(Yes, this sucks at humor value, but I couldn't think of anything else.)
In other news, I know some folks here. 'Sup, folks I know?
I random voted you. I then realized that the vote count was screwy so I corrected my vote so it was on the person it was supposed to be on.rajrhcpfreak wrote:crap i skimmed over those pages not understanding the vote count.
ignore me chastizing plum.
SaintKerrigan random voted then for some reason when he found out the mechanic he unvoted to revote for me. somthing feels weird, its no longer random its intentional. do you have a problem with random voting Iecerint?
ill keep my vote on Saint. he was second on my list anyways.
Yeah. I don't see how it helps town, but it helps scum by giving them an idea of how the town is likely to worship vote, which they can plan for accordingly.Fate wrote:Any reason not to?
1. That,Fate wrote:Let's say a majority of people say they will vote for Egypt. Then the next day Norse Gods have the majority.
We know:
1. People lied about their targets
2. People had a reason to lie about said targets
3. Worshiping a particular group has some win-condition related motive.
We would then know (townies who were truthing) to avoid voting for Norse Gods because of what happened.
Communist Russia forced its people to share with the town. Look what happened to them.Fate wrote:You're reluctance to share with the town is noted.
Yeah. I don't see how it helps town, but it helps scum by giving them an idea of how the town is likely to worship vote, which they can plan for accordingly.Fate wrote:Any reason not to?
1. That,Fate wrote:Let's say a majority of people say they will vote for Egypt. Then the next day Norse Gods have the majority.
We know:
1. People lied about their targets
2. People had a reason to lie about said targets
3. Worshiping a particular group has some win-condition related motive.
We would then know (townies who were truthing) to avoid voting for Norse Gods because of what happened.
Communist Russia forced its people to share with the town. Look what happened to them.Fate wrote:You're reluctance to share with the town is noted.
Yeah. I don't see how it helps town, but it helps scum by giving them an idea of how the town is likely to worship vote, which they can plan for accordingly.Fate wrote:Any reason not to?
1. That,Fate wrote:Let's say a majority of people say they will vote for Egypt. Then the next day Norse Gods have the majority.
We know:
1. People lied about their targets
2. People had a reason to lie about said targets
3. Worshiping a particular group has some win-condition related motive.
We would then know (townies who were truthing) to avoid voting for Norse Gods because of what happened.
Communist Russia forced its people to share with the town. Look what happened to them.Fate wrote:You're reluctance to share with the town is noted.
Actually, thinking about it harder, there's probably two scum groups, with four each, as well as two third-party roles. I say two scum groups because otherwise the worship mechanic would be easily abused by everyone on the same scumteam worshiping the gods that benefit them the most. Two third party because in a game this size, why not?Albert B. Rampage wrote:7-9 is multiple answers. I asked for one precise answer. Follow instructions.
And give scum an even better idea of where the worship votes will go?Faraday wrote:Well I'm sure those people would come forward then and explain why they did so?
That's one possibility. Who knows what kind of roles scum have out there?Faraday wrote:@ Sk ..and? What? If they've an idea where the votes are going..what does it do? They can try and swing the vote a certain way is your worry?
Har har. Actually, I don't see your hydra as scummy at the moment. Must be because of Papa Zito.Mighty Orbots wrote:I expect SaintKerrigan to find this post suspicious just because I'm the one making it and it's how he reacts to me.
Fate can actually get really ballsy as scum, so it's not out of the question. (Ongoing game, so can't directly reference it.)Mighty Orbots wrote:Fate's initial play is probably too ballsy for scum though I don't know his play well.
I see. But wouldn't telegraphing our every worship vote make it easier for people with worship wincons to try and sway worship votes in favor of their wincon?Fate wrote:To answer SK: I never said I knew there to be win cons related to worships, that was just speculation on my part and their possible existence is one reason to have worships out in the open.
If scum belong to one of the god factions, they get benefits from being part of the majority-worshiped god factions. They may be able to influence where worship votes go, whether through persuasion, role-related ability, or otherwise. The point is, we have no idea yet how scum can influence worship votes, and making it easier for them to know where worship votes are going just sounds like a recipe for disaster.DTMaster wrote:How? Unless scum is one of said factions, or they know who's on each faction. V.V. If anything, People who have specific worships want to coordinate the worship votes for a certain factions.
We don't know if that faction is town-aligned/scum-aligned. We don't know if a faction gains the majority they grant us massive powerups.
Heck the whole worship thing reads as multiple factions, but not necessarily multiple scum factions.
Who said I didn't like gods in general?DTMaster wrote:Do you hate the gods you mother fucker? You seem to like ABR's plan that hint heavily about the worships, but you don't like the gods in general.
1. Random votes are random votes. Seriously.rajrhcpfreak wrote:OMGUS or not his reasoning is fallible. lets go slowly for you to understand..
1. he first blames it on random vote. i do detest random votes but thats a losing battle.
2. what better way to random vote than to place a vote and it magicly moves it to another player.
3. apparently the random random vote isnt good enough for SK so he unvotes and rerandom votes.
This is either excessive OMGUS paranoia, or you're scum trying to drum up an early case.rajrhcpfreak wrote:now lets make some conclusions:
1. since his vote really isnt random then there is somthing behind his votes.
i can only conclude that he has some reason to vote for me, or he has a reason not to vote for Iecerint. i wont go into the the many WIFOM options that we can go from that, but in the end he is lying about his random vote.
Your argument is OMGUS. You're taking something insignificant and blowing it way out of proportion. Portraying your case as the victim of "unfair" OMGUS accusations doesn't suddenly improve it in any way.rajrhcpfreak wrote:is this OMGUS? well is it ok to attack a person that you know is innocent for intentially voting for them but hiding it as a random vote? yes as long as its not yourself aparently. is he scum? possibly. enough for me to call him out on it and give him a vote. its not like any of his votes have been pro town anyways.
i really hate that we get to a place in the game where we cant confront attackers without it being called OMGUS.
This is scummy. This is grovelling at its finest.rajrhcpfreak wrote:On worship, i dont care how we do it. i can vote any way, how ever the town requests, or make all my vote completely transparent.
Ok, now this is actually decent reasoning. I'm still concerned with possible ways scum could influence our worship votes, however.Percy wrote:In theory, we could tabulate who falls under the "benefits if X is worshipped", and select the group that has the most townie-looking people in it to worship. Otherwise, we either (1) Ignore the worship mechanic (bad idea), (2) Worship at random / in secret (also bad idea) or (3) Worship a group of gods to give a specific player the worship benefit, risking a boost to scum as well.
Locking scum into claims now is also a good idea wrt the worship mechanic.
Don't worry, suspects and stuffs are coming.Mina wrote:@SaintKerrigan and Elscouta: when you get back, I'd like to hear some suspects from you both. Most of your posts have been about the set-up. It's giving me trouble reading you.
Vote mechanics, dude.dramonic wrote:This is correct?Beholder wrote: 16 Snow_Bunny (1) - SpyreX, Nikator, Starbuck
17 Nikanor (2) -
18 Mina (3) - dramonic
19 SpyreX (0) -
20 Katy (0) -
Seriously Starbuck, voteless again?
Ok, let me put it this way: Spyrex is a deity role. If her worship faction gets the most worship votes, she gets a benefit to her role. It's reasonable to think that other deities, at least, experience something similar. So if scum have a means to influence worship votes, they will use it to empower their players as much as possible. The more they know about our worship votes, the more easily they can plan their strategy. I'd much rather prevent the scum from learning more info about our worship votes (and anything else in general) than is necessary.DTMaster wrote:2.I don't buy this simply because, we don't know what the gods do. Yes they (scum) could be a god faction (or all the gods are scum or something), no we don't know that. If we all worship to the gods of day vigs, we all might become day vigs. But do we really know that? I donno. Would it be cool, yes!.SK wrote:If scum belong to one of the god factions, they get benefits from being part of the majority-worshiped god factions. They may be able to influence where worship votes go, whether through persuasion, role-related ability, or otherwise. The point is, we have no idea yet how scum can influence worship votes, and making it easier for them to know where worship votes are going just sounds like a recipe for disaster.
I expect healthy doses of criticism and paranoia of the worship votes, but if we can use it to confirm an entire faction as town, then we should use the mechanic. It exists for a reason and I expect there to be some resemblance of balance in it.
Posts like these read as scum paranoid of the unknown, rather town, skeptical of the unknown. Squelching potential powerups is a priority for the former.
And what's to say there isn't a scum ability to change people's worship votes? Immediate mislynches, and we might not even know it until the day after (or whenever true roles are revealed).Ooba wrote:How about this - we get the scummiest people (say 4-5) to declare their worship votes beforehand in the thread .. I say we should lynch them if we find out they've deviated from it.
You're not least scummiest overall, you're just currently sitting at the bottom of my suspect list. As for why you're down there, I've got other people piquing my interest more than you at the moment.Fate wrote:2. What made me go from vote worthy to least scummiest, especially with the revelation of my scum-balls?
You simply can't be first in everything, including scumlists.Fate wrote:Did Iecrint just abandon his vote on Scummy McFatepants for a META wagon?
Awwwwww HELLLLL NAW
Fate wrote:Satisfactory answer. I would've asked you in our QT but then it wouldn't have been as an effective distancing vote.
Elscouta wrote:Btw, MO wagon is a good one. I have heard they will give cookies to everyone on it.
Cookies are scummy, biyatch!Nikanor wrote:SaintKerrigan, what do we say about people who give out cookies for lynches?
...because?Faraday wrote:Saintkerrigan is a decent chance for scum too.
What? Specificity is good, man.Manho wrote:"he" can be anyone. it can be you telling me who you will worship, or abr telling me who abr will worship, etc.
Ugh, I feel for ya. Had a similar experience myself a long while back.Kairyuu wrote:That . . . could have gone better. Got the job, then found out I'd be one of those people who go door to door begging for money, then had the person training me get into an argument with someone about property boundries (he wanted us to leave, my supervisor decided to act like a child and not move 10 feet) which resulted in the cops being called. So I quit halfway through my first day. THE SEARCH CONTINUES.
How is this scummy? It's still early in the game, and I wanted to question Fate on it just as well as Ice.DTMaster wrote:SaintKerrigan wrote:Unvote: rajrhcpfreak.
Vote: Dramonic. (Fate)
What's with all the OMGUS?
@ Plum: Serious vote for me or no?
SK posted this after Ice attacked Fate for this already. This is more of a scummy piggy back then Ortolan.
SpyreX wrote:What is a lynch rolecop?
Da Rulez wrote:<2> Lynch Reveals: When a player is lynched, immediately after the Lynch Count is reached the lynched player will be targeted by a mod-confirmed SANE role cop investigation and a mod-confirmed SANE alignment cop investigation with the results being revealed before the night phase. After the Night Phase the lynched player will be killed and their mod-confirmed true alignment and role name will be revealed during the Daybreak.
You made no mention of not understanding the mechanic at or before the time of the statement in question. And it definitely looks like grovelling.rajrhcpfreak wrote:1st: are you serious? just because i have no clue what the mechanic does and i want to help the town im grovelling?
I've already explained myself. There is no hypocrisy in what I did. And now you're trying to bring in lame support for your "hypocrisy" argument. You're really trying to shove this case of yours down my throat, aren't you?rajrhcpfreak wrote:2nd: YOUR VOTE ISNT RANDOM IF YOU REALLY CARE WHERE IT SHOULD BE!! DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THE HYPROCRY IN THIS STATEMENT!!! and i would be doing this if it wasnt a vote on me. ask any of the people ive played with before.
Well, because of my speculation I currently don't plan on voting for Fate, despite him being quite scummy. If he's third party and can't hurt the town with his role, it's much better for us to leave him alone, at least initially. I'm also against a Fate wagon for the same reason, and if one pops up that'll be my argument against it.Plum wrote:Speculation: Fate is just a special little fruitcake in general. Jester speculation is not helpful at this stage of the game. Not sure right now what to make of you for this speculation but want to keep it in mind. Open mental note, as it were.
1. So that's why you're deliberately making remarks like "I win when the good guys are gone" and "I would've asked in our QT but it wouldn't have been as effect a distancing vote." Because you were trying toFate wrote:Speculation: Fate is special but definitely NOT a fruitcake. He may also be avoiding a nightkill/lynch by being worthlessly scummy as to make it to endgame for once in god damn large theme career.
I don't know why SK thinks I would vote him just for speculating I'm a day/Night Jester(latter is an awesome idea btw) of some sorts, but I'd hate to disappoint.
Because the first vote was a joke vote. Near the end of my post I put my vote back on someone I actually thought was scummy.Totallynotmafia wrote:@SK: Why would you vote, unvote, and vote again in the same post? What is the purpose of that?
Did you even read Spyrex's post where he talks about his role/abilities? In either event, why is this scummy?Ooba wrote:- This is all you get about the worship benefits in the OP : “Generally more worship is a good thing for the group receiving it. “
Your first example is me thinking Fate had knowledge about worship wincons and trying to pry the info out of him. The second one was in response to Fate's speculation about worship wincons. Fail.Ooba wrote:- SK has twice talked about the worship wincon - 104, 271. IMO it’s a slip.
I was about to tell you to go to hell, but my reply to Percy actually made me do a total mind shift.Ooba wrote:- (Mina\Iece), SK, CMAR, MO, Parama, ortolan declare their worship targets in the thread. Lynch them if they've deviated from it.
Actually, this is a good point. If we know where everyone's votes have gone today and we get deviations from that, it may hint as to whether or not worship vote manipulation is in play. Okay, I'll go for this.Percy wrote:The alternative is to not talk about worshipping, and have worship be effectively at random, I think, unless you are proposing a different alternative. Whilst it's true that not talking about worship prevents scum manipulation, I think it's better to try and look for scum manipulation than randomly empower particular pantheons.
I'm doing this mostly to see if scum have the ability to change worship votes. If people all say who they're going to worship and the percentages/ABR's worship vote chart say people did otherwise, we either have liars or people who can change worship votes. It'll give us info to work with.DTMaster wrote:1. Question: How does deviating from a god faction find scum? I don't see why scum would lie about their worshiping, especially with the ambiguous nature of the 4 listed now. It doesn't mean that 1 god faction is scum. Also see my Albert 2.
At least your posting frequency is higher than Monks and Masons, so you've got that going for ya.Nikanor wrote:P.S. People are ignoring me because a) I'm town, and b) The cases against me are so weak as to be not worth addressing.
Why didn't you bother to check and see who actually wrote this?Faraday wrote:Nik, I think wrote: I have a feeling that ungod aligned people didn't worship last night (As I claimed), which brought the even split.
I explained it earlier. And it is relevant because if he is a jester or some other third party role then we have to treat him differently than scum.Faraday wrote:Jester speculation is stupid, SK. Since it doesn't end the game you might as well lynch scummy people if not you let scum get away with murder. I don't really understand why you think Fate is a jester in the first place, Sk but yeah.
If true the info would be on a living player. We'll still get the real flip, but not until at least a day later.Faraday wrote:Just saw this cos Plum quoted it, this would be bad, but I don't think so. That'd mean it'd take place on an already alive player wouldn't it? I'm kinda hoping this isn't the case cos well playing without any flips sucks.
My answer be summed up by saying MO did not actually think I was scummy at that time. If you make me I'll go find the post where he said it.DarkStalker wrote:"RVS but you don't vote SK who you call scummy? Yes. Good job on the backtrack. Nice job. Voting for the RVS over your scummy read."
It seems DT has indeed pointed out your tar correction vote there was outside random and on someone you ndidn't think was scum when you really had a scum read elsewhere. Mo was not putting his vote where his mouth was which he complained about when yelling at DT in the first place which i find highly hypocritical. Yay I really want to vote Mighty orbits for this and if Iec's response to my early comments are good enough in terms of they make me lessen my earlier suspicions of him in favor of MO being worse at holding back a vote from Mo's main suspicions then i will move from Iec to voting Mighty Orbits. Until i decide to move vote or not Will def
Nope. Actually, this quote looks more suspicious. DTM at least mostly avoids looking opportunistic.Parama wrote:Guys DTM is just looking for any excuse to find someone suspicious, do you really not see this?
Buuuuuuuuuulllllllllshiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit. You're reaching here. Minus points for you.Iecerint wrote:OK, so, here'sthe other infodump:
Someone posted anonymously in our QT shortly after it opened under the name "Sky." He asked which of the players in the QT had a specific rolename, and he told us that we shouldn't worship ABR. I said we shouldn't give information like that because we weren't certain town, and (because I suspected him specifically for his behavior) asked who he was; he responded by repeating my text back to me. Then Kinetic posted in the QT indicating that we could not post anonymously. He has not returned since then.
(This is the "Mystery Man" I was talking about earlier.)
Because Sky refused to reveal himself and jumped into the QT early with explicit rolefishing and all that, I was suspicious of him; so, based on the times when Sky posted in our QT, I came up with a shortlist of 6 likely suspects using msutils. My random vote (dram) reflects one of the 6 original suspects. I've reduced the list to 4 by now.
OK, fast forward to ABR's dramatic appearance:Albert B. Rampage wrote: Hello SK. I have something for you up there comrade.When I saw these crumbs, they reminded me of Sky, but ABR wasn't on my shortlist of Sky suspects. But it looked to me like ABR might be something similar to him because of the "up there" flavor of the crumb. So I added ABR to my list, but mostly wanted to keep watching to evaluate what was going on.Albert B. Rampage wrote: Fate, I have an inquiry for you up there as well.Bold not added, so another crumb from ABR, but this one makes him look like someone different from Sky ("shadow" flavor). Also, Sky's stipulation that we shouldn't worship ABR would work if they knew one another's roles and were opposed in some way.Albert B. Rampage wrote:I am deliberating whether I want to stay in theshadowsthis game...
I tried crumbing back to ABR to see if he was Sky, after all:Bold added. But he didn't respond, so I stuck with my ABR/Sky dichotomy.Iecerint wrote:Hmm. So I guess you're saying you're also delirium-immune? Like you're justway aboveall these fancy vote mechanics?
Factor in that ABR has shown (IMO) disproportionate antagonism toward my perceived faction claim, and I came up with the following hypothesis:
ABR and Sky are 3rd party players who are each associated with specific factions. One of ABR's is GOO, one of Sky's is the Norse gods. Their win condition involves their associated faction(s) "beating" the opposing faction(s) in some way (whether by eliminating them, or by getting more worship than them, or some combination).
This is an expanded version of the "Universe A" I mentioned in the last infodump. I think this is more likely than Sky and ABR being opposing scum faction leaders ala WoT because the fact that they appear to know one another's roles would be difficult to balance.
(There's also still one more QT poster who has yet to explicitly deny that s/he was Sky. I think Kinetic wouldn't allow that kind of lie, since anonymous QT posting is apparently illegal for us, and that kind of lie would reinforce the anonymity of the posting. So I'd like for him or her to do as much in the QT ASAP. His or her failure to do as much is already evident to anyone with access to our QT, so it's not as if this is much of an extra risk to him or her. If s/he feels otherwise, s/he should indicate why/that s/he does not intend to do so.)
More minus points for you for keeping this alive.Iecerint wrote:Well, we know now that ABR knows Sky and Sky knows ABR, and that they appear to be opposed. So that all fits with the 3rd party angle.
We also know that ABR crumbed to Fate and SK. So that also fits.
If Sky crumbed in other QTs, that would finish with the parallelism.
Last I checked, Nik was still holding on to his worship vote. Unless Nik's lying (and it's possible), your kicking up dust with that side. Maybe you've got something with DTM.Fate wrote:DTM you can dance all the fuck you want around it but the FACT of the matter is you and Nikanor made some limp dick worship votes EARLY. WAY TOO EARLY.
This soundsKaty wrote:Nikanor shouldn't have been voting for Mina JUST to get some sort of magical information, he should vote for her because he thinks she's scum.
Dear god. I suspect Ort too, but this is justChronopie wrote:(ort)Unvote, Vote: CMAR
baa.
Explain. Particularly the part in parentheses.Chronopie wrote:Fate, you know that I'm perfectly willing to follow your plays, except when I'm scum
(then I'm more likely to NK you)
Psst! I'm not voting Fate because I think he's third party trying to off himself for an ability or wincon or something similar. Also, I've been doing a lot more than talking about worship vote stuff, and I've even dropped the matter. Pay attention, plz.Mighty Orbits wrote:SaintKerrigan's Post 488 raises alarms for me (he apparently thinks that Fate looks scummy but won't be interested in voting for him) and he's spent a huge portion of his effort focused on how worship votes work compared to scumhunting
What about this part of your case?Ooba wrote:- SK is right when he says he was only responding to Fate. I retract my wincon slip case on SK.
Ooba wrote: This is all you get about the worship benefits in the OP : “Generally more worship is a good thing for the group receiving it. “
I know you moved me to neutral, but I'd still like an answer to this, please.SaintKerrigan wrote:Did you even read Spyrex's post where he talks about his role/abilities? In either event, why is this scummy?
You know, it's been a while. Refresh my mind on why I'm scum.Fatality wrote:SK, CMAR, Dramonic, etc. are scum as well, we get to them tomorrow.
1. Because I felt like it. *burp*Fatality wrote:ALL THESE EGYPT+CHRISTIAN WORSHIPS MADE BY LESS THAN STELLAR NAMES MAKE ME ITCH. TELL ME WHY YOU DID NOT WORSHIP OLD GODS TO FLIP SPY INTO SOMETHING AWESOME.
Yeah I'll be voting Old Godsx2
Eh? Why?Albatross wrote:I would also prefer if people don't worship the judea-christians.
Or you're off on your guesses/was pulling stuff out of your ass in the first place. Going dooooooown...Icerink wrote:I wonder if I should ask ABR to state who Sky is. If he fails to name someone on my list, that would mean he was just bluffing. It may also mean that he had been trying to support the theory that he was 3rd party.
Going towards scummy fast, because you're trying to use it to justify ABR = Sky = scum, when your whole theory is ridiculous and phony. The fact that you are trying to keep it alive is not helping you out...nor is your willingness to lynch CMAR. (Hint: His behavior does not make him scum at all.)Iecerint wrote:Do you think my interpretation of ABR and Sky is scummy, or just reaching? Because it sounds like the former, which I need you to explain to me.
Riiiiight...Parama wrote:Opportunistic I am not. Finding the actual scums amongst gigantic walls of text I am.
You certainly are doing more than other people here. I retract the point.Starbuck wrote:I feel that I have been when I can respond and be caught up.
I apologize if it's not up to snuff for you, but at least I put in the effort to be caught up on all my games.
For what group?Snow_Bunny wrote:I'll be sending my worship vote now, as well.
I never said I'd never be willing to lynch Fate. I'm just not going to do it on D1, especially when there's better fish to fry.Mighty Orbots wrote:@SaintKerrigan, I'll start with the more important thing. There's no way that you should hold off voting for someone you find scummy in a large game because you're worried that they've got some role where getting lynched helps them. It's just not going to happen enough to be worthwhile and it's much better to try to lynch people that you think are acting scummy. I strongly suggest you drop that line of reluctance to lynch.
I was doing a fair amount of scumhunting before your post. Just because I talk a bunch about worship stuff doesn't mean I'm also not scumhunting.Mighty Orbots wrote:As for your focus on the worship votes, I didn't say you weren't looking at anything else, you are. In fact, since I made my post you've been pretty good at looking at other things. Prior to my post though you had at least as much talk about the worship dynamic as any scum hunting. You also clearly hadn't dropped it when I made that post as the last post you had prior to that was Post 538 which I'd hardly call having dropped the topic. I do pay some attention to what happens in these games.
It's something to keep an eye on. But since it's not in the rules, it's less likely to happen that way.Mighty Orbots wrote:Regarding DTMaster and his claimed post restriction, he was the one that said that he'd have the post restriction confirmed with his first infraction. That clearly hasn't happened. Dropping details like that lets scum get away with things that I'd rather not let them get away with. In this case there are enough reasons not to be putting direct pressure on him that I'm not planning to but it's not something which should be ignored in the long run.
No, he reads like a person who's behind in a high-post game and is having a hell of a time keeping up. I know what that's like. I'd link you, but it's an ongoing game.DTMaster wrote:@SK
I'm curious now. I called CMAR out on active lurking. That's not a justifiable reason for my vote? Wut? A large part of the Ortlan case is this very argument, as Fate said.
In fact, I caught you out on this in Fire and Ice. Yes I just used a meta argument of you to impose on CMAR and Ort, but since when did: CMAR blatantly posting in other games after his "I'll catch up post" become a null-tell for any person?