation time...how many scum do you think there are?
But the Old Ones are the keeewwwwwlest!Mina 65 wrote:(Right now, I'd guess that it wouldn't be such a great idea to worship the Old Ones.)
(Actually, the Norse Gods are pretty great too.)
The Norse Gods.Elscouta 71 wrote:If you had to worship one group, now, which one would it be? (don't explain why, just give one)
I find it very hard to believe that you have read the thread enough to have a working scumdar, but not enough to have recognised the voting shenanigans. Weaksauce.rajrhcpfreak 78 wrote:there is a couple of people i already see rising on my scumdar but someone not helping at all and selfvoting is someone that needs to be removed asap.
Vote: Percy
In theory, we could tabulate who falls under the "benefits if X is worshipped", and select the group that has the most townie-looking people in it to worship. Otherwise, we either (1) Ignore the worship mechanic (bad idea), (2) Worship at random / in secret (also bad idea) or (3) Worship a group of gods to give a specific player the worship benefit, risking a boost to scum as well.SaintKerrigan 94 wrote:Also, I'm fail to see the relevance (if any) of info gained from stating who we'd worship right this moment. Could someone in favor of that plan explain it to me?
Locking scum into claims now is also a good idea wrt the worship mechanic.
Fate wrote:ABR is town, btw.
Funny you should mention that; I'm of the opposite opinion. I'veIecerint 99 wrote:I considered Mina to be rolefishing. I think rolefishing is almost always scummy, and I have no reason to believe that this is an exception.
never
seen scum rolefish. I've accused others
of rolefishing, but I've now realised (embarrassingly enough) that I only do this when I'm scum. If you have some evidence to back up your position, I'd be very happy to read it.Not really, not without more information. I'm guessing it's a "you appoint me and then I claim" kinda deal, though. I think in games where the town know very little, combined with unusual mechanics, spells disaster if scum is appointed a leader. My first game as scum was with you in , and we exploited the mechanics of the game so very hard and looked like we were town the whole way.Albert B. Rampage wrote:Do you guys trust me?
Will you appoint me your chief, citizens?
But it seems like you're going to help us out without going all Mufasa on us, so why do you need to be chief again?
Super town points for SpyreX for stating this. If he was scum, it makes much more sense to claim that he doesn't know whether it applies to actions as well as votes, and tell his scumfaction the real deal in private. Every town PR can now target who they want to target and have no excuse to claim confusion tomorrow.SpyreX wrote:ALL actions (yea, this may help the scum not screw up but the net result depending could be worse).
Hold on, when someone says "Great Old Ones" I think Cthulhu, Hastur, Ythogtha et al. from the Lovecraft mythos, but the "Endless" are from Gaiman's
Sandman
. @SpyreX
: If we want some time with Delight, do we worship "Great Old Ones" or "The Endless"?OK, I'm up to post 135 and need to get some work done today. I'll be back later to deal with the rest of the thread.