R-SURVIVAL -- Game Over

Parama · Post Post #53 (isolation #0) » Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:17 pm

GAT: nachomamma8

Parama · Post Post #54 (isolation #1) » Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:17 pm

GAT: nachomamma8

Parama · Post Post #60 (isolation #2) » Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:46 pm

The safe zone just seems like a way for mafia to keep other scum from getting dayvigged. If we vote scum as the Gatekeeper then they'll likely move all their scumbuddies into the safe zone. And the safe zone doesn't protect from NKs or lynches, so it doesn't block any mafia actions.
Randomly voting the gatekeeper is risky but since it does reduce the amount of time the scum get to talk pre-game it's the best option right now. I know it's too early to be doubting other players but for all we know Cobalt's "random" vote might not be random at all :/

And I am taking this game WAY too seriously atm. Geez, me, this is too early to be doing all this speculation!

Parama · Post Post #101 (isolation #3) » Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm

Hmm, random though I had:
From the rules, I'm taking that only each individual in the safezone knows whether or not they're in the safezone, so the GAT could be secretly escorting mafia scumbuddies into the safezone.
If we don't want to use the safezone, or have it used by scum, wouldn't eliminating the GAT D1 (by dayvig or by lynch) and then not voting another one be the opportune way to eliminate it from play? (thus by voting in Nacho as GAT we've basically assured his death... sorry Nacho

)
I know it could be a risky move, possibly sacrificing a townie... but if we really want to be sure the safezone isn't used, this seems like the only fool-proof way.

Parama · Post Post #119 (isolation #4) » Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:24 pm

bird1111 wrote:
Parama wrote:Hmm, random though I had:
From the rules, I'm taking that only each individual in the safezone knows whether or not they're in the safezone, so the GAT could be secretly escorting mafia scumbuddies into the safezone.
If we don't want to use the safezone, or have it used by scum, wouldn't eliminating the GAT D1 (by dayvig or by lynch) and then not voting another one be the opportune way to eliminate it from play? (thus by voting in Nacho as GAT we've basically assured his death... sorry Nacho )
I know it could be a risky move, possibly sacrificing a townie... but if we really want to be sure the safezone isn't used, this seems like the only fool-proof way.
What gives you that impression?

If you are right, daykilling Nachomamma8 is probably for the best whether scum or town to lessen his ability to protect scumbuddies.

I get that impression from this particular line in the first post of the thread:

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
If your target is inside the safezone, a random pro-town player will die inside the safezone instead.

It implies that at the very least, mafia won't know who's inside the safezone. At least the way I read it... the mafia don't know if their target is in the safezone or not, else it would be pretty pointless to target someone in the safezone... or at the very least it would lower their chance of NKing their target. I'm not sure about it but it's just the way I see it.

Parama · Post Post #153 (isolation #5) » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:11 am

Ellibereth wrote:Parama is lurking.

Yeah, I'll admit I haven't been paying too much attention to this game :/ Though honestly there hasn't been much scumhunting going on, just a lot of speculation (partly my fault <.<)

Parama · Post Post #205 (isolation #6) » Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:12 am

The way you asked the question and responded to people's (over)reactions makes me believe it wasn't deliberate.

Parama · Post Post #210 (isolation #7) » Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:39 am

Nachomamma8 wrote:
yabbaguy wrote:Read the wiki, Anon.

Actually- I think semiopen is the wrong word, this is really closed, despite some sample [effective] vanilla and goon PMs being shown. But w/e.

The polls are certifiably useless- but I think semioldguy might've taken it a notch too far, although I think he's town. Emotional excitement happens sometimes, not always for good, but it happens.

Orto's not fishing either, also. But enough of this poll malarkey, it's pissing me off.
So ya. We've discovered polls suck and this setup may/may not be open, semiopen, or closed. So where do we go from here?

I think from here we should stop speculating and lynch us some scum.

Parama · Post Post #211 (isolation #8) » Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:40 am

EBWOP: That was directed at everyone, not just Nacho.

Parama · Post Post #223 (isolation #9) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:29 am

Cobalt wrote:hey don't vig me, I'm working on a PBPA of parama. that's why I've been less active. expect it later today.

Why exactly me in particular? Just wondering.

Parama · Post Post #240 (isolation #10) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:50 am

Wow, way to kill me while I'm sleeping. Bah. Go town!

Parama · Post Post #659 (isolation #11) » Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:34 pm

I was the first person killed and then I kept up with the game
and actually got the thread opened for you guys once
I take no blame because I didn't get to shoot anyone.

Daykill: Albert B. Rampage

Now I am satisfied.