Mafia 58: Ready Salted - Game over!
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Right now, the only vote that I am even considering is the one that my gut is telling me. Even though I know that you will all most likely attack me for this vote simply because I have a gut feeling, I feel it is the right thing to do.
Vote: Twito
I guess I just don't trust you.
However, if more information comes of on livingod being scum, then I am willing to switch.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Um, I honestly had no idea whether or not Livingod was scum or not. I would really like to here why you think I knew that livingod was scum.theopor_COD wrote:This post from Scot one reason why
scotmany12 wrote:Right now, the only vote that I am even considering is the one that my gut is telling me. Even though I know that you will all most likely attack me for this vote simply because I have a gut feeling, I feel it is the right thing to do.
Vote: Twito
I guess I just don't trust you.
However, if more information comes of on livingod being scum, then I am willing to switch.
Just seems like he knows Livingod is scum and votes Twito (due to his gut feeling) but also uses the old willing to switch line if it appears Living appears doomed. As suchVote Scotmany12-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Ha, you are taking my votes way out of context. I was never trying to sway the vote away from livingod. Its true that I did not vote for him because I did not really see any reason to do so, but not once did I try to convince people to stop voting for livingod. Not once. In fact, I would like you to point out where you think I tried to sway people away from livingod.Lowell wrote:1) My problem with scotmany, as mentioned, is the way he subtly tried to sway the D1 wagon away from livingod. In my opinion this could just be sloppy scum play from a newbie.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Well, I read through everything that I missed. I am set on my vote for amb. I find him to be the scummiest. Nothing will really change my mind, and thus my vote will stay on amb for the rest of the day, unless he claims doc or cop or something. Lowell, eh, might be scum, but amb jumps out more to me.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Come on guys amb is the way to go. Heh, whet do I know? I haven't really been following as close as a like, but I also see lowell as scum too. Right now though, I want amb lynched. Mainly simple because of this post from him
I don't like it. That last sentence I don't really understand, and it looks like he is saying that he has two others on his side. I'm probably wrong with that though. But if he wanted to vote for twito so much, why wouldn't he just do it? Seems to me he is trying to hide and does not want to bring attention on himself. If anyone thinks that I am wrong, please say so.Amb wrote:If anyone decides a Twito bandwagon is good, bear in my mind my vote will be joining the minute I see it. I am only on my number choice because I have two others with me (or however many it is now)-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
First off amb, do not tell me what to do. I have the right to think whatever I want to think, and I'm going to think what I want to think, and if it is wrong, then I'm wrong. I said I was wrong, and you are getting over defensive. If you found twito the most scummiest then why did you not vote for him? Oh, thats right, its because you are scum and you don't care who is voted out so you are going to vote with someone who has more votes on them. You were trying to cast suspicion with that post, and instead of voting for twito, you wanted others to do it first.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
My vote will stay on amb. I have already stated that I will not vote for anyone else for the rest of this day. The deadline, however, is approaching, and if you guys resist in lynching amb, i suggest lynching N9V instead of lowell. I think lowell provided some pretty go defense for himself and, imo, N9V has been more scummy than him.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Ok, so i'm the only one who should be yelled at for swearing. What the hell. I see others throw curse words around like they are nothing and I'm the on who gets yelled for one instance? I was angry, and I swore. There is no problem in that.Rand Althor wrote:
Wow way to be an idiot and swear. Have some decency.scotmany12 wrote:Wow, way to fucking quote your role pm, even though it was strictly forbidden.
He's probably never roleclaimed before.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
amb, a no lynch actually helped us out. If anyone was going to be lynched, it was most likely lowell, with a slight chance of it being N9V. He turned out to be a townie. Lowell had 3 more votes on him than N9V. Not enough people were going to switch to N9V to lynch him. If lowell was lynched, then a townie would have been lynched. Later that night, the mafia would have killed another townie, possibly even a doctor or cop. Consider the town lucky that there was a no lynch.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Whoever thinks I have a vendetta against amb is wrong. Its very simple, I find him the most scummiest, so I'm going to vote for him. I have nothing personnel against him, except that he is scum and we should vote him out. Also, I don't see anyone of your arguments that were bought up against me as a valid, well though out point.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Ok, here is my reasoning for believing that Amb is scum. To start off, he was on the lowell bandwagon. In my eyes, scum received very little, if any, help from that no lynch. They always want a townie gone. Always. And if they can get a townie lynched, then they can rid the town of two townies in one day and night. I truly believe that all of the scum were voting for lowell. This, however, is not enough to incarcerate amb all by himself. There is more reasoning though, and that is enough.
Lets start with his little quarrel with Twito. First he votes him for swearing. If he was offended by his swearing, then he did not need to vote for him, only confront him about it. Maybe he was looking for a reason to get rid of him.
And then there are these two post by him:Amb wrote:
Umm.... I assume that is a claim in humour.... Because that's a suicidal post either way? If you continue to survive in this game after the doctors are presumed all dead, then we will be forced to presume that you are alive as a scum team member. Because the mafia will need to get rid of night killing roles, they will target you on the chance that you are telling the truth.Twito wrote:
You however my friend are unlucky that I did and am feeling OMGUSsy.Amb wrote:Vote Twitofor swearing. THere is no need to use poor language in this game. Twito is lucky I didn't draw a Vig role.Amb wrote:Twito: Yes, I thought it was a joke, but I still think its tantamount to suicide. If you are town, the mafia will have to view you as a risk just in case you werent kidding. This is especially true if I end up dead at Night 1 by a mafia that could attempt to frame you.
Of course if you are scum then the argument differs slightly...-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Quoting myself so my reasoning is all in one post.
Well you could not be dead night 1 because you are scum, but moving on. This posts seems to me like amb knows too much. I'm pretty sure anyone knew that twito's post was a joke. Are you just trying to place suspicion on Twito? Or are you scared that he might be telling the truth? I think both are correct. Secondly, why did niether you or twito die on night 1? First off, I don't see how killing you could have framed twito, but the way I see it, there are 2 situations why niether of you are dead.scotmany12 wrote:Ok, here is my reasoning for believing that Amb is scum. To start off, he was on the lowell bandwagon. In my eyes, scum received very little, if any, help from that no lynch. They always want a townie gone. Always. And if they can get a townie lynched, then they can rid the town of two townies in one day and night. I truly believe that all of the scum were voting for lowell. This, however, is not enough to incarcerate amb all by himself. There is more reasoning though, and that is enough.
Lets start with his little quarrel with Twito. First he votes him for swearing. If he was offended by his swearing, then he did not need to vote for him, only confront him about it. Maybe he was looking for a reason to get rid of him.
And then there are these two post by him:Amb wrote:
Umm.... I assume that is a claim in humour.... Because that's a suicidal post either way? If you continue to survive in this game after the doctors are presumed all dead, then we will be forced to presume that you are alive as a scum team member. Because the mafia will need to get rid of night killing roles, they will target you on the chance that you are telling the truth.Twito wrote:
You however my friend are unlucky that I did and am feeling OMGUSsy.Amb wrote:Vote Twitofor swearing. THere is no need to use poor language in this game. Twito is lucky I didn't draw a Vig role.Amb wrote:Twito: Yes, I thought it was a joke, but I still think its tantamount to suicide. If you are town, the mafia will have to view you as a risk just in case you werent kidding. This is especially true if I end up dead at Night 1 by a mafia that could attempt to frame you.
Of course if you are scum then the argument differs slightly...
1. You are scum. You do not want twito to die because you do not want any suspicion to be cast on you. You also cannot kill yourself in order to place suspicion on twito.
2. Twito is scum. He does not want you dead.
I'm going to take situation 1. Also, you just saved yourself from a vig kill if Twito truly was a vig. Twito does not want to bring suspicion to himself. Moving on.
Speaks for itself.Amb wrote:Unvote; Vote Livingod
Yes it's a bandwagon vote. Have fun FOSing me to death for it.
Really dislike this post. Just thinking about voting someone just to make it equal is scummy in my mind. And still, the only reason he gives for voting livingod is because he had the biggest bandwagon. He does not give anymore reason for voting for livingod.Amb wrote:I'm following you because you were the biggest, although I did toy with jumping onto DragonsOfSummer to make him equal you at the time and leave someone else to choose between them. But whichever :-p
There has already been plenty of conversation in day 1 prior to this post. Stop trying to secretly protect you godfather by trying to start a new topic of discussion. And onto day 2 we go.Amb wrote:It is a tad hard to supply evidence that isnt contrived on day 1. Short of someone jumping up saying "Lynch me, I just realised I'm scum" or a dimwit newbie cop saying "BobGoldfish is scum"* you won't really get anything of any real convincsation** today.
* The logical conclusion would be to lynch BobGoldfish because he would obviously be lying.
** Okay I just randominded that word out of thinnerised air
This is the day where my suspicion of amb truly grows.
Heh, he is truly scared that twito is really the vig. He is bringing up anything that he can against him. Twito gave reasoning for voting for livingod, he didn't just hop onto the bandwagon like you did.Amb wrote:Vote Twitofor "The wagon on livingod lacking speed just proves that it's on scum."
1. Potentially sounds like inside knowledge
2. He was late on the bandwagon himself. Does his statement apply equally to him?
3. Besideswhich there wasn't evidence of any description. Someone had to be lynched and we got lucky. The lack of speed on any bandwagon can be attributed to 'Town' players who don't honestly know if the target is scum.
I find this his most scummiest post in the whole game to date. STOP FOLLOWING THE CROWD! If you truly find twito to be scummy, which I did not see your case on him, then vote for him. Don't wait for someone else to vote for him so you can join the bandwagon, just like you did with livingod. You are trying to get people to vote for him. You thought that since you were able to avoid suspicion with your vote on your own godfather that you would be able to get away with it with twito as well. But you needed someone else to vote for him, which noone else did.Amb wrote:If anyone decides a Twito bandwagon is good, bear in my mind my vote will be joining the minute I see it. I am only on my number choice because I have two others with me (or however many it is now)
And Then:
Yet another bandwagon vote. Why are you so afraid to share your own opinions? Is it because you did it with twito and that got you no where? That might be it. You are scum.OverTheUnder wrote:
Bandwagon much? You aren't forming your own opinion you're just following the crowd that's either A. a scum trying to blend in or B. A Vanilla Townie I'm leaning towards A. right now.Amb wrote:
Are you serious? You cant even be bothered looking at the post immediately prior to mine? What possible advantage is there in me paraphrasing or even quoting the post immediately above mine?!?Amb, care to explain why you are voting for Scope? That's your second vote you've did with little to no reasoning it's looking sorta suspicious.
You have no right to give out this fos when you have been bandwagoning for practically the the whole game.Amb wrote:Lowell is clearly trying to bandwagon though. It's okay as a day one tactic, and sometimes a day two (when there is no info, but clearly at 21+ pages there is info).
FOS Lowellfor Bandwagonning and for giving the appearance of trying to do so under the radar.
You never post that analysis. Instead, your next post it this:Amb wrote:I will be away for the next 3 days or so. I am halfway through a post analysis of all players, I will post then.
All you did there was vote for Lowell for theAmb wrote:Vote LowellTHIRDtime in the same day. That is basically all for day two. Almost done now. Onto day 3.
Yet another instance of you jumping onto a bandwagon. That is about all for day three. I commend you for not voting for scope right away, but it did not rid myself of any suspicion that I have on you.Amb wrote:
KellyChen is right. That renumbers all that ******* work I just did. Reading things by filter can make you miss things at timeskard - you mafia? playing us for fools posting that PM.
In order of votableness:
Theopor_cod is now top of the list for what appears to be a major slip up. So much for the 3½ rating I gave him based on content.
Scotmany12 was going to be my vote for the day. I am now content to wait that one out, Scotmany seems scummy, but Theo way more....
Unvote; Vote Theopor_cod(If i was already voting)
And that is my reasoning for voting for amb.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Ok, I reread what I missed. However, I was really just skimming so I probably missed some. I have grown suspicious of RA and N9V, but Amb is still the most suspicious in my book. Panzer keeps on getting less and less suspicious with his recent push of Amb.
There is one thing that I would like to point out regarding Amb.
He clearly asks him to either vote someone on a wagon, or to post why he thinks I am suspicious. This is Amb's first post after this one by The Fonz.The Fonz wrote:
I'm inclined to agree with you, at least for now, re: Theopor.Amb wrote: Yes, because the slip is explainable. Remember before the slip I had theopor down the list rather than higher. After the slip I pushed him up - but then the explanation made sense to me. In the end I will continue to push the players I genuinely think are scum, and not the player who may or may not have made a slip. He can be caught later if it was a genuine slip.
My vote will either be 9V who I think I was voting pre-crash anyway, or Scotmany12.
Now, as to your own voting intentions: you seem convinced Scot is scum. Having done a readthru of you, I've yet to see a convincing case against him, he has no other votes, and the deadline is nearing. If you really want a Scotmany lynch, I suggest you make a detailed case against himright now, otherwise the deadline will hit without time for a decent bandwagon to build, and if one does build, he'll have precious little time to defend himself.
My own vote today will not leave N9V except possibly for Scope, but if the next post of yours is anything but a detailed case against Scot or a vote for one of the three current bandwagons, I'll be extremely suspicious.
Now, he does not do one of the 2 things that Fonz asks of him. I understand not switching your vote if you find someone more scummy, but I don't see why he wouldn't post his reasons for finding me suspicious. I honestly don't remember him doing one at all, but he is very convinced that I am scum. Right now, I am just treating his suspicions of me as OMGUS.Amb wrote:
The difference is - if we lynch a townie, we have deaths at dawn to cope with as well. A no lynch is preferable in that situation, because even the death of a lurker will provide info now.theopor_COD wrote:
No because people have been pushing my wagon as they have Scope and N9V, we will learn something from someone being lynched than a no lynch. The only people who benefit from a no lynch are the scum. We've had 49 pages and managed to lynch only one person a Godfather for heavens sake! We have no real voting patterns to look back at.The Fonz wrote:I really don't understand how anyone town can think lynching themselves helps the town. Surely no lynch should always be preferable to lynching someone you know is town?
That said:
1. A pushed self lynch can be a scum gambit
2. A no lynch means no scum dies either
3. Any of the current bandwagons could be scum, thus we need to take the chance.
We have to take the risk and lynch someone rather than no lynch. The worst case scenario will be lynching a cop or a doc.
One more thing. He says that a no lynch is preferable. However, I remember him being for a lynch on any of the top 3 bandwagons. Quite contradicting.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Panzer makes a good point with that post. Everyone on the N9V wagon should be looked at carefully. I, however, am with Panzer on Amb. He has been jumping bandwagons the whole entire game, while not will to start his own bandwagon. I don't find him very helpful to this town. I wish that we can just rid ourselves of him already.
Vote: Ambonce again.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
You telling people what to do now, theo. Wow, good for you. There isn't much to my RA vote except that he has been scummy, and since no oner here but me and panzer are willing to lynch to true scum of amb, then RA is a fine lynch for today. That is unless you want the day to end in another no lynch.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
No you told me to. Let's look back.theopor_COD wrote:
Whats your problem? I asked you why your voting him, christ its page 55 you ought to have a reason! Why shouldn't I pull you up on it? Too many people seem happy to plod along post something and dissapear.scotmany12 wrote:You telling people what to do now, theo. Wow, good for you.There isn't much to my RA vote except that he has been scummy, and since no oner here but me and panzer are willing to lynch to true scum of amb, then RA is a fine lynch for today. That is unless you want the day to end in another no lynch.
Fact that you have gone on the whole game without giving a shit aside from wanting Amb lynched frankly frustrates the hell out of me.
Right there, you told me to elaborate on my vote. I'm sure if you really wanted me to, I can go back and look for a reason, but that has changed with RA's recent claim. I'm frustrating you? Thats ridiculous. I am the only one who actually cares about the town and wants to lynch the most obvious scum out there, amb. You are all just blind to see this. I gave a well though out case, not to mention his play styles changed when I started casting suspicion in his way. I am frustrated with the town for not getting rid of him.theopor_COD wrote:IH you really ought to pay more attention.
Scot you going to elaborate on your vote, likewise N9V.
Twito how about anyone else, care to comment? If you laid out a hard case against Scope fair enough but as yet I've not seen one, well worthy of voting him.
Now,Unvote
So far, RA has been uncountered. I would like him to reveal his last investigation, and his results of all. I'm guessing he got an innocent on his night 3 investigation or else he would of told us, but I'm interested in who he got it on. Yes there are holes in his claim, but the fact remains he is uncountered. Back to square one for me.
Vote: Amb
I might be switching to N9V soon. I'm going to reread tomorrow and see if I can come up with something.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Well you are wrong. I do not only post when I am pressurized. I'm just fed up with the town right now. I have already said that the reason I did not vote for livingod, was because I did not have a reason to. I was waiting for someone to provide some evidence, but none came.
I gave reason for my vote for Rand. I wanted a lynch because we need a lynch. And Rand has not been helpful, he lurked, and I didn't find him as protown. You voted for me without providing any reasoning.
I'm trying to move on to other players, but I'm going to vote for who I find the most scummiest, and that is Amb, and I don't know how you don't see it. Look at what he has been doing. For starters, throughout most of the first and second day, all he did was vote hop, and mind you he is still doing that. He is playing one of the most opportunistic games of mafia I have ever seen. Not to mention he was not suspicious of me until I brought of a case against him. And yet everyone thinks that I am the one who is OMGUSing him.
There is one more thing, has Amb be defending anyone? If he has, I would like to know. I have been looking through the game and have not really found any, but if he has, I have incriminating evidence against him. Please help me out a little and look to see if he defending anyone.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
This is what I'm getting at Theo. I don't know if he defended anyone to this type of extent, but if he did, It would just be one more reason that he is scum.Amb wrote:I know when I was mafia in one game, I picked another player to defend
Yeah, there probably was scum on livingod's wagon, and yet there was probably scum off of his wagon. Right now, I'm saying maybe 1 or 2 scum that were voting for him. Slight chance for 3. I'll have to look and see who was on his wagon, besides Amb.
Oh, and Panzer. In no way am I playing the same way that I played in mafia 62. Look through my posts in that game and look through my posts in this game. There may be some resemblance, but not entirely. I went at that game an entirely different way. Don't be mad that no one truly expected me besides TS, who no one believed.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
I had my reasons for voting for you theo. Those have been forgotten, but I'm sure if you want I can look back and find them. I don't see how you just pick 3 out of the group that was on you. I understand not putting Kelly Chen in the group, but there are 8 other people who jumped on your bandwagon and almost lynched you. I don't think you can narrow it down to three people.
The fact is, though, scum tend to be the less suspicious ones to the town. For example, in mafia 62, I was scum. I was not lynched however. Only one person suspected me, and she ended up being lynched. I survived for a few days after only to be nked. You can't always look at the ones who you find to be the most suspicious, because frankly, they can just be playing very poorly or newbish. The scum is suppose to blend into the town, and that is what Amb has been doing.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007