Um...I think I'll
Is there any point
Information Instead of Analysis. But now I see pretty much everyone is doing it, which is understandable. She just seemed to lead it off.Dahill wrote:how is being interested in the setup relate to scumminess?TehVariable wrote:forbiddanlight seems really interested in the set up...while that's ok for now, if it continues it might be suspicious.
So, that was our mysterious mod speaker.
MafiaSSK was the hammer vote. That's why he's dead. And yes, he WAS a player. - Tar
This. Everyone's apparent bloodthirstyness will likely lead to town's loss. And I can't help but feel there might be some scum supporting lynching the mod. Even if the past has shown benefit for doing it, each MS has been a different animal. I don't think it's safe.We already know that lynching the mod is different in this game and any other MS. Let's see if we can determine who is speaking through the mod first, that seems like the next logical step.
I know in MS 2 the psychologist had the ability to talk to Shinji. The only problem is Shinji was a fakeclaim for scum, and if the psychologist found shinji in the person using their full mafia falseclaim, they could become neighbors, IIRC.Didn't one of the previous mind screws have some kind of a relationship between the SK and the shrink? I remember someone mentioning it here as well.. If true, I would bet Aries was SK'd.
Yes, because there wasdahill wrote:
i find this post to be scummy. how about instead of waiting for others to posts cases for you to follow, you do one yourself? active lurking ftw..
FoS: TehVariable
also FoS at all of the people making these types of posts..
How do we know the PR was faked? Could it have been released somehow?dahill wrote:
finally, vote qwints for faking the PR. question: how long were you planning on doing that and how did it benefit the town? faking this type of unreadable PR is straight anti-town
Original thought for the win.pesco47 wrote: Vote TehVariable
dahill covered it already with a FoS, I'm feeling it's voteworthy.
Why do we need to lynch tar though?Electra wrote:
vote: Tarhalindur
I'm certain that if we WIFOM ourselves out of killing Tar, then that's the wrong choice.
What does this even mean? Do you people even bother with reasoning anymore? Forget my poke at dahill, he's the most pro town of the lot of you poking me.SG wrote:
Variable, you should have known what you were signing up for... So:
Fos: TehVariable
Well, at least someone agrees with me.SC wrote:
Instead of going with the flow of suspicions, why don't you elaborate on yours?
Vote: Pesco47
Yeah. The fact Tar confirmed that SSK wasn't posting through him.Electra wrote: @ dahill and Shadowgirl - the player was MafiaSSK. He's now dead.
Am I missing something?
Yos' mechanic in MS 1, correct? I didn't notice :S...I should be paying more attention to stuff like VCsXyl wrote: All votes are counting for the next person down on the player list. Votes on Tar wrap around to Context.
Oh, you did fake your PRqwints wrote:
To those asking why I faked the post restriction - I've already said I was trying to activate my ultimate and that I will no say no more on it. To the question of how long I was planning to do so - just the first day. This is again due to how my ultimate works.
Well, if you read my post, you'd know I already addressed this. Or are you a selective reader?
@ Variable: If SCoug agrees with you, where is your actual suspicion of me coming from? Lame OMGUS without putting your weight behind it is all I can say.
It's a bit hard to when the day ends before you get home. I think my posting recently is more acceptable.
I'd like to pressure TehVariable. I want more content.
Ok, seriously, you could at least answer people as well as ask. This is scummy.Sorry, I'm here. vote: Pacman281292(qwints)
Is there anything scummy about me besides opportunism?
thisI don't meta. I judge on what's in front of me.
If it's just because of your incredibly weak reasoning before, be glad that there are people scummier than you.
Unvote, Vote dahill (TehVariable)
Hahaha! As expected of Tar-san.
Congratulations, folks, you found a neutral: Tarhalindur (yes, that's my role name as well as my user name), normal Survivor w/ 1-shot kill immunity and 1-shot rapidkill as Ultimate. Of course, it's not like you're going to believe me until BlakAdder's ability goes through. There's also no way you're not going to (rightfully) lynch the Survivor tomorrow. Oh well.
day is over.
In light of this new information, it looks like I no longer need to worry about that and can unvote myself. unvote. lol
Think what you will. It's not at all possible that people are busy this time of year. Not at all.Post 498 - variable: You're totally active lurking.
Still a bit fast. For a 30 player game, I expect less than 15 pages.
Post 355 - Variable: We don't know that yet? No, more length is not necessary. Games always go way too long here, this was a good lynch.
A trojan horse? But of course we can't trust your motives.
Last note: I'd beware of Greeks bearing gifts. Those who should know what I refer to will know. Of course, I might be lying...
It is indeed the correct play. (But I won't vote til I've figured out if I'm hammering him or not)
We should not do anything but lynch Tar today.
What was this here? I doubt we'll get any useful info from Tar concerning it, but any theories?
Vote: Cephrir
Unvote, Vote: Machiavellian-Mafia
hrm, interesting theory. Remember that Tar is probably laying incredible WIFOM on us right now though.
Sounds like DGB is scum and Tar-Player knows someone is going to use an investigation role on her either today or tonight (remember 2 actions, he has tonight's actions all ready) because he was sure he'd be quick lynched and didn't want the twilight to last longer than the day in this game every twilight.
ThisWhy are you numbering your posts, has?
Nat would have to be neutral too, but I think Nat as back up mod has to be there as a check on Tar player-mod.
What are the odds of Tar's role PM being misleading (i.e.: could Nat also be a player despite Tar's PM specifically saying he's not?)
Death Note did not require him to use his ultimate. Intervention did.
Anyway, I don't think Tar killed TCS. If I'm reading his role PM correctly, he can only kill people if there are at most 3 members of anti-town factions left. Since we haven't killed any scum yet, this implies that in a 30-player game, there are only 3 (or less) scum... which makes no sense. Sure he's an SK, but he's harmless at this point. (unless I'm missing something?) I say we lynch XssX/Seraphim.
Did you read Tar's role PM?
Also, where the heck do you get the 3 members of anti-town factions thing left?
hmm...that's a good point.
- Death Note only works if the person in question says his ability in the thread (an unlikely scenario, it seems).
The fact that he has to see an ability name posted in thread kinda makes it hard to kill that way unless it was indeed said.
And he can kill without it active.
Oh yeah...I forgot this. Um...anyway, when did TCS ever claim an ability name? Or did he accidentally say it/crumb it?
Veerus. Tar killed TCS.
You probably could have waited for everyone to check in. Day started while I was sleeping. I'd like to have had more day discussion...5 pages! you got to be kidding me.
Need to catch up.
We lynch the SK.
There could have been any number of restrictions on when he could use it. I really wish you hadn't hammered, if you indeed did so.
If he had an ability so important to use it before we lynch Tar, he would have already used it.
That obvious huh? Well, I think we'll stick with figure it out, considering first I'm not even sure I'm allowed to say, and even if I am it takes the fun out of the game.tehvariable, who's alt are you?
It is a reason you can tell us?I have reason to believe that pop is at minimum a cultist, and at most a cult recruiter.
Original thought much? Don't like this from Xyl.I smell a lurker.
Vote: Stef (Cephrir)
Yes, my mannerisms are rather obvious. I'm trying to decide if answering that is too much information though. Let me think about it.
i could tell from the beginning
mainly just by your mannerisms, but i have a theory
answer this (if you can): is this a second account controlled by a player who is/was in the game?
That's it? I'm about willing to join this bandwagon if that's all you have to say.Yeah, I know it doesn't make sense. There are so many people in this game that it moves fast in terms of posts without a lot happening, and I don't have nearly enough of a handle on potential suspects here so I don't have as much to contribute.
I doubt I'm the worst lurker, anyway.
Why the hesitation? Because I was sick of quicklynches, and I hadn't finished reading.Why the hesitation?
Also more of the same IIoA, ironically a Tarhalindur Standard Tell. FoS: TehVariable
this
however, Cephrir's response of "I'm not the worst lurker" was pretty scummy, and at least tajo contributes content so my vote is staying on ceph.
If you like to know what the rules are, yes.Question: If we knew who Chairman Mao was, should we lynch them?
I was being honest. As for the Cephir vote, that was temporary until I found out if I could do this.
Er, isn't the pop vs. DGB more important than Cephrir? There's something EXTREMELY OFF with pop's behvior, and you're fretting over Cephrir?
And all you can say is that you've 'never paid attention' to poptaj???
Isn't it time?
Variable, are you culted? We will find out.
You said it, not I. I actually just want to get a sane investigation (Which it is guaranteed to be by my PM) on DGB since she's hard to read. It doesn't have much bearing on your own alignment, though it might affect the opinions on it.I dont get it. If DGB flips town, am I scum? And viceversa? How the hell does that make sense?
And why the hell the fact that DGB thinks that I targeted her (I might or might not target) makes me cult?
Sorry, misinterpreted your post. I missed that to be honest.I dont have nothing against you, TV and never said you were the one sayng that.
I dont know why Xyl is pushing subtly this dilemma.
You are not confirmed unless a sane investigation occurs on you. This should be the case for anyone. Well, there are a couple other ways to be confirmed, but that's the main one. I also don't like how you are trying to make it look like if she flips scum, you can't be. Wouldn't it be interesting if you were both scum...
I just want to ask something : If DGB comes up town that means I am scum? Or if DGB come sup scum does that mean Im confirmed town?
It was. Until I knew I could activate Whack A Mole. I didn't know if using two actions took todays action or not.Seems like a... placeholder vote,
Ask away. I believe I established my reasons.
I will say right now that something is not adding up to me, and I will have some serious questions for the person who initiated Whack-a-Mole as soon as I get access back (which may take a bit).
Furthermore, it's should have been obvious it wasn't the vote I disputed, it was the fact that he basically said the exact same thing someone said earlier. I never said Ceph was town. Nor did I ever imply that I thought that. Please pay attention.And then going on to vote Ceph in post 785 as if his behaviour had just come to light. While Ceph's next post was scummy, I don't think see how it would have completely given him a new view on him
It explicitly says in my PM what it does, and what it says is exactly what it said in MS II.
But one thing bothers me; why are we assuming that Whack A Mole does the same thing here that it did in Mind Screw 2? Does (whoever used it) know for sure what it does?
Nope, I'm forbiddanlight's other half, Tweedledum. The rest should come together pretty quickly now.
@TehVariable: Explain your role. Immediately. I have reason to believe that you are Chairman Mao. You have used a power that was one of his powers in MS II. Regardless of the fact that it is a pro-town power, if you are Chairman Mao, you need to be removed so that we can see the rules. Therefore, I think we should lynch you when we are finished with the investigation lynch.
Uh...huh...yeah. ok, at this point
No, my condition hasnt been met yet. Im saying that revealing it will benefit scum more than town.
Arguable. It's the way she confronted the investigation, and further, tajo's claim feels more fake than pesco's.We're letting DGB slide based on another claim of a pro-town action.
*snicker* sorry, last time I heard mod confirmed was when someone dead tried to say they'd reread.I know that you cant trust me but Im saying to you that I have a way to prove Im town. Therefore wasting an investigation on me its not the way to go.
At the end, if I get Modconfirmed it wont matter how I got confirmed, right?
How soon is soon?either my PM will be posted soon
Guess I'm getting your vote.. Next person to ask me to post my ultimate condition will get my vote.
But you are MAKING yourself an optimal investigation target...
As much as Id like to tell you how I am going to be confirmed, we are discussing about optymal investigation targets.
Well, my timing WAS impeccable with Tar declaring a new rule, but there are other possibilities, I grant. Just realize it'd make me pretty obvscum if we actually did lynch instead of investigate.I trust TehVariable right now, but we should make sure that who we are "investigating" is someone we don't mind lynching, just in case.
I know this is to cow, but seriously, if I did, I wouldn't try to make it sound like I'm attempting to wriggle out of an investigation with it. So your ultimate goes to waste. You should have played in a manner that felt more pro town to the town.Has, if you had information that benefits more scum than town would you share it even if it confirms you as town?
Ah, sorry...I have this problem as forbiddanlight as well (probably a contributor to why I got caught). I actually started this game intending to mask that by actually putting names by quote boxes but I forgot to after awhile, lol. Bad habits die hard.DGB wrote:
I enjoy post box bonanzas as much as the next gal, but I like it better when you state who you are quoted. If not, it reads like gibberish.
I'm curious, how do you find Cephrir, which is like the anticounterwagon?DGB wrote:
My read on poptajo is... town. Scummy; but town. Still it would help if he was just a bit more cooperative.
Not that it precisely matters beyond wasting an investigation, but did you miss the part where it was established that I'm forbiddanlight? I obviously cannot be scum if this is true (and that's probably the iffy part), but given my role as forbiddanlight and my claimed role, I think it makes a bit of sense. As well as posting style, for that matter.StrangerCoug wrote: TehVariable would make a nice investigation target IMO
I could see this too.ShadowGirl wrote:
In light of this news and figure out whether Pesco's abilities are for the good of the town or not. 'Clearing someone' when they're dead is pretty open ended as to what could happen.
I don't think this would help much. I'm almost certain you are indeed a neutral. It's just a matter of if you are Haruhi or Mao, and I fully believe if you were Mao you'd get Haruhi as a fakeclaim. Since Whack-a-Mole gives alignment, this wouldn't be helpful.Kairyuu wrote: I'm not particular either way. I would go for DGB, Tajo, Seraphim, Cephrir, or myself (if you guys want to confirm that I'm not lying scum).
You would of course say this anyway, whether it's true or not.
I didn't get any fakeclaims. However, I did get the ability to request any fake role pm that I want (and I may be using that soon just to make a wacky, completely improbable one).
Ok, let me breifly go through Haruhi flavor for what I remember of these. I'm not sure if they'll have much germane to the actual effect, but it may be helpful for people good at speculation."Endless Eight" (which I suspect has something to do with the deadline, "The Boredom of Haruhi Suzumiya" (which sounds cool, and kinda supports my claim), and "Editor in Chief? Straight Ahead!" (which I suspect makes the game into kingmaker for the day)
Hmm, I wonder what Lone Island Syndrome could be...I know Tar uses the FLAVOR of it in Whack A Mole, but not sure if he actually made another ability for it.Kairyuu wrote: Wow. So these actually come from the story? Sweet. You mentioned two more of my abilities in there. Lone Island Syndrome and Snow Mountain Syndrome are both powers that I have. The final two are "Live a Live" and "The Dissociation of Haruhi Suzumiya" if you have any flavor on that for me (I intended to read/watch the series, but never got around to it).
Do you by any chance have green hair?Kairyuu wrote: to screw...the rules
Why? Kairyuu hasn't reached his ultimate yet, and needs to activate 3 more dreams of reality to do so. This is pointless for the time being.SC wrote: Origin claim: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
lolwut?DGB wrote: Someone else is trying to kill me? What? Am I such a threat to the scum?
Policy Mod lynch went well .StrangerCoug wrote:
I like DrippingGoofball even less and it comes off as wanting Kairyuu policy lynched. Yes, I'd normally invoke LAL on him too, but the first policy lynch we had this game didn't work out the way most of us wanted. This is a mind screw game, so I question ANY policy lynch working the way town wants it to.
And make sure he uses Endless Eight before he's vigged !Xyl wrote: Kairyuu's new claim makes more sense, but he's already admitted lying once. We can't afford to trust him. I say leave him alive for one day, and if he isn't vigged, lynch him tomorrow.
Come now, this one's easy. We know that at the LEAST he has Dreams of Reality. I HIGHLY doubt he pulled Endless Eight out of his ass, or any of the other abilities I didn't mention in my flavor synopsis.DGB wrote: How do we even gauge what may be gained or lost by leaving him alive, since we don't know if he's telling the truth?
IIRC, Tar's use of this in MS 1 had 3 pro scum, 3 pro town, and 4 semi neutral. So, they could hurt or help with equal frequency.SG wrote:
I meant that if his current claim is true then he poses no threat to us. I mean, he's only neutral. [If that's what he really is.] His abilities would help town more then they would hurt it, no?
Neutral is basically "I want to die" for a claim. If not right then, then pretty soon after. It's not even WIFOM at that point. Scum would have to be suicidal to attempt it. I mean, look at what everyone wants to do with him right now?DGB wrote: I'd like to suggest, for your weighing and consideration, that there is some probability that he lied because he's scum, and 'neutral' might be a good claim if he's afraid he'll be investigated, or to potentially ward off investigations.
I'm going with what Dreams of Reality was in the past, and flavor speculation. I also just wanna see what Tar does with Endless Eight without having to wait til end game.Stef wrote: Teh.. one problem with your line of thought. How do you know Kai's abilities are pro-town? Really.
We know that either Xyl is covering for Kai (doubtful), or that Kai indeed used Dreams of Reality.DGB wrote: She doesn't even know if the abilities are TRUE, let alone town or scum aligned.
I still believe he has Endless EightStef wrote: Ok.. one true thing about his claim ( as proven with his previous claim ) doesn't mean that he's telling the truth. The fact that he used Dreams of Reality doesn't tell us anything really.
I'm not sure if I'm willing to let you go that far. A time loop mechanic just interests me, if that's what it is. Anyway, you DO realize you can use actions during the day, and twilight is just catching up people who forgot to send in their actions during the day, right? Like, I sent in whack a mole mid way through today and it activated.Kai wrote:
@TehVariable: Very Happy I like your stance on this. That's essentially all I want to do, see what this stuff does, and how it actually works in thread. Endless Eight was definitely my top choice to use this Twilight, and if I make it there, I will defintiely be using it. After that, I would like to see what The Dissociaton of Haruhi Suzumiya does, since you had no guesses, and then Snow Mountain Syndrome too, cuz it sounds cool. I'd keep going after that, but that would make 4, and a massclaim at that point would kick me from the game. I'd rather not be policy lynched thoug (especially since I remember seeing somewhere in the Mafia Discussion section a thread about how LAL doesn't work in the current meta, and have Mini Normal 682: C9++ to provide an example of wy this is true). However, if it is called for a bit later once I have one or two more actions activated to see what they do, then I'll go right along with it.
Did I ever say that? I merely stated that Dreams of Reality is probably as chaotic as it has been in the pastDGB wrote: I very much doubt that Tar would make out lives so easy as to repeat everything from the past, roles and alignments.
Endless Eight?Tar wrote:
New Rule
wow. I hope you didn't just make me a target.pesco wrote: DGB died to the mod-SK. It seems whoever can kill is very paranoid about my ability being a delayed vig. I kinda like calling it that now.
How do you figure this? Inquisitor doesn't say much, just that he's anti town neutral. Could be an SKXyl wrote: I think we can safely count Vi as the cult leader.
I think he just wants to get rid of "I'm gonna claim my ability so there!" behavior without calling it jackassery.Kinetic wrote: I'm curious because if Pesco didn't kill DGB, how can we be sure it was the Mod-SK? The Mod-SK was already dead...
Unless the Mod-SK can come back to life? That makes no sense... Mod... Reviver... ... ...
Vote:Tar
Depends. What do you think your chances of survival are?pesco wrote: Mod's pretty dead from the first post. Now that we know there's scum to be found, do we want to bust out my ultimate and see if I've hit any of them? I doubt I'll be NK'd by anti-town any time soon, so we'll have to go by lynch or a vig.
What about the grief counseling?Kai wrote: Have fun guys, and save me a piece of "lie" when this is all over (guess the reference and you get a cookie)
I won't answer for cow, but I'll give you a hint. That's not the scummy part.SC wrote: OK, hasdgfas, since when is guessing how a lynch will turn out correctly scummy?
Pretty sure it didn't say SK by Tar either. It was just in his PM :SXyl wrote:
He was anti-town, and wasn't shown as "SK" or "Mafia". The description fits pretty well, too.
Interesting.SC wrote: No. The only reason I know a cult exists is because of the inside information I gained as per my Ultimate activating and revealed at the start of Day 3.
What amazes me is no one else has thought of that.pesco wrote: May I suggest lynching Rule 0? If it's out of the game, we get to see the rest of the rules right?
Well, that sure makes you look good. Especially given your recalcitrance to elaborate.Kinetic wrote:
No.
Ironically enough, yesterday I would have answered this question differently Razz.
why are you so sure the cult is in the lead?cow wrote:
This looks like something just meant to have us waste a lynch and then have a cult win. This is a terrible idea.
Why? Are you just ignoring what just happened here?SC wrote: Unvote: Rule 0
Let's find Chairman Mao.
It was worth a shot, and hadn't been done before.Seraphim wrote: It won't work. That's the problem. Lynching Chairman Mao is what shows us the rules.
It's not a valid target or we'd see wrapping.SG wrote: I think the whole point of lynching rule zero is so we can see all the rules - which is an alright idea, but perhaps not this late in the game.
Why are you voting me and ignoring the two magically unexplained votes that appeared on me as well? I wish I had an FoS for you as well.MM wrote:
@Kinetic: Why are you still silent on elaborating your peculiar statement?
I'm opposed to lynching rule 0 as well. Unvote, vote: hasdgfas (TehVariable)
What do you know that makes it probably not work? This is MS. Try everything. Most people would say "lynching the mod probably won't work". Well...whoops! It was worth a shot.Cephrir wrote: Lynching a rule probably won't work, so why do it?
Tar is not a one trick pony. I doubt he'd use the same role twice.Xyl wrote:
If cult in this game looks like the cult of pacifism in one of Tar's previous games, then cultists got an alternative second win condition, and can win by fulfilling either. Anyone think they know what the second win condition is?
cow wrote:
Why is anyone voting to lynch a rule? How does anyone think this is a good idea?
But I'm not, y'see. And there's no real justification for thinking I am. Unless you want to use the voting rule 0 justification which...hehehe, you did too. I could support your lynch just for that last.SC wrote:
I do see the benefit of going after the leader instead of the standard cultist, but that is not enough of a defense if you are a cultist.
Un-FoS if necessary
FoS: TehVariable
You obviously didn't comment on it.SC wrote:
No; I'm taking into account what just happened here.
Oh, you just missed the point. I meant the two votes that magically appeared on me without any justification. No one commented on those, when usually unjustified votes catch you hell.SC wrote:
All right, then, I'll bite. I'm less familiar with Mind Screw games than you are, and the concern that the cult win condition could conceivably be lynching Rule 0 was enough to make me reconsider. I thought that, by saying "Let's find Chairman Mao", I was implying that that was the better option in my opinion.
Cept I wasn't deflecting. I was pointing something out that should have been pointed out way before my post. If you mean deflecting to a cult leader, well, I'm not targetting a known target, so it'd be a pretty pathetic deflection, if needed.SC wrote:
No, I want to use the "deflecting suspicion elsewhere" justification.
SC, are you intentionally missing the point or are you just stupid today?SC wrote:
My unvoting Rule 0 has nothing to do with the two unreasoned votes on you; in fact, I missed both of them.
It wasn't deflection.SC wrote:
That's what I meant—deflecting to whoever the cult leader is. I don't think it's voteworthy at this time, which is why I didn't vote you outright, but it is noted.
The malt vote. This works, but why couldn't you have said it at the time? Which is why I'm very wary of you.tajo wrote: Explanation for a mal vote or for a TV vote that I already said it was a mistake?
I dont have reads on many people pretty much for my lazy status of not rereading the game. Xyl analized DGB and I think I like it so far. The problem is that DGB is not the best example of a continuos reasoning.
I reread only by Malt posts and I looked lurking behaviour, non contributal posts and his prod Sereaphim when he wasnt precisely the best player regarding activeness. The only thing that makes me wonder about him is that usually scum dont receive additional kills, right?
Take in count also the minor fact that I need to be in the first 3 votes of the lynch wagon of a scum to activate my ultimate and become mod confirmed which means I prob should be very liberal about voting in a possible early wagon.
I would be happy with a Kin lynch also. I havent liked him all the game. Do you people agree?
thiscow wrote:
Tajo: Why don't you like Kinetic?
Which posts by Malthusis are you talking about that you don't like? I
Never said you. READ MY POSTS! That was questions relating to why not giving reasoning for a vote is scummy, as referring to the two I've called out.SC wrote:
Um, hello? I don't have a solid case on anybody, but I'm not voting anybody either.
And why are you saying the unvote had nothing to do with it? I didn't tie the two together, and I don't see why you are making out like I did.SC wrote:
I don't see myself as intentionally missing the point; I'm just saying the unvote has nothing to do with what you're talking about despite the latter being a valid concern. I do need occasional wake-up calls, though.
The fact that I'm forbiddanlight. And it's been transparently obvious, according to dahill. I doubt I have two different alignments. I'm Tweedle Dum, the other half of the Townie Hive Mind. I basically was a mason with myself, lol.Kinetic wrote:
When were you confirmed? How were you confirmed? I missed it, and I'm sure you know where it was better than I do and I'd prefer not to go digging for it.
Relating to the magical unexplained wagon that appeared on me. I assumed it was a cult movement.Kinetic wrote:
Second, why cult? Some people have called me scum all game, now you narrow me as cult, or with cult like behaivior. May I ask why?
Not to answer for SC, but I'd say you are Mao. Or maybe you are the FMP Mao. That would be hilarious.Kinetic wrote:
If I told you that lynching Mao would not be a good thing, what would you think?
Increase in suspicion for those who don't?SC wrote:
And how are we going to work this out, exactly?
But what's the disadvantage?MM wrote: The vote cycling I did is role-related.
I also do not see any benefit to posting the mafia-related words since Tar is dead.
this.pesco wrote: How come you haven't done it on the other days?