Sorry for my absence. I'm alive.
Spyrex's claim: He's probably telling the truth about what he is. Not sure why scum of any sort would reveal themselves to be a male channeler. Jester speculation seems mostly useless to me. Gentling seems like a very valid route for handling this.
Isaac wrote:CAN WE PLEASE STOP CLAIMING!? OMG.
QFT
Knight of Cydonia wrote:OH MY GOD STOP CLAIMING ALREADY FOR THE LOVE OF BOB.
QFT
Seriously folks, cut it out already.
Albert B. Rampage wrote:lol you think he already told me his ability?
Did you not say previously that your partner forbade you from divulging it? Doesn't that imply you know what it is? I'm pretty sure your assertion that you have not yet lied is due to sneaky wording. The problem is that I do not understand why you feel it is necessary.
As for Alfred B Rampage's claim - this really depends the comparison that Shadow Knight draws between what ABR listed in his role claim and what, presumably, SK was told. But his claim looked extremely detailed, and if there were any glaring inconsistencies then I think SK would have pointed them out by now.
I don't really find the fact that ABR claimed in the first place to be very indicative of his alignment - he has a reputation for having done far more delirious things in the past.
Lastly on this subject, I support one of SK & ABR confirming/contradicting Fabian's claim of Saidar being used. Really. How is this information damning?
Faraday wrote:And by breaking the oaths I'm saying it doesn't make him automatically scum, just careless and perhaps stupid.
QFT - and this is important. Granted, I think that catching claimed AS in a lie makes it more likely they're scum, but since everyone here is
playing a role
, breaking a post restriction is not an
impossible
contradiction, even if it is illegal.
for lack of content in existing posts and seemingly insincere vote on ABR.
@Mufasa, please provide a list of your top three suspects with brief explanations for why you find them suspicious.