NY 192: Game Shop Mafia (Over)

[Political Clout]

Vote Count 1.16 (FINAL)

davesaz ( :idea: ) - Wickedestjr, Nosferatu, RadiantCowbells, pisskop, Dwlee99, Keyser Söze, Fro99er, Aeronaut, Frozen Angel
Dwlee99 (2) - Wake88, JarJarDrinks
Frozen Angel (1) - Nero Cain
Nosferatu (1) - TheCow
pisskop (1) - davesaz

Not voting (2) - DeathNote, Zulfy

(expired on 2016-01-08 23:59:59)

16 players alive, 9 votes to lynch

It looks like scum started killing off the wagon on dave. It makes an okay-ish lean for those on it still being town. But I can't help the feeling that not just one scum was on it.

@jarjar why were you on the dwlee wagon? I'm still scrolling up and down with the replacements.

@pie ask any questions about any one player that was on my slot. The response might take some time because I will have to read for context. I'm semi confident I will be able to tell what they may have been thinking at the time of their posts regarding logical deductions/voting patterns. If it is about word 5 sentence 3 in paragraph whatever I won't be of any use.

[Political Clout]

I am going through vote counts.

[Political Clout]

I tried going through a lot of vote counts and seeing the reason ehy they voted during final lynch, but that turned out to be extremely boring. I do get pinged by jarjarbinks, wake, and keyser.

[Political Clout]

Vt

[Political Clout]

Why are you certain 3 scum?

[Political Clout]

I don't disagree. Frankly I am no good on set-up spec so I have no clue if what you say is demonstrable. It certainly makes for a decent line of thought, if nothing more.

As far as sk hunting; usually someone who is okay with any death and reserved in stances is an okay place to start. Their are players who have a "personality" or certain playstyle that they have tailored. But as a general rulemif someome is independently scummy they might be an sk.

I was hoping for more activity from the active players. And go through an accelerated sort of rvs phase of my own. And jump in. I am not sure whether to read day 1. At first glance it seems vacuous of intelligent discussion.

[Political Clout]

Okay here are my actions:

Night 1: No action
Night 2: pirate mollie
Night 3: DeathNote
Night 4: No action
Night 5: Golden Robster

I am not sure I agree with this choice(?). I just find it odd. I would think firebringer you would be eager to reveal a possibility for why their was no kill. And a highly reasonable possibility considering your role.

My inquiry is two fold: why did you think it was reasonable to wait and why did you not pursue rob day start as scumhunting does not require you reveal information a conclusion about someone does. I dislike your presentation immensely.

[Political Clout]

VOTE: Robster

- Scum didnt shoot into a BP claim
- Scum didn't decide not to attack
- Scum didn't attack Robster (They're shooting into a much more town-looking slot)

Only logical explaination for the missong kill is Robster was the attacker.

:facepalm:

Please explain why they wouldn't attack me.

And take note, JJ said this last day.

pisskop flipping red = scum robster

What is your argument here? I'm "seeing", but not understanding what your point actually is.

[Political Clout]

Can we discuss errant as a possible lynch as well? I dislike how limiting we're being here.

[Political Clout]

Can we discuss errant as a possible lynch as well? I dislike how limiting we're being here.

we can discuss it, but you'd have to have a compelling explanation for why Fire's result isn't a guilty if you wanna lynch outside of GR in the end

It wasn't so much about lynching outside of GR my issue was mainly only discussing GR as a probable lynch. I haven't really read Errants iso mostly skimmed.

It has gotten me thinking do I wanna lynch outside of GR? It looks like I just have to follow or abstain for now as I do not have a good grasp of the game or the players.

[Political Clout]

@pieguyn thanks for putting in the leg work new friend.

And it looks like my gut read of errant was right so yay.