FFVII Mafia: Over
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
I just read xtoxm's, ABR's and armlx's posts. My initial guess is that xtoxm is scum with an ability to search for opposite scumteam. It's reasonable to guess that there are two scumteams in a game of this magnitude. It wouldn't surprise me if armlx is scum. It's possible that xtoxm is scum with the ability to hunt power roles, in which case armlx is his target and victim today. Tough to say.
1) What would the two scumteams be in this game?
2) Why would xtoxm claim vanilla while hinting at a guilty on armlx?
3) Who is taking sides on this issue most ardently? They likely have inside info on armlx's alignment.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Well, now the question is.. would ABR suicide as scum to kill the town cop investigating his scumteam?Albert B. Rampage wrote:I wasted my investigation on Xtoxm. He is scum. Confirmed.
I have no clue, since he's a wingnut.
But at least we're guaranteed one scum if we lynch Xtoxm today. ABR dies as scum tonight or tomorrow if Xtoxm comes up good guy. There's even a decent chance both are scum.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Albert, you're an idiot. I hope all decent mods decide to ban you from their games in the future, because fakeclaiming a cop with a guilty on D1 is about as unbalancing and game-wrecking as you can get. Have some respect, man.
And/or die as the scum you are.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
I totally agree with this conclusion, except for the way it conflicts with the fact that ABR claimed Cid.More likely, I think, is that you're some kind of scum (SK, or member of a second scum group, or something) who thought Xtoxm was probably lying scum of a different flavor (not a hard guess to make, considering how scummy he acted all day) and decided to try to use the situation to get yourself "confirmed" by pretending to be a cop and faking a guilty investigation on someone you were sure was scum.
Here's the thing though. We know Albert is a terrible player. So he probably didn't think his actions through. So if he's actually a townie who's NOT Cid, he didn't realize that by claiming Cid he'd get a power role outed. (Cid's likely power and is probably pondering whether or not to counterclaim Albert right now.) If he's scum, he claimed Cid knowing full well he could get counterclaimed and killed immediately. If he's the real Cid, he'd have to know his claim would get him killed if he got lucky about xtoxm.
So which is more likely? That Albert's stupid scum who fakeclaimed Cid, or really really stupid town who is in the process of outing the real Cid? Or is he the real Cid?
(Choice 4: Cid as safeclaim, yuck.)dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
I think the problem with this game is that when an attention-whore like Albert fakeclaims and gets a townie killed, it utterly demoralizes the town. We can't possibly read a thing from the fake-guilty, because not a single player in the game had any reason to believe Xtoxm was not scum. Scum would simply assume he was in another scumgroup.
So we learned next to nothing from yesterday. Good job Albert, hope you got the attention you were looking for. We're basically stuck with a second Day One. Yay.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Typically, the way you have info on D2 from actions on D1 is because there were a few competing wagons and then one of them got lynched. You see their alignment and can determine who was trying to save them if they're scum and who was irrationally trying to bury them if they were town. But you need uncertainty D1 to make that happen.
Albert claimed a guilty, making absolutely everything that happened after that point worthless. And anything before that point would have yielded better results if we actually got to see who was willing to lynch an uninvestigated xtoxm as opposed to another candidate. We never got that chance. It was a fractional day at best, and we never got to see true intent to lynch before the phony guilty.
A one week D1 in a 25 person game? Tainted by a phony guilty? Useless.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
This isn't a terrible observation.. Liam, why did you want to test xtoxm instead of ABR?iamausername wrote:His statement of wanting to "test the cop who claims first" makes absolutely no sense. There is no reason why the order that Xtoxm and ABR claimed in should have made a difference. If he'd said he didn't believe ABR's claim, that would be different, but he never gave any indication that he didn't believe the claim, just that he wanted to ignore it until Xtoxm's claim was tested.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
kloud, you think yesterday provided us with useful information that shouldn't be disregarded haphazardly. Well, here's you from yesterday:
And today you FOSed armlx but didn't vote. And now you voted for a policy lynch on ABR instead, waiting to see if it would gather momentum. And while you babbled on for ages about Barrett and character names vs. power roles, you haven't even touched on ABR's Cid claim.kloud1516 wrote:FoS: xtoxmI will go back and point out exactly what posts I do not like, which will most likely parallel posts already quoted by others, but I feel it would be beneficial for me to do so anyways.
At the moment, I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and see whether or not your day cop claim is true by going along with the suggestion of lynching either you or armlx. I would much rather not risk losing a power role so early in the game, and so I will
vote: armlx.
I don't think you're trying terribly hard to find scum. You're trying to look like you suspect armlx, but you're not following through. And you're a little too willing to lynch ABR, who you don't really find scummy.
vote: klouddialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
kloud, you're playing dreadfully.
1) You went down the rabbit hole arguing against "good guys in game = protown" and then in the face of four evidence points to the contrary, shifted your argument to the ridiculously useless "there's no proof the scum will go after major characters".
2)
A greater benefit than nailing scum? We're as little as three days from lynch or lose--two days if there's a single scumteam of 4-5.kloud wrote:I expressed that I was voting (ABR) based on utility alone, for I feel the need to rid the game of unhelpful and detrimental players will be the greatest benefit for the town at the moment.
3) You accuse me of hypocrisy for voting ABR and then accusing you of being scummy for voting ABR. Retarded. I was voting him for 12 hours til I realized a specific mistake I made. You unvoted ABR after a long-term vote with intent. That's way different from what I did, and it's sketchy of you to compare the two.
So anyhow, Cid = good guy or safeclaim, and if ABR is faking Cid we'll find out eventually no matter what. I voted him because I forgot about his nameclaim. Fortunately Cludsy wasn't as hasty as I was. I find it suspect that you're not leaning towards "hero character = protown alignment".
4)
If ABR had not claimed Cid I would be voting him right now. There is no way the maker of this game, who loves FFVII, is going to make Cloud and Tifa bad guys, and Cid is a good guy across several games. I will eat my entire collection of hats he's an evil character--it would be the equivalent of making Rand al'Thor the bad guy in a Wheel of Time game or Luke Skywalker the bad guy in a Star Wars game. Ain't gonna happen.Do you feel I need to address ABR's Cid claim? I have already given my piece about how at the moment I am more inclined to believe that not all major characters are pro-town power roles. What do you feel I need to address about the fact that ABR claimed Cid?
So yeah, considering you were just voting Cid, I'd like to know whether you think the Barret=town w/ power, Dio=town, Bugenhagen=town, Reno=scum trend should be applied to ABR's and other future claims.
I also think it's suspect that your last FOS was on MBPikamon for this:MBP wrote:Also... about the dead Turk, looks like Xtomx was right about the mafia at least being Shrina, or Shrina related.
Duh, it's common sense. Are you trying to imply that MBP didn't use common sense here, he actually just blurted out that his scumteam targeted a major character last night? What a huge stretch you use to try and make MBP look scummy.kloud wrote:Who's to say the major characters aren't scum themselves? We do not know at this point, so I find it interesting that you would, on Day 2 with as little information as we have, be "pretty sure" that major characters would be scum targets.
Again, common sense. The Turks are a group of 3-4 in FFVII, and when one comes up scum it makes sense that that goon's leader is also a Turk. if Tseng ain't Reno's scumpartner/godfather I'll be stunned.kloud wrote:Indeed, Reno was/is a Turk, but that might not necessarily mean that they all are. The phrasing of this passage makes me feel as though you have extra information that you are not sharing.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Let's not forget that kloud's "reasoning" for voting ABR is not that he finds ABR scummy. He voted to waste a day and get rid of ABR so ABR would not be able to confuse us during scumhunting on D3 or D4.
Assuming this game lasts 6 days, I think wasting a day by lynching a nonscummy player reduces our chances of victory by 17%. Albert already reduced our chances by 17% yesterday, and I don't think we should repeat that mistake. We should lynch the scummy guy today so we have info tomorrow. A policy lynch doesn't teach us much about the people on or off the lynch. A policy lynch makes D3 into yet another D1.
It seems to me that if you actually think ABR is confusing the hunt for scum but isn't scummy, you could simply ignore his posts. If you think he's scum, make the case. Promoting a policy lynch as you've done today, kloud, is in my opinion about as scummy as what Albert did yesterday--Albert got rid of a player we all thought was useless, confusing and scummy, and you only think your lynch target is two out of those three.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Yes you did, you said you may or may not be Cid.Albert B. Rampage wrote:I haven't retracted ANYTHING I've said on day 2.
Now you're saying you are again. At this point, cry wolf syndrome is kicking in, and I have to say that if town loses this game, and you are town, you will be widely considered the one responsible for losing us this game.
If you are town:
* you made yesterday's lynch useless information-wise for the most part
* you have distracted town today with your shenanigans and are getting in the way of a proper lynch
* your claim of a major role yesterday probably shortened your lifespan considerably (you could have gotten a protect as Cid if you didn't lie about xtoxm and retract the Cid claim)
You're on a rampage alright.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
I'm voting Albert because he retracted his Cid claim. The other points are purely me chastising him for being a total jackass. I am not policy lynching ABR, I'm lynching a player who got a townie killed yesterday and who now has absolutely no pro-town characteristics whatsoever.kloud1516 wrote:Interesting. You are so hasty with your convictions to condemn me for pushing for a policy lynch earlier today, and, based on two of the three reasonings you provide with the post above, it would seem you have turned a new leaf and have decided to do the same.
Unvote
FoS: MBL
ABR retracting the Cid claim does make me feel that that is where my vote shall most likely godialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
If you were a townie and someone came up with a fake-guilty on you, how would you respond?Cludsy wrote:I'm alsoFoSing Amrlx, he seems to have been far too defensive for ABR, andhe also pushed for Xtoxm's vote a lot, along with iLord who ended up being Reno.
FOS: Cludsyfor not thinking like a townie.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
armlx, other than the fact that xtoxm got a "guilty" on you, how did you view and treat his claim differently than ABR's? Don't you have metas that say both of them are liars regardless of alignment?
After reading your reactions to D1's events, I don't really think you're scum, but I am curious to know why you approached the two claims so differently.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
armlx, when a player is as acutely aware of their own meta as ABR apparently is, can you actually use that meta in any useful way?
And even if he does have a meta oflyingas town, does the meta say his lying as town results in bad things for town? Because I have lied before as town and it's NEVER been bad for town because I didn't get a townie lynched or wreck the day's lynch opportunities or soak a doc protect I shouldn't have.
Put another way, has Albert ever screwed the town over THIS MUCH by his lying as town?
Do we have examples of Albert lying as scum to compare this to?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Albert, who are the scum on your wagon?
I'm actually kind of stunned that if we have a vigilante, they didn't knock Albert's block off last night.Carn Carn wrote:ABR, there are other roles that would most certainly want to target you N1 for your fake-claim.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
There is no way a doctor protected Albert last night. Therefore, a failed vig on Albert means he is bulletproof.
If he was a bulletproof townie he'd have let us know by now. He's bulletproof scum who set up a convenient story to explain his survival after a cop claim. I'll reread his play for nuance, but I don't see him as town at this point. If someone else sees a reasonable alternative explanation, please provide it posthaste.
confirm vote: Albertdialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
No, my point is that Albert'sarmlx wrote:And you auto-assume the doc protected him after xtoxm turned up not scum? Given his history?intentionwas to draw a doc protect. If xtoxm came up scum, Albert would have drawn the doc protect, which we now know is an anti-town play because at BEST Albert is a bulletproof townie who is not in need of a doc protect.
A bulletproof townie calling for a doc protect? I don't buy it. Albert is scum. Probably an SK, as bulletproof godfather is less prevalent than bulletproof SK in a large game.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Albert's new claim and flavor:
Note: the ship is crashed but he can still somehow pilot it to follow people.Albert B. Rampage wrote:Well I'm Cid. I'm a watcher. Flavor is my ship is crashed but I can use it at night to follow people. I targeted christinao drago last night and got no result.
Albert's old claim and flavor:
Note: the ship is severely damaged and so Cid builds a Cylon detector.Albert B. Rampage wrote:IM A DAYCOP
in the aftermath of the airship battles where the Sierra is severely damaged, cid uses his knowledge of high-tier technology to build a spec scope that can detect abnormal levels of mako energy (jenova cells?) in their bloodstream. he can only use this once a day.
When you asked for the doc protect, you knew 100% you would get it if xtoxm came up scum. No doubt about it.Albert B. Rampage wrote:Carncran and MBL you are wayy overthinking things. I planned the doc protect to have cover for NK immunity? Implausible..
So why did you ask for it if you're a freaking watcher? You would be pulling that doc protect away from cops, vigilantes and other more powerful characters than yourself.
Why did you choose to watch drago?
Does anyone really think there are two watchers in this game?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
There are two mafia groups and an SK, most likely. Look at the flavor and colors of the dead scum in the first post. Shinra and Turk, if my memory serves me right. Recall that Liam told us to look on his wagon for Turks--that may very well mean his scumpartners were avoiding voting for him. I doubt he'd have us give extra scrutiny to his scumbuddies like that, so they were probably coming up with excuses not to vote Liam.
Pretty sure CarnCarn nailed ABR, which is a bit odd considering he only had a 1/4 chance of doing so. Possible serial killer? If he's the SK, there's a vig out there most likely.
My guess is two three-man mafia teams, all with powers. That means c. drago is likely vanilla town.
Each team probably has a GF, a tracker/watcher, and a roleblocker.
Great news: no pro-town cops dead!
5 scum left out of 17 remaining, not terrible.
Pretty crazy that all kills managed to avoid Cludsy's protect/roleblock. Hopefully we have another pro-town tracker/watcher who can guide us today. Two days worth of results is not a terrible time to claim if you think you have scum dead to rights, especially considering there are three scumteams and we really need to eliminate one of them to cut down on the number of nightkills.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
And by the way, I doubt there was a successful protect N1 seeing as how there were four kills both nights. Five kills a night would be a bit of a spastic game, don't you think?
If I was Cludsy the doc, I think I'd have protected CarnCarn last night. But if he was forced to roleblock the person he protected, maybe not, since CarnCarn claimed investigative powers.
edit: whoa, CarnCarn claims to have been roleblocked. That would mean we have another vig out there for sure if Carn is telling the truth. Possibly three scumgroups of two, I suppose.
If Carn IS telling the truth, then all scum probably have powers, as I doubt a pro-town rb would have blocked CarnCarn. If CarnCarn is telling the truth, then this game has the potential for 5 NKs a night, which is more than I think I've ever seen in a game. Curious.
CarnCarn, do you think scum or town roleblocked you?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Lowell, carncarn claimed vig who was blocked last night. Which means we essentially have 5 killing groups if he's telling the truth. Thought you should know.
I said Tony's impending claim was obvious due to his slack attitude and overconfidence in the face of impending lynches. He was obviously prepared to claim Cloud or another very powerful role if he got in trouble.
I'm inclined to believe the claim, as the behavior's been consistent.
As for a doctor protecting Tony, that's not likely to happen but you never know. We have a dead doc, and I think two docs in this game would be overpowered for town--a cop claim early could be protected a looong time.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
I think there was a disproportionate percentage of scum on your wagon. Some were eager to vote you and reticent to vote Liam over ABR. (Though they claimed to find Liam scummy). Others attacked Liam aggressively for much of the day.TonyMontana wrote:
First of all, did you just assume that everyone on my wagon was scum?MrBuddyLee wrote:CarnCarn=SK
Secondly, Sephiroth is the SK. There is no reason to believe Cait Sith would be a safeclaim.
I agree that Sephiroth is probably the SK, but having the powers CarnCarn claimed fits well with the kind of power an SK would need to survive a game of this size. And since an SK obviously can't claim Sephiroth, he must have been provided a quality safeclaim to explain his powers away. Cait Sith's slots are a perfect explanation for that power, the flavor is convincing, and the game wouldn't be cheapened by the lack of an actual Cait Sith.
Then consider that CarnCarn claimed to target ABR N1 with no effect. He hypothesized that either he was blocked or that ABR was protected after fakeclaiming a cop with a guilty. Since it's extremely unlikely that ABR was protected N1, we're left with CarnCarn's story that he was roleblocked N1.
Plus, I'm still bothered by the fact that if CarnCarn wasn't blocked N2, as he claims, that we could have had FIVE nightkills last night. I see it as more likely that CarnCarn actually DID kill someone, but is telling us he did not.
So there are your choices; either:
* CarnCarn/Westbrook was roleblocked two nights in a row
or
* CarnCarn actually killed someone each night and lied about it
I'm guessing CarnCarn killed ABR N2. I'll reread to see who he killed N1.
major FOS: CarnCarndialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Hmm. kloud and iLord were run through. The rest were shot. (iLord was both shot and run through.)
So there are probably 2 scumgroups that shoot, a vig that shoots, and Sephiroth "running people through" with Masamune. I guess that means CaitSith/Sephiroth would have had to kill iLord and kloud the first two nights.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Natirasha wrote:If I may, why?
So if I said I had a guilty on you, or tracked you to a dead townie, you wouldn't ignore my attack?Natirasha wrote:uh huh.
I'll ignore your attack, then.
Your response looks really sketchy. I think you're nervous scum. Town would have laughed my comments off, or been interested in my attacks on the other four players I named. You seem eager to appear nonchalant about the fact that I have you dead to rights.
major FOS: Natirashadialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Tony's first three posts today were perfectly reasonable. And the tete-a-tete with you could be explained by the fact that he was an obvious power role, and has been telegraphing that since D1. He had no problem with looking a little irrational at the end of yesterday because he didn't want to get nightkilled. And it worked, yay. (At least I think, 'yay'.)dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
I was fucking around to see Natirasha's reaction. I got what I was looking for, and no, I don't have inside information on the setup.
Sorry to rain on your parade, CarnCarn. I know it's possible you're telling the truth, but I see a few unlikelihoods in your story and have to point them out.
Interesting attempt to discredit me before you know if my claims are valid. Why would you do that? Nervous much?CarnCarn wrote:Uh, wow, did you just accuse a third of the players here? Where to begin.
Don't you mean "I AM a Jack of all Trades"? "ICarnCarn wrote:First of all, I said I was a Jack of All Tradessaid" sounds so... noncommittal...
I agree, that's what you said. The argument against you lies more in the fact that you're claiming to have been roleblocked two nights in a row than in who you actually targeted.CarnCarn wrote:so I don't get to kill every night (unless I get extremely lucky).
That's N2. How about N1?CarnCarn wrote:If you think about Yuffie, the doc + RB, dying last night, then it makes sense that I could have been either protected and RB'd or been RB'd by scum who were afraid I would target them.
I don't anymore--actually read the nightkills more carefully. I think you killed kloud last night.CarnCarn wrote:Also, how can you think that I am an SK AND that I killed ABR N2 (look at the kill method used to kill ABR)?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Jebus, we just lost four townies overnight. And you guys just outed a likely power role. Of course I'm jumpy. We need to nail some scum, and fast.
CarnCarn is lying scum unless ABR was protected by Cludsy N1. Cludsy left us with minimal clues, but I find it difficult to believe that he would doc protect someone who just fakeclaimed a cop with a guilty.
Would any of you have protected ABR night one?
I'm not voting CarnCarn yet. I think I've succeeded in drawing attention to the possibility that Cait is Sephiroth's safeclaim, and I don't think town will allow him to win in endgame if that's the case.
And Jebus, your defense of Natirasha is interesting. You say:
Let's take another look at that defense:Jebus wrote:I think his defense is equally strong
Point by point:Natirasha wrote:By definition,people are selfish. What I mean is,I don't care about what you say about other people(unless, of course, I have a reason to care, like in. This is why I get bored in most games I'm in: I like attention, I get bored. I always respond to people telling me I'm scum like this.I keep on the defensive, unless I'm either a, scum or b, a power role.
1) His agenda is selfish. Scum are more likely to be self-oriented than town.
2) He doesn't care about the alignment of other people. Scum are less likely to be curious about alignments--they just want to survive.
3) He's defensive. Scum are more likely to be defensive than town--town go on the offensive to catch scum.
So what exactly is strong about Nat's defense, Jebus?dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Looks like I'm the current vote leader with (3). Let's look at the cases, shall we?
1. Empking:
Weak reason. Do you really think I thought I'd get protown cred for posting the 13th vote on a 12-to-lynch wagon? If anything, I drew negative attention to myself.Empking wrote:If Liam comes up scum I'll be looking at MBL for his unnecessary vote.
2. Zakeri:
a) This whole post looks like you wrote it up with your scumpartner overnight--especially considering kloud was announced as dead just two posts above your post! Did you rush to paste this from your scumpartner's PM?Zakeri wrote:My main suspects for today are MBL, Christiano Drago, and Yosarian2.Kloud doesn't seem suspicious to medue to the fact that he couldn't tell it was Shrina as the Scum group versus The player's group. Also I believe CarnCarn isn't scum because of the roleclaim and the earnest he fought with using his results as a tell. Speaking of which,looking over Yuffie's role, it looks like the doctor had a good reason to target ABR. Likewise, Wecan't trust the result on CD because he was blocked.
b) you defend CarnCarn and conveniently post the cornerstone of CarnCarn defense in the next post: "obviously ABR was doc protected". A little too coincidental if you ask me.
c) You insinuate inside information about drago being blocked? Did this odd remark ever get resolved?
3. Natirasha:
Pure, unadulterated OMGUS.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
What do you think of Zakeri's coming-out post, CarnCarn? See what I saw about it possibly being pre-written overnight?
Yes, I realized the drago/ABR thing after I posted but the MS CPU error kicked in.
And sometimes, votes don't go through because there are voteblocking roles. There's no harm in adding an extra to making sure it goes through, especially close to deadline.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006