New York 181 -- Game Over
-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 39, Shiro wrote:Vote:Garmr
Reaplacing out just to get scot free after we caught you inexcusable
Someone Didn't read the after game I was getting annoyed because I really thought axle and boon skies (which I didn't mention) were opposing scum (axle because of his behavior, boon skies because he was the same role as me and I thought the opposing scum team had all the same roles.) You guys wouldn't touch them so I raged. Didn't think they would turn out town.
That aside I'm more curious as to why wake voted egg only to quickly shift it to shiro. Instead of making two competing wagons me and egg, He made It so we 2v3v2. It feels suspicious because he changed his vote only 2 mins after he voted egg. Someone would only do that if they were cautious of the rvs stage.
Serious vote.
VOTE: wake-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 66, SilverWolf wrote:In post 62, dragonspawn wrote:In post 59, ika wrote:In post 58, dragonspawn wrote:That's a rather straight forward approach ika. How about I do the same with you? Are you scum?
I'm hungry. Maybe I'll get some donuts. What kind do you like? How about the rest of you?
god i want to think of something snarky to say to it but im drawing a blank.
no im not scum im town
I'm totally flattered but I'm not God.
Ha, that's funny. Donuts with chocolate icing are the best.
I remember when the crispy cream opened up here people lined up outside it for 3 days before opening for some free donuts(One years worth). Kinda sad really. Oh I'm the same as silver wolf Chocolate icing here and my fave icecream flavor is rum and raisins. (Normally I hate raisins through lol)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 77, Nikanor wrote:if i had to put it into words, i guess i dislike that he said the 2v3v2 thing. his vote on wake looks like someone who spotted something odd and decided to do some digging to see how they could justify a vote.
Wait so you noticed that wake is acting odd as well (different than normal wake) and you feel no need to question him?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 83, Mikazuki wrote:You guys are killing me with that food discussion, take pity on the poor person who's on a diet
*cough*Waffles>Pancakes*cough*
VOTE: Nikanor
In post 77, Nikanor wrote:if i had to put it into words, i guess i dislike that he said the 2v3v2 thing. his vote on wake looks like someone who spotted something odd and decided to do some digging to see how they could justify a vote.
You're digging even harder than Garmr. So you agree with him that something's up with Wake?
watch this-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 89, Albert B. Rampage wrote:No.
I think I know what you're getting at. But I want to hear you say it.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 91, T S O wrote:Garmr, pretty slick avatar you got going there.
Thank you-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 98, Nikanor wrote:In post 82, Garmr wrote:In post 77, Nikanor wrote:if i had to put it into words, i guess i dislike that he said the 2v3v2 thing. his vote on wake looks like someone who spotted something odd and decided to do some digging to see how they could justify a vote.
Wait so you noticed that wake is acting odd as well (different than normal wake) and you feel no need to question him?
yup the rvs thing was odd. but you're trying to twist it into something scummy.
(i have no idea how wake normally plays, the rvs thing was objectively odd).
but the main thing i dislike is the fact that you brought up the 2v3v2 thing.like how could that even be intentional on his part, nobody actually looks at the vote count and goes "hmmmm i think i want the wagons to look like THIS."
Damn garmr you're awesome so freaking awesome
Scum do as they want to look for as many possible chances to mislynch someone as possible
Also let me point out how wake normally plays. He usually takes between 49 to 70 post to make one vote.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 101, Nikanor wrote:In post 100, Garmr wrote:Scum do, as they want to look for as many possible chances to mislynch someone as possible
yes, that is what i am saying, ty for the translation
Sorry forgot to put a comma in there.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 104, Aneninen wrote:In post 63, Garmr wrote:That aside I'm more curious as to why wake voted egg only to quickly shift it to shiro. Instead of making two competing wagons me and egg, He made It so we 2v3v2. It feels suspicious because he changed his vote only 2 mins after he voted egg. Someone would only do that if they were cautious of the rvs stage.
Serious vote.
vote: wake
The part about competing RVS wagons is silly, including the explanation given in 100, but the part about his cautiousness is right.
Dragonspawn does nothing but fluffing and so many players has gone along with him.
We should remember who was pushing the Wake-wagon and who was pushing the Garmmrn-wagon.
Egg?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 108, Aneninen wrote:Silverwolf: I've never met Dragonspawn before.
I usually fluff a lot but I'm not fluffing Today.
Gammrnmhrm: what about him?
Oh misread what you said thought you said and was making a guess as to which player you were talking about.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 123, Wake1 wrote:In post 63, Garmr wrote:In post 39, Shiro wrote:Vote:Garmr
Reaplacing out just to get scot free after we caught you inexcusable
Someone Didn't read the after game I was getting annoyed because I really thought axle and boon skies (which I didn't mention) were opposing scum (axle because of his behavior, boon skies because he was the same role as me and I thought the opposing scum team had all the same roles.) You guys wouldn't touch them so I raged. Didn't think they would turn out town.
That aside I'm more curious as to why wake voted egg only to quickly shift it to shiro. Instead of making two competing wagons me and egg, He made It so we 2v3v2. It feels suspicious because he changed his vote only 2 mins after he voted egg. Someone would only do that if they were cautious of the rvs stage.
Serious vote.
VOTE: wake
If anything, I'm curious about why you'd take joke votes so seriously, and apparently try to weave them into something they aren't.
Whyexactly do you think they were serious? I expect a damned good answer from you on this, Garmr.
I'm half dead been up all night but. If they were both rvs why not just stick to the egg wagon it just seems like a really cautious move.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 127, Wake1 wrote:
You should explain this in detail, because in my opinion two non-serious votes aren't a pattern at all.
You don't vote this early for one. Through it has been almost a year since we played.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 132, Wake1 wrote:Why do you think I can't take the pleasure of making two RVS votes in rapid succession? What are you trying to do here?
And you honestly don't know me too well, nor do you know current underlying circumstances, which affect my ability to play.
If I were able, I'd be amassing thorough, well-written reads on an occasional basis.
Just doesn't seem like you. I don't know you personally but I remember the games we played the drama you caused at the time and the way people talked and how I looked into you.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 117, elusive wrote:In post 57, ika wrote:also i will divine if elusive is town or not very early on starting with this:
elusive are you scum?
I'm town, yay.
However, this leads me into RVS Questions for Town (Scum Plz Do Not Answer So We Know Who U R)
1. Which do you like being more? Town or scum?
2. What is your second favoritest color?
3. Are you scum?
4. What is your spirit animal?
5. What are your favorite scum hunting strategies and how do they work?
Oh and bonus question for like the Truly Amazing:
Who is the most dangerous player (for either alignment) in this game's player list and why?
1.Scum it's easier
2.Blue
3.yes
4.Wolf
5.Making myself look like a idiot and easy lynch just to bam lynch two scum in a row with a awesome argument.
Most dangerous player other than me for being a wild card umm ika his more of a wildcard than me.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 171, Wake1 wrote:In post 169, Garmr wrote:In post 132, Wake1 wrote:Why do you think I can't take the pleasure of making two RVS votes in rapid succession? What are you trying to do here?
And you honestly don't know me too well, nor do you know current underlying circumstances, which affect my ability to play.
If I were able, I'd be amassing thorough, well-written reads on an occasional basis.
Just doesn't seem like you. I don't know you personally but I remember the games we played the drama you caused at the time and the way people talked and how I looked into you.
Hope you have a good understanding of what you're talking about, buddy, because your post here isn't making any sense.
I don't see what doesn't make sense through?
@Egg Just curious who are your top three scum reads.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 182, Egg wrote:In post 117, elusive wrote:However, this leads me into RVS Questions for Town (Scum Plz Do Not Answer So We Know Who U R)
1. Which do you like being more? Town or scum?
2. What is your second favoritest color?
3. Are you scum?
4. What is your spirit animal?
5. What are your favorite scum hunting strategies and how do they work?
Oh and bonus question for like the Truly Amazing:
Who is the most dangerous player (for either alignment) in this game's player list and why?
1. Town power roles are my favorite.
2. Blue?
3. No.
4. Don't have one
5. If I told you that, they wouldn't work in this game.
Bonus: House. He's reckless and doesn't give two shits. And he's actually a pretty good player on top of that.
Wake, all I'm saying is that my major point against you in Fire and Ice where you were scum can now be applied to this game. I'm still open to the possibility that it's just a general thing for all of your games, but it's scummier than anything else in the first five pages.
Aneninen, I actually liked your old style. And I'm kind of worried that if you are town I'm going to mistakenly read you as scum here because limiting yourself to a specific amount of sentences can make your posts come off as fake or forced. It's better to post more naturally in my opinion. Not that being more concise is a bad thing. Just your system might be taking things too far.
Ika, why do you think it would be obvious that you prefer to be town?
Anen, you were acting like Gamr and Wake were the only wagons and ignored mine entirely in Post 104 when you said we should remember who is pushing Gamr and Wake. I find this even more interesting now that I realize you were voting me at the time that you said that.
Silver, all you did is repeat what you've already said. I get that you think Wake started this game differently than you're used to and I get that he had a scum game with a similar start. What I'm asking is specifically why Wake RVS voting rather than being cautious is scum motivated. Not everything that is weird is because the person is scum. Tell me what is going on in Wake's head that makes him lay RVS votes specifically because he is scum. To answer your question the fact that he doesn't want to be read is scummy because town should WANT people to know that they are town. Only scum should worry about whether people can read them or not. See above though. This might be something that he says all the time and not even alignment related. I haven't exactly decided how I feel for sure yet.
Gamr, I don't have strong scum reads yet, but top three as of right now: I guess Wake, Anen, and you.
Good enough I'm all down for a wake wagon.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
On a quick note I have a slight town read on dave even through he hasn't posted much. This one post just rings town to me.
In post 115, davesaz wrote:I haven't played with Wake before. I did notice a post saying he changes style over time because he doesn't like being read. Not liking being read sounds odd to me, but probably more a personal preference thing.
Making note of who is making note of the change in Wake. SilverWolf, Garmr, Nikanor, House, and Egg, not in that order. I'd be really surprised if more than two of these are scum together. If Wake is town I might look in this list for scum, but it's entirely possible they're primarily town and the difference in Wake is indeed because he's scum.
You can really see him trying to figure things out which scum don't really need to do because they already know. It comes across as genuine and gives off some pretty town vibes.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 210, Nikanor wrote:liking House, texcat for town.
Wake, elusive, dragonspawn look scummy. elusive less so than the others, just one post is pinging me, where she got her back up over the sauron joke.
all my reads are conflicting though. like, probably only one of garmr/wake and one of dragon/elusive are scum. but i'm scumreading all four. it sucks.
whine whine whine
i also just skimmed five pages so my reads are prob shit
Like I said before I can't read tex cat as his post little content what makes him town?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 213, Nikanor wrote:i'm too cool for quizzes.
i liked tex's answer to albert's question. she seems chill.
In post 167, texcat wrote:In post 166, Albert B. Rampage wrote:texcat, your analysis on the game state and the players therein, please.
LOL, the only conclusion I've come to so far is that there are a lot of players who are hungry for breakfast.
So you got a town read from fluff how??????-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Nikanor You totally ignored my question. How did you get a town read out of a joke. (even through i did have a chuckle at it).
UNVOTE: wake
VOTE: Nikanor
Nikanor is playing a game of survival. I didn't think much of the time because I was focused on wake but lets look over some of the events.
1.She voted me with a blank vote but only felt like giving a reason when pressed. Her reason was hypocritical and reaching. I feel like she wouldn't of even given a reason if not pushed. This shows she wasn't interested on pushing my wagon and was content with being on it.
2.In post 210, Nikanor wrote:liking House, texcat for town.
Wake, elusive, dragonspawn look scummy. elusive less so than the others, just one post is pinging me, where she got her back up over the sauron joke.
all my reads are conflicting though. like, probably only one of garmr/wake and one of dragon/elusive are scum. but i'm scumreading all four. it sucks.
whine whine whine
i also just skimmed five pages so my reads are prob shit
If she was town I think she would factor we have two scum parties (4 mafia goons and 1 sk) and this is likely a slip in her thinking.
3.She seems to be dishing out some reads with out reasoning. Texcat is a good example she is just town reading her because of texcats joke and when I pressed forward on it ignored me completely. Looking through all her post they lack proper reasoning.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 363, Flubbernugget wrote:
Nikanor can be town for his observation on wake even though I disagree with it being scummy. From my experience wake's posts are just fluffy and I do admit to not always reading the longer ones
House's reads are shallow. I don't see him analyzing intentions, just going after actions that in their current context that should be null.
This reasoning to read nik as town is just as artificial as niks town read on tex. Nik only really called wake scummy with little to no reasoning and then told wake to make his walls smaller. There is no conviction in her scum reads at all. Also have those observations actually contributed anything?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 371, Nikanor wrote:In post 275, Garmr wrote:Nikanor You totally ignored my question. How did you get a town read out of a joke. (even through i did have a chuckle at it).
uh no i didn't ignore your question, i said i thought she seems chill.
I meant I asked you why that would be considered a town read.
In post 215, Garmr wrote:In post 213, Nikanor wrote:i'm too cool for quizzes.
i liked tex's answer to albert's question. she seems chill.
In post 167, texcat wrote:In post 166, Albert B. Rampage wrote:texcat, your analysis on the game state and the players therein, please.
LOL, the only conclusion I've come to so far is that there are a lot of players who are hungry for breakfast.
So you got a town read from fluff how??????
In post 275, Garmr wrote:1.She voted me with a blank vote but only felt like giving a reason when pressed. Her reason was hypocritical and reaching. I feel like she wouldn't of even given a reason if not pushed. This shows she wasn't interested on pushing my wagon and was content with being on it.
I voted you on like page 3. give me a break
Doesn't matter it's the fact you reacted the way you did.
You show no signs of factoring just this person can't be scum with this person ect.
In post 275, Garmr wrote:If she was town I think she would factor we have two scum parties (4 mafia goons and 1 sk) and this is likely a slip in her thinking.
i did factor that in. i figured the chances were negligible and i was gonna be wrong on at least one pairing anyway so i ignored it since the point of the post was to bitch anyway.
[/quote]
In post 275, Garmr wrote:3.She seems to be dishing out some reads with out reasoning. Texcat is a good example she is just town reading her because of texcats joke and when I pressed forward on it ignored me completely. Looking through all her post they lack proper reasoning.
dw, my inscrutability means i'm town. i have reasons for all my reads, i just choose not to share most of them bc they'd sound like bs.
If even you think they sound bs shouldn't that tell you something? It comes off to me that you're dodging giving a valid reason.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 377, Nikanor wrote:
a) texcat seems relaxed in the face of questioning.
b) if you actually find a vote without a reason on page 3 scummy then i have no words.
c) i don't need to explicitly post everything if the intent behind the post (to whine) was clear anyway.
d) the scholar should be wary of declaring his discoveries, lest he be accused of witchery and hanged.
A) That's ok but there really isn't to much pressure on anyone at the moment the wagon haven't even been past 6 yet. So really that's null as scum probs don't have pressure with this situation.
B)That's not what I found scummy I found that you felt need to give reasoning only after being pushed scummy don't try to twist things please.
C)Yeh but you proceed to devalue all your reads, By saying stuff like I just skimmed these pages or all those were silly.
D)Yeh but if you don't throw anything out here how do you expect to get anywhere.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 386, Nikanor wrote:a) whatever you say bub
b) ok so let's take a step back here. please explain why you find my reasoning hypocritical and reaching. and also explain why i should have to push a wagon based on one post on page two. i'm sure i could look through your past games and find a similar situation where someone has made a serious vote early without explaining what it was about until asked. have you attacked everyone who has done this? if not, what's different about this game, or what's different about the way i did it.
c) again, the intent was to bitch about having too many conflicting scumreads, not to provide scumreads.
d) i generally have to wait until my scumreads make a post that i can reapond to with buzzwords, otherwise people just brush me off. vOv
A.Others had said this to toots
B. Your basically saying I was reaching for a reason when you yourself had to reach for a reason after being pushed to explain yourself. The fact you actually felt a need to shows you want acceptance It was also obvious you took time to think of the reason after the vote not before by your post in between the vote and the reason. It's all the small things that add up to one scummy post You haven't really invalidated any of my reason. Also I don't think I have reacted the same way as town scrambling to find a reason after be asked why.
C. You were still posting game relevant information your point which included your scum reads so what if you were bitching? Also that a strawman argument as you taken this way far away from the original topic.
D.Why was it different then when you were pushed by dragonspawn. Why didn't you wait for one of these buzz words.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 412, Aneninen wrote:In post 344, Garmr wrote:hello are you guys just going to ignore my post on nik?
No and I think he's scummy, so give examples about him playing a game of survival, please!
Other than most of the things I said about being reactionary game being mostly responses with very little of her own initiative. When things are done off her own accord she discredits them as bitching or they have very little impact in the first place.(Wakes so called walls for example.) She's playing a very safe and flexible scum game.
Talking about wakes post after taking the time to read them again here's a short summary of some of them after a certain point. These are the ones that stood out to me.
There's a lot of ass kissing in 223
Wakes 251 scatter shot would be a lot better if it was a focus shot in my opinion. It's null through and I can't find anything wrong with it.
Wake 313 Basically saying post more I find you scummy and like a act? I don't know it just reads weird like his telling Deltawave to buck up instead of actually pressuring. Kinda null- scummy I guess more confusing.
My opinion of you hasn't really changed much.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 422, Nikanor wrote:In post 390, Garmr wrote:In post 386, Nikanor wrote:a) whatever you say bub
b) ok so let's take a step back here. please explain why you find my reasoning hypocritical and reaching. and also explain why i should have to push a wagon based on one post on page two. i'm sure i could look through your past games and find a similar situation where someone has made a serious vote early without explaining what it was about until asked. have you attacked everyone who has done this? if not, what's different about this game, or what's different about the way i did it.
c) again, the intent was to bitch about having too many conflicting scumreads, not to provide scumreads.
d) i generally have to wait until my scumreads make a post that i can reapond to with buzzwords, otherwise people just brush me off. vOv
A.Others had said this to toots
B. Your basically saying I was reaching for a reason when you yourself had to reach for a reason after being pushed to explain yourself. The fact you actually felt a need to shows you want acceptance It was also obvious you took time to think of the reason after the vote not before by your post in between the vote and the reason. It's all the small things that add up to one scummy post You haven't really invalidated any of my reason. Also I don't think I have reacted the same way as town scrambling to find a reason after be asked why.
C. You were still posting game relevant information your point which included your scum reads so what if you were bitching? Also that a strawman argument as you taken this way far away from the original topic.
D.Why was it different then when you were pushed by dragonspawn. Why didn't you wait for one of these buzz words.
a) the majority is typically incorrect bby
b) i) how was it reaching, i said your point was bs because wakescum would not specifically want a 2v3v2 wagon instead of a 3v3 wagon. ii) the fact that i felt a need to answer the guy shows that i'm not a complete asshole. iii) it was obvious i took the time to think about it when i said "if i had to put it into words". iv) "scrambling" lool v) you never showed me my supposed hypocrisy, pls amend.
c) it's not a strawman, i've said before that the reason i didn't mention the minimal possibility that i might be correct on one of my two dichotomies was because i wanted to sound like a puny little girl and considering that possibility would have been contradictory to my goal. ik you're just going to keep arguing that since i wasn't explicit it doesn't count tho.
d) i hadthat this game might be different but guess what, the next two posts after mine included the usual brushoff so i guess that's just normal old hopeless life for you.HOPE
A)is going nowwhere I'll just accept you can't provide a good enough anwser.
B)i)You admitted yourself only scum think about wagon positioning. So it should be a tool to hunt scum with (even if it's just to break rvs.) Instead you attacked my reasoning even through you thought wake was scummy. ii)No it shows you are cautious of what others think of you. iii)It's not hard to say because of 2v3v2 thing looks like reaching I don't think you need like 40 mins for that. iv)Lol v)The hypocrisy was you accused me of reaching while reaching yourself.
C)I don't find your explanation valid and your going to stick by it and bring it full circle there is no point as I been caught in these circular arguments to many times before and I lost a game because of it.
D)Is more of a emotional response than a logical one.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@elusive
Isn't asking for more information about peoples just another way of saying give me a read ;/. I stick by my thought you haven't let go of that quiz.
In post 433, elusive wrote:In post 431, SilverWolf wrote:In post 430, elusive wrote:
Ika,Since when have you known me not to be able to handle a little pressure? I've been in two Titus tunnels, I've yet to see anyone top thatSpoiler:
I was in a Titus tunnel off site once and here in a game once. I was town both times. She thought I was scum. I sympathize.
SilverWolf, I am blocking some of the trauma now but it was hundreds of back and forth posts (long ones too). And the first time we were both town. The second time though she was scum and I was town and I turned off my instincts and she totally owned that game. Titus is the best and also most frustrating mafia player I know. I could go on and on about her, lol.
Flubber, are you speaking of a particular occurrence in the thread or being passive aggressive or castles in the sky? Be direct, it doesn't cost extra.
On a side note I have never ever been wrong about titus alignment in all of my forum games and out of the skype games I was wrong about 3 times out 50-70? she has always been wrong about mine on forum gave . I have been in a titus scum tunnel multiple times I always seem to come out on top.
I just finished a game where I got her lynched as soon as she replaced in. (tbf her slot was null to most except i was scum reading it when she came in.) Not only did she try tunneling me but it caused her teammate that was in a good position to be outed and he got lynched lylo because of it. (Well one of the reasons)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=60083
I think honestly it's my play style that puts titus off as I'm not a normal type of person. As fferylt puts it I have a scum mindset. (This was an excuse to brag)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 430, elusive wrote:I answer all questions that come my way as only scum needs to be difficult.
I'm assuming you have experience on another site. The meta on mafia scum is different than other sites I looked at and from what I heard the site titus is on is extremely different. Due to the amount of elitist on this site it's more strict. There will be scum that answer your questions cause people have caught on to thinking like this ages ago.
While you consider titus the best player. On this site she is around average (some consider her below average due to her uniqueness) as am I (Through I feel like my scum game is typically above average I feel like I finally got my town on a level where it's suitable just needs to be less gambity so decided to pick a open set up where it be less tempting to gambit)
There are power houses like thor(scum powerhouse),fferylt(town powerhouse),Slandaar and desperado(to lesser extents). This isn't even mentioning the veterans that retired from mafia.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 447, Nikanor wrote:In post 432, Flubbernugget wrote:Is anybody following nik vs. garmr right now because I really can't right now.
I also want to note that I stalled a discussion that almost got me pegged as scum once by responding to each line of someone's post by numbering/outlining it. If you're attacking the lines of a post you're probably not actually attacking the post itself.
garmr is really good at saying "i fundamentally disagree with the way you play mafia and i think you're scum for it" in incredibly circuitous ways.
me breaking it down into lines is the only way to show people that he's full of shit.
you've proved nothing other than you can't debate for shit. I'd like to point other people think your answers are inadequate as well not just me.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 452, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 365, Garmr wrote:@Klingoncelt
Just realized were I seen your name before you were the worst on my valentines list.
Klingoncelt:14.01% tsk tsk
I only answered about half the questions. Maybe I would have done better if I finished the thing.
If you got over 70% I would gave you a free town read-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 455, Nikanor wrote:inadequate != incorrect bby
inadequate = lacking the quality or quantity required; insufficient for a purpose-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 458, Nikanor wrote:inadequate leaves room for error, if i ask for a bright red room and you give me paint that is slightly too dull, you are inadequate but not incorrect.
but i was just joking anyway, the difference between the two words is insignificant.
but while we're on the subject of jokes, the fact that you've had to go back to "but other ppl agree w meeee" for a second time now is kinda hilarious.
It doesn't matter if your right or wrong on Texcat as town you would need a good reason to town read someone. You town read Texcat and when asked on the reasoning you gave fluff aka she's funny and confident.
Also talking about jokes trying to use word play to disregard my scum read because you got caught red handed is pretty funny.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 461, Nikanor wrote:like, you say in one breath that the people in this game are of below-average skill, then in another you try to pass it off as a good thing that they're agreeing with you. it's amazing.
p-edit: oh god he's doing the thing
@Nik talking about painting things scummy. In those sentences did I ever refer to anyone in this game? It was more off topic about players I respect and veiw as =. How meta can be different.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 472, Garmr wrote:In post 461, Nikanor wrote:like, you say in one breath that the people in this game are of below-average skill, then in another you try to pass it off as a good thing that they're agreeing with you. it's amazing.
p-edit: oh god he's doing the thing
@Nik talking about painting things scummy. In those sentences did I ever refer to anyone in this game? It was more off topic about players I respect and veiw as =. Also How other sites meta can be different from this one thus changing the way we hunt.
Edited for better understanding-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 477, Shiro wrote:In post 476, Garmr wrote:@Shiro
Hey, I just null read you,
And this is crazy,
But here's my call out,
So change it, maybe!
Hey, I just read that
And this is crazy.
But I can't do that
So keep it, maybe
Funny songs aside, if you have any questions towards me feel free to ask
Ok a couple of questions.
1. Who's yah scum reads and what's the scummiest thing about them.
2.What's your thoughts on nik now?
3.Are you ready to vote yet and push a stance-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 481, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 478, ika wrote:In post 477, Shiro wrote:In post 476, Garmr wrote:@Shiro
Hey, I just null read you,
And this is crazy,
But here's my call out,
So change it, maybe!
Hey, I just read that
And this is crazy.
But I can't do that
So keep it, maybe
Funny songs aside, if you have any questions towards me feel free to ask
I got one, whos do you suspect is sk? (yes there is a motive for my sk hunt)
Look hard at Egg, Garmr, and Wake. Tell me what you think.
Garmrs sexy.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 483, Shiro wrote:@ika Honestly? No idea. This is my first game with sk. I do not really know what to look for.
@Garmr
1.delta for being his whole fight with Wolfe is really bad IMHO. his you tell me why you aren't scum is pretty bs as well. Egg's point of bad town play why as scum yada yada is just meh as well
Nik but if you ask why I don't really have a this and that long. Call it gut
Egg but pretty mild I didn't really like his reads and I found some of his reasons kinda meh like,mine included. I haven't really done anything worthy of a slight town read.
2.Look above
3.No I am not ^_^ I don't really have anything that could even be called remotely called a case
@elusive
you still haven't told me what you gathered from the quiz reactions D:
Oh ok how much persuasion does it take to get your vote on the nik wagon. -bakes shiro a cake-
@NIK
hey nik
Nik but if you ask why I don't really have a this and that long. Call it gut
This is an example of what I was talking about and expected a town you to do or at least a competent scum you.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 487, Shiro wrote:@Garmr hmm I dunno maybe two cakes? But tgen again bribery seems like such a naughty thing. Let alone tgat the cake has a tendency to be a lie
In post 486, House wrote:So KC, what do you think about the fact SW rolled scum this game?
what makes you think so? I have been townreading her thus far.
No one and half cakes and that's my final offer.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@Elusive
That's incorrect my reason was I was scum in a multi scum faction game and had a scum read on a guy(axle and lynching him was impossible. Axle had walls and walls and he did my head in. The so called thing I was caught on wasn't even correct. He implied i made a slip about knowing boon got shot. My faction didn't even shoot boon.
Also I wasn't even the biggest wagon at the time I left. Thor was at 5 I was at 4 With both my scum buddies already on it. It also took 9 to lynch. I had plenty of leg room to talk my way out of it. But axle was god axle gave me head aches I just can't deal with him as town or scum.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Thinks I got from the last two pages.
I think silver wolfs town from her reactions in this convo alone. I don't think she has the heart to fake a emotional response like that.
I think that klingons probably the sk. She seems to have gotten wrapped up about it and by pushing the sk label on silver I think she thinks it's actually her attempt distancing herself from the role in the future.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 676, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 668, Garmr wrote:Thinks I got from the last two pages.
I think silver wolfs town from her reactions in this convo alone. I don't think she has the heart to fake a emotional response like that.
I think that klingons probably the sk. She seems to have gotten wrapped up about it and by pushing the sk label on silver I think she thinks it's actually her attempt distancing herself from the role in the future.
If I were the SK do you really think I'd tell you how I play as the SK?
Wolf does this whenever anyone votes for her. Every. time.
No one has her permission to vote for her ever, especially when she's scum, or a tantrum will ensue. It gets old.
Yes and you'd probably tell me how you play sk as town as well. So I take that action as a null.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread