Wheel of Time Mafia: Rip in the Pattern (GAME OVER)
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
I don't know where I slept last night. The mod just gave me a role PM, no other information. I'll ask.MrBuddyLee wrote:
Welcome.Goatrevolt wrote:I'm going to start reading the game tonight. I probably won't get caught up immediately, though, as this game looks long and complicated. Any deadlines or special information I need to know before I start my read?
You need to tell us where you slept last night--everyone but you two replacements have claimed. The mod should have told you in your introductory PM.
Isacc has claimed Serial Killer who killed two townies last night. Albert claimed Aes Sedai. Kairyuu claimed "motivator" or a double-power enabler. If your role has any dependence on the location you sleep, you'll want to tell the mod your future sleeping location before the lynch happens today. Don't dawdle!
I ask that nobody gets lynched before I'm caught up. I'd like to make an educated selection on my room tonight, and I can't think of any reason to rush into a lynch before I have a chance to figure out what's going on.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Unless I'm dead. There's more than just info as well. I'd prefer to have some understanding of where I should be staying tonight, etc.Benmage wrote:I guess, but I don't really understand the delay..any information he gives can be given tomorrow.
Just finished reading page 13. I'm going to go grab some dinner and then continue. I'm not taking any notes, so I should be caught up by tonight or tomorrow.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
I'm caught up.
Sajin: You're fishing for info on whether or not MoS is AS. Earlier in the game you were trying to fish for whether or not ABR had broken AS oaths. Why are you so interested in whether people are AS or not? Seems scummy, no?
MoS: You mentioned at some point you believed Flay was a SK. With Isacc dead and SK, how does that affect your opinion of Flay?
Flay: Explain to me how lynching a jester is a pro-town action. You arriving at the conclusion that he's a jester is suspect enough, but I can't begin to fathom how lynching him would ever benefit the town.
Armlx: You're floating through the game throwing your support behind popular wagons. Who are your top 3 suspects now, and why?
Kairyuu: Why do you keep announcing in thread who you plan on motivating? It gives off the distinct impression that you are more concerned with confirming yourself and your role than you are with using your role to the benefit of the town. Can you explain your "motivation" here?
Kison: Can you explain your vote?-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Was this directed at me? I'm not voting you.Mr. Flay wrote:Seriously? I don't mind if people suspect me, but this tendency to vote without a reason is seriously irritating.
Can the town win while a jester is still alive? I was working under that impression, but it just hit me that I'm probably wrong about that.Mr. Flay wrote:WHY do people think lynching a Jester is "scum" or "third-party" behavior? Jesters distract from lynching scum. Day One especially, eliminating one would be useful for the rest of the game. If you think there is a Jester in a game, when IS the right time to kill them? The Mafia/SKs aren't going to do it! We've seen no evidence yet of a vigilante, and in any case, they'd have to believe my case to use up their action (and be able to kill third-party roles, if they're Aes Sedai).
I've backed off from thinking SpyreX is a Jester (though I haven't ruled it out), but I really cannot fathom what people think I SHOULD have done with that theory/knowledge. Everyone suspecting me on that score (and that seems to be the primary reason, for those giving reasons at all) should answer this immediately.
If the town needs a jester dead to win, then I actually agree day 1 is a good time to get rid of one. If not, then I can't see any convincing reason to waste a lynch on one.
Still, how common are jesters? Common enough to be a legitimate consideration, or no?-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Uh, what? That doesn't address the situation at all. You called me out for a reasonless vote. I didn't vote. Why not just say "I was mistaken" or "that wasn't addressed to you"? Responding to your attackers is all well and good, but why respond with something that makes no sense?Mr. Flay wrote:
Yes. You're not voting me, but you're calling me out. So I'm trying to respond to my attackers as much as possible.Goatrevolt wrote:
Was this directed at me? I'm not voting you.Mr. Flay wrote:Seriously? I don't mind if people suspect me, but this tendency to vote without a reason is seriously irritating.
Ok. I can see how you could arrive at Jester as a possibility.Mr. Flay wrote:No, the town does not lose if a Jester lives to the end of the game (actually the Jester usually loses at that point, hence SpyreX' "I shouldn't live to endgame in any case" being part of my case. He has ASKED to be killed!
However, if the town can win with a jester still alive, then why would you ever want to lynch one? The "distraction" argument is weak. He'd only be a distraction if people allow him to be one, which certainly doesn't need to be the case at all.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
As much as I'd love to be a friend of scum, I'm going to have to go for the smart person label instead.
I don't see the need for MBL to give out his information right now. I would guess he does have a pro-town reason for wishing to avoid claiming, because I fail to see the benefit he gets as scum by making a fuss about it when he could simply lie about his sleeping location. If he does have a pro-town reason, we fail by outing it now.
I don't see sleeping location claims directly leading to scum anytime soon. So I don't understand the importance of why this must be outed now. What's going to happen beyond us saying, "Ok, cool, that's where you slept" and moving on?
Vote Benmage
Seriously? He doesn't claim his sleeping location and you want a full claim? Preposterous. Do you think his refusal to claim sleeping locations makes him likely to be scum?-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
I'm really behind right now and struggling to keep up. I really can't tell you whether or not the partial mass claim is a good idea until I've caught up and understand what even prompted it.
Since we're already midway through claiming, though, I'm not going to oppose it. Is this strictly an AS/not AS claim?-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Knowing if someone is AS or not =/= knowing their role.Kairyuu wrote:Also, why do you STILL refuse to claim when, of 16 living players, there are only 2 we don't know the roles of? You are refusing to help the town. I don't like it.
Kairyuu: Explain how we catch all the remaining scum (or several, as later clarified) from a mass claim?-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Claiming roles is unnecessary.
1. Yes/no (done)
2. Targets
3. Partners
4. Detections
And if there are any discrepancies in the above, then we get those specific players to full claim.
As for color, I really don't know whether that should be claimed along with targets/partners or not. I'm thinking not.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Let's assume you're correct and we catch scum based on the logic puzzle. We are going to lynch that scum today. We don't need to also out who the best targets to kill off are.Kairyuu wrote:@Goat: Why is it unnecessary? Please explain to me why I'm wrong. If you can't then your statement is just as baseless as MoS' was. If you're going to oppose something that has logic backing it up, then you need to provide an actual counter, rather than just telling me I'm wrong.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Windmill. Pretty sure I've been there every night since I replaced in.SpyreX wrote:Ohh, and before I forget:
@Ben, ABR, Goat:
If I missed it: Night 2 sleeping locations.
Explain? Not sure how that debunks my logic.SpyreX wrote:Goat:
Assuming the doubling effect of AS AND the fact that a DOC just came out, thats not really gonna fly.
How many colors of AS are there? 8? Are we looking at 2 of each as the likely story here?SpyreX wrote:However, I think we're up to 16 AS total. Which means something FUNNY is going on. Aside from 8*2 I can see ONE other solution that makes sense. But, for either of those at minimum the colors need to be known - and if the colors are known...-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Benmage wrote:Who was keeping twilight 4 sleep locations together so I can look at them in iso, or if someone can repost those sleeping barn twilight 4.
I ask this, because mine and KoC detections do not match up. I want to essentially get information from the person KoC claims to have detected targeting the windmill...have them comfoward with who they targeted. (Maybe if possible what they did)
Yeah, we were both at Windmill. My detect Saidar didn't have anyone targeting the windmill, thus it looked like KoC was lying about targeting me.Benmage wrote:How did KoC's action not show up... Maybe i overread. KoC doc'd Goat right? Slept barn...was Goat with me at the windmill?
(Still needs to view twilight 4 locations again so I don't have to ask these lookupable questions)
Kinetic sent me a corrected twilight 4 detect that included 1 from the barn to the mill, which would match KoC's claimed actions and throws my KoC is obviously lying scum theory down the trash.
River.Mastermind of Sin wrote:In addition, I have found another puzzle that will reveal ANOTHER scum.MacavityLock, Setael (claiming for Faraday, not himself), TSS, and Goatrevolt need to reveal the locations of their twilight 3 targets.There is more to the story, but I cannot explain further until those claims have been made (in any order).
Yes, clearly I'm deliberately declaring a fake detect that anyone who slept at Windmill could easily prove false . Benmage can back up my assertion that the original detect Saidar didn't have your targeting of me in it at all.Knight of Cydonia wrote:Incidentally, I'm now almost certain Goat is also scum, possibly JVW's partner. Deliberate fake-detect from scum is obvious, Goat.
My original detect Saidar from Windmill was: 2 to the barn. I got a PM from Kinetic correcting it to: 2 to the barn, 1 from the barn.
Unvote
I'm finding KoC more scummy than JVW, but I'll unvote pending MoS' info.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Didn't ABR claim his roleblock on Isacc prior to Isacc claiming immunity to the OP?Mastermind of Sin wrote:By the way, a JVW/Mora/ABR scumteam would make a lot of sense, since ABR claims to have blocked Mora and JVW the last two nights, and he claimed to block Isacc, who was immune to the one power. Combine that with the evidence against JVW and ABR's dodginess when it comes to breaking the three oaths, and it's certainly something worth thinking about.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
No.MrBuddyLee wrote:And by the way, aren't all you magic fools supposed to be claimingtonight'stargets, not previous nights' targets?
I thought the idea was for ustomorrowto first claim our targets and then later claim locations to keep people from tailoring their target claims to the location claims.
I have no idea why people are claiming stuff now.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
The exact opposite is generally true. Scum are not interested in trading themselves 1-1. I find KoC going after JVW as "obvious scum" to be much more of a town play than JVW not even bothering to do anything about KoC.Setael wrote:I'm changing to koc for a few reasons.
1) putting jvw at -1 when there's so much to claim or at least discuss claiming before someone is lynched. I realize we can talk about it during twilight, but I still think that -1 vote was hasty and scummy, especially wig shadow votes and the like so rampant.
2) looking back, I think koc immediately voting jvw is scummier than jvw not going after koc. Scum know alignments and therefore see very quickly who they should be going after. Town is more likely to hesitate, in this case because they're not sure of the info or it's not so cut and dry that it's either them or someone else.
Maybe that's not very clear, but the bottom line is that if jvw were scum I think he would have gone for koc's throat. Kind of like koc went for jvw's throat.
unvote, vote: KoC-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
This isn't a good plan. KoC's alignment is tied to JVW's, so testing him alone would be kind of a waste if we plan to lynch JVW anyway.Setael wrote:My proposal is that I research the River and we require KoC to sleep there. Everyone else stay at one of the other three locations, which sajin will research.
If not enough people want to just know how many antitown players we have, we could instead have sajin research one person as well (one person alone stays at the windmill or somewhere that sajin will search.
Opinions?
Please no one else vote JVW until this is decided, as once the lynch is reached it will be too late to orchestrate where everyone sleeps.
I think testing people individually is a weak use of the role. I'd much rather test groups of roughly 3 players. It will serve much more useful in the long run. It won't tell us immediately what someone's alignment is, but it'll be far more effective in clearing people a few days down the line.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
I think the biggest problem with this theory is that we have no clue if SK tried to gentle SpyreX or not. Also, do players who get killed show up on the detect Saidar? Does anyone partnered to a dead AS know their actions and whether it appeared on the detections the night they died?MrBuddyLee wrote:SK was roleblocked N1.There should be an additional xxx->Stables in Setael's detects detecting SK's night action that is not there.I believe this nearly guarantees that Yos or ABR is scum--and it's very possible SK died where ABR claimed to target Isacc.
This theory relies too heavily on conjecture.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Do we know where he slept? Your argument is that there is no record of him using saidar directed at SpyreX, not that there is no record of him using saidar at all.MrBuddyLee wrote:
Regardless, in the extraordinarily unlikely event that SK didn't gentle, he would have attempted to Bond Warder as Benmage has, and would have shown up on Saidar.Shadow Knight, May 1 wrote:I do believe that Spyre should be gentled tonight.
SK was roleblocked, with 98% certainty, unless someone has an otherwise unexplained Saidar usage for him. Which we don't.
Also, could Mufasa RB the first night? This is also a possibility.
Finally, dead players actions might not show up on the detect saidar depending on the timestamping of those actions.
There are far too many unknowns here.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Just looking at the manner in which ABR claimed to have blocked Isacc/Kairyuu will show you that this isn't true. ABR claimed to have blocked Isacc before Isacc revealed he was immune to the one power (to my recollection). That would be an extremely stupid play to make if he was lying.MrBuddyLee wrote:And whywouldn'tscum RB a claimed Aes Sedai D1? Who better to block? Albert claims to have roleblocked either Kairyuu or Isacc, an issue he never cleared up fully. Nor did he explain why he blocked them. My guess is, he actually blocked ShadowKnight, who was likely at the Blacksmith with Isacc/Kairyuu.
This is possible, but we just need to check the saidar results where Yos slept to easily prove/disprove this.MrBuddyLee wrote:#2 option: Yos blocked SK and claims he didn't get orders in.
Here's a thought. We're missing the detect saidar for JVW's claimed action of targeting SK. We're missing SK's detect saidar results from that same night. Coincidence? Possibly not.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
To go along with this, perhaps Isacc had an aura of nullification or something like that. Him killing SK both prevented us from detecting SK's action as well as prevented us from detecting JVW's targeting of SK.Goatrevolt wrote:Here's a thought. We're missing the detect saidar for JVW's claimed action of targeting SK. We're missing SK's detect saidar results from that same night. Coincidence? Possibly not.
That is a far simpler explanation than the idea that both a roleblocker is lying about targeting SK and a doctor is lying about targeting SK.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Meh. Two actions don't show up related to the same player. Occam's razor. What's more likely here:
1. Two players lied about their targets for N1 after it was made clear that lying about your targets would get you killed based on the detect saidar pattern. It just so happens that both lied about targets involve the exact same player day 1, a player who was killed by a SK who had the capability to kill multiple players and whose role we do not know at all.
or
2. Either the kill took place in an earlier phase than the other actions being taken (SK using an ability, JVW protecting him) thus causing them to not occur and not show up on the detections, or Isacc had some sort of ability that "black holes" OP usage.
The 2nd one seems far more likely. Why would a doctor fake claim a protection on someone who died when the purpose of people claiming was to compare it to the detect saidar results? Wouldn't that be roughly the worst fake claim of all time? Especially if JVW didn't actually use an ability (as the detect saidar would suggest)...why would he claim to have used an ability, and not only any ability, but a doc protect on a target who died...? Why would a roleblocker fake claim a roleblock on someone who killed 3 people successfully that night?
This is far too big of a coincidence to be simply that, a coincidence. It doesn't make sense for any of these players to be lying about whether or not they targeted SK, so the likely answer is that they aren't.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
I would guess Mr. Flay killed KoC. We haven't seen incineration as a kill since.
I think the most likely explanation is simply that Isacc had the ability to kill in an earlier phase than when other abilities went off. Maybe this was a 1-time use power or something he could only do once every night. He had the ability to kill twice (three times with motivation). It wouldn't be crazy to suggest that his second kill was a special power.
I mean, can you seriously tell me that my above paragraph is less likely than JVW, a doctor, lying about targeting a player who died that same night, when the detect saidar shows him doing nothing? And in addition, ABR, a roleblocker lying about targeting a claimed SK who got off 3 kills, but was later shown to be OP immune? No way.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Maybe Isacc had a "twilight or earlier" kill and a regular killing ability that was a daybreak kill.Benmage wrote:Kai said he only motivates daybreak actions. This was shown when he claimed to of motivated ABR and got nothing changed. This was than believed that all killing actions are daybreak actions.
Isacc killing someone before actions could be done by or done to them is far more likely than this far-fetched "X people are lying in ridiculous fashions all regarding the same player night 1" idea.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Let me break this down.MrBuddyLee wrote:
So Goat, let's be perfectly clear here. You're saying:Goatrevolt wrote:Isacc killing someone before actions could be done by or done to them is far more likely than this far-fetched "X people are lying in ridiculous fashions all regarding the same player night 1" idea.
1) JVW is NOT lying about protecting SK. He's a real doctor whose power not only failed, but wasn't detected. JVW should not be lynched.
2) If one of ABR/Yos is a scum roleblocker (the most likely scum role of all the AS roles we've heard), they are not likely to lie about their twilight action roleblocks.
and 3) Isacc was responsible for all three N1 kills, two of them at daybreak (which allowed KoC to use his power) and one at Twilight which resulted inABR's twilight action on Isacc being detectedandJVW's twilight action on SK not being detected?
Can a roleblocker confirm that RB is a twilight activity?
Can a Yellow confirm that Protect is a daybreak activity?
1. JVW would have no motivation to claim a doc protect that wasn't on the detect Saidar. Furthermore, if he did want to claim a doc protect that wasn't on the detect Saidar, what motivation would he have to claim one on a player who died that same night?
2. Yosarian can easily be verified by the detect saidar whether he targeted SK or not. He claimed to submit no action, and we can easily verify the truth of that. That leaves ABR. ABR claimed to have roleblocked Isacc, despite Isacc still getting off kills, and only later did Isacc reveal he was immune to the one power. That is a foolish and stupid claim for ABR to make if he is lying.
3. Isacc was responsible for 3 kills is pretty obvious. Three players were dismembered, and we have not seen that kill method since. Who made the other dismemberment kills if not Isacc?
Your bolded sections are irrelevant. I'm saying JVW and SK's actions didn't show up on the detect saidar because SK was dead before they could actually submit those actions. JVW couldn't doc protect a target that was already dead, thus he didn't have an action. SK couldn't gentle SpyreX if he was already dead by the time the Gentling action would take place...so his action doesn't show up on the results. ABR blocking Isacc would still show up, because Isacc is still alive at this point and thus ABR has a legitimate target, even if it doesn't succeed.
To my knowledge Gentling is a daybreak action. I think Kinetic said at some point that unless otherwise specified, it's daybreak. If protecting is also a daybreak action, then Isacc making a twilight kill on SK and JVW's daybreak protect and SK's daybreak gentle not actually occurring because they would occur after SK is already dead would be by far the most likely explanation.
What is more likely: Numerous players lying for absolutely no discernible reason all regarding the exact same event, or the simple and plausible explanation that Isacc had a twilight kill?
Anyway, a doctor needs to confirm whether or not the protection is a twilight or daybreak action to clear this up. If it's a daybreak action, then I am almost certainly correct about Isacc.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Is your doc protect a daybreak or twilight action?Knight of Cydonia wrote:I think any use this discussion had has petered out now. Back to lynching the scum.Vote: JVW
Is there any reason people continue to ignore my posts? Does anyone really care to figure out whether or not KoC/JVW is actually a 1-1 or are we just on auto-pilot now?-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Knight of Cydonia wrote:It's not stated in my PM whether or not it's Daybreak or Twilight.
Ok, so that means it is a daybreak action.Kinetic wrote:Couple of notes. One, I would like to remind everyone, as I have posted before, that any ability which does not explicitly state it is aTwilightorRapidactive ability is a Daybreak ability. A vast majority of all abilities are daybreak abilities.
What this means is: JVW submitted a daybreak action on SK. SK tried to use the daybreak action of gentling on SpyreX.Neither showed up on the detect saidar. We can conclude that the simplest and most likely explanation is thatIsacc killed SK during the twilight phase, thus preventing these actions from occurring because SK was already dead when they would have gone off.
Or, simply, JVW + KoC is not the 1 for 1 we thought it was. JVW is almost certainly not lying about targeting SK, and SK makes sense as a doc protect day 1. I think we should start looking elsewhere.
Yeah, I will look into it.MrBuddyLee wrote:I still think ABR was too sketchy around the roleblock N1 issue. Goat, independent of the JVW issue, can you please assess ABR's behavior surrounding his claimed N1 roleblock? I don't know that you've looked into it fully--the timing doesn't support your assessment that ABR's play was too brash to be a scum play. And remember--ABR claimed somewhat unprovoked.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
Yeah, but you're missing the point. Two specific daybreak events didn't show up on detect saidar. Both of those events involved the same player who also died that night. I'm suggesting that said player was killed before the daybreak phase even came around. So, JVW's protection didn't show up on the detect Saidar because SK was already dead, so there was nobody for JVW to protect. Likewise, SK's daybreak action of gentling SpyreX didn't show up on the detect Saidar because SK died in the previous phase, so he wasn't even alive to gentle SpyreX.armlx wrote:I'm pretty sure daybreak effects show up on Detect Saidar.
The argument to lynching JVW is that he lied about his night 1 actions, because he says he targeted SK but it isn't on the detect saidar. This is a bad, flawed theory, because the most likely explanation is that he did try to target SK, but it didn't show up on the detect Saidar because Isacc killed SK in an earlier phase. My theory is backed up by the evidence that SK's action also didn't show up on the detect Saidar. Occam's razor.
Did JVW blatantly lie in literally the worst possible fashion he could possibly lie in if he's scum, and additionally did SK manage to somehow lie or not submit an action despite this being unlikely based on his post history? Or did Isacc kill SK in an earlier phase? The latter is far more likely.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
I see nothing wrong with that defense. The vast majority of the time, "too stupid to be a lie" works.armlx wrote:IDK, this seems really loose. The part that rings wrong with me is GR trying to use the "Its too stupid to be a lie" defense.
Armlx, why isn't SK's ability on the detect Saidar? He wasn't roleblocked. He was around and posting far too frequently to simply "miss" the submitting of an action. So why isn't it on the saidar? You strawman my argument by arguing against the too stupid to be a lie, but ignoring the meat of my point.
I'm thinking he was roleblocked the old fashioned way...by being killed. And JVW's bandage on SK fizzled when he was dismembered in response.
Kinetic stressing the complexity of the game being incredibly difficult is a point in my favor, not a point against me.Benmage wrote:
Indeed Kinetic stressed the complexity of this game is going to be incedibly difficult. I'm down for this 1-1 thing, but we may also want to consider who just believe to be ole fashion scummy.armlx wrote:IDK, this seems really loose. The part that rings wrong with me is GR trying to use the "Its too stupid to be a lie" defense.
The argument for JVW-KoC being a 1-1 is that the complexity of the game is simple, yet numerous players made a very unlikely series of coincidental plays all revolving around the same dead player night 1.
The argument I'm making is that the complexity of the game is not simple, and that the most likely and believable explanation is that Isacc could kill in an earlier phase than daybreak, thus nullifying the daybreak action of two players. This argument doesn't revolve around numerous players lying in absurd fashions about the exact same thing, and instead suggests that the most likely and simple explanation, "they are telling the truth" is correct, and that the game's complexity is the true issue here.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
I really have no clue about any of the flavor arguments being discussed, but we should really start deciding on a lynch. Deadline is Sunday.
Vote Seteal
She's been looking for excuses as to how both she and Sajin can both be town despite discrepancies in their roles. First there was the unsupported "maybe two notes at the same location get screwed with" and now the "maybe I'm naive" point. She's trying to justify how she could still be town if Sajin dies and shows up town, rather than the natural townie response of going after Sajin for contradictory results/role mechanics.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
I'm dead serious. There are no excuses.Benmage wrote:
You can't be serious.. give the guy a break...Goatrevolt wrote:
You haven't caught up on 130 pages yet? You've had plenty of time...charter wrote:I have no idea what is going on.
He's probably from a country that uses the day/month/year format.Benmage wrote:
Uhh what month are you on?Kinetic wrote:Daybreak actions are due by 5/7, 11:59 PM-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
I wasn't being serious.Benmage wrote:Goat after the first day or so..after a few post this becomes you’re activity.
Posts: May 14--May 16--May 21--May 29/29--June 4--June 9--June 14
Basically you played half the beginning of this game inactive. Stop being a douchebag the guy just replaced in, 130 pages…over the holiday weekend… if he does it in a week I’ll be happy.
Knight of Cydonia wrote:I'm amazed JVW didn't get lynched, to be honest. If anything, JVW/Me was a far simpler 1v1.
Except it very likely isn't a 1-1. Both of you are more than welcome to step up and refute my points.Mastermind of Sin wrote:indeed.-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA
I think that looks pretty bad for Sajin. I can't think of any reason to justify why two town note givers would have one receive the information via PM and the other just have it posted in thread. Regardless of sanity, that doesn't really make sense.Mastermind of Sin wrote:Sajin claimed that the mod sent him results by PM. Setael very clearly stated that the only results he knew were the ones posted in thread. He didn't actually know which of the notes were his, because the mod didn't PM him the results privately.
My Ajah claim can be verified. TSS should claim his first.Mastermind of Sin wrote:By the way, TSS and Goatrevolt still owe us an ajah color claim. I'm fine with claiming my color after they claim their colors, simply because I can back my up with posts from other players. Therefore, they should go first since their claims are less substantiated. Also, I should point out that Mora, who knows my role, has also confirmed that the aforementioned posts confirming my role DO exist, in case anyone questioned that. Even if he is scum, he had to confirm this, because otherwise I would know him to be scum for lying to everyone.
MoS, I find it interesting that you are pushing Mora as scum, yet wasn't it Mora's information that caught Flay? Am I missing something here?Mastermind of Sin wrote:Also, how do you feel about Mora vs Yos2, considering that Mora was just blocked for the second time that a nightkill went missing?-
-
Goatrevolt Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Pond Scum
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: May 17, 2008
- Location: Blacksburg, VA