Past Ages Mafia - Game Over

Santos · Post Post #27 (isolation #0) » Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:31 pm

Can't believe no one has done this yet.

Well, its not like

everyone

knows whats up.

Vote: ortolan

Santos · Post Post #98 (isolation #1) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:59 am

Alright. It was the 'it might be better to go to night' that tripped me up.

Ha ha.

Santos · Post Post #100 (isolation #2) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:03 pm

never mind. totally failed sexual innuendo.

Santos · Post Post #114 (isolation #3) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:36 pm

Unvote

Vote: No Lynch

as the two-headed deal has me worried. I wouldn't mind seeing what happens to everyone tomorrow.

Santos · Post Post #128 (isolation #4) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:40 pm

I support the idea of a lynch. We get two town directed kills for one; we'd be fools to pass this up.

So you're suggesting that the chances of hitting scum is great, if not greater since two people can die today...amirite?

So are we assuming the two heads are made up of town/town, town/scum, and scum/scum?

Santos · Post Post #129 (isolation #5) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:43 pm

Well, considering I listed all the possibilities of these pairings there is definitely a point in going for a lynch, however, it may cost us the game if we lynch two townies. Adversely, lynching two scum in one hit would grossly overpower the town. I just don't see town/town or scum/scum being a possibility in this game or else the game ends QUICKLY; wanting the day to end quickly is scummy.

Santos · Post Post #130 (isolation #6) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:45 pm

Unvote

I abstain unless my other head has a better point of view on the situation.

Santos · Post Post #164 (isolation #7) » Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:23 pm

10 scum is impossible, moron.

Cut the malarkey and tell me something I don't know.

Santos · Post Post #173 (isolation #8) » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:00 pm

Santos · Post Post #181 (isolation #9) » Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:20 am

Argggg, I need to post here. I will. Tonight. For sure.

Uhhhhh...check?

Santos · Post Post #213 (isolation #10) » Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:48 am

@BSG,
'there you are!'

'Well, hey, do I know you?'

'No! But that's where you're,

there

!'

What should we do, other-head?

Santos · Post Post #214 (isolation #11) » Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:49 am

@Kmd, I think your other head wants your tonsils.

Santos · Post Post #269 (isolation #12) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:09 pm

I'm just not so sure where to vote. I am in no rush, either. Empking seems suspect, but he doesn't ever say much to begin with. Its like shooting fish in a barrel, maybe he'll pin scum or maybe he is scum looking to pounce on a townie. Either way, it makes me hungry :p

Santos · Post Post #271 (isolation #13) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:52 pm

Just for shits and giggles, why not BSG and I vote for each other (minus Emp's vote of course)? I'm curious if anything will happen.

Santos · Post Post #273 (isolation #14) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:00 am

Has this been tried?

Santos · Post Post #279 (isolation #15) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:31 am

Lawrencelot, why do you need

Mod

assurance about how the game was setup? Obviously this whole thing has been random, unless you know something we don't?

Santos · Post Post #303 (isolation #16) » Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:46 pm

Sorry for my absence, I had work today, but now I am posting.

lol

Santos · Post Post #304 (isolation #17) » Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:48 pm

as for suspicions...I am most suspicious for myself in abandoning this game. I am not in favor of taking a chance in lynching two townies at once and I seriously doubt we would hit two scum in such circumstance. I am only suspicious of Empking, but as for anything else I don't have anything left to say. Plain and simple.

Santos · Post Post #305 (isolation #18) » Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:50 pm

yay, triple post.

As for miss BSG, do what you want with our vote; I stand firm for

No Lynch

, but I would be more comfortable if you and I made a collaborative effort in that decision. Otherwise, its your free will because I've exhausted the

no lynch

idea.

Santos · Post Post #307 (isolation #19) » Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:56 pm

Idk. I've been absent for like 2 and half minutes since my last post, so I'm sorry.

Santos · Post Post #308 (isolation #20) » Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:57 pm

check that, 6 minutes. If I agree with you about those posts, then I may be absent later to put a vote.

[/blatant sarcasm]

Santos · Post Post #317 (isolation #21) » Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:03 pm

Not so productive? Did we miss conception, or what?

Santos · Post Post #319 (isolation #22) » Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:19 pm

I thought that one worked...meh.

Santos · Post Post #323 (isolation #23) » Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:03 pm

I think I touched someone's nerve.

BSG, I would be fine with lynching Braeden...he is more scummy IMO.

Santos · Post Post #348 (isolation #24) » Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:44 pm

BSG, did you need anything from me? Were we going to make a decision or just

no lynch

?

Santos · Post Post #357 (isolation #25) » Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:59 am

@

K7, Popu, julien, lawrence, ortolan, empking, shadowgirl, RR, raider, Brandi, Kmd, Braeden:

What are the reasons for the votes on those above people?

Santos · Post Post #393 (isolation #26) » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:19 pm

Slicey, since you claim townie, do you know your partner is 100% town as well?

Santos · Post Post #400 (isolation #27) » Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:41 am

Oh, nice catch

I agree with BSG. Slicey followed my lead by claiming he has a partner and not another head. Partner = scum buddy = guilty. I am satisfied.

Santos · Post Post #418 (isolation #28) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:23 am

UR, you crack me up. You want me replaced? Why dont you you say it a few more times and maybe you'll get your wish.

As far as i can tell, UR is significantly pro town because he is clearly annoyed with me for wasting this spot in this game. If UR was scum, then he probably wouldnt care so much that i was making an ass of myself and would rely on me getting myself lynched by retaliating obnoxiously to other players = i would be lynching myself because i was annoying as opposed to being scummy. UR, I believe you are pro town because of the above. So i have no qualm with you.

Santos · Post Post #420 (isolation #29) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:29 am

I am saying that you are doing your job as a pro town player by wanting to get me lynched because i am wasting this spot you would rather have someone else play in. Scum players would just wait for a chance to vote me as opposed to continually whining to have me lynched or replaced.

Santos · Post Post #422 (isolation #30) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:37 am

I am not trying to get lynched. I am playing mafia the way I want to play mafia. Do you have a problem with that?

Santos · Post Post #423 (isolation #31) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:53 am

Furthermore, if we fail in a lynch today (no lynch, or town lynch) scum will probably NK UR which will make it a great reason to have me lynched by saying I now have a personal vendetta against UR; I don't.

If we hit scum, then, well, you know...hurray!

Santos · Post Post #426 (isolation #32) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:47 pm

@Brandi, i am entirely confused by your post. Can you elaborate further on what you mean?

Santos · Post Post #429 (isolation #33) » Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:20 pm

But not your vote for BSG? Thats just racist, bra.

Santos · Post Post #444 (isolation #34) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:42 pm

WIFOM, whatever. I could have poisoned both the glasses.

Santos · Post Post #462 (isolation #35) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:19 am

BSG is a female, fyi.

Santos · Post Post #465 (isolation #36) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:15 pm

I guess mentioning BSG is a female is an understatement.

Anyways...

Santos · Post Post #493 (isolation #37) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:53 am

@Lawrencealot

, why are you not voting for me when you keep saying you want to vote for me? My understanding is that if we want to lynch scum, it might as well go along with one townie too because 1 scum is better than lynching two townie (heads), no?

Santos · Post Post #529 (isolation #38) » Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:31 pm

from Lawrence

As you wish. Unvote; Vote: Santos. I don't believe in Jesters in closed games, so...

So you are scum? I figured you would want to talk this out as to why you think I am scummy as opposed to just putting a vote on me like a mafia member would given ample opportunity when it arises.

FoS: Lawrence only

. And

Jesters

? Give me a ****in break dude.

from Braeden

I think Slicey and Santos are scummy.

'think' is not explaining why, Braeden. Please explain: WHY.

from Slicey

Well, it looks like I'm going to be lynched. Do me a favor and get rid of Santos, will ya? He isn't going to do anything the entire game.

That sounds like my mafia death sentence tonight.

^omg, WIFOM, omg.

Santos · Post Post #530 (isolation #39) » Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:33 pm

and what I was saying by 1 scum/1 townie is better than lynching 2 townies (heads) so why would Lawrence be so incredibly indecisive unless he is not wanting to vote for the Slicey lynch because it is possible his scum buddy is a part of that lynch...

Santos · Post Post #532 (isolation #40) » Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:36 pm

I need to learn how to utilize punctuation in my sentences. Good grief.

Santos · Post Post #559 (isolation #41) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:48 am

Lawrence wrote:@Santos: For some reason I have to read your posts multiple times before I understand a thing of it. No, I am not scum. Yes, I have given clarification, although I didn't clearly mention it as it is obvious: you asking for a vote pushed me over. I already said I don't think Slicey is scum (anymore) so that's why I voted you instead of Slicey. I hope I answered all your questions...

I'm glad

did something

, but voting me because I asked why you are hesitant to vote isn't the same as voting because you want to vote. If you had voted for your own reasons and clearly stated them in the thread (not because I told you to), then we all would see a more legitimate response from you. Saying I told you to vote for me is simply stupid. Please have a better reason, sir.

Santos · Post Post #560 (isolation #42) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:49 am

I'm glad *you* did something

fixed.

Santos · Post Post #562 (isolation #43) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:32 pm

**** you too pal

Santos · Post Post #578 (isolation #44) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:27 pm

Santos is appearing as useless as ever.

Lol. And you're just a fountain of input.

Santos · Post Post #581 (isolation #45) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:04 pm

Another gem.

Santos · Post Post #631 (isolation #46) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 3:58 pm

UR, you're retarded.

Santos · Post Post #747 (isolation #47) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:42 pm