The Sopranos: A Deadly Game (GAME OVER!)

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:43 am

/confirm...

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #38 (isolation #1) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:37 pm

Vote: Millar13

for arguing against someone being triggerhappy in a Soprano's game...

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #126 (isolation #2) » Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:03 pm

I'm suspicious of this wagon, which millar is a prime instigator of. I like my vote on him and encourage others to stop the al wagon and lynch millar.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #138 (isolation #3) » Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:28 pm

hohum wrote:@elvis_knits: You always build cases on people this fast and this early?

Do you think building a case on someone is pro-town or anti-town?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #142 (isolation #4) » Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:39 pm

I disagree with millar and agree with al. It's hard to imagine someone actually trying to justify how building a case could be anti-town. Millar differentiates between "scum cases" and "town cases", but the only players that would know the difference, i.e. someone's alignment, is someone on the same scum team.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #145 (isolation #5) » Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:58 pm

ZONEACE wrote:Building a shitty case is anti-town. THATS HOW.

Just because it's a poor case doesn't automatically make it anti-town. Pro-town results can still come from a poor case, for example lynching the case builder, and it still will get reactions.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #207 (isolation #6) » Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:50 pm

I'm sorry, I find it unlikely that Al and Millar are both scum, and I think that Millar has been much more scummy.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #349 (isolation #7) » Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:29 pm

I still think Millar is our best bet. He started a wagon on Al on fishy premises, and I don't like his massclaim idea either.