I'd only want to get investigated if me flipping out townie makes it easier for the town to scumhunt.Xylthixlm wrote:I fail to see how wanting to have yourself investigated is anti-town.hp [leaves] wrote:DGB (for voting for herself which would have caused town to waste an investigation)
Ceprir (for the same reason as DGB and lurking)
Are you scum?StrangerCoug wrote:Answer this for me then: Suppose you and I are lovers and you do not know that I am scum. Your win condition reads, "Under normal circumstances, you win when all threats to the town have been eliminated from the game; however, if StrangerCoug is scum and he wins, so do you if the two of you are alive." Are you, therefore, not town because I'm not either, even though that's not something you would know?
What if the unvotes work but votes after unvotes don't? Won't have we just reward the cult the game?Kinetic wrote:Dammit. It might be exactly as I fear.
We CANNOT No-Lynch, there is a VERY high chance that there is a role that wins if we No-Lynch. However, I believe there is also a role, a DIFFERENT role that has an ability which makes it so people either A) cannot unvote, or B) the votes that we see in the vote count are not the correct ones.
Because of this, there is a way to test B, but unfortuantly for me, if A is correct I am the only person who can be lynched, and as I said before, we cannot no-lynch in this game.
The only possibility of A being correct and the town not being forced to lynch me, however, is if the person with this ability can either turn it off, or it has an experation date. I'd like to ask whoever is the cause of this ability if they could explain it, at this point it would be the townie thing to do. But the person who did this could very well be scum.
Ugh.
This is important: I'd like to bandwagon someone, anyone, else to see if we can lynch someone despite not "technically" being able to unvote (or at the least, see our unvotes. Whoever is fine (I'd like to volunteer M-M for this, but anyone but myself will do). This includes voting them AND FOSing them to lynch.
If, after 11 people have bother FOSed and Lynched (because I count 20 votes in play, 11 would be required, but I might not have the right count), and that person is not lynched, then we will have no choice but to sacrifice me and lynch me, much to my own dismay.
If the cult wins, it is game over unless their win condition specifies the game won't end.Vir4030 wrote:However, even with the cult leader dead, the cultists still have a win condition. If they win tonight, that could put us in lylo tomorrow. If two cultists win, we could be in lylo at 9p with 4 aligned scum. If three cultists win, we could be at 8p with 3 aligned scum, which while not technically lylo will prevent us from lynching Pesco.
Yes; but Xyl's vote didn't rotate to me as it should. It rotated to either Caboose or iamusername. If that vote count is correct, I bet 10 bucks either Caboose or iamusername (most likely caboose) is the speaker through Tar.zwetschenwasser wrote:Vote rotation, hp.
The cult is most likely after the High Council. Pesco made it pretty clear.iamausername wrote:Note: Recalling DGB's death, I'm censoring the word "m*stly" in case of Cult of Massclaim. I figure if such a thing exists, their win condition would have to specify exact role names because otherwise we could get into serious arguments about exactly what constitutes a claim.
If all the High Council members are killed, the cult will still win the game (if their win condition is that. Seems possible, as the cult would know who (as in flavor name) is in the High Council, and a massclaim would make it pretty obvious.).Xylthixlm wrote:I don't like that question mark.Tarhalindur wrote:The Sixty-Seventh Vote Count (aka The "Cult Win Condition Is No Longer Relevant?" Vote Count)
From least info to most info would be a pretty good order.iamausername wrote:Sounds good, yeah. Does anyone particularly care about an order? I don't think it'll make a lot of difference in this case.hp [leaves] wrote:I like this idea.qwints wrote:I propose a limited mass claim at this time. - that is, reveal any and all information you have learned without revealing your role.
All I know is that someone tried to kill me.
Come on, you could make up something better than this.Caboose wrote:Guess I'm next, then.
I'm Chell (from Portal), a Replaceable Townie. If I am to die by any method other than lynching, I get replaced instead.
My ultimate is called Time Rift, which is activated when I am replaced ("I" meaning the person who originally got my role PM, which was Stef). Time Rift causes all the actions submitted that day to be delayed by two game days. I used my power yesterday, which is what caused the whole "DISCONTINUITY" thing.
Seraphim, you go next.
I had figured out you were scum. Caboose was the most likely, Seraphim was second and you were third on scumminess. (I even entangled Seraphim and myself on day 8 in case i got killed(which was the most possible mafia kill, given that there was a relation between being a MVT and being kill immune))Xylthixlm wrote:On a completely unrelated note, someone who knows my meta could have figured out that I was scum because I wasn't pushing for lurker lynches! I push them very strongly as town, but this game the two of the biggest lurkers were my scumbuddies. Fortunately (for me as scum) most people view pushing lurker lynches asscummy, so I actually looked more protown by not pushing them.