Mafia 70: Traditional - Game over!

Flameaxe · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:52 pm

I would OMGUS, but then I wouldn't be able to do this:

Vote: zoneFace.

That's right! I went there! WHAT NOW?! (the F WAS intentional! No wai!)

Flameaxe · Post Post #33 (isolation #1) » Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:48 am

Woo!

Unvote, vote: hmrox

Only a little bit OMGUS...there is actually some reasoning behind it.

Flameaxe · Post Post #40 (isolation #2) » Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:13 pm

And the bandwagon keeps growing! Woo!

Flameaxe · Post Post #55 (isolation #3) » Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:00 am

Sorry for not getting on earlier, packing for my trip. (

Mod: I are is out of town till monday, as my PM said

) It's not a 100% serious vote, just that my guess that a newer scum player would probably jump on, even though it is basically just a wagoning. Starting the bandwagon means nothing hmrox, you just happened to be the last one to jump on before I posted it. It's not a huge case (or even a case at all really) just one to get the game going a bit.

Flameaxe · Post Post #144 (isolation #4) » Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:16 pm

/back in town. Did a quick glance tonight, will get a better readthrough tomorrow. But for now,

Unvote

.

Flameaxe · Post Post #238 (isolation #5) » Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:57 am

So Lemming...you point out his roleclaim with 3 votes on him. What about the other claim in this game (Niv) with nothing but a random vote on him? Did you really find that it was necessary at all?

Flameaxe · Post Post #266 (isolation #6) » Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:09 am

The Venerable Zorg wrote:
Aimee wrote:
The Venerable Zorg wrote:First off, i dislike the way in which, an anti-Flameaxe BW formed on Hmrox very quickly.
FoS: Flameaxe
Um, what?

You didn't like the Flameaxe wagon so you FoS
Flameaxe
?

The Venerable Zorg wrote:On the other hand, he has claimed vanilla. I'm no expert on Mafia, but i'd been taught that scum don't usually claim vanilla, because often, it doesnt change alot.
Complete WIFOM speculation.

Yeah I agree that Zorg's 133 was quite sucky.

No, i meant that when Flameaxe recieved some pressure, a wagon quickly formed on Hmrox. This felt a bit like an attempt to take the pressure off Flameaxe-if the scum were scared that their buddy was going to get lynched.
I realise that my comment about claiming vanilla is WIFOM, but it was simply my opinion at the time.
Could someone please tell me what about my post 133 was so 'sucky'?[/quote]

What was your reasoning to go after me, and not the people that put Hmrox at 5/6 votes? Random vote wagons REALLY make me feel pressured though, daddy and his friends always tried to bandwagon me at night while I was sleeping. It scarred me forever.

Flameaxe · Post Post #306 (isolation #7) » Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:31 am

Zorg wrote:Well assuming the bandwagon on Hmrox was a counter-wagon to the one on you, the only motivation for that wagon would be if you were scum, being protected. So it made sense to go after you first.

*cough*

Fonzie wrote:Flameaxe didn't come under any pressure though. It was a completely random, unreasoned bandwagon.

Even the person who I voted declared it was a pointless wagon with no reasoning.

Also, that person hasn't posted for about a week as well...

Flameaxe · Post Post #308 (isolation #8) » Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:35 am

Basically EXACTLY like that game...

Flameaxe · Post Post #333 (isolation #9) » Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:01 am

Any reason for going after TS over someone else?

Flameaxe · Post Post #345 (isolation #10) » Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:59 am

The constant pointing out of Zoneace's possible lack of useful posting isn't exactly useful either...

Flameaxe · Post Post #349 (isolation #11) » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:03 am

The why not one? You are taking my post the completely wrong way. I was simply asking if there was a reason behind the vote, or just picking someone out of the crowd.

Flameaxe · Post Post #733 (isolation #12) » Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:03 pm

Yarr, I'm here. I just got back in town though (Patrick was informed before I left) re-reading soon.

Flameaxe · Post Post #826 (isolation #13) » Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:46 pm

WhiteyTheOppressor wrote:Flame: Oh, he's playing this game? Post more. Likely town I guess.

More.

Flameaxe · Post Post #888 (isolation #14) » Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:50 pm

Unvote, vote TS.

Flameaxe · Post Post #898 (isolation #15) » Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:04 pm

Unvote, Vote: Zorg

Wagon, wagon, wagon=Talkie, talkie, talkie.

Flameaxe · Post Post #907 (isolation #16) » Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:22 am

Unvote

. Hmm...the developments keep growing batman!

Flameaxe · Post Post #930 (isolation #17) » Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:21 pm

Mentioning that that counterclaim wouldn't mean that TS is confirmed scum, and there might be two cops with varying sanities?

Flameaxe · Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:33 am

Zeppo wrote:That if they actually are a cop and the scum decide to night kill them (even assuming there is no doc protection on them that would make them waste their night kill completely) then it means someone else didn't get night killed, sparing the life of a useful townie.

Cop>'useful townie'.

Flameaxe · Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:50 am

And using one night to test them, to at least prove they are scum...isn't an option?

Flameaxe · Post Post #1070 (isolation #20) » Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:57 pm

Hi Sim!

<3<3<3

Oh and

Vote: Zeppo

for reasons stated above. I fuhgot before.

Flameaxe · Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:25 pm

Conscious*

Flameaxe · Post Post #1107 (isolation #22) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:38 am

No, Zeppo voting is the only path to the light!

Flameaxe · Post Post #1116 (isolation #23) » Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:52 am

Maybe you should consider that there is a possibility that your case is just dumb. Not everything you say is true when someone doesn't refute it.

Flameaxe · Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:46 am

Who does like me? I mean srsly...

Flameaxe · Post Post #1138 (isolation #25) » Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:15 pm

Assholes! Bah, go town.

Flameaxe · Post Post #2896 (isolation #26) » Sun May 11, 2008 3:05 pm

Ether should post the transcripts.