Allow me to eludicate:
Data is not the right lynch (could be SK, whateves)
LLama is townTM
Zaz is bussing X.
I get all giddy when I get to hammer.
Which leads us to:
Vote: X_~
I think its funny looking at the yin versus the yang. I found it that much more likely BECAUSE it was so heavy and early on, really, not a lot.I'm not sure about Zaz. If he was bussing X, then he was doing it DAMN heavily, and right from the moment he replaced in, which just doesn't makes sense to me.
To take a page from the gospel of DGB - who am I to stand in the way of a good bus?Zaz wrote:SpyreX, please explain why you voted X_~.
Not to mention the whole tri-way bussing going on (which, I think makes X a genius versus a crazy) - after looking at that no way would I have thought cat was scum as well. So, sacrifice one to make the others look good in a classic yin-yang is p sweet.X wrote:
I'm at L-1...q-q
But I can still help.
Well, I suggest looking at who voting me by agreeing on what someone else said. That's a scumtell.
Who made attacks but didn't follow through.
I have no idea what my alliance is since my pm was messed up and it was "lost". I supposed to be helped by you guys in figuring out my alliance T_T
I hope my alliance get announced once I am lynched so at least you guys have information to work with.
I started this game very enthuasiastic, but am not used to this pace. Been having problems irl so I am really busy. Everything is starting to get sorted out though.
I think my lynching will help the town far more than me staying alive.
GO TOWN!!!
Go ahead and make it in a nice single spot (which is phase one of my issues with it) and I'll show you the major issues.Zaz wrote:Please point out why you saw it as weak.
Also, if you saw a case I've supported as stronger than the X_~ case, which is it and why?
I have a qualifier in my wincon that makes it clear I'llZaz wrote: Can you elaborate on this?
Welll, its either 4 or more or 2-2 split without flavor differentiation unless you're telling me LF was a town kill.Zaz wrote:SpyreX, when looking at your posts, it seems you have the impression there are 4 mafia members. If so, how come?
MAY not be the way to go. We have a vig shot. THAT should be aiming for cult. If we hit the leader then you're dead to rights.Zaz wrote: Also, SpyreX, if you think I'm not the way to go, why do you still have your vote on me?
Because, you didn't? As that whole wagon went up you were just poking at the lynch. I really don't want to have to go through the volley of posts to further eludicate this but if I have to I will when I have time.Zaz wrote:SpyreX, please tell me why you think X_~ mentioned me with this:x wrote:Who made attacks but didn't follow through.
You started out on X under the guise of "gut".SpyreX wrote:The big one is the "gut" then "reasons" THEN "more gut" with it - once the gut is held up by reasons jumping back to "gut" well.
You haven't had a strong case on anyone. You've been volley-posting with suspicions that you let simmer and then came back to the X as it gained momentum.SpyreX wrote: As for "stronger" - I never said you had a strong case on anyone. You used more WORDS for X than you did others but it doesn't change that they were all sniping bidness hiding this maneuver.
[quote"A few posts up"]I have a qualifier in my wincon that makes it clear I'llZaz wrote: Please paraphrase your wincon.
Keep on keepin' on.Zaz wrote: Also, my point was that it seems you're convinced that there are exactly 4 mafia members. Your response makes me think this even more as you stated a '2-2 split'. So how come?
I'm not convinced there are exactly 4. Far from it. I am convinced there is STILL mafia left which means either a split or at least 4.SpyreX wrote: Welll, its either4 or moreor 2-2 split without flavor differentiation unless you're telling me LF was a town kill.
I approve of this.Fishies wrote:The level of activity here is poor. We want a lynch today, and Zazie is not the right lynch.
It should be noted that if Spyrex is telling the truth (and if he's not there's no reason to think there's a cult), there was no culting night 1, so arguments which rely on people's play changing today are bad.
Yea I'm just making stuff up WOOSHzaz wrote: Look at this post. After you've done that, state the above again. If you can state it without admitting afterwards that it's not true, you didn't check the links.
My main suspicions came from those posts. Add then that he did everything he could to avoid them and lied about it as well. Then came some suspicions from posts he made later on. Between these suspicions, there are some bits of gut.
When someone beats you over the head with the fact they are the cop and then gets votes almost immediately it warrants notice. Considering he SAID he was a power role (and one comes to mind) I give double applaud to the pointed attempt to accuse me of rolefishing here.Zaz wrote:Why bring up that you think Whoot is a powerrole?
Again:Tjoe is probably scum.
Read him in iso. He doesn't vote untill like page 9, fos's X then follows up w/ a vote but gets off onto whoot for putting X @ L-1 (that's not scummy)
X where are you post (iso 32) looks like him trying to prod a scumbuddy to get active to avoid being lynched.
Today he votes whoot who was clearly making sure it was known he was a cop and votes me for no reason despite not really mentioning me before now.
This guys probably scum of some sort, not sure what.Most likely mafia, mebbe.
Seriously?
Oh whoot is the other person. He's town.
I'm never going to bank on the scum being that functionally slow (as in this case it would have required NOT READING WORDS).Not accusing you of rolefishing. I'm accusing you of pointing out who you think a powerrole is. In the offchance that scum didn't catch it, you revealed it. There's no reason in pointing it out unless there's a lot of suspicion on him that he may get lynched.