Syke, Star: Cut down the text. It's bad when I'm already starting to skim some of your "points".
For fake-scumhunting.
is loltastic too. Hey, I've never won more than 100 bucks playing pull-tabs. That means it'll never happen! (if you missed the point, that's a completely fallacious argument and does not pertain to your alignment now).DocPotter wrote:I DocPotter have yet to receive a scum role at all, in any game.
I've replaced into games into scummy spots hoping to get one but no luck.
I was trying to figure out how much experience you really had with experiencing scum flailing vs. town flailing with a join date that's basically 2 months old.Parama wrote:Wasn't sure about it when the wagon was first forming but his reactions reek of scum.
You know, I was curious about this as well and I looked back. As far as I can tell, syke believes Anon to be skilled; and would be scary if Anon were scum.sykedoc wrote:I've already stated my reasons in many previous posts. Please go look for it as I shouldn't need to restate my reasons.Anon wrote:Sykedoc, why am I scum again?
I like dares.parama wrote:I have no excuse for my vote on wolf. I misread his posts :/ Go ahead, lynch me for it. I dare you.
1) This doesn't make sense as any combination of the two beyond town-town or scum-scum; and the former (t-t) only if they trusted each other; which obviously isn't the case. Coaching doesn't work unless you can be fairly certain (or know) the other persons alignment and can trust their judgement.Bogre wrote:[1]I'm actually leaning more towards the thought that Docpotter was being easy towards mislynch, or possibly coaching Syke, in their connection.
[2]I've been debating this for a bit: Syke's case was based on a lot of meta, but he seemed to fulfill that meta case to my thoughts that he was playing similarly to what he had done before, despite claims to the contrary. [3]It's my opinion that it's escalation beyond the initial meta(which is meta and less worthwhile to begin with), without much reason.
Vote Docpotter
Bolding and italics are mine.Bogre wrote:In essence, since you seem to have misunderstood me:The -only- redeeming factor of the case on him was that he, at the beginning of this game, claimed to be playing differentlybut thathe seemed, to me at least, to be playing exactly the same.I'm not supporting that case.
Plus, Amished, wtf are you talking about? Why would he want to replicate said meta if thecase on him was that he was playing -too- his meta and that he was scum in the other game?
So you're giving somebody that you barely talked about more scumpoints than somebody that you are1. Not giving him a positive evaluation. Giving him a 'Docpotter seems more likely scum' evaluation.
"implicating" for bringing up meta.I'm not fucking redeeming him for bringing up his meta, I'm -implicating- him.
In the first paragraph, you attribute all of Doc's scumminess to coaching (which I've already explained why that doesn't make sense).Bogre wrote:I'm actually leaning more towards the thought that Docpotter was being easy towards mislynch, or possibly coaching Syke, in their connection.
I've been debating this for a bit: Syke's case was based on a lot of meta, but he seemed to fulfill that meta case to my thoughts that he was playing similarly to what he had done before, despite claims to the contrary. It's my opinion that it's escalation beyond the initial meta(which is meta and less worthwhile to begin with), without much reason.
Vote Docpotter
This is your 604. I separated it into sentences so you can see what I'm saying (well, moreso that everyone else can see that you're scum, but whatever).Bogre wrote:I've been debating this for a bit:
Syke's case was based on a lot of meta, but he seemed to fulfill that meta case to my thoughts that he was playing similarly to what he had done before, despite claims to the contrary.
It's my opinion that it's escalation beyond the initial meta(which is meta and less worthwhile to begin with), without much reason.
Apparently you believe more in meta than you stated. You thought that he was playing to the meta that he brought up; and was scum in the game? I didn't even look at any of the meta case as it's all bullshit, tbqh; so I didn't realize his role in any game that he's played in before. This could be you misunderstanding me where I meant that if Syke was aware of his meta as it appears he is, he can play to whatever meta he would like to so that he can appear whatever he wants to be.Bogre in 609 wrote: Plus, Amished, wtf are you talking about? Why would he want to replicate said meta if the case on him was that he was playing -too- his meta and that he was scum in the other game? (sic)