What's wrong with going first?
VOTE: pistachi0n
... I'll be back tomorrow
What's wrong with going first?
I think Titus was just messing around in 268, but I can understand why Firebringer might think otherwise and might think Titus is scum trying to get buddy with him.. What really bugs me is how Titus takes a defensive stance in 274.In post 274, Titus wrote:In post 272, Firebringer wrote:In post 268, Titus wrote:Fire, let's be Painbringer. Double voting masons.
RC, I think I can read you well enough.
I would, but I kinda get the feeling your buddying me.
No way you already are town reading me.
Thats insane even for you.
No it's not. But OK, you'll see I can legit read you.
I'm just waiting for things to get interresting, while being busy with other stuff.In post 658, Shiro wrote:In post 651, Firebringer wrote:In post 635, Shiro wrote:Lady Titus can we form a grand wagon on Zympx?
Explain why Zympx.
Because he needs pressure. He is an absolute zero in the game so far.
I don't mind lynching pistachion either. So just to get this off my back, I think we should lynch him.In post 806, Titus wrote:6) Subtly associates Pistach with Zymf.