NY 193 : Werewolf Mania (GAME OVER- TOWN WIN)


User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #3 (isolation #0) » Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:28 pm

Post by Zulfy »

/confirm
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #44 (isolation #1) » Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:26 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 24, Golden Robster wrote:VOTE: I Am Innocent

indeed you are


Chance this is scum being cheeky
VOTE: Lobster
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #56 (isolation #2) » Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:46 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 51, JarJarDrinks wrote: just went "fuck it" and threw a vote down.


+1
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #125 (isolation #3) » Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:28 am

Post by Zulfy »

Putting pressure on almost50 or ika is pretty useless in my opinion.

We need to put pressure on a player so as to see not only the reactions of the people around the wagon but the player being pressured as well.
Cuz we're going to get the former no matter what so we might as well go for the most info possible with the latter.

And with ika, who seems like he's gonna have a very hollow playstyle, or almost50, who seems to have a strange way of going about playing this thing, I don't think we're gonna get too much outta either when we pressure them.

Pedit: Robster I'm not really seeing why you have a problem with Keyser's post.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #126 (isolation #4) » Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:29 am

Post by Zulfy »

Then again I wouldn't want an Almost50 in lylo.
Oog
I hope you know what you're doing sir
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #139 (isolation #5) » Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:21 am

Post by Zulfy »

Lobster that was RVS come on now
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #140 (isolation #6) » Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:22 am

Post by Zulfy »

I put Robster but phone changes it to Lobster
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #142 (isolation #7) » Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:24 am

Post by Zulfy »

@Xk, anyone else really Idk I am still looking
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #461 (isolation #8) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:04 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 65, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 56, Zulfy wrote:
In post 51, JarJarDrinks wrote: just went "fuck it" and threw a vote down.


+1

Care to elaborate on that?
\
Scumping. Feel like it could be JJD proactively shutting off any criticism of kyu's trite little comment.

Just a scumping JJD.
In post 80, Keyser Söze wrote:
In post 44, Zulfy wrote:
In post 24, Golden Robster wrote:VOTE: I Am Innocent

indeed you are


Chance this is scum being cheeky
VOTE: Lobster

Explain this one to me.


Just RVS, it would be humorous if Robster was scum and said that I am innocent is innocent, as scum would know that.

Page 1-5 catchup.
Not much to go on for me.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #466 (isolation #9) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:17 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 128, SilverWolf wrote:
In post 125, Zulfy wrote:Why are you theory talking and soft defending two people already?


This was the best contribution I could come up with at that stage of the game.
In post 129, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 125, Zulfy wrote:Putting pressure on almost50 or ika is pretty useless in my opinion.

We need to put pressure on a player so as to see not only the reactions of the people around the wagon but the player being pressured as well.
Cuz we're going to get the former no matter what so we might as well go for the most info possible with the latter.

And with ika, who seems like he's gonna have a very hollow playstyle, or almost50, who seems to have a strange way of going about playing this thing, I don't think we're gonna get too much outta either when we pressure them.

Pedit: Robster I'm not really seeing why you have a problem with Keyser's post.

If you think pressuring Almost50 or ika will be less revealing than someone else, then who do you suggest we pressure?

Already answered by Keyser, somebody more active/less strange.
It would have been at this point that I would have voted you, just for the reaction, but I'm too late for that now.
In post 132, Keyser Söze wrote:
In post 123, Golden Robster wrote:Anti-town on the surface. I think the chances of him being scum are slimmer than what I previously had in mind. Why would a third party scum do that? Could he be a PR role and lying about being VT in order to lead scum away from trying to kill him? Is he trying to identify scum that might latch onto him?

I took a step back because I could see newb-town Almost50 messing his VT roleclaim up like this. It would be a very bold move as a scum-gambit (from an inexperienced player) - as it brings immediate focus/attention to his slot. Experienced scum do not actively create WIFOM on their slot to this degree this early.
It's my view that needlessly creating WIFOM is ALWAYS scummy, but this is almost50, and he's really weirding me out so Idk



In post 144, SilverWolf wrote:Responses to me voting for ika
Spoiler:
In post 122, Keyser Söze wrote:
In post 120, SilverWolf wrote:Back to this.

VOTE: ika

In post 103, ika wrote:ok im off to work.

ika's not at home...
:giggle:

In post 125, Zulfy wrote:
Putting pressure on almost50 or ika is pretty useless in my opinion.


We need to put pressure on a player so as to see not only the reactions of the people around the wagon but the player being pressured as well.
Cuz we're going to get the former no matter what so we might as well go for the most info possible with the latter.

And with ika, who seems like he's gonna have a very hollow playstyle, or almost50, who seems to have a strange way of going about playing this thing, I don't think we're gonna get too much outta either when we pressure them.


Pedit: Robster I'm not really seeing why you have a problem with Keyser's post.

In post 138, Keyser Söze wrote:
"she obviously believes that pressuring ika could give us good insight"


Yes, pressure on all slots is productive. As I said, this game is built on interactions. I just found it amusing that SilverWolf placed her vote on a player who just signed off to work (it's pressure, not not real pressure).


I was interested in hearing her notes on ika's scum meta. I.e does scum-ika react a certain way to naked votes on his slot while he is at work
:giggle:

In post 143, Ricastle wrote:Happy with my vote where it is.

The idea that ika requires pressure to be sorted is nonsensical. His alignment becomes glaringly obvious as the game goes on regardless.

I love all these responses to me voting for ika. I've also already explained why I'm doing it and what I think of his meta. There's def scum in here defending him if he's town and if he's scum, likely a scumbuddy in here.

ika-reads?

Keyser-reads?
[/quote]

This seems like some species of omgus, you may be right about things but it's better to try to convince others of that instead of dismissing them as possible scum
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #467 (isolation #10) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:18 am

Post by Zulfy »

These tags man
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #468 (isolation #11) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:20 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 463, JarJarDrinks wrote:@zulf

scumping = scum ping?

Nope, not at all, I don't know where you get that idea/s Yea, that's it

if so then can u clarify? I gave you a scum ping by my analysis of Xkfs "fuck it" vote?


Yep. Seemed to me like he went out of his way to show that he didn't caaaare and your reaction to that seemed strange.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #470 (isolation #12) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:21 am

Post by Zulfy »

Oh RC is in here hiya
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #475 (isolation #13) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:29 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 167, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 142, Zulfy wrote:@Xk, anyone else really Idk I am still looking

Also, why would you try to talk us out of pressuring ika and Almost50, when you yourself don't have any preference other than those two? Surely, it's better to be pressuring someone (what we were already doing), than to be pressuring no one (what you seem to want us to do).

I'm a fan of "things could be better" over "things could be worse"
In post 169, Almost50 wrote:@JarJar: So you won't let go even after I role claimed. This makes you either scum or a very misguided town who will not be too beneficial to town on the long run.

UNVOTE: BlackStar

VOTE: JarJarDrinks

You're continued beating of the already very much dead horse is preventing the town from scumhunting elsewhere. There's NOTHING to be found here when I have stated, repeated and further reasserted my will to be the lynch of the day some 7-10 days later on. If you're going to spend a whole week inspecting my case and mine alone then I'm not sure my initial read on you was spot on (I'm getting well used to including scum in my initial town reads, so this doesn't at all surprise me).

In fact; at this point I'm willing to accept 15 other votes on me w/o considering it being scummy. Yours, and YOURS ALONE is the one vote I'd consider to be a STRONG SCUM TELL if you do cast it on me.

+1
Still gotta read the page after this but this seems like scum trying to act more like a newbie than they actually are.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #476 (isolation #14) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:34 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 183, TheBlueRose wrote:
In post 73, BlackStar wrote:
In post 71, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 68, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 55, JarJarDrinks wrote:"what is your opinion on everyone else that is both on and off your wagon?" is such a garbage question this early into the game.

I really don't agree giving that yo have already formed opinions of atleast 2 (or 3 if you count IAI) players.

Right. I formed opinions on TWO or THREE players. He's asking for my opinion on EVERYONE ELSE. How could I po1ssibly have an opinion on that many people?

Like I can understand asking about others ON the wagon. But on and OFF the wagon?

I agree with you. I think its weird that people are already asking what you think of everyone.


I had only asked since you did have some ideas flowing. Sure it was far to early to have reads on everyone, but you stated some about people who were on and off your wagon. Not everyone sure, but some.

+1
In post 185, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 181, SilverWolf wrote:
In post 171, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 144, SilverWolf wrote:Responses to me voting for ika
Spoiler:
In post 122, Keyser Söze wrote:
In post 120, SilverWolf wrote:Back to this.

VOTE: ika

In post 103, ika wrote:ok im off to work.

ika's not at home...
:giggle:

In post 125, Zulfy wrote:
Putting pressure on almost50 or ika is pretty useless in my opinion.


We need to put pressure on a player so as to see not only the reactions of the people around the wagon but the player being pressured as well.
Cuz we're going to get the former no matter what so we might as well go for the most info possible with the latter.

And with ika, who seems like he's gonna have a very hollow playstyle, or almost50, who seems to have a strange way of going about playing this thing, I don't think we're gonna get too much outta either when we pressure them.


Pedit: Robster I'm not really seeing why you have a problem with Keyser's post.

In post 138, Keyser Söze wrote:
"she obviously believes that pressuring ika could give us good insight"


Yes, pressure on all slots is productive. As I said, this game is built on interactions. I just found it amusing that SilverWolf placed her vote on a player who just signed off to work (it's pressure, not not real pressure).


I was interested in hearing her notes on ika's scum meta. I.e does scum-ika react a certain way to naked votes on his slot while he is at work
:giggle:

In post 143, Ricastle wrote:Happy with my vote where it is.

The idea that ika requires pressure to be sorted is nonsensical. His alignment becomes glaringly obvious as the game goes on regardless.

I love all these responses to me voting for ika. I've also already explained why I'm doing it and what I think of his meta. There's def scum in here defending him if he's town and if he's scum, likely a scumbuddy in here.

ika-reads?

Keyser-reads?

So basically what you're saying is that, regardless of ika's alignment, you believe one of {Keyser, Zulfy, Ricastle} is scum?


Yes

For the record, I think you're probably right.

Please explain what part of his argument has convinced you
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #477 (isolation #15) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:36 am

Post by Zulfy »

v/la for, let's say two days


Really wanna play but not feeling too good right now. Give me some time
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #489 (isolation #16) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:08 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Yea idk what that was
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #490 (isolation #17) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:11 pm

Post by Zulfy »

UNVOTE:
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #606 (isolation #18) » Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:59 am

Post by Zulfy »

Mod I am really sorry but I gotta be replaced out
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #621 (isolation #19) » Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:21 am

Post by Zulfy »

Request rescinded
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #622 (isolation #20) » Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:37 am

Post by Zulfy »

ISO'd RC.
RC votes Ricastle for saying that RC is a bad town player (See me, I'm not very impressed by Ricastle's skill myself)
RC votes Ricastle (presumably) for the stuff Ricastle says on page 19, as he had his vote parked on the laughing anime gif person before that. I see that stuff as classic Ricastle but can see how RC would do that, he is RC.

No pings on RC.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #624 (isolation #21) » Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:49 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 551, Keyser Söze wrote:I fear this is bad play by town-ika. If scum-ika has fakeclaimed, he has no long-term strategy, as the real seer would inevitably counter-claim/flip.


In other words, bad play by scum-ika. +1
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #625 (isolation #22) » Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:50 am

Post by Zulfy »

Keyser being da best as always but
In post 187, Keyser Söze wrote:My only concern was his reachy interpretation of BlackStar's post as a scum-slip (post 96).


+1, I'm not seeing how this is much of a concern. I feel like you put this in here just because you felt you had an obligation to criticize JarJarDrinks in some way.

Spoiler: Memo to find out where this went
In post 197, Keyser Söze wrote:
@Xkfyu - please explain why "one of {Keyser, Zulfy, Ricastle}" is "probably" scum. Why are you ruling out the possibility of town challenging town, or town challenging scum?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #628 (isolation #23) » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:03 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 255, Nero Cain wrote:Didn't like blacks #73 much. Could be shadowing scum.

+1, reaching
In post 318, Nero Cain wrote:I think he's prob scum trying to out the real seer.


This feels like town WIFOM
Wait just a second there was never a need to counterclaim ika +1.
By the way now you're giving the ika slot some space? What are you doing here Nero?

In post 366, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 365, BlackStar wrote:Stop fighting over trivial shit and work together so that we can figure out who is scum

^scum

Explain this


In post 598, Nero Cain wrote:you didn't ask me to explain, you asked me some nonsensical "how do I know" bullshit.


You are better than this that's not town +1

In post 619, Nero Cain wrote:there's going to be a chorus of people that say "its empty stop trying to lynch it!"

Am I mistaken in thinking that this is your approach to the ika slot?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #630 (isolation #24) » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:09 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 591, I Am Innocent wrote:Rough week all, just found out my dad might have prostate cancer. So yeah my head really ain't into this right now.


:( I'll be thinking of you, Innocent.
No pings on this one. In fact I think I'm not gonna spend too much time paying attention to Innocent for now.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #631 (isolation #25) » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:11 am

Post by Zulfy »

That's it for today I think. This game looks like it's gonna be interesting. I am actually excited again.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #675 (isolation #26) » Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:13 am

Post by Zulfy »

Or they are the same person/know each other offline.

The wolf avatars make me suspect that.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #925 (isolation #27) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:12 am

Post by Zulfy »

Masquerade/Phantom Cobalt

Null, but I gotta go down the list, you know?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #927 (isolation #28) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:14 am

Post by Zulfy »

Spoiler:
In post 535, SnarkySnowman wrote:Reads for now:

Town {RC, Almost}
Townlean {ika, xkfyu}
Null {Zulfy, Keyser, I Am Innocent, Bebop, Blackstar, Albert, BlueRose, PC, JarJar}
Scumlean {Nero Cain, Golden Robster, Ricastle}

In post 555, SnarkySnowman wrote:Yeah I don't get at all why people think ika is scum.

Bebop, to touch on what you said about almost, I think this game feels different for him than the newbie game we played with him in, and I read him as town for now. I haven't seen a town game of his but this doesn't feel like a scum game.


^Everything of substance for SnarkySnowman.

Snarky could be doing better +2 for the lurking
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #936 (isolation #29) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 11:50 am

Post by Zulfy »

fuxk you

Ohhhhh
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #937 (isolation #30) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 11:51 am

Post by Zulfy »

Wait there's no o. Nevermind
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #939 (isolation #31) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 11:59 am

Post by Zulfy »

Rhubarb Pie reminds me of myself.

Townmyself.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #940 (isolation #32) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:06 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 74, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 69, Almost50 wrote:@JarJar: Actually; it IS alignment indicative (albeit a weak tell) especially in my case. If I was scum and knew there to be one of my associates in an inactive spot I would've -at least- waited a bit longer before I pointed it out. But your explanation makes perfect sense too.

Bad Bad post.


First off, telling us that his post IS alignment indicative. You don't get to give yourself townpoints dude.

Second, How in the world can it actually be alignment indicative when we have no idea if the inactives are scum? You seem to KNOW that you should be getting townpoints for recommending a policy lynch on scum.

Third, you say that if you were scum, you would have waited a bit longer. But why? If you were scum, wouldn't it make sense to do it earlier to "warn" ur buddy that he needs to start posting more? What does waiting gain you?

This really isn't working out for me.
See I thought I'd just go down a list ISOing everybody but it's very fatigue-inducing and demotivating.

So I'll instead focus on the first thing that comes to my mind, which is Nero Cain's fake claim. (According to himself)
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #941 (isolation #33) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:07 pm

Post by Zulfy »

+q, ignore the quote on the above post
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #942 (isolation #34) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:12 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 864, JarJarDrinks wrote:See this is why I'm not sure about Almost. Like every post of his screams scum to me. But several of my scumreads don't jive w/ Almost as a scumbuddy.


JJ, why is bussing not a sufficient explanation?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #943 (isolation #35) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:14 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 908, Almost50 wrote:
In post 906, JarJarDrinks wrote:No No No. His play is good. It's how scumhunting is done. If you are town then YOUR play is what's bad. Like unbelievably bad. Your whole "ignore me but feel free to vote me" spiel can only come from scum or absolutely terrible town.


Well, to each their own, brother. I'm not playing this game to anybody's standards but my own. As long as I'm not breaking THE RULES, then I'll do what I feel is in the best interest of the town regardless of whether they see it my way.


I'm here for you, Ostrich.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #944 (isolation #36) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:17 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 777, Nero Cain wrote:What lies have I told?

That you were seer +1
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #945 (isolation #37) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:18 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 825, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 810, Almost50 wrote:hypothetically assuming SS is scum it doesn't change the fact that his reads are trustworthy.

Image


Scum need good reads in order to be townread.
Scum are in the best position to give good reads at day start.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #954 (isolation #38) » Tue Jan 26, 2016 6:23 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Is seer just regular Cop?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #999 (isolation #39) » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:57 am

Post by Zulfy »

Good morning
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1143 (isolation #40) » Thu Jan 28, 2016 1:26 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Could someone do me a gigantic favor and fill me in on the big stuff?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1204 (isolation #41) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:09 am

Post by Zulfy »

VOTE: Ricastle
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1279 (isolation #42) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:58 am

Post by Zulfy »

Sorry I have been having trouble focusing.

Give me some time, just need a little time
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1280 (isolation #43) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:00 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1221, Nero Cain wrote:
Zulfy


In post 684, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 632, Nero Cain wrote:In post 628, Zulfy wrote:
Explain this

If Black is scum he'd know mine and Ika's alignment. If Ika is town there is scum motivation in diffusing a TvT fight.

Of course, it would depend on what scum would try to achieve, but I would say that, more often than not, there would be more scum motivation in not diffusing a Town vs Town fight.

Would you care to respond to this?


I agree with x and disagree with you.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1281 (isolation #44) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:01 am

Post by Zulfy »

+1 on x, inactivity is not much to go off
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1286 (isolation #45) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:10 am

Post by Zulfy »

Same thing, dont feint
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1287 (isolation #46) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:11 am

Post by Zulfy »

I havent responded cuz I havent been active.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1292 (isolation #47) » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:15 am

Post by Zulfy »

Nero's dagger is blunt
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1333 (isolation #48) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 12:25 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Firebringer is this going to last for the whole game?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1334 (isolation #49) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 12:25 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Make your answer as condescending as you can, please
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1337 (isolation #50) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 12:27 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Copypasting cuz I'm a lazier slob than Firebringer.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p7605893
We can't lynch almost50, he's hilarious


http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p7611343
No one had flipped at the time? This post makes zero sense to me.


http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p7610535
Self-fulfilling pressure. It's interesting to look at now.
Someone voted for Ric and he didn't react so someone votes for Ric and he didn't react so someone votes for Ric.
Shit wagon. Never sheeping RC ever again.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p7605327
ha

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p7609635
Ric Firebringer Blackstar and I (grrr, says x) all on the same page here.
Voting Ric for voting you is shit tho +1

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p7608031
zero. ZERO reason to softclaim

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p7607994
How could you like RC after the loweswt-effort ricastle tunnel ever? +1

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p7606284
Pisskop seems like he's anything but aggressive right now. Am I misunderstanding +1

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p7605751
+666

Blackstar looks opportunistic with me, omgus yeayea but +1


http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p7613687

You serious? Make your case, if I'm such a strong scumread

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p7613659
What are you even talking about?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p7613618
How could you know this?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p7605488
Pretty useless post here Rob +1

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p7598859
"You can't possibly expect that response to fly, can you?"
Why does it matter? Are you scumreading him for it?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p7599277
I disagree, x can keep doing what he's doing. (grrr, x)

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p7601678
No excuse. The objective is to identify scummy +1


http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p7601703
Nero, you didn't reply to this.

Hypocrisy +1
Jarjar not following up on it +1
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1338 (isolation #51) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 12:27 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1335, Firebringer wrote:
Until I get my way.


I'll help you out. What would you like?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1341 (isolation #52) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 12:30 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Sorry I already used up my blind sheeping excuse.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1344 (isolation #53) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 12:34 pm

Post by Zulfy »

^+1 for lazy entrance.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1348 (isolation #54) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 12:43 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Those are my stances. I am light on my feet.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1351 (isolation #55) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 12:44 pm

Post by Zulfy »

How's this: almost50 is not getting lynched.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1381 (isolation #56) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:50 pm

Post by Zulfy »

I forgot you were ika slot.
You should probs mentioned that next time.

Deja vu ooooooo
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1382 (isolation #57) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:51 pm

Post by Zulfy »

VOTE: BlueRose
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1384 (isolation #58) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:51 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1377, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:
In post 1376, pisskop wrote:Hes conftown. gdi you guys cant be this dense.


Just because hes conftown doesent mean hes right.


What even is this
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1428 (isolation #59) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:33 am

Post by Zulfy »

+1 on RapidCanyon, not paying attention to his own votes
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1430 (isolation #60) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:48 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1429, Nero Cain wrote:What a snooze fest.

Antiguo town proposals masquerading as impatience/player apathy.

Plus one.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1431 (isolation #61) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:48 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1430, Zulfy wrote:
In post 1429, Nero Cain wrote:What a snooze fest.

Anti town proposals masquerading as impatience/player apathy.

Plus one.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1453 (isolation #62) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 1:00 pm

Post by Zulfy »

How new is Snarky?

Seems to me like he should know better.

Plus.


One.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1456 (isolation #63) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 1:04 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1432, Nero Cain wrote:Are you trying to break the record for # of stupid posts per game?


Tryna discredit me without putting up an actual argument.
In post 1439, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:
In post 1438, Nero Cain wrote:TBF I don't have a TR on Zulfy.

What is your read on him?


nullish-scum, mostly scum.

Explain.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1457 (isolation #64) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 1:06 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1455, pisskop wrote:Besides, he shares my desire to shut Nero up.

Hey me too, but keep an eye out.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1461 (isolation #65) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 1:35 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1459, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:
In post 1456, Zulfy wrote:Explain


56 you thought someone throwing down a rvs vote was scummy
146 dident even explain why you gave +1
and if you think someone is scummy, lynch them and pressure them, dont just say "+1" and move on.


56 you read wrong, I didnt like how JJD decided that that was townie

My playstyle is how it is, you not liking it does not make me scum.

Who are you prepared to lynch?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1467 (isolation #66) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:25 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1463, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:so according to your playstyle, you can take a post, call it scummy, and not explain why?


Where do I need to explain?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1469 (isolation #67) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:28 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1410, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1337, Zulfy wrote:viewtopic.php?p=7613618#p7613618
How could you know this?

'cause I am actually reading the the game.
Right, that was the question. How do you know? Where did you find that out?


In post 1337, Zulfy wrote:viewtopic.php?p=7601678#p7601678
No excuse. The objective is to identify scummy +1

???? ok? Like I think Piss is scum and Piss is asking me why I am not asking him his reads and any reads from a scumslot are WIFOM and you are saying that I'm not trying to identify scummy behavior? Like WTF? How does THAT have anything to do with the current conversation? I'd lynch you just for saying the most mind boggling dumb things I've ever seen but I could pretty easily see scum motivation in it as well.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1470 (isolation #68) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:31 pm

Post by Zulfy »

^im saying youre using "oh it's WIFOM so why bother" as a lame excuse and I dont like it.

Not understanding my point? Ask for clarification, tryna discredit me the way you are is at best lazy as hell
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1472 (isolation #69) » Wed Feb 03, 2016 5:16 pm

Post by Zulfy »

No
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1488 (isolation #70) » Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:22 am

Post by Zulfy »

Nero u r ignoring me
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1489 (isolation #71) » Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:23 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1484, Nero Cain wrote:I think Zulfy trying to play us against one another is scum motivated.

That has never happened
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1492 (isolation #72) » Thu Feb 04, 2016 10:27 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1348, Zulfy wrote:Those are my stances. I am light on my feet.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1493 (isolation #73) » Thu Feb 04, 2016 10:28 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1366, Golden Robster wrote:I'm just still distrustful about this whole "seer" business.


+1, looking like something scum would think scum would never say
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1500 (isolation #74) » Thu Feb 04, 2016 11:03 am

Post by Zulfy »

No town reads on no one.

RapidCanyon has discredited himself
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1502 (isolation #75) » Thu Feb 04, 2016 11:11 am

Post by Zulfy »

Thats just how it is Nero, no town reads. Everyone null or scumlean.

What deal?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1515 (isolation #76) » Thu Feb 04, 2016 1:08 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1503, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:
In post 1502, Zulfy wrote:Thats just how it is Nero, no town reads. Everyone null or scumlean.

What deal?


so you think nobody is town?


+1

Next post will be scoreboard.*

*(No guarantee)
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1521 (isolation #77) » Thu Feb 04, 2016 2:08 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1516, Nero Cain wrote:Was this not a town read on IAI?

No scumpings ist nicht eine townlean
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1793 (isolation #78) » Sun Feb 07, 2016 7:42 am

Post by Zulfy »

Prodded. Today Sunday February 7 is crazy. Monday Zulfy will rise again
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1875 (isolation #79) » Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:33 pm

Post by Zulfy »

VOTE: BlackStar
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #2161 (isolation #80) » Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:33 am

Post by Zulfy »

Then vote nero what r u doin
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #2166 (isolation #81) » Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:10 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 2163, BlackStar wrote:
In post 2161, Zulfy wrote:Then vote nero what r u doin

Still waiting on that scoreboard thing

Can't deal with it
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #2167 (isolation #82) » Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:10 am

Post by Zulfy »

Mod please replacements me out
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #4743 (isolation #83) » Sun Mar 20, 2016 4:50 am

Post by Zulfy »

I couldn't have handled this.
no investigation no right to speak

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”