VOTE: Kokichi OmaIn post 19, Kokichi Oma wrote:Hi, everyone. I hope we have a fun game. I'm totally not mafia by the way. Swearzies.
Large Normal 210 - Endgame
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I checked Boonie's game and another one and see that they are similar, but the big difference is that there is no declaration of town alignment in the others. And that is what I was voting for.In post 103, Aneninen wrote:
Might be null. A quick check on his meta shows that he had this kind of starting post as town before. (One of Boonie's games.)In post 19, Kokichi Oma wrote:Hi, everyone. I hope we have a fun game. I'm totally not mafia by the way. Swearzies.I'm not sure if I've ever actually played in a game with a day vig.
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
And yet you're comfortable town reading people from a single post. I don't understand how that works. And it seems like you scum read Frogger on a single post.In post 316, Mulch wrote:
CorrectIn post 312, Transcend wrote:man what a bad fucking vote
joda is completely null right now and that's the only way you should perceive her at this time.
What's your problem with that
I'm not scumreading anyone right now, it's asinine that you can scumread someone on 5 posts in a 7 page game
You don't care who is scum?? That can't be right.In post 251, Mulch wrote:
No idea and I don't careIn post 248, Transcend wrote:ATTN THOSE WHO TR LOVEBIRD:
In post 225, Dunkerdoodles wrote:(5) Lovebird: Aneninen, Transcend, Fro99er, TwoInAMillion, rb
If Love is town then who is scum on the mislynch? Or is it an all town motivated mislynch?
Random thoughts....
The reactions of Mulch and Kokichi for being voted for essentially the same reasons were very different. I suspect that may just be their different playstyles. Mulch attacked Brass and defended himself numerous times and defended Kokichi. Kokichi just barely mentioned it.
I'm already tired of the Frogger/Mulch conversation. Large games are hard enough without all the bickering.
@Transcend, I'd like to know how you read Assemble even if he's only posted 4 times in a game. Last time I played with him I copped him on N1 because I knew I'd never get a read on him.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Yeah, it wasn't random, but it was based on page 1 crappy reasons, and we were mostly still in RVS at the time. Still Kokichi is not looking any townier in my book. I did not like the entire bullet proof episode.In post 490, Fro99er wrote:
I thought your vote wasn’t RVS and you gave reasons for voting kokiIn post 489, texcat wrote:I keep thinking that perhaps I should unvote or move my vote since I'm still parked on my RVS vote of Kokichi, but I think I'm happy leaving it there.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
It seems obvious to me that scum first tried to put Brass forward as the alternative to Kokichi and then when that didn't really take off they're trying 2319. When you've got a scum in the noose, it's lynchbait that get proposed as alternatives.In post 595, Transcend wrote:
what intel do you have to declare thisIn post 589, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:2319 wagon is bad.
I think Kokichi and Mulch are lovers. Kokichi is scum and is desperately trying to get confirmed as town. He decides to claim mason and hope that Mulch will go along with it. Honest town Mulch does not, but he does not want to die with his lover so soon. (Or alternatively, a not so honest town Mulch realizes that a counterclaim would be bad for town, and does not go along with the fake claim.)-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I don't see it listed under normal approved roles, but it's not listed either under roles that can't be in normals.
Why do you think Mulch is defending Kokichi?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Nope. Not me. At least not until Mulch confirms.In post 650, Kokichi Oma wrote:My next claim is that I'm a day friendly neighbor, and showed myself to Mulch. Who believes me?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
And yet I see that rb has actual reasons for town reading Transcend. What were your reasons for town reading Kokichi?
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
My reason for this post is that you asked me a question. My other reason for this post is that I haven't posted in a while and am probably getting close to prod territory.In post 1035, Mulch wrote:@Texcat
Would you mind giving reasons for more of your posts? It's hard for me to discern your alignment.
Is that what you meant? OK, really, like my reasons for voting Kokichi? Or was there something specific you wanted me to talk about?
Kokichi appears to have no interest in scum hunting. Most of his posts are about himself. His primary goal seems to be getting town read, but for me, proclaiming that you are not scum and making three fake claims is not going to work.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
*sigh*In post 1102, TwentyThreeNineteen wrote:Can someone other an anenein tldr this koki wagon? I dont understand
Really? I did it just a few minutes ago... 1092 How short does it need to be for you to read it?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I do, unless you agree with "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers".In post 1111, TwentyThreeNineteen wrote:
Sorry tex, I skimmed over that.In post 1108, texcat wrote:
*sigh*In post 1102, TwentyThreeNineteen wrote:Can someone other an anenein tldr this koki wagon? I dont understand
Really? I did it just a few minutes ago... 1092 How short does it need to be for you to read it?
Do you think koki is a better lynch today than brass?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I'm not buying it. Can you explain why you weren't masons a week ago, but are masons now? What has changed? Do you have day chat as masons?
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I know it's my confirmation bias, but that really looked like a fake town slip to me. Did not feel real at all.In post 1301, Gamma Emerald wrote:
waitIn post 1267, Kokichi Oma wrote:Gamma/Transcend/Texcat
you're aware that this game is 17p right
Koki has softed bulletproof.In post 1306, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1291, texcat wrote:I'm not buying it. Can you explain why you weren't masons a week ago, but are masons now? What has changed? Do you have day chat as masons?
Why is it not credible? Did they push each other?
Then he claimed to me masons with Mulch, and Mulch denied it.
Then he claimed to be a day friendly neighbor exposed to Mulch, and Mulch again denied it.
You should really just do a quick ISO of Kokichi, but keep your waders on.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I have too, but usually when town fake claims they are able to explain, at some point, why they did it, what the town motivation was. We never saw any follow-up from Koki, like... Here's what I learned from reactions to my fake claims. All we saw was another fake claim.In post 1315, Gamma Emerald wrote:
It's not really townie but I don't see why it's scummy either. I've seen people fakeclaim and fakesoft as both aligns, if he's counterclaimed then whoopsIn post 1314, texcat wrote:Do you think fake claiming is townie?? What if he was counterclaimed?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Ugh. Waking up to 8 new pages to plow through. Don't yall ever sleep? I've mostly caught up, but I did skip most of Frogger's drunk posts.
I wish I had a clue what this meant. Am I the cat?In post 1650, rb wrote:
Ive never been so simultaneously amused and aggravated at the same timeIn post 1647, Macabre wrote:The cat is a fan of random chance. Risk taker! Bad person, or thrill seeker? Take a chance!
I'm assuming that some of those are only off the table for today? Because I have not added Frogger or Uzi to my town pile. And there might still be an outside chance of Aneninen or Kokichi being scum. I would guess that Assemble is town, but it wouldn't be a guess that I'd wager more than a nickel on.In post 1687, Transcend wrote:OFF THE TABLE: OMA RB FROGGER UZIVERT 2INAMIL DOGGO ANENINEN MARSHY TEXCAT
ON THE TABLE: LOVEBIRD UNABOMB JODAXQ (tho leanin town there yo) MACABRE (prob only as policy)
Consider my vote to be on Lovebird. (Not sure what the VC is at the moment.)-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 1644, Kokichi Oma wrote:VOTE: Texcaat
Next time vig, listen to me.
We lynch in Texcat/Transcend/UnabombaH-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Ugh. Transcend, why are you abandoning the Lovebird lynch you've been pushing since the very beginning? Look at what Love did today. He lurked and hoped his wagon would go away. When it didn't, he came in and defended himself just enough to get a couple of unvotes. Doesn't that smell like scum under pressure to you?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 2129, Kokichi Oma wrote:In post 692, texcat wrote:Yeah, my vote is never moving from Kokichi. I don't want to see the 4th or 5th fake claim.
I don't like these posts, she says that she doesn't like my fake claims, but it was clear that none of them were legit for a reason.In post 699, texcat wrote:I see zero town reasons for Kokochi's fake claims.
I don't know what you're saying here. My votes were for a reason. Are you saying that none of your fake claims were legit for a reason. You never went anywhere with it. You never explained why you were fake claiming. I thought it was just to sow confusion and dischord and fishing for counterclaim.
I also claimed to be mason at the end with Mulch (who confirmed us as mason's together.) And she had no reaction to it. Wouldn't someone who had a hard scumread at least have some sort of reaction to it? It just seems like she's parked her vote on me since her first post of the game and hasn't done any game solving or scumhunting to try and find my alignment. It looks like she is just hoping for a mislynch on someone for being 'purposely' scummy.
This some of you might find silly, but I don't like the way this post is formatted, in the way that she is referring to' town' like she isn't part of the town. It's just seems like a perceptive slip to me.In post 703, texcat wrote:They are anti-town. We could have had a mason counterclaim easily. That would not have been good for town.
Look at these posts defending gamma softly, she was trying to derail it without being too much involved. Also, don't you think that someone who scumread me would be more vocal about me being scum and it's me leading the wagon on town? She didn't say anything about that and was just subtly trying to derail it. (she didn't even say that he was weary of the Gamma wagon just because I led it. Which bring me to my next point.)In post 1398, texcat wrote:Huh. You'd think scum would come up with a better claim than that.
Uhm...no. Yes I was softly defending Gamma. I was questioning and examining his odd claim. I don't think that is scum indicative. I certainly would not do that as scum. I'd either hard defend him, or I'd bus him. And sorry, I didn't realize that you were leading the wagon.
See how she's so willing to vote Lovebird here? Yet didn't want to vote Gamma at all? Also, there is the fact that she says she still hard scumreads me, yet she easily went to the Lovebird wagon, even though I voted it. Isn't it weird that she didn't even bring up that she was weary that I'm on the wagon?In post 1966, texcat wrote:Is everyone still hungover?
VOTE: Lovebird
I'm not a fan of the difference between Day 1 Lovebird vs Day 2.
Are you kidding? It's Day Two. Do you think I should have the same reads I had on Day One? And you were scumreading Brass/Gamma all day one. And you've now soft claimed cop. Where did I say I still hard scumread you on Day 2? Granted I still have creeping suspicions, but far far from a hard scumread.
She also says that she isn't a fan of Lovebird's Day 1 and Day 2 difference, yet HASN'T explained what the difference is at all, or even quote some posts to back up his reads.
Uhh yeah I did. You even quoted it below. You didn't agree with it, but hey what do I expect?
So basically, all we have is someone who is kept their vote on their first post of the game vote. Was very hesitant and tried to subtly defend Gamma's claim, and someone who is okay joining a wagon who their top scumread is on, which contradicts the day prior when it came to confirmed mafia.
You were my top scumread yesterday. That's why my vote was on you. Events happened. Flips happened. You are no longer my top scumread. That's why my vote is on Lovebird who is my top scumread. You're really distorting things here.
Also I disagree with this post, they didn't lurk at all, in fact I feel like when votes were piling up, that's when they started to post. I don't think Lovebird was even here when votes began piling on her.In post 2109, texcat wrote:Ugh. Transcend, why are you abandoning the Lovebird lynch you've been pushing since the very beginning? Look at what Love did today. He lurked and hoped his wagon would go away. When it didn't, he came in and defended himself just enough to get a couple of unvotes. Doesn't that smell like scum under pressure to you?
So what? Number of posts is irrelevant, especially when half of them don't say anything more than vote tex. You have 1 substantial post above.In post 2143, Kokichi Oma wrote:
How? I have the 2nd most posts in the game of people alive. And I clearly explained my scumread in depth.In post 2139, TwoInAMillion wrote:Because you are all being dodgy/lurky.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
If Lovebird is town, why did he sit at L-1 for so long? Does that mean all the scum were already on the wagon or that scum off the wagon were abstentees or were scum just reluctant to hammer? I still think Lovebird is likely scum.In post 2280, Transcend wrote:UNVOTE:
can't lie i've been pretty unconfident that lovebird would flip scum but her d1 voting patterns were terrible-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
But kokichi claims that slot is 100% town.In post 2288, TwoInAMillion wrote:the 2319/marshy slot is looking very scummy as well.
scum r on da ropes.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.