Weather Mafia -- Divine Intervention? Over
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Fixed.Cyberbob wrote:
Who's to sayMonkey wrote:Farside22 obviously didn't know it was a scumtell, does that make it one now?sheisn't grasping at straws to defendherself?
Discussing the nightkill (especially when it hits doc or cop) is normally a scumtell... but it is a weak one because it's not like townsfolk aren't going to notice that the doc died, and are just as likely to mention that it sucks (and mean it more) as the mafia are.
This is on the same level as "first person who posts each day is likely to be mafia because they have more interest in the game and are usually the last to send in night choices." Well, there has to be a first post regardless... so statistically there is a higher chance that a nonmafiaso will post first than a mafiaso will.
BTW, it is actually rainy here in southeast Texas . This weather sucks, can't wait for night, hopefully RL weather will change with game weather."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
With 15 alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.
unvote, vote: Niv1/2 way mark. Interested in seeing how this turns out ."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
/applause Blackberry
I figured it was close to that (or at least hoped... kinda pointless to do it w/ no backup)."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Tracker/watcher is a special case... it's not as powerful as a pure cop, and it is MUCH harder to fake results for. If you get info saying someone targetted the person who died, and you ask them who they targetted the night before and they answer incorrectly, it is VERY likely that the person is scum... but, unlike a scum who can just pretend to be a cop because they know who is scum and who isn't, you can't really fake results all game long, especially if you are wrong on a person.farside22 wrote:
No I found it strange comment. Most people dont' role claim first day. (Shrug). Plus Niv said he had no idea what you were talking about. I wanted more information before I decided.Blackberry wrote:Niv is scum. He targetted MBF last night.
Are you trying to protect him? >_<farside22 wrote:
You have to explain better then this. Your vote alone does not send someone to the gallows.Blackberry wrote:Niv -- tell the truth about who you targetted last night or you die.
FOS: farside2.
Therefore... it's a special case ."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Blackberry, when you are a vanilla townie and you have a "gut feeling" about someone... YOU DO NOT FUCKING FAKE CLAIM TO GET THEM LYNCHED!!!
Sorry for the language, but dammit man... where is a vig when we need one?
FOS: Gorradfor the hammah so soon... andvote: blackberry... I just can't bring myself to believe that a townie would do something like that."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I believed that Blackberry was a tracker that had tagged Niv as targetting the person who died N0. The way he stated his question strongly suggested that he was a tracker, so I assumed that to be true, and when he revealed it only made it seem more likely. The quick lynch should not have happened... which is why my FoS is on Gorrad right now (glare), but with conjured evidence against him, I seriously doubt we would have lynched someone else anyway.
Now, after Niv turned out town, Blackberry is saying that not only he was lying, but that all he really is is the only vanilla townie in the game? With a role name that differs from what the dead players and several townspeople have (it differs from my setup)? The only other person who says theirs is setup like that (so far at least) is xtoxm, who was the person who put Niv at -1 and has pretty much just agreed with and defended blackberry as far as I can tell.
The only thing that is bugging me right now is that a scum group just can't be that stupid... it just is not possible... I can't bring myself to believe it. But at the same time, if Blackberry ends up scum, my vote is going for xtoxm next."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
You do know that that makes me WAY more suspicious of you right?Xtoxm wrote:
Or maybeI can't bring myself to believe it. But at the same time, if Blackberry ends up scum, my vote is going for xtoxm next.we'repulling a WIFOM on you"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
@ BlackBerry: Glork could have easily put "there are no vanilla roles" in a mafia goon's role PM. Or you get to ask a yes or no question each night (to Glork). Regardless at this point I don't trust you to do anything beyond attracting the towns attention... omfg... Glork wouldn't put a jester in his game would he?unvote... and hammer opportunistically.
Dammit... jester makes almost as much sense as scum and is more dangerous (unless it is an alternate win condition). Stupid brain . Who else thinks it's a possible role? Or am I just being really paranoid now? Because it doesn't explain xtoxm's puppy dog behavior to Blackberry... /shrug oh well, I can always revote for him later."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Whenever someone is behaving in a way that is scummy on purpose without looking like they are trying to get lynched I automatically think "Jester" on the off chance that they actually are a Jester. Besides, there's no reason to rush through this day too, we have plenty to discuss.Xtoxm wrote:
I heard in another game that the one who brings up the possibility of Jester is almost always mafia. Can't remember the exact statistic, something like 5/6 I think.Twomz wrote:@ BlackBerry: Glork could have easily put "there are no vanilla roles" in a mafia goon's role PM. Or you get to ask a yes or no question each night (to Glork). Regardless at this point I don't trust you to do anything beyond attracting the towns attention... omfg... Glork wouldn't put a jester in his game would he?unvote... and hammer opportunistically.
Dammit... jester makes almost as much sense as scum and is more dangerous (unless it is an alternate win condition). Stupid brain . Who else thinks it's a possible role? Or am I just being really paranoid now? Because it doesn't explain xtoxm's puppy dog behavior to Blackberry... /shrug oh well, I can always revote for him later."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I agree with Gorrad in post 158. But I can always put my vote back on Blackberry later. My next two scummiest are Gorrad (for the hammer) and xtoxm (for puppy dogging after blackberry, who I think is scum).
I'll hopefully be able to do a lookup on my suspects tomorrow and build up something at least resembling a case against one of them... if not, then I shall at least try to incite conversation.
*cheers"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I want to wait for the clarification from Monkey on if there was a guilty on xtoxm. Also, were you told in your role pm that you were sane? Because a double guilty looks a lot like paranoid or insane... although, I can't argue with the results ."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Blackberry, so far your track record suggests you are not telling the truth... just FYI.
vote: Blackberrythat's L-3. For reasons earlier, gorrad's post 158 (makes sense) and monkey's investigation (need to test eventually anyway, might as well be someone I find extremely scummy /shrug).
A lot of my suspicions on xtoxm rely on Blackberry being scum... so I think lynching him first would be ideal. But, that might just be me."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Hands down? Why is it a scum tell to bring up jester when it looks to you like someone is trying to get themselves lynched? What about the way I talk makes you think that I think that you aren't scum?Blackberry wrote:Twomz (Twomz is mafia, hands down. First bringing up Jester idea and his votes agaisnt me, I can tell by the way he talks that he has no real belief that I am mafia, he just wants me lynched)
Normally, especially early in the game, believing someone to be scum isn't required for a wagon/lynch, only that there is sufficient evidence to show that they are acting scummy. Rarely will I be able to point at someone the first couple of days of a game and tell who specifically is scum and who is not... if it was obvious the game wouldn't be fun. It is true that you are my top lynch candidate, but it is because I think there is sufficient evidence to prove you are scum, not just because I think you are the scummiest acting player."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
There is acting scummy while trying to look town, and then there is acting scummy while trying to look town and get yourself lynched without anyone noticing that you want them to lynch you. When people act the second kind of scummy, the only logical reasons are 1) They are a jester 2) They don't want to play the game anymore 3) They have some sort of "when I am lynched" ability that they want to use 4) They are too stupid/newby to know wtf they are doing.hasdgfas wrote:@Twomz: The problem with Jester talk is that we have no evidence of a Jester at all. Jesters are much more common in open games where you know that they are there. If you find someone scummy, it is much more likely that they are scum than Jester, whether it's obvious scumminess or not. Unless we had evidence of a Jester in this game(which we don't), I would simply feel most comfortable lynching the player I think is scummiest, in this case Xtoxm for me. Jester talk just distracts the town, which is never a good thing.
I eliminated 2 and 4, and since he said that he is just vanilla... Jester is more likely than bomber, or whatever the rolenames for people who do stuff when lynched is. I am not saying that he IS a jester, I am saying that he is acting like I would expect a jester to act. If you lynch people for acting like scum, why shouldn't you be cautious when they act like a jester?
Of course, this is all only somewhat relevant because the consensus is that Glork wouldn't put it in the game/doesn't go with the theme/they are usually in open games, but I still prefer to be careful then to not think of all the options.
On another note, what are all the players opinions on BB and xtoxm? Do you think both are scum? Just one? Neither? Is there another lynch candidate you want to push for? Is the majority of the town ok with a lynch of one of them? And if so, are we just letting the day go on for discussion while we wait for votes? Has everyone posted recently (actual posts, not just "I'm here, lol @ <player>")?
I think that there is a good chance that they are both scum. The only hitch to my thought on this is whether monkey is sane, insane or paranoid (or effected by the weather, and if so, what is the effect). I would prefer a BB lynch because most of my thoughts of xtoxm being scum depend on BB being scum, so I would be much less suspicious of him if BB were innocent, where if we lynch xtoxm and he is innocent, I would still think of BB as scum."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
@ xtoxm: You are now trying to say you would support a lynch on someone who is attacking you (and the guy that you have been puppydogging after) when there are two guilty investigations on the two of you?
I'm adding OMGUSing and deflecting to the xtoxm tally."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
You think I am scum for explaining my opinion on Jesters? This is the same opinion I have in any game where I think there is a possibility of a Jester (or, any game larger than a mini that is not open, regardless of the likelihood, there is always a POSSIBILITY). You chose this one point over the stunt BB pulled on day one and the crazy speed at the end of the Niv wagon?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
There are enough different weather phases in the game for us to be able to assume that there is at least some use for each one... with 16 players that leaves little or no room for townies.
ChaosOmega brings up a good point with the wiki post. Testing monkey to make sure is still preferable than just assuming he's paranoid or insane.
IMO, BB is the better lynch, because if he is scum, then xtoxm is most likely scum too, but I see no evidence of it going the other way.
If we do not want to test the investigation results, then I wouldn't mind a Gorrad wagon (I don't know yet if he merits a lynch or not). Heck, any wagon would be ok, as long as we don't let the game stall out this far into Day 2."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Fixed, and the answer is... nothing.xtoxm wrote:What about my play do you think has been pro-town?
@armlx: If you vote for BB today, I'll vote for xtoxm tomorrow with you (deal?)."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Wait, asking someone to vote for someone that I think is scum is scummy... but LYING to get the town to lynch someone for no apparent reason isn't?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Fair enough, I plan on voting for xtoxm tomorrow anyway . Unless of course, something else comes up (it usually does).armlx wrote: Twomz: No deal. I actually believe Blackberry for the moment.
PS: I am not trying to set up lynches, I am merely expressing my intention of voting as a step up from scummiest/next scummiest.
PPS: Farside, I didn't understand your post... could you word it differently?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
A: It appeared as though a claimed tracker caught someone targeting the dead player. Normally, this means that the player is scum (GASP!). Of course, there is the possibility of gravediggers (always show up as targeting the dead player) and other targeting roles (which would have said that they targeted, although I should have been more doubtful that early on day one). But I suddenly logged on to Niv being dead because of a couple of players voting without thinking (or letting the town discuss anything).A: He voted with us for NIV, quickly.
B: He brought up Jester--and then when no one went along with it he revoted me... HUH?
C: He attempted to make a deal to get out xtoxm... WITHOUT even caring what my identity was (unless of course he already knew).If you want to call me scum for this, you have to admit that you are scummier for starting the wagon with false information
B: I revoted you when someone pointed out that Glork wouldn't put one in a 16 player game that is so involved mechanic wise. I only unvoted because it appeared as if you were actually trying to get lynched (as I said, a good indicator of being a jester).
C: What? You claimed "only vanilla townie". You know what? I don't believe you. Why? Because you have lied before and could easily be lying now. With a game this size, the likelihood of townies is low, and even given that if you could have gotten a townie or two to claim, it would have narrowed down the choices for power roles for your scum buddies. BTW, you don't know how much I wanted to fake claim townie just to see you roast. Luckily, I'm not bad enough a player that I have to fake claim to get someone lynched when I'm town (but just barely)."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
She's probably an internet lawyer and goes around catching pedophiles or something .
Gorrad, you are currently lynch -2, do you want to post a defense... claim... angry noises?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
1) BB: I would probably have changed my vote from you the moment it looked safe, because almost everyone else would be a power role (I'm not just saying this because I have kept my vote on you, just being honest).
2) Xtoxm: If you were a vig, it is very likely that you would be restricted by the weather and would probably not be able to pick when you could vig.
3) All: The game is starting to drag on a bit. Rather than let it grind to a halt (gorrad's claim was just that he has a role that is affected by weather... big surprise) maybe we should start some sort of claiming? A weather claim (what type affects you) might be interesting, being as it is the main mechanic of the game. Personally, i don't think a mass claim would normally be good at this point, but maybe a partial..."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Dammit Gorrad >.> I was trying to catch scum for that very reason. (capital letters in #3 spell "A TRAP").Gorrad wrote:The scum could know when to pick us off (ie right before our specified weather), so I'm against it.
Well, I guess bookitty kinda nibbled... but not enough to jump on . It was worth a try /sigh."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
TBH, I was thinking about ways to get the game moving along when partial claims came to me, then I realized that claiming weather effects would help the scum more than the town, so I decided to make a fake suggestion to see who would bite. Gorrad kinda ruined it, and Bookitty really didn't jump on it enough to warrant a vote imo, so the experiment was a failure /sigh.
@ Xtoxm: Do you really not get how that was a trap?
unvote, FOS: BB, Gorrad, xtoxm
Is there really any reason that Gorrad has so many votes and the two people with investigation results on them have dead bandwagons? The thought of voting for Gorrad to move the day along keeps bubbling up in my mind, but I really don't think it's a good idea to put him at -1 to lynch.
I have stated my cases against BB and xtoxm, so I really don't know what to do besides try to look at Gorrad now as well.
Gorrad
Day 1: Some sort of attack on Iammars because of pointing out that it looked like someone was breadcrumbing (capitalizing every first letter does look like that, so it's a moot point on Gorrad's part) and then hammers Niv because of a safe bet. Not allowing him to claim is a major mark against him.
Day 2: Immediately lashes into BB (understandable) demands roleclaim then votes (for decent reasons). States a policy of lynching jesters (good or bad depending on the type) and says that Glork probably wouldn't put one in a game he has spent so much time on (a very good point, reason I decided BB wasn't a jester). Says xtoxm is #2 on his scum list. Very vague role claim
and switches his vote to xtoxm because of changing his thoughts to BB being a stupid townie rather than a gutsy scum. Broke mah trap .Gorrad wrote: 2) I have a power role that only works during a certain kind of weather. I couldn't have targetted anyone last night either, but I'm still a power role. I expect that others have a similar role rule to mine. BB, you should NEVER assume a theme game like this to have only standard power roles, and you should know that. That being said, the more he talks, the more he looks like an idiot townie. My vote's better off on Xtoxm. Unvote, Vote: Xtoxm, HoS: Blackberry
And, I don't see anything that screams scum at me like it does for BB and xtoxm, but I don't really see a whole lot of protowniness going on either. Not enough for a vote imo. I'd much rather see a BB or xtoxm lynch.
But, I would like to see an actual not skating around the edges claim Gorrad. If anything made me more suspicious of you it's the fact that you were so vague that it couldn't even be called a role claim. Just say what you do, not when you do it (unless others would prefer to just lynch you without knowing what you do, like Niv )."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I only agree with the third point, because I have been trying to be productive this whole time, and it is still just a hollow shell of an attempt QQ... what parts of the post are contradictory? Inciting? Also, isn't inciting people to vote or think one of the more productive things you can do with your time in a mafia game?armlx wrote: I really don't like Twomz's last post. It's contradictory, inciting, and trying to look productive all at the same time, which is scummy in 3 ways."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
"Progressive reasoning"? I don't even know what you are getting at with that. I have shown MY reasoning, and agreed or disagreed with others reasoning. What else do you want from my reason, desegregation?
Inciting? As in "Inciting the crowd to violence"? I don't really get what you are trying to say with that. I was one of the first people to jump on BB and xtoxm today, and even if you say they were "obvious" it doesn't matter because I think they are both scummy and most likely scum.
I fosed Gorrad because of the whole hammer thing. That isn't enough of a reason for him to be the main suspect in my eyes though, so I did a reread on him, and found little else, so I said so. If almost half the town thinks someone is scummy it is worth looking in on, even if only to look at the cases people on the wagon are bringing up. Being suspicious of someone does not necessarily mean thinking that they are scummy, only acting suspiciously. The hammering was suspicious, and I found little else that would push him from suspicious to scummy imo, yet, he is the vote leader. To me that screams... scum on wagon, or at the very least uncaring townies who just want to jump on someone for a single reason and not look for other reasons beyond a weak first one.
The four suspects right now are
Gorrad - for shaky reasons at best, mainly for hammer. Some could say the weak ass role claim would be a reason to stay on, but no one has voted him after the claim so it wasn't a reason to vote him.
Twomz - I am on all the other 3 suspects lists, and am being put under suspicion for the jester and trap things. There could be other reasons, but if there are I don't remember them, besides, my opinion in this area isn't important.
BlueBerry - Faked claimed day 1 which lead to the quicklynch of a townsperson based on a gut feeling. Role claim that would benefit scum if it was true or false (narrow the target area of townies or allow a scum to live).
Xtoxm - Basically just followed what BB said and tried to deflect his wagon. Also, is one of the only two people so far in the game where all they had is a role name (the other is BB). If you read his posts literally, then there are several times when he basically says he is scum..
[quoteThe WIFOM thing was a joke btw, cos of what cyberbob said.Xtoxm wrote:
YupTwomz wrote:
You do know that that makes me WAY more suspicious of you right?Xtoxm wrote:
Or maybeI can't bring myself to believe it. But at the same time, if Blackberry ends up scum, my vote is going for xtoxm next.we'repulling a WIFOM on youNot some tactic to tryt and make you think i'm town[/quote]because i'm scum.
Decided that I was the most scummy player for bringing up Jester AFTER I decided that BB wasn't a jester and revoted him. Almost as if he wanted me bringing it up to stay in the spotlight, but people didn't stick to it enough so he had to bring it up again.
I would willingly vote for BB or xtoxm right now. Gorrad, I don't really think is scum, but I find it suspicious that he doesn't want to actually roleclaim (something I attribute to scum not knowing what to fakeclaim).
So I would order the four top suspects: BB, Xtoxm, Gorrad, Twomz (from most scummy to least scummy). Can we have a mass opinion on this?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
<- is not Curious George.
@ Gorrad: ...my only problem is that you pretty much claimed a generic claim for this game. I'm pretty sure everyone but scum could say almost what you said, but fill in the blanks you left out. I for one am not satisfied with that claim (I consider it like you were wagoned, then just said that you were a power role in a game where there are no townies, it just doesn't cut it in my book). But, if you're not gonna actually claim or post a defense, w/e. I guess you haven't really been attacked for anything besides the hammer, so I'm unsure of why all the votes are still on you.
@ Blackberry: ? Gonna give me a reason? Or do you just think I'm scummy like your gut told you Niv was scum? If that's the case I'm as good as confirmed town [/sarcasm]
@ Farside:
I said it was a possibility, I've seen mods give scum information for fakeclaims before, and it's very possible Glork has done the same. But again, it's just speculation and it's only day 2 after a rather short day 1, so nothing can be too certain yet.Thinks that Glork would tell mafia there was no vanialla roles (I think that would be an unfair advantage and would hope the Mod would do no such thing).
@ Iammars: If you mean go meta him, I'm gonna need some games that he's been in, and I don't really have time to do so right now anyway. His play day 1 (and so far day 2 imo) is bad regardless of his meta... like KAREN bad.... I don't know if anyone here was in that game though... (mafia 69, ongoing)
Xtoxm is now at -2 to lynch. I don't think we should put him at -1, so I'd say hold off on the votes.pseudo-vote: xtoxmXtoxm, the question was not directed at you, so you don't have to keep on about it. Just let the dialog run it's course."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
It sounds to me like Iammars has another player's role name mentioned in his role and he wants to find out who it is before the night where roles of the dead aren't known. I'd probably do the same in his situation.
BTW, after this curious george stuff is taken care of, i'm probably voting for xtoxm. Just FYI."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
So your name is "Coroner Rick" but earlier you claimed that you had no rolename, only a role (after blackberry claimed). Why would you lie about that? Or did you think the title added to the Rick negated it?
Post 137
So, were you lying to say Blackberry, are you lying about your role now or were you just confused about your role?xtoxm wrote:Actually, my name is just my rolename too."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
vote: xtoxm
That puts him at -1 to lynch.
Is there any particular reason you have cyberbob, porochaz and myself as "scum"? Because if you thought all three of us were scum, you would be actively pursuing all of us. If you just thought we were scummy with no real evidence, then labeling us "scum" is pushing it quite a bit. Also, labeling people "town" for no given reason this early in the game is folly as well."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
1) I am automatically suspicious of "oh, I just need a few days to confirm myself" role claims.
2) If he faked the coroner results, how would we be able to tell the difference? Easy ride to endgame and the possibility of skewing results in favor of the scum.
3) BB: You said that your role was Vanilla townie, and that you had no "name". Xtoxm agreed that he too had no rolename. Well, now he's trying to say that that's not true, and giving no real reason for it (Coroner is to a role as Coroner Rick is to a role name. Vanilla townie is to a role as _______ is to a role name).
4) Y'all need to start taking everything as truth, seriously, this is mafia. People lie in mafia, and the people that do it the most are SCUM, in fact, there is no real reason for town to lie. Some say that doctors should fake claim, but I don't agree with that philosophy.
5)
He's been calling me scum all day, I could care less what his opinion on me is. But, out of nowhere he claims two other people that he hasn't even brought up points against (to my knowledge) are scum as well.farside22 wrote: Why are you quick to lynch him after he names you as scum and now his claim? No one is going to know today what his role is if he is lynched due to the weather. You were on my list of scums with good reason. I'm now more certain with this vote.
No one will know what his role would be if he dies TONIGHT. We are under the warm weather warning that makes it 6 to lynch, not blizzard or fog which denies us role knowledge upon death (that's tonight unless I am mistaking the mechanics somehow).
So, I can kinda understand the quick lynch, although counting off how far he is from lynch when I vote him doesn't help the "quick lynch" goal imo, but why else do you think I'm scum?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
And why are you saying that I'm OMGUSing xtoxm? He's been my #2 suspicion since post 147, and then in post 154 he kinda says he thinks I'm scum, but it's really just a statistic that he probably pulled out of his ass. I had gotten another point or two in at that point anyway, but before he ever FoSed or voted for me, I had him firmly in my #2 spot. How can you OMGUS someone when you thought they were the second most suspicious player in the game before they even started pointing fingers at you?
If you want to say that he voted for me before I voted for him, that's fine, but I was too busy trying to get my point on blackberry across (still a little peeved that he bought himself another day away from giving the hangman his boots), to worry about xtoxm. Well, now that I decide to move my vote to my #2 it's OMGUS because he voted for me (OMGUSing and deflecting in their purest forms imo) before I got around to voting for him?
And once more... this was xtoxm's response to people questioning Blackberry's claim of
xtoxmpost 130 wrote:Townie (Vanilla Townie).... that is my role name.post 137 wrote:Actually, my name is just my rolename too.
This is just the kind of slipup I would expect from a scum who was trying to help their scum buddy, and then tried to fake claim. Either that or he lied on the first post when he knew that he had a role name that differed from his role.post 420 wrote:I am Coroner Rick, a Coroner."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Wow, I actually agree with something xtoxm said... it's a miracle.xtoxm wrote: I am assuming, for the moment, that there are 4 scum in the game, given the 3:1 ratio. Does everyone agree with this?
Now to go over Xtoxm's posts that contain a case against myself... since he doesn't want to restate them...
Post 154
This has been addressed. I doubt it is anything more than a statistic pulled out his ass.Xtoxm wrote:
I heard in another game that the one who brings up the possibility of Jester is almost always mafia. Can't remember the exact statistic, something like 5/6 I think.Twomz wrote:@ BlackBerry: Glork could have easily put "there are no vanilla roles" in a mafia goon's role PM. Or you get to ask a yes or no question each night (to Glork). Regardless at this point I don't trust you to do anything beyond attracting the towns attention... omfg... Glork wouldn't put a jester in his game would he?unvote... and hammer opportunistically.
Dammit... jester makes almost as much sense as scum and is more dangerous (unless it is an alternate win condition). Stupid brain . Who else thinks it's a possible role? Or am I just being really paranoid now? Because it doesn't explain xtoxm's puppy dog behavior to Blackberry... /shrug oh well, I can always revote for him later.
Post 200
What hole? All I did was bring up a possibility, what is so scummy about being cautious?I would support a Twomz lynch. I think your trying to dig yourself out of the hole of mentioning jester.
And how can anyone think Blackberry is scum when he has proved he is the only vanilla townie?
Post 217
So far in the game, I still have seen no reason from him for thinking I am scum. Suspicious? Maybe. Def. scummy? No. Nothing really to refute here for me anyway.
You are trying to tell me i'm OMGUSing when the fact is I think you are scum.Twomz wrote:@ xtoxm: You are now trying to say you would support a lynch on someone who is attacking you (and the guy that you have been puppydogging after) when there are two guilty investigations on the two of you?
I'm adding OMGUSing and deflecting to the xtoxm tally.
I'm supposed to go vote someone else I don't find suspicious just cause you're voting for me? lol..
Post 367
At this point he has really not posted any case at all against me, yet he lists me as his #1 suspect, besides the fact that he had voted and unvoted Gorrad at this point, but not even Fosed me.Twomz, Gorrad, BB.
No point putting myself in there is there. Seeing as I know my role an all.
Post 398
I'm included in this group, but just saying that everyone voting for you is probably scum is just stupidity, if not desperate scumming.All these people saying I am very scummy and are going to vote me are probably scum themselves, looking for an excuse.
Post 424
1) Wow, really? That clears everything up.(1)Well i'm not scum. (2)I'm telling the truth and that is my role. (3)I'll C+P my notes on this game for future reference if i'm lynched.
Me - Coroner
Blackberry - Only vanilla townie
Armlx - Town
Monkey - Insane/paranoid Cop
ChaosOmega - Town
Iammars - Man with Yellow Hat
[4]Twomz - Scum
Cyberbob - Scum
Porochaz - Scum[/4]
Bookitty - dodgy
Hasdgfas - dodgy
Farside - Probable Town
Gorrad - Probable Town, Weather related role
Note that where I say scum this does not mean I am certain, it means that's my opinion of them.
2) Because, you know, people are voting for you because they think you're incapable of lying and are all really evil soul sucking demons .
3) Why not post them before you die if they would help? So that we can ask questions about them?
4) Up to this point in the game you have just said that you are suspicious of me and made a reference to me bringing up Jester ONCE. You haven't even pointed at the other two "scum". Oh well, you "explain" in another post, so I'll go on then.
Post 426
So, voting for you makes me autoscum now? And someone has to put that 5th vote on or else we will never lynch.Why are you voting for me now? What about my claim makes me look anything other than town?
You are just admitting you are scum now...
Post 454 (the "notes" and/or the "back through the thread and post a more detailed anaylisis of everyone"?... just the one on me).
a) Yeah um, I went through to find this "going on about" and I ended up having to just post any post where you referenced me being scummy, cause guess what, you have a grand total of ONE point against me (the Jester thing). You can't go back and restate one point? Wow, and I thought I was lazy >.>.Twomz - Scum. (a)I've kinda been going on about this a lot, so I don't think I need to restate it here, however if it's requested I will. (b)Other than Twomz. (c)He recently stated he doesn't care what I have to say about him so I will return that.
b) hmm?
c) What does that have to do with you thinking I'm scummy?
And um... that's about it. I have brought up several "weak" points against xtoxm, a couple before he even said that he thought I was suspicious, yet I get blamed for OMGUSing from this? People probably made better cases than this in Mostly Mute Monk Mafia... where they could only post 2 words at a time!
@ Xtoxm: If you would, please post some kinda case against me. I enjoy debating points that are brought up against me. I play mafia best when people point out where I've been scummy and start up conversations about it. I suck at contributing beyond the points that I bring up and argue about with people. If this is all you can do then I really will just ignore you for the rest of the game (like I do Kaleidescope and a few others).
@ Others on my wagon: Can y'all post y'all's cases so I don't have to go and do PbPs of all of y'all too?
@ Whole town: Has everyone said one way or another about being Curious George?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Well, I looked back, and the only person voting me who has any kind of case against me is armlx, and I have responded to his points before. Although I don't know if I have directly addressed them.
So are we going to get some activity from the lurkers? There are only 7-9 votes tied up on the main wagons, what about the other 4-6 players? What do y'all think about me, xtoxm or another player as the lynch? Don't think you will get away with waiting for the last minute then throwing your vote on a wagon to stop a no lynch."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
a) Based on false data from you.Blueberry wrote: A) You quickly voted for NIV.
B) You mentioned Jester.
C) My gut says your scum.
b) So? You looked like you were trying to get lynched, to me it's the logical conclusion.
c) Hmmm, so I'm confirmed town? How does that help your case?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
So, either mars is mistaken/lying, or someone on the list is lying. Iammars, could your ability just have something to do flavor wise with curious george?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Because other people in the game are smart . (Yes, personal attacks are frivolous, but I can't pass up an opportunity like this)
But really Blackberry, neither you nor xtoxm has provided any real evidence against me while almost every action both of you has made can be seen as evidence for scummy behavior. If y'all actually made cases and attacked me with relevant data I wouldn't argue... sure, I'd defend myself, but I wouldn't attack you for attacking me, or harass you for it. Just saying OMG OMG <Player A> is scummy because he voted for me, he called me a name, he doesn't agree with me, and/or I have a "gut" feeling isn't good protown playing... hell, it isn't even good SCUM playing, it's BAD playing.
Now, onto actually important issues (I believe)
I didn't think of this. It's a good point and a very valid reason for why George wouldn't claim.Gorrad wrote: 3) Since he hasn't claimed, George probably has the same ability as Mars, and will be able to find him without having to claim
What do you think Iammars?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Yeah, but it's like saying no to your kids, ya gotta do it if you want them to be worth anything.
Xtoxm. Hammering yourself is something that only scum do. If for some insane reason you are town, then I hate you with a passion brighter than the sun. Never vote for yourself if you are town (unless it's early day 1 as a joke, then it is acceptable). The whole point of voting for townsfolk is to try to find scum, if you are town then voting for yourself does nothing for that goal."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
This is pretty much what I say everyone time someone claiming to be town votes or hammers themselves. I make up something new each time to make it special though ."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
That wasn't a comment to this specific game, but to the problem at large. We won't know if it applies to this game until Glork tells us if he was scum or not.
The only really bad problem that I haven't been able to get rid of is that I don't censor my posts when I'm town. Mainly because I have no real reason to, as long as it's not helping the scum, getting every thought and opinion I have out shouldn't hurt the town. Some see that as scummy (when I bring up Jester, my opinion on no lynches, being very frank in my opinion of other players playstyles, ect) but I don't care because if it ends up helping just a little bit it's worth the suspicion on me."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Glorkon the first post you have xtoxm as "Coroner Rock."
Well, it appears as if we definitely have just one killing group, so Monkey was either insane or paranoid. I suppose that means Blackberry is town or godfather (grumbles).
Therefore, I have no where to put my vote. Gorrad was the only person I was even mildly suspicious of besides those two and it's not enough for a vote.
I suppose this calls for a reread."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I agree w/ armlx to an extent. But beyond a certain point it falls into WIFOM territory. But, yeah, the general gist of it is that people will ignore the people that scum find scummy because they wouldn't want to accidentally start a wagon on a buddy and have to backtrack to stop it.
But knowing that they may leave them out of the list... /shrug."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I really hope farside and bookitty aren't scum because I'm very chauvinistic at heart and will have a hard time voting for them without good reason >.<.
@ Iammars: Did you find your little friend or w/e? I'm assuming he knows who you are now.
@ Gorrad: And why are you suspicious of me? What about the others on your "list", why are they there?
I'm gonna do something I don't normally do... I'm gonnaFoS: Cyberbob, ChaosOmega and Porochazbecause I have a feeling at least one of them is scum, especially after that little exchange, but I can't figure out which one is the most likely.
BTW, unless there's a strong objection, I'm going to go ahead and claim today, if only for the reason that it might help the town and there isn't anything scum can do about it."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Well, that's the thing... I don't have one more night.
I am theLightning rod. I have the ability to soak up kills on stormy nights (like tonight). And I'm gonna use it. So I'm gonna die tonight, but no one else is.
Basically, I wanted to claim so y'all would know... because I won't be here much longer . And it gives the town a night where ya'll don't have to worry about getting killed.
Too bad the doc's dead /sigh."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
After checking back with my role PM, Lightning Rod is my role name and ability. Earlier, I thought the role ability was called something else >.< now I feel bad (because I wouldn't have pushed BB or xtoxm quite as hard yesterday if I had just read my role PM).
And BB, your behavior is just scummy. I can't really point out any one thing, because almost everything you say pings my scumdar /shrug."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Yeah, i REALLY hope there is no RBer... it would make coming out pointless, although the mafia might just forget to send in a kill and let me die ."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Wait, sorry. I was assuming you meantMAFIARber (more likely than town Rber), which is bad for me. Although with the way roles work in this game, the likelihood of a Rber on either side is low."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
But Gorrad, BB already has Terrible Townie and points in Uselessness and Scummy Posting.
And armlx, nothing is too long to sig (unless it goes over the limit).
Besides you can always put a link to his post in your sig."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I agree that it is most likely 4 scum, because there is no SK, and I doubt we'd have some other neutral role in a game with this flavor.
@ the scum: Hey dudes/dudettes... if one of you claims today, I won't use my ability tonight as long as you promise to off Blackberry. I think this plan benefits all parties involved yes? If more than one of you wants to claim, that's cool too."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I'll have to look over her posts to get one. Pretty neutral opinion off the top of my head >.>Bookitty wrote: Twomz, what's your take on Farside?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
You, you goat-sniffing woolheaded retard with about as much usefulness as a hoofless horse. (I've been reading too much Wheel of Time, and my insults are starting to stray to those veins)Blackberry wrote:
On who?Twomz wrote:Seriously, can we get a modkill or a replacement here?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas