I'm actually struggling to think how this helps aside from avoiding PRs but explain that.
CDB
Luna
Titus
FA
I suggest that we go by these 4 names.
I don't believe that there are 2 FN's. If they fake a claim with another, then that's 3 scum found once revealed.
Post
Post #2159 (isolation #201) » Tue Oct 13, 2015 1:21 am
Postby Vedith »
In post 2158, talah wrote:If you're talking about Friendly Neighbour targets then you need to get FAQ out of there since he's an easy strongman PR.
I don't care if scum are targets.
Well what other name? I'm thinking that 4 names will be better. Scum will look at trying to make the FN visit pool smaller, so we could possibly be relying on just 2 of these names alive tomorrow. At least with 4 it can pressure them to make a different kill rather than focus on the pool of choices.
Post
Post #2162 (isolation #203) » Tue Oct 13, 2015 1:40 am
Postby Vedith »
Of course there is an advantage, it tells us if an FN is lying. Or at least leads us closer to a scum team.
Cross checking is pointless, as scum can kill the real one and then the fake one can say he got a FN and sent one. (doubtful, but pointless for us to do).
Not happy with VeeGee on the list personally. Performer I'm okay with, so we should go with those 4 names. Anyone agree/object?
Post
Post #2165 (isolation #204) » Tue Oct 13, 2015 1:58 am
Postby Vedith »
In post 2163, talah wrote:No I mean is there any advantage for scum to being the target of a FN message, unless it's fake?
Obviously if you get a FN message I don't know if you're town. You still have to confirm the message if it came from town, even if you're scum.
Other option is it's scum confirming fake scum FN message.
Am I missing anything?
Well, as I said, when found out it would give us an extra name if scum lie. That would make 3 confirmed scum.
The tracker can also follow one of them and then after the results, if something seems odd pipe up. It's a pretty good strategy I think.
Post
Post #2204 (isolation #206) » Wed Oct 14, 2015 1:27 am
Postby Vedith »
Well, FN has their names to go with really. The watcher can decide which one to watch and day 3. Both (or same, or none) confirm if someone is town. From there, both FN confirm who they targeted and then the Watcher confirms if one is lying (other wise keeps quiet).
With the Vig. What are you thinking? I think that the Vig should shoot who they think is scummy. If there is only 1 kill without a reasonable answer we then pressure. However, as the scum could use the tactic of not shooting to mis lynch, I don't think that it would be confirmed scum. If there is a detective role to search, then IaI will be a good shout.
Post
Post #2208 (isolation #208) » Wed Oct 14, 2015 2:23 am
Postby Vedith »
In post 2207, talah wrote:If you're claiming a watcher role offhand right now you need to clarify that asap so whe know what we're dealing with. We only have a couple of days to go today and that would be some bullshit to deal with.
I'm just stating that this is what should happen.
What's the issue?
Post
Post #2276 (isolation #215) » Thu Oct 15, 2015 12:10 am
Postby Vedith »
I'm happy.
Out of the names to lynch, I prefer Performer. IaI could be a good asset if vig and FB/Sala/Banana has been my strongest town read all game.
Post
Post #2282 (isolation #216) » Thu Oct 15, 2015 3:25 am
Postby Vedith »
In post 2279, Performer wrote:Ved, how come you're putting yourself into the Vig pool? If there's one thing consistent in my town game, it's that I don't appreciate people suiciding, like self votes. It's not pro-town, we're losing extra power.
How is it town of me to say, Vig, shoot any of these names that aren't me, and FN don't visit me.
It's putting my money where my mouth is, or whatever the saying is.
If the excuse is they shot me and someone healed me, I'm going to be suspicious as anything.
Also, I'll get to FB town read later (although it's more from Sala and Banana).
Post
Post #2284 (isolation #217) » Thu Oct 15, 2015 3:28 am
Postby Vedith »
The issue is, we are in so many games together, I read you wrong nearly 100% of the time, and we both know that you are really good at adapting your play. So I'm trying to go by my read of Banana and Sala.
In post 2376, Luna Fox wrote:...
I just realized that if you had to ask about Friendly Neighbors, you didn't receive that in your PM...
I did.
So why did you not mention this when you said the message said he was town?
I mean, I understand if you haven't seen the role before, but you must have expected it to be a role, right?
I'll take it. Town have me so it's more or less a win.
Someone who comes into the game without knowing anything that has happened throwing their 2 pence around is not what will win it.
Post
Post #2438 (isolation #238) » Sun Oct 18, 2015 7:54 am
Postby Vedith »
In post 2434, DrippingGoofball wrote:You are just too pointless and annoying, I refuse to read, respond to, or acknowledge any further post from you.
Yeah I noticed that you were one of these type of players a few weeks ago. XD
Pick your toys up. I'm going to not vote IaI in spite of you... I hope that helps.
Post
Post #2540 (isolation #253) » Sun Oct 18, 2015 11:05 pm
Postby Vedith »
In post 2533, talah wrote:Gotta hand it to you Vedith. Things change a lot if I flip scum, since I was hard-defending my buddies.
I'm talking about TheWorst and AJ in particular... You have been defending them ever since the day started... And yes I do think that you would make such a bad play before you ask.
What makes IaI town? Nothing... I'm not saying that he is town, I'm saying that he is easy to catch out.
Post
Post #2554 (isolation #256) » Sun Oct 18, 2015 11:40 pm
Postby Vedith »
In post 2551, talah wrote:No, I don't believe you are a vig. You are either scum claiming the kill so they can kill on future nights, or simply an SK.
Ah, so now you are throwing SK around?
This gets better and better...
Question, why did you have an issue with me assuming a tracker when you have made up half a dozen roles?
Post
Post #2563 (isolation #259) » Sun Oct 18, 2015 11:49 pm
Postby Vedith »
In post 2560, talah wrote:Because I floated strongman / scum jailkeeper for the scumteam as a counter to 2 x protective roles and 2 x FNs for town. As an example.
The other roles I've mentioned were to do with Performer's fake-crumbs - which he's unequivocally stated are fake.
You just chucked in some bullshit roles and tried to justify your reasoning for them.
There's no reason to think of these additional roles, the whole smoke without fire, eh?
And now you have decided to push on an SK possibility. This is so scummy it hurts. :<