The Dark Goma Mafia: Massacre of the Cloth (Game Over)

dramonic · Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:13 pm

I'd much rather have you touch milk, unless your new ability involves killing him.

@PZ: Im still waiting on that case you know...

dramonic · Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:07 am

when they are touched, they can do their action. The night after, the touched is blocked. The night after, he can do his thing again.

amiright?

dramonic · Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:32 pm

1. Tons of useless throw-away posts/one liners.

You're one to talk

2. Lots of rolefishing and speculation.

Erm... no?

3. Consummate bandwagoner.

And that's scummy because...? You know, bandwagons are the main weapon of the town

In addition:

1. Voted Kise (iso 1) for his goofy intro. Backs off when nobody joins. Scum looking for an easy wagon.

Right, next time I claim impossible role I'll make sure to call out whoever votes me because it's scummy =_=

2. Jumped townie DeathNote

Like 6 other players. I'm hardly jumping everyone

3. Pushed a townie to suicide to "confirm he isn't mafia". (Iso 36) Then derided Jordan for lacking patience. (Iso 55)

First, having him suicide confirms he isn't mafia, second it allows us to build extra reads, according to how whoever he kills flip.

You called that pushing for a suicide? He has a killing power, kick-starting the development of the game is town. Also, we told him to wait.

**4. Called DGB (confirmed townie) antitown for voting Kublai Khan (confirmed scum) (Iso 56)**

DGB wrote:vote: Kublai Khan because I'm always happy to help bus'ing scum.

SHe'd have to be scum herself to bus, I called her out on it.

5. Calls Snow_Bunny newb town (Iso 61) after asking the bomb to blow her up (Iso 41) and then wants her dead (Iso 64) and then votes her (iso 145) and still wants her dead (iso 173)

Did I say I wanted her dead in ISO 61? Oh look, I did!

6. Lists Kublai Khan as neutral, the top choice of all scum partners (Iso 61)

Hey look, my read on you is neutral too! You must be scum!

7. Votes chamber for his joke post (iso 113). Backs off when nobody joined. See Kise

I believed he was serious

8. Terribad reason for voting Milkshake (jailkeep = scum since when?); drops not because he's wrong but because "you guys are unwilling to follow through" (iso 170)

I believe he's the strangler, it's a good enough reason for me. Also if nobody is willing to lynch him except me my vote serves no purpose on him. I think it's pretty general knowledge I think he's scum.

Answers are bolded.

dramonic · Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:36 am

I'm confused as to why my 2733 is supposedly lynch worthy. I'm simply nulling his case point by point. <_<

dramonic · Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:03 am

wouldnt be a big loss XP

dramonic · Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:30 am

LlamaFluff wrote: on the merit that he is not dramonic

If that's your reason you should ALL drop dead:lol:

dramonic · Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:31 am

VP Baltar wrote:care to come clean dram? Want to make changes to your claim?

Hmm? My claim is 100% legitimate.

The converters are not responsible for the death of the giver.

dramonic · Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:33 am

dramonic · Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:25 am

We really arent responsible for the giver's death. Heck, my PM really says I'm anti-violence :S

I really DO believe Milk is the strangler. investigate him or rolename him or touch him, but dont leave the villain alive!

dramonic · Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:29 am

hmm, outing buddies
KK, among others.

dramonic · Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:36 pm

Kise wrote:Awesome game, CKD. Dram being scum means I don't know my meta on him like I thought. Then again, he could have been hunting for rival scum (SK) so that's why I trusted him.

Honestly I REALLY thought I'd caught SKshake. Had he been lynched earlier, I'd have died for sure. However if he'd been the SK this game would've been a whole lot easier for converters ^_^;