NY 193 : Werewolf Mania (GAME OVER- TOWN WIN)
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Chance this is scum being cheeky
VOTE: Lobsterno investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Putting pressure on almost50 or ika is pretty useless in my opinion.
We need to put pressure on a player so as to see not only the reactions of the people around the wagon but the player being pressured as well.
Cuz we're going to get the former no matter what so we might as well go for the most info possible with the latter.
And with ika, who seems like he's gonna have a very hollow playstyle, or almost50, who seems to have a strange way of going about playing this thing, I don't think we're gonna get too much outta either when we pressure them.
Pedit: Robster I'm not really seeing why you have a problem with Keyser's post.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
\In post 65, Xkfyu wrote:In post 56, Zulfy wrote:In post 51, JarJarDrinks wrote: just went "fuck it" and threw a vote down.
+1
Care to elaborate on that?
Scumping. Feel like it could be JJD proactively shutting off any criticism of kyu's trite little comment.
Just a scumping JJD.
In post 80, Keyser Söze wrote:
Explain this one to me.
Just RVS, it would be humorous if Robster was scum and said that I am innocent is innocent, as scum would know that.
Page 1-5 catchup.
Not much to go on for me.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 128, SilverWolf wrote:In post 125, Zulfy wrote:Why are you theory talking and soft defending two people already?
This was the best contribution I could come up with at that stage of the game.
In post 129, Xkfyu wrote:In post 125, Zulfy wrote:Putting pressure on almost50 or ika is pretty useless in my opinion.
We need to put pressure on a player so as to see not only the reactions of the people around the wagon but the player being pressured as well.
Cuz we're going to get the former no matter what so we might as well go for the most info possible with the latter.
And with ika, who seems like he's gonna have a very hollow playstyle, or almost50, who seems to have a strange way of going about playing this thing, I don't think we're gonna get too much outta either when we pressure them.
Pedit: Robster I'm not really seeing why you have a problem with Keyser's post.
If you think pressuring Almost50 or ika will be less revealing than someone else, then who do you suggest we pressure?
Already answered by Keyser, somebody more active/less strange.
It would have been at this point that I would have voted you, just for the reaction, but I'm too late for that now.
In post 132, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 123, Golden Robster wrote:Anti-town on the surface. I think the chances of him being scum are slimmer than what I previously had in mind. Why would a third party scum do that? Could he be a PR role and lying about being VT in order to lead scum away from trying to kill him? Is he trying to identify scum that might latch onto him?
I took a step back because I could see newb-town Almost50 messing his VT roleclaim up like this. It would be a very bold move as a scum-gambit (from an inexperienced player) - as it brings immediate focus/attention to his slot. Experienced scum do not actively create WIFOM on their slot to this degree this early.It's my view that needlessly creating WIFOM is ALWAYS scummy, but this is almost50, and he's really weirding me out so Idk
[/quote]In post 144, SilverWolf wrote:Responses to me voting for ikaSpoiler:
I love all these responses to me voting for ika. I've also already explained why I'm doing it and what I think of his meta. There's def scum in here defending him if he's town and if he's scum, likely a scumbuddy in here.
ika-reads?
Keyser-reads?
This seems like some species of omgus, you may be right about things but it's better to try to convince others of that instead of dismissing them as possible scumno investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 463, JarJarDrinks wrote:@zulf
scumping = scum ping?
Nope, not at all, I don't know where you get that idea/s Yea, that's it
if so then can u clarify? I gave you a scum ping by my analysis of Xkfs "fuck it" vote?
Yep. Seemed to me like he went out of his way to show that he didn't caaaare and your reaction to that seemed strange.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 167, Xkfyu wrote:In post 142, Zulfy wrote:@Xk, anyone else really Idk I am still looking
Also, why would you try to talk us out of pressuring ika and Almost50, when you yourself don't have any preference other than those two? Surely, it's better to be pressuring someone (what we were already doing), than to be pressuring no one (what you seem to want us to do).
I'm a fan of "things could be better" over "things could be worse"
In post 169, Almost50 wrote:@JarJar: So you won't let go even after I role claimed. This makes you either scum or a very misguided town who will not be too beneficial to town on the long run.
UNVOTE: BlackStar
VOTE: JarJarDrinks
You're continued beating of the already very much dead horse is preventing the town from scumhunting elsewhere. There's NOTHING to be found here when I have stated, repeated and further reasserted my will to be the lynch of the day some 7-10 days later on. If you're going to spend a whole week inspecting my case and mine alone then I'm not sure my initial read on you was spot on (I'm getting well used to including scum in my initial town reads, so this doesn't at all surprise me).
In fact; at this point I'm willing to accept 15 other votes on me w/o considering it being scummy. Yours, and YOURS ALONE is the one vote I'd consider to be a STRONG SCUM TELL if you do cast it on me.
+1
Still gotta read the page after this but this seems like scum trying to act more like a newbie than they actually are.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 183, TheBlueRose wrote:In post 73, BlackStar wrote:In post 71, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 68, Nero Cain wrote:In post 55, JarJarDrinks wrote:"what is your opinion on everyone else that is both on and off your wagon?" is such a garbage question this early into the game.
I really don't agree giving that yo have already formed opinions of atleast 2 (or 3 if you count IAI) players.
Right. I formed opinions on TWO or THREE players. He's asking for my opinion on EVERYONE ELSE. How could I po1ssibly have an opinion on that many people?
Like I can understand asking about others ON the wagon. But on and OFF the wagon?
I agree with you. I think its weird that people are already asking what you think of everyone.
I had only asked since you did have some ideas flowing. Sure it was far to early to have reads on everyone, but you stated some about people who were on and off your wagon. Not everyone sure, but some.
+1
In post 185, Xkfyu wrote:In post 181, SilverWolf wrote:In post 171, Xkfyu wrote:In post 144, SilverWolf wrote:Responses to me voting for ikaSpoiler:
I love all these responses to me voting for ika. I've also already explained why I'm doing it and what I think of his meta. There's def scum in here defending him if he's town and if he's scum, likely a scumbuddy in here.
ika-reads?
Keyser-reads?
So basically what you're saying is that, regardless of ika's alignment, you believe one of {Keyser, Zulfy, Ricastle} is scum?
Yes
For the record, I think you're probably right.
Please explain what part of his argument has convinced youno investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
ISO'd RC.
RC votes Ricastle for saying that RC is a bad town player (See me, I'm not very impressed by Ricastle's skill myself)
RC votes Ricastle (presumably) for the stuff Ricastle says on page 19, as he had his vote parked on the laughing anime gif person before that. I see that stuff as classic Ricastle but can see how RC would do that, he is RC.
No pings on RC.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 551, Keyser Söze wrote:I fear this is bad play by town-ika. If scum-ika has fakeclaimed, he has no long-term strategy, as the real seer would inevitably counter-claim/flip.
In other words, bad play by scum-ika. +1no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Keyser being da best as always but
In post 187, Keyser Söze wrote:My only concern was his reachy interpretation of BlackStar's post as a scum-slip (post 96).
+1, I'm not seeing how this is much of a concern. I feel like you put this in here just because you felt you had an obligation to criticize JarJarDrinks in some way.
Spoiler: Memo to find out where this wentno investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 255, Nero Cain wrote:Didn't like blacks #73 much. Could be shadowing scum.
+1, reaching
In post 318, Nero Cain wrote:I think he's prob scum trying to out the real seer.
This feels like town WIFOMWait just a second there was never a need to counterclaim ika +1.
By the way now you're giving the ika slot some space? What are you doing here Nero?
In post 366, Nero Cain wrote:In post 365, BlackStar wrote:Stop fighting over trivial shit and work together so that we can figure out who is scum
^scum
Explain this
In post 598, Nero Cain wrote:you didn't ask me to explain, you asked me some nonsensical "how do I know" bullshit.
You are better than this that's not town +1
In post 619, Nero Cain wrote:there's going to be a chorus of people that say "its empty stop trying to lynch it!"
Am I mistaken in thinking that this is your approach to the ika slot?no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 591, I Am Innocent wrote:Rough week all, just found out my dad might have prostate cancer. So yeah my head really ain't into this right now.
I'll be thinking of you, Innocent.
No pings on this one. In fact I think I'm not gonna spend too much time paying attention to Innocent for now.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 74, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 69, Almost50 wrote:@JarJar: Actually; it IS alignment indicative (albeit a weak tell) especially in my case. If I was scum and knew there to be one of my associates in an inactive spot I would've -at least- waited a bit longer before I pointed it out. But your explanation makes perfect sense too.
Bad Bad post.
First off, telling us that his post IS alignment indicative. You don't get to give yourself townpoints dude.
Second, How in the world can it actually be alignment indicative when we have no idea if the inactives are scum? You seem to KNOW that you should be getting townpoints for recommending a policy lynch on scum.
Third, you say that if you were scum, you would have waited a bit longer. But why? If you were scum, wouldn't it make sense to do it earlier to "warn" ur buddy that he needs to start posting more? What does waiting gain you?
This really isn't working out for me.
See I thought I'd just go down a list ISOing everybody but it's very fatigue-inducing and demotivating.
So I'll instead focus on the first thing that comes to my mind, which is Nero Cain's fake claim. (According to himself)no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 864, JarJarDrinks wrote:See this is why I'm not sure about Almost. Like every post of his screams scum to me. But several of my scumreads don't jive w/ Almost as a scumbuddy.
JJ, why is bussing not a sufficient explanation?no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 908, Almost50 wrote:In post 906, JarJarDrinks wrote:No No No. His play is good. It's how scumhunting is done. If you are town then YOUR play is what's bad. Like unbelievably bad. Your whole "ignore me but feel free to vote me" spiel can only come from scum or absolutely terrible town.
Well, to each their own, brother. I'm not playing this game to anybody's standards but my own. As long as I'm not breaking THE RULES, then I'll do what I feel is in the best interest of the town regardless of whether they see it my way.
I'm here for you, Ostrich.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 777, Nero Cain wrote:What lies have I told?
That you were seer +1no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 825, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 810, Almost50 wrote:hypothetically assuming SS is scum it doesn't change the fact that his reads are trustworthy.
Scum need good reads in order to be townread.
Scum are in the best position to give good reads at day start.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 1221, Nero Cain wrote:Zulfy
In post 684, Xkfyu wrote:In post 632, Nero Cain wrote:In post 628, Zulfy wrote:
Explain this
If Black is scum he'd know mine and Ika's alignment. If Ika is town there is scum motivation in diffusing a TvT fight.
Of course, it would depend on what scum would try to achieve, but I would say that, more often than not, there would be more scum motivation in not diffusing a Town vs Town fight.
Would you care to respond to this?
I agree with x and disagree with you.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Copypasting cuz I'm a lazier slob than Firebringer.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p7605893
We can't lynch almost50, he's hilarious
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p7611343
No one had flipped at the time? This post makes zero sense to me.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p7610535
Self-fulfilling pressure. It's interesting to look at now.
Someone voted for Ric and he didn't react so someone votes for Ric and he didn't react so someone votes for Ric.
Shit wagon. Never sheeping RC ever again.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p7605327
ha
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p7609635
Ric Firebringer Blackstar and I (grrr, says x) all on the same page here.
Voting Ric for voting you is shit tho +1
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p7608031
zero. ZERO reason to softclaim
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p7607994
How could you like RC after the loweswt-effort ricastle tunnel ever? +1
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p7606284
Pisskop seems like he's anything but aggressive right now. Am I misunderstanding +1
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p7605751
+666
Blackstar looks opportunistic with me, omgus yeayea but +1
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p7613687
You serious? Make your case, if I'm such a strong scumread
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p7613659
What are you even talking about?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p7613618
How could you know this?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p7605488
Pretty useless post here Rob +1
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p7598859
"You can't possibly expect that response to fly, can you?"
Why does it matter? Are you scumreading him for it?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p7599277
I disagree, x can keep doing what he's doing. (grrr, x)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p7601678
No excuse. The objective is to identify scummy +1
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p7601703
Nero, you didn't reply to this.
Hypocrisy +1
Jarjar not following up on it +1no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 1377, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:In post 1376, pisskop wrote:Hes conftown. gdi you guys cant be this dense.
Just because hes conftown doesent mean hes right.
What even is thisno investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015