NY 172: Another Large Normal (GAME OVER)

bjc · Post Post #21 (isolation #0) » Fri Mar 14, 2014 2:53 pm

I'm scum.

bjc · Post Post #31 (isolation #1) » Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:54 pm

Yeah there is nothing town about a joke early in the game. Sheesh.

bjc · Post Post #33 (isolation #2) » Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:06 pm

I have nothing so far considering I made one comment right before I left for home, just got home when I made the other comment while skimming the game.

So yeah... I have no "take" on this game so far at all, lol. Except for the usual people that are too uptight.

bjc · Post Post #35 (isolation #3) » Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:01 pm

vote: Doc

I'll be back tomorrow to offer actual opinions, and this vote is based on a skim of the thread.

bjc · Post Post #82 (isolation #4) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:49 am

In post 24, ThAdmiral wrote:
In post 9, PeregrineV wrote:
Vote: ThaD

You haven't posted in the neighborhood QT yet. What's up with that?
Lolz, I'll get on that

In other news I like being out of rvs within 3 live posts. While its sort of forced (what super early day 1 case stuff isn't) I still like rogers better for it.

In post 21, bjc wrote:I'm scum.
Lemme guess: "reaction testing"?

vote: bjc

There you go, now you can call me scum for "taking the bait".

So my question here is why the above fake-claim/joke is okay while mine isn't?

In post 25, Doc Holliday wrote:
In post 21, bjc wrote:I'm scum.
There is no legitimate purpose to this as Town. bjc is either scum or not worth listening to. Obtuse gambits are anti-Town.

Sticking with talah for now, but this deserves a vote later.

Horrible. First off, since when was this a gambit?
Second, why is something like that posted in RVS even taken seriously?
Lastly, I like that you say this deserves a vote yet stick with who you're voting at the time. Doesn't make a lot of sense for someone that just scolded me for claiming scum in my opening post.

In post 32, Mister Rogers wrote:@BJC: What's your take on the game so far?

Are you the talkative type? After reading the newbie game you were a part of with BB and molla, I'm thinking yes.

In post 36, aptil wrote:Bjc already looks like he is going to be a lynch bait here.

Forever and always <3

In post 39, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 31, bjc wrote:Yeah there is nothing town about a joke early in the game. Sheesh.

In post 33, bjc wrote:I have nothing so far considering I made one comment right before I left for home, just got home when I made the other comment while skimming the game.

So yeah... I have no "take" on this game so far at all, lol. Except for the usual people that are too uptight.

In post 35, bjc wrote:
vote: Doc

I'll be back tomorrow to offer actual opinions, and this vote is based on a skim of the thread.
A joke usually indicates humor, or can be used to relieve tension.
Your opening post did none of that.
And if a joke, you forgot to show you are town by self-voting.

It's all of 30 posts. What's there to skim?

Vote: bjc

Would also throw a vote BBMolla's way for scum-placing out.

Yeah, well that's like, your opinion, man.

What's there to skim? All thirty posts I guess. Self-voting is town?

In post 44, Damon_Gant wrote:
In post 21, bjc wrote:I'm scum.
What a peculiar post. No meaning, no purpose, no humour. Everything else in this game thus far is smoke clouding my vision.
Vote: bjc

I find your breakdown of my post fascinating.

Bad vote.

In post 48, Luca Blight wrote:You can't read much from bjc's opening post; you have to question why scum would want to draw attention to themselves so needlessly early on, but it could be some sort of ridiculous bluff.

He comes across as apathetic, which I would attribute more to Town in the early stages of a game as opposed to scum.

You have to question why people needlessly ponder why bjc posted it in the first place, unless you're scum pointing fingers this early for something so silly to get an early wagon on someone, I guess.

bjc · Post Post #96 (isolation #5) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 12:46 pm

In post 92, ThAdmiral wrote:
In post 82, bjc wrote:So my question here is why the above fake-claim/joke is okay while mine isn't?
I didn't claim an anti-town role.

Both were fake, so I don't see the difference.

bjc · Post Post #248 (isolation #6) » Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:04 pm

dodging here as well

bjc · Post Post #293 (isolation #7) » Tue Mar 18, 2014 7:22 am

In post 291, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 21, bjc wrote:I'm scum.

In post 33, bjc wrote:I have nothing so far considering I made one comment right before I left for home, just got home when I made the other comment while skimming the game.

So yeah... I have no "take" on this game so far at all, lol. Except for the usual people that are too uptight.

In post 248, bjc wrote:dodging here as well
OK!!

We look forward to your posts!!!

I already offered a few thoughts Saturday, I believe. Did you not read them?

bjc · Post Post #516 (isolation #8) » Wed Mar 19, 2014 1:26 pm

In post 511, Mister Rogers wrote:Too tired must sleep.

The one thing that is burning in my mind is:

Pere should not be allowed to sideline, posting helpful read guidelines & screaming about BJC. This without actual scum hunting is scummy.

PEDIT: @ZD -- I want to puke.

I think I agree with this.

bjc · Post Post #521 (isolation #9) » Wed Mar 19, 2014 3:46 pm

In post 517, pisskop wrote: I think I agree with this.

You're a terrible person.

List why you think this.[/quote] And you're a moron.

I also have no clue why you're calling me a terrible person.

In post 518, Yates wrote:
In post 516, bjc wrote:I think I agree with this.
VOTE: bjc

@bjc
- Is voting for you the only way to extract content?

No... Not at all.

Are you voting me because you think I'm scummy or just to be stupid?

bjc · Post Post #527 (isolation #10) » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:03 pm

Well, I did claim my role before getting voted on so there's that.

And lol at that fucking question. I claimed scum and drew like three votes pretty quickly. So of course the content generated after that was in response to being voted on. Le'sigh.

bjc · Post Post #530 (isolation #11) » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:44 pm

And if I'm content with lurking?