In post 29, Heat wrote:loving that mod vote
This seems like the sort of thing that scum would comment on early on.
VOTE: Heat
On a different note, hello everyone.
In post 29, Heat wrote:loving that mod vote
In post 52, Frozen Angel wrote:well nice ! finally somebody asked
MarioManiac deserve to be pushed. I think he voted for mod just to say "hey! I wasn't sirious back there when I said my vote is half sirious!" or something like that ... which I don't like.
you talk to much (well - I'll try sorting you out later)
Elyse was to fast to accept the case against Mario so I think we need to look an eye on her.
and I just don't like when people start the game with this sentence : "Hello ! I'm town! " - It get me a very bad feeling ...
Notsicence checked and didn't voted.
and I'm desperately waiting to see my L... Rc
In post 67, Grib wrote:In post 64, Shinobi wrote:In post 52, Frozen Angel wrote:well nice ! finally somebody asked
MarioManiac deserve to be pushed. I think he voted for mod just to say "hey! I wasn't sirious back there when I said my vote is half sirious!" or something like that ... which I don't like.
you talk to much (well - I'll try sorting you out later)
Elyse was to fast to accept the case against Mario so I think we need to look an eye on her.
and I just don't like when people start the game with this sentence : "Hello ! I'm town! " - It get me a very bad feeling ...
Notsicence checked and didn't voted.
and I'm desperately waiting to see my L... Rc
I don't like this post either.
Too many suspects for faulty reasons - reeks of scum trying to spread doubt.
Add this one to my current list.
I did a quick skim of her scumgame. My impression is that she's more serious as scum.
Take a quick look and let me know what you think?
In post 68, Frozen Angel wrote:In post 64, Shinobi wrote:In post 52, Frozen Angel wrote:well nice ! finally somebody asked
MarioManiac deserve to be pushed. I think he voted for mod just to say "hey! I wasn't sirious back there when I said my vote is half sirious!" or something like that ... which I don't like.
you talk to much (well - I'll try sorting you out later)
Elyse was to fast to accept the case against Mario so I think we need to look an eye on her.
and I just don't like when people start the game with this sentence : "Hello ! I'm town! " - It get me a very bad feeling ...
Notsicence checked and didn't voted.
and I'm desperately waiting to see my L... Rc
I don't like this post either.
Too many suspects for faulty reasons - reeks of scum trying to spread doubt.
Add this one to my current list.
my only *people who I want to pressure on* (not suspects - maybe a bit suspects) are Elyse - Mario
your unhappy becuase I said I don't like when people start the game with that sentence?
In post 73, Frozen Angel wrote:NS is just someone who needs to be looked at.
and RC was my partner in the game your currently reading - we have a background!
I never stated I'm scum reading them , did I?! so why are you putting words in my mouth sir ?
Frozen Angel wrote:
your trying hard to make something out of my poor vocab don't you? I mean there was stuff going in game. then suddenly we saw a post from him and bye! I'm curiou to see his next move.
and RC! I'm just curious about him...
SO what are you really trying to achieve here?
In post 109, Heat wrote:RC I love the limerick. I can't say I'm a fan of the ending though </3
I'm definitely liking what Grib is putting out right now. Shinobi too.
In post 179, Heat wrote:In post 150, Shinobi wrote:In post 109, Heat wrote:RC I love the limerick. I can't say I'm a fan of the ending though </3
I'm definitely liking what Grib is putting out right now. Shinobi too.
But I'm voting you.
Can you elaborate on any of this?
I'm on my phone so this won't be too in depth, sorry
The exchange between you and FA, mainly. For you it's just sort of a gut town read. I don't really like FA though. I know other people said that she seems more collected as scum, but I get the feeling that she's really frazzeled and is just sort of making noise rather than actually looking for scum.
P.edit: yeah it looks like she's just making noise
In post 194, Grib wrote:Could you link the game?
'Mario was mislynched once, therefore he probably isn't scum' doesn't work by itself.
In post 351, Zymf wrote:I've just skimmed through the whole thread since my last post..
I like MarioManiac4's case against Dwlee99 in post 322
I think Titus was just messing around in 268, but I can understand why Firebringer might think otherwise and might think Titus is scum trying to get buddy with him.. What really bugs me is how Titus takes a defensive stance in 274.In post 274, Titus wrote:In post 272, Firebringer wrote:In post 268, Titus wrote:Fire, let's be Painbringer. Double voting masons.
RC, I think I can read you well enough.
I would, but I kinda get the feeling your buddying me.
No way you already are town reading me.
Thats insane even for you.
No it's not. But OK, you'll see I can legit read you.
In post 339, Dwlee99 wrote:And it draws people's reactions cause they will say things like "How can you do a VCA without flips".
[/quote]In post 361, Dwlee99 wrote:snip
In post 375, pistachi0n wrote:I've caught up on the game and I'm not liking Dwlee. His case on Mario is (self-admittedly) OMGUS:
In post 338, Dwlee99 wrote:Mario's misreps and terrible case make me lean heavily scum on him. Like that case was the worst case I have ever seen.
Okay, but why is it the worst case you've ever seen? What are some examples of the misreps? Are you going to respond to Mario's case itself besides calling it bad?
VOTE: Dwlee
In post 400, Espeonage wrote:
It's above it.
Not buying the mario wagon so counter is still up for grabs until the dav wagon took off which I haven't looked at yet.
In post 523, Titus wrote:What is your Dave read?
BTW I am back home. Time to show my menu. Cuz I am a terrible baker.
In post 525, Titus wrote:In post 524, Shinobi wrote:In post 523, Titus wrote:What is your Dave read?
BTW I am back home. Time to show my menu. Cuz I am a terrible baker.
I don't want to lynch him.
Why?
In post 527, Titus wrote:In post 526, Shinobi wrote:In post 525, Titus wrote:In post 524, Shinobi wrote:In post 523, Titus wrote:What is your Dave read?
BTW I am back home. Time to show my menu. Cuz I am a terrible baker.
I don't want to lynch him.
Why?
Because lynching high output players on day 1 is almost always a bad idea.
What about Dave is "high output"? He's here but he's not scumhunting. Those are the best lynches.
Lurkers are terrible d1 lynches unless active lurking.
In post 532, Titus wrote:In post 531, Shinobi wrote:You've basically disregarded the fact that he has a case on someone and is pushing it. How is that not scumhunting?
And that's besides the fact that saying someone isn't scumhunting is almost entirely subjective and meaningless in and of itself.
No it's not. He's not pushing a case but trying to divert attention from himself. It took wagoning him to get him to even pick someone as scum.Even then, his pushes weren't designed to inquire about alignments but just to provide an alternate suspect.
A townie doesn't resist when asked for reads unless there's nothing to comment on. That's hardly the case.
In post 550, Dwlee99 wrote:Wtf. You voted them in RVS for posting something about someone mod voting and have just been randomly talking about them here and there like "they're still scum".
WHY CAN'T WE LYNCH THE STACHIO. ;-;
In post 579, Grib wrote:
She's pushing things that don't make sense.
In post 549, Shinobi wrote:No, we're lynching Heat.
Do you have any other issues with Heat besides what you stated in your first post, or is it just because he hasn't done anything since to make you townread him?
In post 714, pignash wrote:Proactive -acting in anticipation of future problems, needs, or changes.
Just in regards to asking where I was. That one action was proactive. That doesn't mean he gets a pass for the rest of the game from me, just why I'm not scumreading him currently.
In post 715, Grib wrote:Deflecting to lurkers is not proactive.
In post 855, Dwlee99 wrote:Pistachio and AJ are probably scum, I agree. I'm definitely more confident in my stachio read though. My entire wagon (unsure about mario but he is leaning scum because of his only focusing on me and then him telling me to stop talking about stachio and getting town read) is really scummy.
In post 1046, Zymf wrote:I'm sorry for being inactive, I shouldn't have joined this game :/
@Frogger: If you have a replacement ready, I don't mind being replaced.
Most of the active players seem to agree that we shouldn't lynch Dwlee. I don't really understand why, but...
I don't mind lynching pistachion either. So just to get this off my back, I think we should lynch him.In post 806, Titus wrote:6) Subtly associates Pistach with Zymf.
VOTE: Pistachi0n
In post 1079, Heat wrote:Zymf's post was scummy as fuck.
Also Dwlee how are you certain the game is multiball?
In post 1142, pistachi0n wrote:I don't think Dwlee is scum anymore. He's so adamant, every post of his is "LYNCH PISTACHI0N LYNCH PISTACHI0N" and he even argued with Titus about the right reason to vote me when Titus was willing to vote me anyway.
I'm scum-reading Shinobi. Half of the posts are about semantics, "I guess," or statements with no elaboration.
VOTE: Shinobi
In post 1161, pignash wrote:Oh it's so fun to post and then immediately get called scum...
It's almost like it's the reason I have said little to nothing the whole game because I feel like opening my mouth means being scumread. It's discouraging really. Every third person is throwing out naked scum reads so it's not like I'm alone in this.
In post 1228, pistachi0n wrote:In post 1144, Shinobi wrote:In post 1142, pistachi0n wrote:I don't think Dwlee is scum anymore. He's so adamant, every post of his is "LYNCH PISTACHI0N LYNCH PISTACHI0N" and he even argued with Titus about the right reason to vote me when Titus was willing to vote me anyway.
I'm scum-reading Shinobi. Half of the posts are about semantics, "I guess," or statements with no elaboration.
VOTE: Shinobi
What? Where?
Like in 1088 "I can be swayed, I guess"
964 statement with no elaboration
In posts like 357 and 521 he's disagreeing but not giving content/elaborating.
In post 1295, pistachi0n wrote:Dwlee, why were you blindly trusting Titus when you switched votes earlier?
In post 1298, pistachi0n wrote:In post 1296, Shinobi wrote:In post 1295, pistachi0n wrote:Dwlee, why were you blindly trusting Titus when you switched votes earlier?
Answer my question from earlier plx.
The "I can be swayed, I guess" shows indecisiveness and wanting to go with the crowd, disagreeing without a reason is lazy and a way to look like you're posting a lot without saying much.
In post 1317, Elyse wrote:
I've liked AJ's latest posts and haven't liked pistachio's. I also trust dwlee more than titus
In post 1325, pistachi0n wrote:In post 1321, Dwlee99 wrote:I hate my life. I am literally the worst. Why cant I just draw scum all the time like I did 9 games straight on my home site.
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
This is actually making me lean towards scum reading you again.