You should know why.
Oh, btw, Paint is being stupid, so Ben the Mage is encountering technical difficulties.
Sorry; it's the program's fault your robe is turning purple when the box clearly shows I'm trying to color it dark blue v.v
Hey, 10% of the politicians give the other 90% a slightly better name.GIEFF 62 wrote:Saying "politicians are scummy" was a joke (they really ARE scummy in real life, yuk yuk)
tubby and me have an understanding. We know how to talk to each other. *secret gang signs go here*GIEFF 70 wrote:Vi, why is tubby asking you what to do?
I'm... not quite sure how IH said that, outside agreeing with you.Shanba 121 wrote:Going back to what IH said; how useful is it to have 6 or so people repeating the same point without even committing to a vote.
I gave two.E-Badger 147 wrote:you managed to imply I'm scummy and vote me without actually giving a specific reason,
Near surety?E-Badger 147 wrote:disparaged a valid line of questioning (as one option would imply IH is town, and the near surety the poisoner wasn't town means speculation is unlikely to help scum),
I'm presuming you mean that I called for an end to discussion with my vote?E-Badger 147 wrote:proposed a line of questioning then immediately passed it off,
It's the only tone I've got.E-Badger 147 wrote:and FINALLY managed to do so with an uncalled-for condescending tone.
What is the pragmatic difference betweenvollkan 212 wrote:Just FTR, Shanba said:Vi wrote:*You were part of the "doggy-pile" on BloodCovenant (agreeing with Shanba here)@both of you: What BC said was ambiguous in its meaning, and came on top of his strange response to my wifomery. As such, I can't see what is wrong, at this point in time, with a wagon on him. I would still be voting for him, had Haylen not amused me so.Shanba wrote: Nice little doggypile there guys. If you've all finished showing what a good townie you are by condemning BloodCovenent, that would be great. I have strong suspicion that that is not what he meant, but I'll keep mum for now.
vollkan 215 wrote:What are you referring to here?
vollkan 215 wrote:Youcriticised his involvement in the "doggy-pile".
Yes it is, actually, because you're completely missing the point of whatvollkan 215 wrote:It's therefore not at all tangential for me to question whether your attacks on the wagon are valid.
That would be me reading this:vollkan 215 wrote:Nothing I have said takes the view that BC is scummy "until I say he says otherwise".
If I'm taking this out of context or otherwise misconstruing your words, please tell me, although tbh it's not that big of a deal to me.vollkan 212 wrote:On BC, point 2): I am actually inclined to agree with you here (in terms of what I think is most likely), but he still hasn't clarified what he meant.GIEFF wrote:2. Said we shouldn't focus on what scum should or shouldn't do (I don't think this is scummy)
I commented on what was pertinent to the game, and tossed a few jokey things out since it was early enough in the game.tajo 220 wrote:Vi, why so "random stage" in 63? What do you think of GIEFF and BC?
That's So Random!tajo 118 wrote:Vi keeps being so "random stage" in 118.
Saying the same thing twice for posturing purposes?tajo 124 wrote:I dont like
1. BloodCovenent
13. Tubby216
18. Benmage
15. CuriousKarmaDog
Unvote Vote : Blood.
FOS: Tubby, Ben and CKD.
...Shanba 232 wrote:Anyway, to me it's pretty clear that no one is actually bothering to work out what BloodCovenent was actually saying there, and (here's a hint) it's not that we shouldn't scumhunt.
...tajo 233 wrote:Second,[ElectricBadger's]Vi vote is a lazy OMGUS.
Right, I see lots of people who got more meaning out of that than cicero's post count.GIEFF 318 wrote:I disagree completely. The statistics are plenty meaningful without my own conclusions.Vi wrote:@GIEFF: Do not post statistics without conclusions, or else they're meaningless.
Correct. However, I edited his chastisement out because he supplied conclusions in later posts.GIEFF 318 wrote:Why did you ignore cicero's statistics? He didn't make any conclusions either.
How often have you seen Benmage contribute ITT?GIEFF 318 wrote:Why did you ask Benmage (twice) why he was voting for me?
This statement, without significant qualifiers, isGIEFF 322 wrote:More information is always good for the town,
...saying things like...GIEFF 322 wrote:The number of characterssays moreabout activity and contribution than just the number of posts (especially for people like BC, tajo, and shanba).
Don't you know it's rude to fly around and buzz around other things that are going on?GIEFF 322 wrote:Don't you know it's rude to answer a question with a question?
GIEFF 322 wrote:There were many people who voted without any reasoning in the first two pages, and Benmage's vote for me looks completely random. Yet you picked it out of a crowd, questioned it twice, and are now voting for the same person - me.
So what I want to know is: were you questioning Benmage because it was me he was voting, or was there another reason you questioned his vote?
Yes.GIEFF 324 wrote:I agree way-long wall-posts are bad for the town. But you will not convince me that information such as number of posts/characters and voting histories are bad for the town. Are you trying to get me to stop providing this information?
TheGIEFF 324 wrote:And then EB did answer my question. What is your point?
Please read me in isolation and ask again if you need further help. Thank you.GIEFF 324 wrote:Don't you find EB scummy, too?
Once again. Please readGIEFF 324 wrote:When will you reveal your reasons for questioning Benmage?
On second thought, don't ask again. This hasn't been a good day and the next post I direct to you will probably include flaming.Vi 323 wrote:I have reasons for questioning Benmagethat are about as forthcoming as your reasons for voting ckd.
I have no read either way on tubby.GIEFF 325 wrote:Also Vi, what are your current thoughts on tubby? Thus far, you've asked him if he had anything of worth to post,said you had an understanding with him, told him not to coast, sympathized with his vote,attacked tajo after FOSing him,and attacked me after making a case on him.
I assume you think he's town?
*sweetly* How so?cicero 326 wrote:I agree with GiEFF not Vi. The character post was helpful.
Do you know what a "red herring" is?GIEFF 329 wrote:You're trying to get me to stop posting information that can only be of benefit to the town.
That's not what I said. Try again.GIEFF 329 wrote:You're trying to get me to stop being aggressive.
I can't say I read all of your posts. Let me give them a second look.GIEFF 329 wrote:You've read my points on tubby, and think they are null?
The first one is stretching it a little, but they're both good points.GIEFF #29 wrote: 1. Scum care about getting pressured, more so than townies, as their win condition is basically lynch-avoidance (but townies' win-condition also includes finding scum). Thus, scum like to pretend they do not care as much about pressure. In response to my pressure on him, tubby claimed he didn't care what anyone thought, yet he obviously does care.
2. Going back and giving a false reason for the Spyrex-unvote also has a scum-rationale. Tubby-scum wants to look like a good townie, scumhunting and hating the RVS. And so when asked about his unvote, he saw an opportunity to fabricate some reasons that he thought would give him town-poinst, i.e. saying "OK fellas, I'm done with that random stuff, time to get down to business!"
I've never seen that happen before...GIEFF 333 wrote:Oops. Your thoughts, Vi?tubby216 wrote:by that he means he is checking my scum meta agianst this game since we played that one and i was scum there,too
I think this is a good time to admit that I'm entirely in the wrong on this one.GIEFF 333 wrote:Yes, Vi, by accusing me of being antagonistic, you are telling me to stop being aggressive. I've done nothing antagonistic like attack people personally, so when you call me antagonistic, the only thing I can think that you are referring to is me calling out play that I find scummy.Vi wrote:That's not what I said. Try again.
If not that, what were you referring to?
And why did you accuse me of piggybacking without even having read all my posts?
WhyE-Badger 334 wrote:Vi: could you explain how post counts played out in that game so we could avoid it here?
The only thing you said in 255 that was worth posting was your read on ElectricBadger. Everything else was just awkwardly standing aboot and being about as irrelevant as you can get without saying literally nothing.SpyreX 355 wrote:What reads fake about my 255?
...which one would think would provide an indication of who is more likely scum and who is not.vollkan 358 wrote:The stats weren't meaningless at all. They don't lead to a conclusion as to who is scum versus who is town, but they certainly provide an indication as to who is actually contributing and who is not.
Okay, this cybersex joke is going a bit far.Haylen 342 wrote:Exactly.Crazy 341 wrote:Also, you asked the mod to prod yourself?
I'm sure there's an unnecessary joke to go with this, but I can't think of it offhand.Battle Mage 359 wrote:Again, apologies. I actually suck.
For what you were trying to do, that was clever.cicero 367 wrote:Well, I WAS thinking of imperiously attacking people for posting good information that encouraged contribution, coupled with antagonistically attacking people for being antagonising. But that shtick had been taken so it's back to the drawing board for me.Vi wrote:cicero, care to contribute with something more directly related to finding scum?
I'm willing to believe tajo's attack on ElectricBadger was based in a misunderstanding.GIEFF 368 wrote:A few pages ago, you said you really wanted a wagon on me or tajo. Why has Spyrex passed up tajo since then?
Go ahead and give names; I don't mind.GIEFF 368 wrote:I can't believe tubby was town. That's just insane. I thought this game was over, we busted tubby easy, and we got a lot of buddying wishy-washy half-defense stuff like "well yeah he's scummy, but we shouldn't lynch him" which I assumed would catch even more scum.
And... how many of those DO you think were from Town?GIEFF 368 wrote:If you are town, STOP KILLING PEOPLE! I don't think that two daykills and one daykill-attempt can all be from scum.
...wow. In the last 24 hours I think I've been owned in six unique and exciting ways. Well, I needed the humility pill anyway.Battle Mage 379 wrote:Gieff - Mafia Neighbour, Venge-Stabbed, Day 1
@the bolded: Um... what?cicero 376 wrote: The game had 23 members, aplurarilityof which are sitting around making a noise that rhymes with clap, clap, clap - either through not posting at all or voting for people with a reason called "I'll tell you later" and you are going to single me out for not scum hunting?
And I can't wait.cicero 376 wrote:I have not gone into rabid Cicero mode - yet - but I have hardly been unwilling to ask questions and voice opinions and, as I usually do on day one, try to shake up the lurkers.
ElectricBadger 391 wrote:They'll get old, fat and cynical?charter wrote:Those that do not vote Maryita in their next post will stand to face the same fate as EB. I'm not explaining, so do not ask.
Please don't waste everyone's time. If you're going to waft suspicion in my general direction, go ahead and vote me.SpyreX 393 wrote:What chain lynches are you talking about? The exchange between you and gieff regarding tubby was interesting. And gieff was scum. Fancy that.
So I'm between actual scum and honorary scum that you were running up right then for a slip. 'Doesn't seem like I win either way, ne?SpyreX #13 wrote:Although this latest tryst of GIEFF-Vi-Tubby is pretty killer.
Although, that really pales to I think my first honest to god scumslip:
Unvote, Vote Tubby
SpyreX 410 wrote:...
I am confused.
Gieff flipping scum and tubby flipping neighbor makes me all but convinced YOU are town Vi.
I'm not sure what you read into what I said?
I don't see how I was supposed to get that you were convinced that I was Town out of this.SpyreX somenumber wrote:The exchange between you and gieff regarding tubby was interesting. And gieff was scum. Fancy that.
Not what I meant.Mariyta 436 wrote:Yeah, I meant aside from dying...Vi wrote:There is one way, actually.Mariyta 430 wrote:Sadly, there's no way for me to refute the claim that I did.
I agree with this.charter 509 wrote:To the people voting me: Switch your vote to Mariyta, if she doesn't flip scum, you can lynch me. You're not going to lynch me first, so stop trying.
8/10Kairyuu wrote:I'm not. I'm being difficult for the hell of it.charter wrote:You're not really present. Why are you so worried?
This actually sounds like good advice.DTMaster 557 wrote:Next you lynch cicero for doing the same thing and then lynch Nikanor.
all of this, which looks very much like filler. Then there's this--DTMaster #29 wrote:@EB Death
Interesting and shows carter has a good nose for this. Time for a reread.
@Kariyuu
o-o... Why would Seraphim withhold that information? And I never heard of someone dying if they are investigated. Sounds fishy... but I'll make note of that. (Also don't answer the first question, it was rhetorical and me speaking/typing outloud)
@BC
Vote the mod to experiment on since I know in Tar's game he's sometimes a player.
@Mariyaa
Scum confession? It's mainly a strike against scum lately.
--which looks like fishing around and obvious ignorance of unflavored Mafia.DTMaster #25 wrote:I'm also throwing the idea there are multiple scum factions out there. I have no confirmation of this based on Gieff's death since we could have SKs running around. Based on the huge amount of deaths on day 1, we can only confirm multiple killing roles or a person with multiple ways of killing people.
Given a game this size it's not unlikely to have multiple scum roles in play. Do you have something to suggest we are only dealing with 1 faction here?
--which could be taken as a "shout-out" that is, indeed, pointless speculation that has a very slim chance of helping anyone except scum who don't know who each other are.DTMaster #26 wrote:@RL
Neighbor within the same group which might mean all the mafia members do not know each other or do not have means to communicate with each other. This would suggest a large scum team with some uninformed members. But at this moment it's speculation.
--which isn't scummy at all but a reminder that we have Wiki tags.DTMaster #26 wrote:[url="http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Scum"] Wiki link here. [\quote]
Neighbor is the same thing as an unconfirmed Mason.DTMaster 582 wrote:@Vi
The reasoning is the concept of scum neighbor baffles me. On my completed list I played 1 newbie game and 1 mini normal, so the whole concept of the role seems too redundant to have. In these games (look at my wiki) they were scum teams of two players with the auto ability to night talk. If the same applies here, why have a scum neighbor role. :s
I am a sucker for AtEs. But to say that intuition means nothing is rather incorrect.DTMaster 582 wrote:I appreciate the partial defense, but its a biased view based on AtE stance alone. An "honest feel" means "gut feeling" which means nothing at all. :p Kinda like my "gut feeling on tubby" with the whole meta defense.
All of these except for the first and the last sentences are false or misguided at least. Please elaborate what "it" is in the first sentence.DTMaster 585 wrote:2. I claimed VT henceits an easy choice. VTs are sacrificial lambs who try and be useful in thread but end up getting butchered to the mob. Also they act like scapegoats for scum as meat shields. But they have the best power which is talking in the thread. :p
I need to show you a certain Newbie game...charter 586 wrote:Holy shit. This is bar none the absolute biggest implosion in the history of mafia.
Notice how many votes it takes to lynch. It only works if the triplevote was taken out.randomlunatic 591 wrote:@Vi, why does the triple vote no longer count?
Read, please.Vi 580 wrote:So don't get the wrong impression, you're both extremely lynchable today. But I get a slightly more honest sense out of your posts. Only slightly, though, as I'm seeing a line between the second and third quotes where you seem very interested in the concept of scum who don't know each other.
Nikanor 451 wrote:A lyncher is theonlyexplaination for your question.
His Appeal to Fear also fits this conclusion.
In retrospect, the idea of a Town Poisoner who didn't have the sense to claim immediately and didn't have enough sense to wait for a decent target... makes little sense.Nikanor 451 wrote:@Everyone: If you are a townie who poisoned IH, please claim now.
While these are all things that charter did, this ignores that there were a lot of people at the time - myself included - who really had no problem with all of that. Nikanor didn't question any of them.Nikanor 547 wrote:@charter: You think I'm scum because I don't automatically believe the claim of someone I find scummy? You have refused to answer or have ignored most of my questions. You have threatened players of whose alignment you supposedly had no knowledge. I have no reason to believe you, as I find you nothing but scummy.
And this is a complete 180 considering 542 was one of charter's posts. If the wagon is inevitable, why wait to vote/hammer? Why express opposition in one sentence and then support in the next?Nikanor 547 wrote:Post 542, however, does make a good point. And I see there is no point in pushing a charter lynch today. If anyone puts Mariyta at L-1, I'll hammer. Otherwise, I'll just sit and wait for CKD to hammer.
But does that make him more likely to be scum?rl 594 wrote:@Vi, I'm voting DTMaster becuase I find his claim bizzare, the timing especially. He wasn't really singled out for any pressure, there was no call for a claim, it really confuses me why he did it.
I acknowledge that I misrepresented here. (not intentionally)Nikanor 606 wrote:You bolded the wrong thing. I'll fix it for you:Vi wrote:Nikanor strikes me for saying some suspiciously one-dimensional things inthread, for instance--Nikanor wrote:A lyncher is theonlyexplaination for your question.
His Appeal to Fear also fits this conclusion.Stop misrepresenting what I said, please.Nikanor wrote:A lyncher is the only explainationCrazy wrote:Why the heck would charter say he knew Mariyta was scum if he was lying?for your question.
His Appeal to Fear also fits this conclusion.
I do. The people in this game don't make sense.Nikanor 606 wrote:It's day two with eight people dead. It has been proven through Mariyta's flip that charter was (at least) incorrect, unless the distorter has a poisoning ability. DTM has come out at the start of day two with a claim and a self-vote.Vi wrote:In retrospect, the idea of a Town Poisoner who didn't have the sense to claim immediately and didn't have enough sense to wait for a decent target... makes little sense.
Don't tell me you are still thinking this game makes sense?
You don't have to find someone scummy to question them, Nikanor.Nikanor 606 wrote:Just because everyone else took charter's claim unquestioningly doesn't mean I have to do the same. Just because you disagree with me about something looking scummy doesn't mean you yourself are scummy.Vi wrote:While these are all things that charter did, this ignores that there were a lot of people at the time - myself included - who really had no problem with all of that. Nikanor didn't question any of them.
What's the point of that, pragmatically speaking?Nikanor 606 wrote:I meant that I would rather have my vote on charter than on Mariyta, but that I would hammer and end the day if required.Vi wrote:And this is a complete 180 considering 542 was one of charter's posts. If the wagon is inevitable, why wait to vote/hammer? Why express opposition in one sentence and then support in the next?
Noted that I am bad at history and should apologize here.Nikanor 606 wrote:Craplogic is a correct term for it.Vi wrote:[craplogic]Then there's how Mariyta claimed to have Distorted Nikanor just before charter got his message.
Mariyta said she never lied. Just for kicks, I'm tempted to believe her and suggest that Nikanor did it.[/craplogic]
a) Mariyta claimed to have distorted CKD just before charter got his message, not Nikanor.
b) If you are inclined to believe both Mariyta and charter's claims, your second point about me being the culprit is impossible, since Mariyta claimed her distortion two days after the poisoning.
...Wait, now it all makes sense!Battle Mage 621 wrote:Charter - Paranoid Cop, Shot, Day 2
When did I become your agent? I'm not here to defend you.DTMaster 624 wrote:Intuition is helpful, but I personally see that you need more then that to convince the town. That is where evidence comes in. (etc.)
I just realized that I've been thinking of "Insane" when I'm reading "Paranoid". In that case, see below.populartajo 653 wrote:I agree with the wagon but there is something that is bugging me intensively. Why are people exactly prefering Spyrex over obvscum DTMaster?
Based on a guilty result of a paranoid cop? Where did Occam razor go?
Giving scumpartners a chance to try to fudge out of it before another lynch occurred?tajo 653 wrote:I think the most likely explanation is a sk/other scumgroup that didnt think things very well and rushed the kill. I dont see Spyrex or Spyrex scumbuddies (if he has them) killing charter, who would flip cop, to painfully prove that Spyrex was indeed scum and accelerate the process. What was the benefit here?
'Ever wonder why charter so fervently believed things that he didn't have any information about and why he refused to claim so often?tajo 655 wrote:i doubt[that "paranoid" was a post restriction"]but please explain.
You're both wrong and reaching. Which kind of summarizes how I feel about your play throughout and how you're pushing this wagon off SpyreX.tajo 655 wrote:Also Vi, any comments on my post where I theorize about you being in a group with gieff, maryita and badger?
How not so?SpyreX 665 wrote:Killing him would have in all scenarios but this oneguaranteedmy death. That makes no sense.
This. As long as you're claiming, we may as well Hide-confirm someone.ckd 667 wrote:so Spy are you saying you used your ability AND hid last night? you targetted two people last night? who did you hide behind?
Yes, obviously. Why not assume the worst?tajo 673 wrote:Vi, so do you think charter is more likely a cop with a paranoid post restricion than a paranoid cop? Do you think his vote for tubby, that obviously was not a result, makes sense in that post restricted scenario.
I voted for reactions, and mistakenly passed him as reacting as I would expect a Townie to.tajo 673 wrote:Any explanation of why after suspecting badger you become his top defender and start attacking me and GIEFF?
--which again reinforces the above thought process.Vi #13 wrote:The pressure on ElectricBadger by tajo and GIEFF is criminally bad. I'm hitting a brick wall as to whether tajo is scummy by intuition, though. I definitely want one or both of them dead by endgame.
Never used it, never seen it. The only experience I have is with scum lurking, ignoring people, or bussing. The one time I tried something buddying/defending, the partner in question got replaced by Gimbo and summarily lynched.tajo 673 wrote:What are your thoughts of chainsaw defense?
See above.tajo 673 wrote:Any explanation of why you preferred GIEFF over me when we both attacked Badger?
I explained this a long time ago.tajo 673 wrote:Any explanation of why you asked benmage twice for why he voted GIEFF?
Vi #19 wrote:Benmage is transparent. By pressuring Benmage early, I hoped to get a read on him early as well. Him not being here has hurt that effort quite a bit.
I wouldn't rule out kills that can only occur after so much time or so many posts.tajo 673 wrote:And why do you think scum left him to do one investigation more. Pretty interesting timing, dont you think?
I'm not sure immediately. Let me ask this - what would SpyreX-scum do (WWSD?) upon facing a Guilty result from charter-Cop? (other than kill charter, obviously)tajo 673 wrote:Please order the possibilities on what happened with charter kill. We are going to assume Spyrex is scum here.
1. Spyrex killed him and sealed his fate with it.
2. Someone other than Spyrex killed him and sealed Spyrex fate with it. Too bad charter was paranoid.
I've explained myself more than clearly on the subject.tajo 673 wrote:My problem is that people are using a guilty result of a paranoid cop to vote him. How the fuck does that make sense?
I find him quite amusing tbhtajo 673 wrote:Thoughts of DTMaster, also, please.
1) It looks like I'm the only person who believes that, actually. You may be thinking that because there are only four people posting and ten not.populartajo 686 wrote:1) Am I the only one here that thinks charter was indeed a paranoid cop and not some crap about postrestricted cop or cop with another approach?
2) How do you explain his result on Spyrex?
3) Did he catch him poisoning someone?
4) How do you explain Maryita flipping distorter (possible roleblocker) and not poisoner, and she defending against she wasnt the one poisoning IH but not defending she wasnt scum?
5) Its pretty obvious that charter didnt catch people poisoning so he made up that to pressure Maryita and to not be so obvious cop.
6) Its not about assuming the worst scenario. Its about assuming the most likely scenario.
7) Charter is a paranoid cop that got both guilty results. A guilty result on Spyrex prob doesnt mean anything more than a paranoid result. That shouldnt be a valid reason to suspect Spyrex.
8) People voting Spyrex. Is the guilty result the only reason why you are willing to lynch Spyrex?
Says the person immediately dismissing charter as paranoid.tajo 691 wrote:And this being a bm game, I still think not all things should be taken at face value. *words words words*
I survived until Night 7 as a (real) Cop who claimed Day 4 in HAtPF. What's your point, that one instance in a game that specifically featured modular Role PMs so as to facilitate unusual role/alignment combinations should dictate policy in all future games?tajo 691 wrote:I might also point you to Rocissi Mafia where Caboose claimed cop and survived 4 days after giving two guilty results on the other family group. I was tne only one that suspected him while the rest thought he was confirmed town.
-----SpyreX 695 wrote:3.) Yos starts out with this paranoid != paranoid AND cop != cop (implying that his role was something else entirely). Then, from his assumption (and my action) it is said that charter "did" me during the day. However, since nothing has happened AND based on his logic charter isn't actually a cop what could he have seen?
I don't see where it's not adding up. Say it a little more slowly?SpyreX 695 wrote:Sans the fact I'm not scum it still doesn't add up. If charter thought he was a cop day 1 with a guilty in this bizarro setup playing it like some kind of poison-tracker makes sense because it makes his role appear to be less than it is.
Why not all three of the above?SpyreX 695 wrote:1.) Why? After seeing a paranoid flip it makes more sense to me to assume that it was a lucky shot and the scum was telling the truth than paranoid != paranoid.
Please.SpyreX 695 wrote:5.) See 1. I can get into it in more detail but I'm gettin serious town-vibes off him.
Now that he doesn't have a vote, I'm liking this line of thought more.SpyreX 695 wrote:6.) The guy who was all but busted day 1, starts out day 2 with a self-vote and a case on himself then goes "well, if they lynch him they're not lynching me today" and votes? Yea. Scum. Survival.
In the context of you thinking he's scum, or in general?Yos2 709 wrote:And then, of course, DTmaster claimed vanilla for no reason, which pretty much means he needs to die today.
Yosarian,Yos2 708 wrote:There might beonecult recruit, but if there is he's basically a survivor and wouldn't actually care who gets lynched right now.
Because you lost your vote at the same time the cult recruiter flipped.DTMaster 713 wrote:I don't get why you singled me out though.
Cass "gets it".Cass 728 wrote:1- Killer is scum with Spyrex-scum. He assumed Charter was sane investigator, Spyrex was lost either way, so he'd better day-kill before more investigations could occur. And odds were that Charter would flip some weird role name that would sow doubts.
Except Hider is pretty awesome on its own, so I'm having some difficulty swallowing this hypothesis.SpyreX 731 wrote:I am not saying I get "better" powers if I target scum. Ultimately, "better" powers is just conjecture based on the fact I got a power already when I was "wrong" about my guess.
Read Cass's quote from my previous post. Try again.Boeing 747 wrote:I'm still shaking my head at the "Yea, as scum he killed the cop hoping he'd flip cop to lynch himself."
So no matter which wagon everyone decides to support, you'll vote with it? That's pretty dubious.Yosarian2 758 wrote:How so?Crazy wrote:It's more that SpyreX being scum makes DTM less likely to be scum.Vi wrote:Crazy, when did DTMaster become "freaked Town" IYO?
I'd be surprised if either one was town. They're probably both scum.
Vi 763 wrote:So no matter which wagon everyone decides to support, you'll vote with it? That's pretty dubious.Yosarian2 758 wrote:How so?Crazy wrote:It's more that SpyreX being scum makes DTM less likely to be scum.Vi wrote:Crazy, when did DTMaster become "freaked Town" IYO?
I'd be surprised if either one was town. They're probably both scum.
The handle toward Yos2's hand? Come, let thou answer me;Benmage 778 wrote:Is this a dagger which I see before meYosarian2 wrote:I'd still like to see them both die today, if any dayvigs are willing to make that happen, but I'm now more convinced that SpyreX is scum. DT is still PROBABLY scum, and defiantly someone we can do without no matter what now that he dosn't even have a vote, but there's a chance he's town
Benmage wrote:How understand we that?Vi wrote:The handle toward Yos2's hand? Come, let thou answer me;
I have thee not, and yet I have thee still.