Mafia 58: Ready Salted - Game over!

Twito · Post Post #15 (isolation #0) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:36 am

Riverwind23 wrote:well i'll be the first to post.
Hello, i'm new here but i have played several mafia games before now.
I would like to start the day with a
No Lynch

No Lynch is very bad option.
To put more weight to my opinion about no lynching

Vote: Riverwind23

Twito · Post Post #26 (isolation #1) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:40 pm

Riverwind23 wrote:i've heard the lynch no lynch argument so many times that if i hear it once more...

So why the fuck do you keep doing it? And then they blame it on us IC's coz we should've taught you.

Battle Mage wrote:
unvote, Vote: Dragon

Piling this early on, is NOT a good idea for protown.

Unvote
Vote: DragonofSummer

I actually agree with Battle Mage here even though I decided this already when I read your vote.

Twito · Post Post #28 (isolation #2) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:36 pm

scotmany12 wrote:Um, Twito, give more reason to vote for Dragon because you also jumped on the vote for river.

No.
Soon I'm gonna vote you for defending your scumbuddy Dragon.

Twito · Post Post #29 (isolation #3) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:37 pm

Just giving heads up..

Twito · Post Post #32 (isolation #4) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:53 pm

No it's not just take my word for it.

Twito · Post Post #34 (isolation #5) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:19 pm

livingod wrote:Take... your... word...

Hmm...
Not a bad idea Mr. Omniscient.

Exactly. I

forbid

you from doing otherwise.

Twito · Post Post #38 (isolation #6) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:31 pm

I think speaking latin which I don't speak is obviously an evil trick scum would use to communicate with eachother! Who else here speaks latin? Identify yourself, scum!

Twito · Post Post #39 (isolation #7) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:35 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:Sigh... So much discussion simply based on the fact that I agree voting for no lynch on the first day... and as the first post in fact... is a very dumb thing.

You agree with voting for no lynch? And just a while ago I watched you vote based on you disagreeing with no lynch. Seriously guys we have a scum here.

Twito · Post Post #41 (isolation #8) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:39 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:Doh... I got ahead of myself. I agree that voting no lynch on the first day is a bad idea... it just didn't get posted that way.

Aha. Backtracking are we?

Twito · Post Post #43 (isolation #9) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:Well obviously I don't think it is a good idea! Or else I wouldn't have voted against him for it. And anyway I hate thinking faster than I type sometimes...

Scum always think faster than they type. Obvious scumtell!

Okok lets stop spamming I'm going to sleep now I really need my beautysleep.

Twito · Post Post #58 (isolation #10) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:30 am

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"][quote="~N9V~"]

Vote: KaleiÐoscøpe

because Ðo

scøpe

is something you use to shoot with more precision.[/quote]It makes it harder for people to vote for me.... ehehehe

Unvote
Vote: Twito

[/quote]
Oh my god! Your Scum!

Twito · Post Post #69 (isolation #11) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:25 pm

Amb wrote:
Vote Twito
for swearing. THere is no need to use poor language in this game. Twito is lucky I didn't draw a Vig role.

You however my friend are unlucky that I did and am feeling OMGUSsy.

Twito · Post Post #77 (isolation #12) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:55 am

livingod wrote:BM: What!? There is no wagon on you. Are you scum in this game as well?

The wagon that started on DoS and where BM is the first vote. I had t oread it twise to get what he meant.

DragonsofSummer wrote:As for the backtracking allegation. If you are refering to when I think you are it really was just a mistype. I can't prove this because well there is no proof of this, but where the real problem comes in is that I didn't go back and check what I posted right away or I would hav EBWOPed it to what I actually meant. But Twito found it first and we went back and forth with it.

If they are referring to that me "using that as a suspicion" was a joke and anyone using that as a real evidence is a suspect.

Amb wrote:
Twito wrote:
Amb wrote:
Vote Twito
for swearing. THere is no need to use poor language in this game. Twito is lucky I didn't draw a Vig role.
You however my friend are unlucky that I did and am feeling OMGUSsy.
Umm.... I assume that is a claim in humour.... Because that's a suicidal post either way? If you continue to survive in this game after the doctors are presumed all dead, then we will be forced to presume that you are alive as a scum team member. Because the mafia will need to get rid of night killing roles, they will target you on the chance that you are telling the truth.

It was a joke.

I have to cut down the joke posts I'm afraid.. Well I have to but I'm not sure I will..

Twito · Post Post #88 (isolation #13) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:39 pm

Amb wrote:Twito: Yes, I thought it was a joke, but I still think its tantamount to suicide. If you are town, the mafia will have to view you as a risk just in case you werent kidding. This is especially true if I end up dead at Night 1 by a mafia that could attempt to frame you.

Of course if you are scum then the argument differs slightly...

Well lets see what happens and worry about it later.

Twito · Post Post #89 (isolation #14) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:40 pm

@Livingod: Based on what are you voting DoS?

Twito · Post Post #103 (isolation #15) » Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:46 pm

@talkabouttwito: This is me alright.

Riverwind23 wrote:why are people still harping about the no lynch? i changed my vote, ya know!

We have moved on don't feel so important

Twito · Post Post #105 (isolation #16) » Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:49 pm

If some of the newer players didn't know good way to ask mod for something is to bold it.

MOD: Could we get a votecount?

Twito · Post Post #118 (isolation #17) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:41 am

As you ignored my guestion and posted contentless stuff instead which I find highly scummy lets try again:

Twito wrote:@Livingod: Based on what are you voting DoS?

Twito · Post Post #120 (isolation #18) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:48 am

Post 74:

livingod wrote:and only then had I realized DoS's backtracking.

What do you mean by that?

Twito · Post Post #122 (isolation #19) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:00 pm

livingod wrote:Oh yea, there's that post! I ignored it because I had addressed it to my wagon. That was the "post I didn't post" I referred to in Post 117. Yes, that also is a factor in my vote. The backtracking I was referring to was the "I support no lynch" "no wait! I DON'T support no lynch" thing.

Ok I though so.

Unvote
Vote: livingod

Twito · Post Post #126 (isolation #20) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:07 pm

scotmany12 wrote:Right now, the only vote that I am even considering is the one that my gut is telling me. Even though I know that you will all most likely attack me for this vote simply because I have a gut feeling, I feel it is the right thing to do.

Vote: Twito

I guess I just don't trust you.

However, if more information comes of on livingod being scum, then I am willing to switch.

That's sad..

You really should trust me.

Twito · Post Post #132 (isolation #21) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:02 pm

Cheesefan wrote:Well there

It wasnt just the gut feeling

I just wanna get all the motovations out in the open

I myself am wondering about certain people

but gut instincts i think warrant a FOS at most

I dont give a monkeys if you vote twito or anyone else

as long as you can give evidence for it

You

have

to

stop

writing

like

this

.

Twito · Post Post #133 (isolation #22) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:03 pm

Amb wrote:(Correction to the first *, you would lynch the claimed newbie cop, not the person he fingered. Stupid me)

If someone fingered on someone else I would seriously be afraid of that fingering someone.

Twito · Post Post #135 (isolation #23) » Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:42 am

The wagon on livingod lacking speed just proves that it's on scum.

Twito · Post Post #137 (isolation #24) » Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:14 am

Kelly Chen wrote:I am inclined to agree with Twito, we are wagoning scum. I would guess that none of his scumpartners are voting him right now. They need to throw him under the bus right now so that they look better later. I hate to give advice to the scum but it's undeniable.

QFT

Twito · Post Post #141 (isolation #25) » Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:04 am

livingod wrote:So now you're "convinced" I'm scum, right? After your last post, if someone votes me, they'll be a good lynch candidate for you if my wagon fails. I.e. You said, "scum, vote for your buddy!" some other guy goes, "hey livingod's scum, i'll vote him" You take a mental note of that. Then, something happens and my wagon disbands. You say, "well, scum thought he would get lynched so they voted him, especially after my post regarding scum tactics. Hey, this guy voted him right after I told scum to vote him! Lynch him!!!111"

No actually it became a WIFOM and doesn't really affect either way.

livingod wrote:All you're accomplishing in your last post is telling people to broaden their range of lynch candidates, so that if my wagon fails, you can just shift the blame to someone else.

I really hope your wagon doesn't fail as I'm pretty coinfident of it being on scum.

Twito · Post Post #142 (isolation #26) » Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:05 am

scotmany12 wrote:Can I have the reason for voting for livingod. I want to know why you people think he is scum.

In the end my vote fell on him when he confirmed using typo DoS made as a real reason to vote and wagon him.

Twito · Post Post #144 (isolation #27) » Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:16 pm

Kelly Chen wrote:
livingod wrote:
unvote vote Kelly
Oh crap!!

No really looks like you are gonna die. Would you like to claim a flying pumpkin? Don't worry I will counterclaim.

Twito · Post Post #147 (isolation #28) » Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:16 pm

BM's logic truly is ridicilous!

Twito · Post Post #149 (isolation #29) » Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:52 pm

phita23 wrote:
VOTE: DragonsofSummer

Because everything is based on a lot of speculation, I'll vote for DragonsofSummer because he suggested a nolynch.

Clear interest in bandwagoning but unwillingness to join livingod wagon. Instead made up shit reason to vote DoS. Welcome in livingods scumbud.

Twito · Post Post #154 (isolation #30) » Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:30 am

/me will be away for one day.

Twito · Post Post #207 (isolation #31) » Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:30 pm

Twito · Post Post #225 (isolation #32) » Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:44 pm

My suspects for scum, remember this after we lynch t_COD:
Riverwind is scum with theopor_COD.
Kaleidoscope is scummy.
Riverwind is scum with Cheesefan.

Amb wrote:
Vote Twito
for "The wagon on livingod lacking speed just proves that it's on scum."
1. Potentially sounds like inside knowledge
2. He was late on the bandwagon himself. Does his statement apply equally to him?
3. Besideswhich there wasn't evidence of any description. Someone had to be lynched and we got lucky. The lack of speed on any bandwagon can be attributed to 'Town' players who don't honestly know if the target is scum.

Are you a fking moron or what? Scum?
Anyone who knows a shit about the game can tell my actions yesterday were 100% protown and I can basically be counted confirmed now thank you very much. Voting Twito is scum strategy.

Vote: theopor_COD

Why do you make this too easy?

Twito · Post Post #229 (isolation #33) » Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:09 pm

Sidecomment to DoS and scotmany12: OMGUS is not a scumtell.

Twito · Post Post #231 (isolation #34) » Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:58 pm

Yes that I can understand. OMGUS can also be a scumtell but just fair normal OMGUS on itself is not.

Twito · Post Post #237 (isolation #35) » Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:44 am

The evidence points into this being the truth and nothing but the truth.
The evidence shall remain secret for the time being. Your reaction is noted.

Twito · Post Post #239 (isolation #36) » Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:50 am

5 more votes to go! Riverwind this is your change to bus your scumbuddy. Others of the same group feel free to join in!

Twito · Post Post #242 (isolation #37) » Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:16 am

Riverwind23 wrote:if i do anything at this point, including staying the same course i am on now, i will be accuse of being scum. that being said i refuse to change my vote. of course somone will make this post out to be scummy, and if i didn't post i'd be called a lurker and be made out to be scummy.

So basicly, no matter what i do, you'll think i'm scummy. which sucks. alot.

Must suck to be you.

Twito · Post Post #244 (isolation #38) » Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:05 pm

Kelly Chen wrote:Don't worry about whether you look scummy, just lynch the scum. That is your mission as protown.

Or incase you are scum please bus your buddy.

Twito · Post Post #258 (isolation #39) » Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:22 pm

Cheesefan wrote:
Battle Mage wrote:ok, now i really am having second thoughts. The 2 people above me (who were voting for me previously) i had assumed to be Mafia. Now however, they seem to have transferred to the TheoporCOD wagon, with the comment that they will "lynch me tomorrow".
The way cheesefan seems so keen to follow his buddys actions, regardless of how much he wants to lynch me, wreaks of scumminess to me.
I'm going to
unvote
and suggest that others look further into this, before we make a premature townie lynch...
BM
To be honest i think you reek of scummyness

Your wagon just wasnt growing though, in fact it was shrinking

so i jumped on the wagon of the next most scummy player

and yes if a wagon starts on you again ill be more than happy to join.

You have been untruthful in this game and you were in love with livingod on day one

So to be quite honest, yes tommorow you have my vote.

If

you

don't

stop

posting

like

this

I

will

kill

you

any

way

I

can.

Riverwind23 wrote:Twito, your a jerk (and a few more choice words i refrain from saying).

theopor_COD is indeed very scummy( more so than battle mage). And, fully knowing that Twito will never shutup about it, i
vote:theopor_COD

Good boy.
*taps the head of Riverwind and hands him a cookie*

OverTheUnder wrote:
Vote, Theopor_C0D
After seeing Kelly list off all of his posts, I read through those and he looked pretty scummy then, and after he would just vote for Kelly no even giving a reason. That's pretty scummy. Also sorry for not being active recently school's hit me hard.

This vote I don't really like..

BM you are a moron and non of your logic makes sence.

Twito · Post Post #261 (isolation #40) » Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:27 pm

Riverwind23 wrote:ABSOLUTE NON-SENSE POST, PAY NO HEED.

yay, i'm a musketeer! do i get a sword? why do they call them musketeers if they have swords? shouldn't they have muskets? wait no, muskets suck, they should have .50 cals. yeah that would be sweet. or maybe rocket launchers. do you like rocket launchers? they make big explosions! explsions make me think of yellow. yellow makes me think of cheese.i like cheese. my e-mail is cheesemaker, isn't that funny? cause i can't make cheese. can you?

END OF NON-SENSE. IT IS NOW OK TO BREATH.

Are you preparing for some sort of roleclaim? This is an honest innocent guestion, not rolefishing, don't even bother with that.

Twito · Post Post #263 (isolation #41) » Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:32 pm

Riverwind23 wrote:no, no roleclaim, i was just bored. what's role fishing?

Ok. I understand I'm often bored aswell.
Rolefishing is when you are asking guestions trying to figure out role of someone/roles.

Twito · Post Post #264 (isolation #42) » Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:32 pm

Riverwind23 wrote:and i don't wanna a cookie, i want McDonalds, take me to McDonalds! waaaaaa!

Not accepting a cookie is a scumtell.

Twito · Post Post #266 (isolation #43) » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:09 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:Hey Riverwind if you really want to vote theopor you have to unvote BM first! Just something I thought might interest you! (ChannelDelibird says so).

Ain't you paying a lot of attention and yet failing contribute.

Twito · Post Post #267 (isolation #44) » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:10 pm

HUGE FOS: DoS

Twito · Post Post #269 (isolation #45) » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:No I just haven't had much to say. Of course I am paying attention, but I don't feel the need to input into your and RR's arguement because I have nothing to add to it. You are arguing against each other and I have already shown that I agree more with your reasoning than his. So for now I have not posted much except to tell Riverwind what he seemed to have missed. I was just trying to help out.

RR isn't in this game the argument is being held on another game.

Twito · Post Post #270 (isolation #46) » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:27 pm

But I'm not saying you weren't helpful. You just were helpful in a way that doesn't make you look more town or scum.

Twito · Post Post #273 (isolation #47) » Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:03 pm

Amb wrote:
BM you are a moron and non of your logic makes sence.
Degrading other players etc is not on. This is a game, not a chance to insult people. I am contemplating PMing the mod to intervene on this. Mafia can be a very entertaining game, but to call someone a moron because you don't like their logic (even IF their logic is wrong) is (or should be) out of bounds. This is true regardless of how scummy or unscummy BM's role is.

Trying to get me modkilled is a scum tactic. And I obviously meant inexperienced with moron. Simple typo.

Twito · Post Post #275 (isolation #48) » Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:36 pm

Amb wrote:I didnt mention modkill at all! And if trying for that is a scum tactic - why would I post it in the thread anyways, when I could just PM the mod with impunity.

My voting you, btw, has more to do with the reasons I listed earlier, not my argument over style of play.

Ah so your voting me aswell?
You must be scum!

Twito · Post Post #287 (isolation #49) » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:48 am

~N9V~ wrote:Im here, Im having problems with my computer.. It crashed, so I cabn only get on on Mondays-Fridays, for about half an hour. At school that is.

Heh, I want a claim from COD before I hammer him.

Scummy.

Riverwind23 wrote:yeah, that would be kinda nice to have.

Scummy.

Why? Skimming and willingness to just lynch the one with most votes without reading case againts him or anything.

Unvote

This wagon is too happy.
Next vote must be thinked and my other suspicions reviewed.

Twito · Post Post #288 (isolation #50) » Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:44 am

Vote: DoS

I'm pretty sure about this.

Twito · Post Post #292 (isolation #51) » Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:54 am

Amb wrote:I wouldnt be upset with a lynch of OverTheUnder either. He was my number two under Twito.

Unvote Twito; Vote OverTheUnder

I was coincidering him for a while but now that you are voting him he has some town points.

DoS is scum guys, really, vote him.

Twito · Post Post #293 (isolation #52) » Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:56 am

DragonsofSummer wrote:[quote="Twito]Vote: DoS
I'm pretty sure about this.

Could you elaborate on why you are sure I am scum?[/quote][/quote]
The way you are following the thread so closely. Right now there being 8 minute difference between this post and the post I voted you. And earlier when you noticed the unvote missing and yet hadn't said anything useful for a good while. You are obviously here and watching and failing to contribute which is absolutely scummy.

Twito · Post Post #300 (isolation #53) » Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:10 pm

What about actually voting DoS-scum and making the world a better place?

Twito · Post Post #302 (isolation #54) » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:00 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:Maybe because I'm not actually scum? 8)

It wasn't guestion and no that's not it.

Twito · Post Post #303 (isolation #55) » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:00 pm

I mean it wasn't a why guestion.

Twito · Post Post #305 (isolation #56) » Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:34 am

scotmany12 wrote:
Unvote
for now.

Theoper seems to have defended himself, even though he could clearly be lying. Right now, though, I am stumped on who to vote for.

DoS is obviously scum but if you don't wish to vote him..

Twito · Post Post #307 (isolation #57) » Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:59 am

I have to do some backtracking here. DoS does look awfully scummy just view all his posts he hasn't really commented on anything but still successed on jumping in the main bandwagons. The reason why I'm backtracting is that DoS was basicly the reason I caught on livingod scum yesterday which makes me very much doubt those two being scum together.

Unvote

for now.

Twito · Post Post #314 (isolation #58) » Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:02 am

DragonsofSummer wrote:
Twito wrote:I have to do some backtracking here. DoS does look awfully scummy just view all his posts he hasn't really commented on anything but still successed on jumping in the main bandwagons. The reason why I'm backtracting is that DoS was basicly the reason I caught on livingod scum yesterday which makes me very much doubt those two being scum together.

Unvote
for now.
But Twito I did add to the reasons for voting Theopor and Livingod. You even agreed with the fact that I made a good point about why I voted Theopor. (page 10 posts 226, 230, and 231 for Theopor, and for Livingod it really all goes to the fact that first he bandwagoned on me for bandwagoning, and then tried to back it up with my supposed back tracking that wasn't even there in the first place.)

You did add

reasoning

or that's what it looks like to me. Honestly I'm still feeling your lynch. The next ones in line could be ones I pointed earlier. Maybe kaleidoscope or cheesefan.

Twito · Post Post #317 (isolation #59) » Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:06 pm

I'll likely reskim here before voting unless someone does it for me and find my earlier suspects guilty and provides points againts them. Please do that.

Twito · Post Post #326 (isolation #60) » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:50 am

Vote: Kaleidoscope

Twito · Post Post #327 (isolation #61) » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:51 am

~N9V~ wrote:As I've sad earlier, I think OvertheUnder is scum. I beleive this because he hammered the GodFather, without any reason, except: I want to hammer someone. So as I see it, he hammered who he knew was the GodFather, and with doing that, tried to take the eye off of him.

And if he had hammered townie you would blame him for that. Tbh I find you kinda scummy for not making a real case.

Chibo vote makes sence.

Twito · Post Post #343 (isolation #62) » Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:06 am

Riverwind23 wrote:i still don't understand why people suspect me.(though most people do so i suppose it dosen't matter)

You should vote Kaleidoscope. That's cool thing to do. People wouldn't suspect you if you were to be cool.

I'm kinda ignoring BM atm and hoping he gets nightkilled.
I mean his logic is completely ridicilous. Just look this:

BM wrote:I reckon ive stumbled on a scum trio, and you are the leader.

We just lynched godfather yesterday so do you suspect the scumgroup has more than one leader or that there are several scumgroups?

Twito · Post Post #347 (isolation #63) » Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:27 am

IH wrote:Hey everyone!

Twito, care to tell me who's scum while I reread?

Rereading.

I was planning on re-skimming myself and then felt too lazy and voted obvobv Kaleidoscope-scum.

Twito · Post Post #349 (isolation #64) » Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:37 am

Riverwind23 wrote:maybe i should vote you twito. would that be cool?

Voting Twito in a game like this where Twito is so obviously protown would be very uncool. You are lucky to have me as a mentor or you would just become part of those uncool people.

The lack of Kaleidoscope vote noted.

Twito · Post Post #356 (isolation #65) » Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:22 pm

Panzerjager wrote:Twito respond to my accusations please. These accusations are in post 328.

Nah I don't feel like it.. Oh well.
So I'm often drunk I admit I'm an.. No wait that accusation wasn't againts me..
I mean my gut told me COD is town, I got townie wibe from him so I let him go. Actually you seem to have very wrong picture of town Twito as I don't remember pushing wagon to lynch if I believe the claim and the person pushed are town. I've many times pushed multiple wagons the same day until I find scum.
Also you must understand that following Twito is the only reasonable pro-town move in a game with Twito. I wonder how the games without Twito ever survive.

amb wrote:If anyone decides a Twito bandwagon is good, bear in my mind my vote will be joining the minute I see it. I am only on my number choice because I have two others with me (or however many it is now)

Thanks for identifying yourself, scum.

Now guys you just don't seem to understand do you? Voting Kaleidoscope now is protown thing to do and that's what all the cool kids do these days. His buddies feel free to bus him now.

Twito · Post Post #357 (isolation #66) » Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:39 pm

Twito away for the weekend.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... start=1500

Twito · Post Post #360 (isolation #67) » Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:54 pm

Panzerjager wrote:How does amb feel scumm and Twito not. The man is saying that your not protown unless you follow his wagons. He wants us to be sheep and follow him as if he is playing a flute. Why would a protown player want us to stop thinking?

You just don't get it do you. And way to misrepresent.

Twito · Post Post #362 (isolation #68) » Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:19 pm

Panzerjager wrote:What a way to have us vote for everyone you wish to be dead. You obviously don't know that my job is to catch scum like you.

No actually that's protowns job. Your job as scum is to lie and pretend you are trying to catch scum.

Twito · Post Post #363 (isolation #69) » Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:20 pm

Hey wait a secound don't turn this on you we are lynching Kaleidoscope here not you. Sorry I sometimes can get pretty OMGUSSy. Btw wagon attempt on Twito at the time Twito is away is coincidered huge scumtell.

Twito · Post Post #365 (isolation #70) » Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:39 pm

theopor_COD wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:
Unvote, Vote: amb

I dislike his last post. Seems scummy to me.
I don't really like this post much. Any chance you could eloborate a little more, there seems to be more obvious candidates than Amb.

Yes there is indeed Kaleidoscope. But Amb is also a good choise.

Twito · Post Post #386 (isolation #71) » Sun Feb 18, 2007 4:57 pm

[quote="theopor_COD"]what made him change his mind about Chibo so much?[/quote]
I didn't see him saying nothing like "Chibo looks protown". Where did you get this: "change his mind about Chibo so much"-thing?

[quote="theopor_COD"]As for the case against Amb, I don't see it so much, Amb has pointed out why he found Twito and OtH scummy in this post [/quote]You do realize that the case he made doesn't make any sence what-so-ever and so it's scummy even though Amb has indeed provided some bullshit

reasoning

.

theopor_CODs resent defending of Amb makes me re-suspicious of theopor_COD.

[quote="scotmany12"]I do still feel strongly about chibo. The reason I voted for amb is because he is not willing to be the first one to vote for twito. However, if anyone votes for him, then he is willing to jump on as well. That is what I didn't like about his post.[/quote]
Very much pro-town feeling from this post.

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]I'm still here. Still in for a BM lynch.[/quote]
What about a KaleiÐoscøpe lynch?

[quote="Riverwind23"]fine i'll go for that, i've been wanting to do that, but the wagon deteriorated.

vote BM

plenty of reasons have already been stated if not by me.[/quote]
No no no.

[quote="BM"]wow, someone sure is keen to wagon. Note the fact that the post quoted was preceded by a request by Kaleidoscope to change their scum-wagon back to me. Im thinking Riverwind is noob scum, being led by Kaleidoscope.
Either that, or Riverwind is noob scum trying to tag along with a pro-town player.
I think i will Unvote, Vote Riverwind [/quote]
Actually you would be better off voting KaleiÐoscøpe.

[quote="Riverwind"]I mean since i'm such i noob i couldn't cause too many problems now could i? [/quote]Drawing the newbie card aren't we?

FoS: Riverwind

[quote="theopor_COD"]Kaleidoscope's happy for a BM lynch but isn't even voting for him![/quote]That's actually a HUGE scumtell.

[quote="Panzer"]I'm have three people I think are scum and that is River, BM, and Chibo. I believe they are all equally scummy, but can we lynch Chibo? He really isn't playing at all so would it be wise to lynch him if he isn't really playing? He is like a silent vanilla townie. Anyway River and BM are actually acting excessively scummy and are trying but failing to create mislynchs. My vote will stay on River for now.[/quote]
So you would like to lynch Chibo cuz he is acting like a silent vanilla townie? And basically are expressing your willingness for his lynch without voting him. You are also suspicious of all major suspects atm and no one else at all.
In overal I find this post very scummy.

FoS: Panzer

Twito · Post Post #387 (isolation #72) » Sun Feb 18, 2007 4:57 pm

Twito is back btw.

Twito · Post Post #405 (isolation #73) » Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:56 pm

About the time guys.

Twito · Post Post #408 (isolation #74) » Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:07 pm

Amb was pushing againts Twito earlier with some friends which is very bald move only scum would do. But now that he has start behaving properly and is voting Kaleidoscope I don't see why we can't all be happy and vote Kaleidoscope.

Twito · Post Post #417 (isolation #75) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:33 am

Seriously I don't think BM is scum simply cuz he wouldn't be stupid enough to protect his scumbuddy that blatantly. Or maybe I'm overestimating him. But I'd rather like to think I'm right.

Twito · Post Post #423 (isolation #76) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:08 am

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]I like it how people suspect me but misserably fail in explaining why. Doesn't seem like the townie way to me.[/quote]
Give up scum. Yet another lie saying that you like it.

Twito · Post Post #429 (isolation #77) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:40 am

I resently heard KC is an excellent scumhunter. As she hasn't found any scum in this game she is likely to be scum herself. (or him?)

Twito · Post Post #432 (isolation #78) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:16 am

Kelly Chen wrote:Wow, who said that? Was it livingod?

Don't remember where I read it from nor who said it.

Twito · Post Post #433 (isolation #79) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:16 am

I don't think it was livingod tho..

Twito · Post Post #435 (isolation #80) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:38 am

I'm actually scum together with yellow and bm.

Twito · Post Post #436 (isolation #81) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:39 am

I'd like to point out that Lying All Liars just doesn't work.

Twito · Post Post #440 (isolation #82) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:43 am

I don't see a case on KC or Twito either.

KaleiDoscope your poor attempt to defend yourself are noted. It's also nice to get atleast something out of you after you lurking back the beginning of the game. Sadly we caught you, you are scum and about to be lynched.

Twito · Post Post #441 (isolation #83) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:43 am

*that "sadly" is "sadly for you"

Twito · Post Post #444 (isolation #84) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:52 am

[quote="Riverwind23"]i'm slightly confused. whose voting for what and why?[/quote]
Scums always acting confused..

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]I've got nothing to defend myself against since there aren't any points presented against me in the first place. Twito screams i'm scum and the rest says I agree with Twito. I've heard nothing more then that.[/quote]
There is your voting record. Basicly all you've done is jump on wagons. You have not exactly said anything else. So there is also your lack on contribution. I suggest everyone views all posts made by KaleiDoscope. Function on the bottom of the page.

Twito · Post Post #445 (isolation #85) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:53 am

Maybe if you provided your opinions on everyone or maybe a quick PBPA it would help your case. Or more likely help us use you to catch your partners aswell.

Twito · Post Post #447 (isolation #86) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:59 am

Yes you gave REASONING why you voted everyone you voted. But saying something why you are doing that is not exactly same as giving proper reasons which you didn't.

Oh I obviously would be all out defending my scumbuddy BM and if I were to be protown I would be all out for an easy BM lynch for the way he acts in all games.

Twito · Post Post #449 (isolation #87) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:04 pm

Nope actually I couldn't.
Obviously mafia team wouldn't be all to happy with secound scumlynch in a row. Then again that's in no way argument againts me.

Twito · Post Post #451 (isolation #88) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:17 pm

I'd like to think my arguments overal in the game beat yours 100 - 0. I didn't really bother too much in presenting the case againts you as it's deadly obvious looking at your posting history. In nice so many people checked over you and thinked about it.

Twito · Post Post #453 (isolation #89) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:24 pm

As long as they are lynching scum I don't see a problem with that.

Twito · Post Post #455 (isolation #90) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:29 pm

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Of course not, but it's rather stupid that if you're a townie that you get lynched just because someone is shouting it.[/quote]
Yeap that would be rather stupid indeed and should never happen.

Twito · Post Post #457 (isolation #91) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:41 pm

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]So why do you, Twito?[/quote]
Why do I what?
[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Of course not, but it's rather stupid that if you're a townie that you get lynched just because someone is shouting it.[/quote]
Am a townie and get lynched because someone is shouting it?

Nah doesn't really happen. Btw you could actually try to present a real case againts someone. Maybe someone who is not BM as BM always makes stupid posts pointing which out doesn't actually lead to his allignment. Also I'd still like to hear your opinions on everyone on the game.

I honestly see you as scum looking at what you've based your vote on this game and your lack of contribution.

Twito · Post Post #459 (isolation #92) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:48 pm

So you think BM is the only remaining scum in this game?

Twito · Post Post #461 (isolation #93) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:53 pm

And what if BM would turn up town? What would you do? Apologize for being a dirty scumbag but say that you really ain't scum?

Twito · Post Post #463 (isolation #94) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:58 pm

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]I don't really think that's the case and if it does turn out that way, I don't think I would apologize (as i'm not a scumbag), as his play cried for it.

Oh, and same question for you.[/quote]
If BM turned up town I wouldn't be least bit surpriced as I've already lynched him on another game for similar behavior as town. I'm also in several games together with him where his behavior is scummier than in this one.

If BM turned up scum I would be surpriced and would need to correct my stance on him and my suspicions overal in this game.

Twito · Post Post #466 (isolation #95) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm

I like driving wagons on people I think are scum and lynching people who I think I'm scum cuz I think I'm right about my suspicious. This way I also gain information from those wagons. I would be stupid not to try to get the who I think is scummiest around lynched. If I'm lynching the one I wanna lynch I know I'm not following scum to lynching someone they wanna lynch.

I will explain my reasons for pushing livingod lynch and voting him if you want.

Twito · Post Post #469 (isolation #96) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:35 pm

I'm an angel. Just look at my actions day one and realize I'm obviously pro-town on this game. You calling me names isn't actually helping the game along.

First of all before even lynching kaleidoscope I would be looking into his wagon and his defence. If everything would be alright I would look for more discussion and start asking people guestions. If even after this, probably with deadline already placed, I still though Kaleidoscope is scum I would wish him to be lynched.
If after all this he turned up town I would be very surpriced and would re-analyze his wagon and look for new suspects.

I don't remember scotmany atm could you remind me of him?

Twito · Post Post #470 (isolation #97) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:36 pm

Panzerjager wrote:Please Twito continue and I agree I play by those rules too.

So do you want me to explain livingod or not as I don't really see a reason why it being so obvious..

Twito · Post Post #472 (isolation #98) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:40 pm

Panzerjager wrote:I don't see the case on Scope or Livingod.

I'll explain to you why I voted livingod and were so sure about his scumminess.

Twito · Post Post #476 (isolation #99) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:23 pm

[quote="livingod"]No lynch!? Baaad mojo!

vote River

[/quote]
Looking this now it could be usual scumdistancing. Nothing scummy for livingod tho at the time.

[quote="Riverwind23"]Whoops, sorry for voting wrong. Why does everybody flip when you vote No lynch?

Unvote: no lynch Vote:livingod

for spelling my name wrong![/quote]
Backs up the first theory.

[quote="scotmany12"]Um, Twito, give more reason to vote for Dragon because you also jumped on the vote for river.[/quote]
Why is he asking me more reason for when voting on top of page 2?

[quote="Twito"][quote="DragonsofSummer"]Sigh... So much discussion simply based on the fact that I agree voting for no lynch on the first day... and as the first post in fact... is a very dumb thing.[/quote]
You agree with voting for no lynch? And just a while ago I watched you vote based on you disagreeing with no lynch. Seriously guys we have a scum here.[/quote]
I'm blaming him as a joke when he obviously mistyped.

[quote="Twito"][quote="DragonsofSummer"]Doh... I got ahead of myself. I agree that voting no lynch on the first day is a bad idea... it just didn't get posted that way.[/quote]
Aha. Backtracking are we?

[/quote]
I keep doing it.

[quote="Twito"][quote="DragonsofSummer"]Well obviously I don't think it is a good idea! Or else I wouldn't have voted against him for it. And anyway I hate thinking faster than I type sometimes...[/quote]
Scum always think faster than they type. Obvious scumtell!

Okok lets stop spamming I'm going to sleep now I really need my beautysleep.[/quote]
And I keep doing it.

[quote="livingod"]

unvote vote DoS

. Baaad mojo.[/quote]
He was blaming me of voting DoS the last page and now he is jumping on the wagon.

[quote="livingod"]and only then had I realized DoS's backtracking. [/quote]
He had realized DoS backtracking. I wasn't sure what he meant by this but if it was what I though it was it was a huge scumtell to vote based on.
(eventually as guestioned about it he told it was because DoS first voted riverwind for supporting no-lynch and then accidently typed that he supports no-lynch. I attacked him for this as a joke and livingod decided to use it as real evidence)

[quote="Twito"][quote="DragonsofSummer"]As for the backtracking allegation. If you are refering to when I think you are it really was just a mistype. I can't prove this because well there is no proof of this, but where the real problem comes in is that I didn't go back and check what I posted right away or I would hav EBWOPed it to what I actually meant. But Twito found it first and we went back and forth with it.[/quote]
If they are referring to that me "using that as a suspicion" was a joke and anyone using that as a real evidence is a suspect.[/quote]
Here I explain it being a joke and start guestionizing if livingod used it as a reason. If you don't believe I was joking just look at the smiley face in the post to made it understandable even for those without sence of humour.

[quote="livingod"]BM: My last sentence in my post wasn't based on the logic "he seems to be scum there, so he must be scum here." It was more of an outlandish comparison. I.e. don't take it seriously.[/quote]
Now livingod starts: "I'm sorry I didn't mean it"

[quote="Twito"]@Livingod: Based on what are you voting DoS?[/quote]
Me being a good townie and wanting to be certain why Livingod voted DoS and if the "backtracking" is included.

[quote="Riverwind23"]why are people still harping about the no lynch? i changed my vote, ya know![/quote]
Riverwind being kinda over defensive. Which I usually don't coincider a scumtell but it's starting to look like one. Anyways this is un-livingod-related.

[quote="livingod"]Who said we were? As you can easily see, we've moved on.[/quote]
Ignoring my guestion.

[quote="Amb"]

Unvote; Vote Livingod

Yes it's a bandwagon vote. Have fun FOSing me to death for it.[/quote]
Looks like he knows it's not gonna look bad on him cuz livingod is scum. But this is not related to my reason for thinking livingod is scum either.

[quote="livingod"]Whoa! How did I get such a large group of followers?

River's vote is OMGUS.
Amb and Kelly just want to join the fun.
What about the rest?[/quote]
Trying to put down the case againts him and ignoring my guestion.

[quote="DragonsofSummer"]Livingod you stick resolutely to that, but the only reason you gave for voting me was and I quote

[quote="livingod"]Baaad mojo.[quote] Then later Twito asked you to clarify that. (Post subject 89) and you still haven't. These are the two main reasons that I have not unvoted you. You voted for me with no explanation and haven't clarified why you are voting for me at all. Meanwhile I have stated why I have voted as I have and given my reasons. You can feel that I'm scum all you want, but you are acting much more scummy than I am.[/quote]

[quote="livingod"]As for my reason of voting DoS, You're right. I haven't explained it. It could be one of those posts that I thought about yet for some reason didn't post. Anyway, it was your vote on river that kinda seemed wrong. I can't really pinpoint what it is, hence no more of an explanation than "baaad mojo!" It's like when someone looks at you the "wrong" way. Can't really tell why, but just a vibe I got.[/quote]
Answering the guestion but it's not yet what I'm looking for.

[quote="Twito"]As you ignored my guestion and posted contentless stuff instead which I find highly scummy lets try again:
[quote="Twito"]@Livingod: Based on what are you voting DoS?[/quote][/quote]

[quote="livingod"]Oh yea, there's that post! I ignored it because I had addressed it to my wagon. That was the "post I didn't post" I referred to in Post 117. Yes, that also is a factor in my vote. The backtracking I was referring to was the "I support no lynch" "no wait! I DON'T support no lynch" thing.[/quote]
Me being good townie confirmed that his reason for wagoning DoS was crap.

[quote="Twito"][quote="livingod"]Oh yea, there's that post! I ignored it because I had addressed it to my wagon. That was the "post I didn't post" I referred to in Post 117. Yes, that also is a factor in my vote. The backtracking I was referring to was the "I support no lynch" "no wait! I DON'T support no lynch" thing.[/quote]
Ok I though so.

Unvote
Vote: livingod

[/quote]
And on the next post he goes down.

At this point I was sure livingod is scum.

---
[quote="scotmany12"]Right now, the only vote that I am even considering is the one that my gut is telling me. Even though I know that you will all most likely attack me for this vote simply because I have a gut feeling, I feel it is the right thing to do.

Vote: Twito

I guess I just don't trust you.

However, if more information comes of on livingod being scum, then I am willing to switch.[/quote]
Not understanding what I meant and thinking I wagoned without reason.

[quote="Kelly Chen"]The backtracking charge does not stand up to any scrutiny. Look at DoS' posts for yourself.[/quote]
Understanding it.

[quote="Cheesefan"][quote="scotmany12"]Right now, the only vote that I am even considering is the one that my gut is telling me. Even though I know that you will all most likely attack me for this vote simply because I have a gut feeling, I feel it is the right thing to do.

Vote: Twito

I guess I just don't trust you.

However, if more information comes of on livingod being scum, then I am willing to switch.[/quote]

I reckon the underlying reason behind this vote is that you think Twito's vote on livingod wasnt backed with enough evidence.

If this theroy is correct then you are really justifying your vote right

either way i dont think your going on just your gut

and if you are then i dont think you should be gut voting really

I prefer votes with even a shread of evidence.[/quote]
Not understanding my vote either..

[quote="Twito"]The wagon on livingod lacking speed just proves that it's on scum.[/quote]
More proof about it.

[quote="Twito"][quote="Kelly Chen"]I am inclined to agree with Twito, we are wagoning scum. I would guess that none of his scumpartners are voting him right now. They need to throw him under the bus right now so that they look better later. I hate to give advice to the scum but it's undeniable.[/quote]
QFT[/quote]

[quote="livingod"]Perhaps because scum are already voting for me?[/quote]
What a defence here.

[quote="scotmany12"]Can I have the reason for voting for livingod. I want to know why you people think he is scum.[/quote]
Not understanding it.

[quote="Twito"][quote="scotmany12"]Can I have the reason for voting for livingod. I want to know why you people think he is scum.[/quote]
In the end my vote fell on him when he confirmed using typo DoS made as a real reason to vote and wagon him.[/quote]
I re-state my reasons.

[quote="phita23"]

VOTE: DragonsofSummer

Because everything is based on a lot of speculation, I'll vote for DragonsofSummer because he suggested a nolynch.[/quote]
Hmm... Trying with the counterwagon.

[quote="Battle Mage"]Well i gotta agree that Livingod has been acting a bit scummy in this game, but im equally wary of the fact that such a large majority is already wagonning him. Really, there is such little challenge there, im wondering-if he is Mafia-WTF are the rest of em!?

Unvote

[/quote]
[quote="Twito"]BM's logic truly is ridicilous![/quote]

[quote="Twito"][quote="phita23"]

VOTE: DragonsofSummer

Because everything is based on a lot of speculation, I'll vote for DragonsofSummer because he suggested a nolynch.[/quote]
Clear interest in bandwagoning but unwillingness to join livingod wagon. Instead made up shit reason to vote DoS. Welcome in livingods scumbud.[/quote]
His reasons for voting are also crap.

[quote="OverTheUnder"]

Unvote, Vote LivinGod

<_< My first Hammer. <3[/quote]
Why did he hammer?

[quote="Riverwind23"]The weekends seem to be slow here. odd thing that.[/quote]
Ignoring the issue.

[quote="Cheesefan"]

Vote:Battle Mage

He was livingod's Cheerleader yesterday[/quote]
[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]

Vote: Battle Mage

Seems obvious[/quote]
[quote="Riverwind23"]

Vote: Battle Mage

agreed[/quote]
Why would BM so obviously defend his scumbuddy? That doesn't make any sence.

[quote="theopor_COD"]

Unvote, Vote Battle Mage

If he's not mafia then I think Cheesefan and Kaleidoscope most definately are.[/quote]
This is why I voted t_COD.

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Seems like BM is feeling bad for not jumping on his buddy. I like it how you're trying to blame me that your godfather died. We should hammer you.[/quote]
Trying quicklynch.

----

Fine I've gone far enough I hope you now understand my vote on livingod and livingod wagon.

Twito · Post Post #477 (isolation #100) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:24 pm

Panzerjager wrote:Kaleidoscope doesn't vote on evidence. He has provided none of it. That and he is pushing for BM which isn't so scummy because Livingod was scum. Why would someone jump on their scum leaders wagon when It's not even the number 1 wagon yet? He was on it before Twito. Another FoS for Twito, I believe he bussed Livingod caught him off guard and is trying to mislynch Kaleidoscope. Scratch the FoS.
Vote:Twito

Panzerjager is likely scum.

Twito · Post Post #478 (isolation #101) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:26 pm

Also I forgot about Phita23 as I was away for a while in the beginning of the Day 2.
He has afterwards been replaced by Lowell.

Lowell and Riverwind are actually better suspects than Kaleidoscope now that I look at it. Kaleidoscope still strikes me as scummy. Panzerjager is scum.

I'll look into Lowells posts and likely vote him.

Twito · Post Post #479 (isolation #102) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:28 pm

Unvote
Vote: Lowell

This could be Panzer. Or Kaleidoscope. Or Riverwind. In that order.

Twito · Post Post #480 (isolation #103) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:30 pm

So as a short version my reason for voting livingod was him using DoS's obvious mistyping as a reason to vote him and wagon him. I made a joke about this mistyping and livingod in the search of reasons for voting DoS used it later on as real evidence.

Twito · Post Post #482 (isolation #104) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:37 pm

Panzerjager wrote:Alright, I still think you are scum, but I can call a truce to lynch riverwind-scum.

Really if you are attacking me cuz of the joke I made about you just another game it really was a joke and nothing personal take it easy. That's what I'm feeling you are doing. And what do you think about Phita/Lowell?

Twito · Post Post #487 (isolation #105) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:01 pm

Please view all posts by Lowell and by Phita. The total is reasonable small(tho so it is on Kaleidoscope) and scummy.

Twito · Post Post #490 (isolation #106) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:04 pm

Lowell has made 4 posts and Phita made one. That's great total of 5!
I'll look into scotmany as you seem to be pushing that one aswell.

Twito · Post Post #491 (isolation #107) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:06 pm

Scotmany could well be scum aswell. Riverwind is likely scum.

Twito · Post Post #492 (isolation #108) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:07 pm

I could see Cheesefan as scum aswell but not that likely.

Twito · Post Post #494 (isolation #109) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:10 pm

Trust me there is one.

Twito · Post Post #496 (isolation #110) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:17 pm

Panzerjager wrote:Alright, how about a push on Lowell?
Vote:Lowell

I can definitely feel a Lowell push. I would have pushed him earlier but I forgot about Phita.

Twito · Post Post #498 (isolation #111) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:41 pm

Amb wrote:Somehow PanzerJager just went from voting Twito to agreeing with him in the space of an hour, and ten billion posts. Seriously, do you guys actually breathe between posts?

Breathe?

Twito · Post Post #505 (isolation #112) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:18 pm

N9V wrote:If I was in the mafia, I would've killed OverTheUnder Night1, for hammering their GodFather.

That would be completely stupid as you could just frame him the next day. This whole case againts OverTheUnder is based on him hammering the godfather(which I just saw being done by town in a speedlynch on another game btw). Really ridicilous.

N9V wrote:And then you throw it completely off by saying: "OverTheUnder has some town points". So? So!? Ooooooh, he has had a few town points, does that make him town? I've had a few scum points, does that make me scum? NO!

Yes he has town points that over do the whole case your building based only on the hammer. And from what I know you could be scum.

N9V wrote:Why yes, of course I would've blamed him for lynching a townie too. But it would've been more forgivible. Seriously, what is the chance of getting the GodFather after what? 8 Pages of posting? I could mabey see it if we discussed longer than that, but it would still be pretty iffy.

So you would attack him for it no matter of the allignment of the one he hammered? Ok.
It was very obvious he was scum.

N9V wrote:But if thats not enough, I strongly beleive that he is scum, that if we lynch him and I am wrong, then you can lynch me the next day. Or if I'm right, I pray the doctor in this game will save me!

Scum would be very unlikely to kill you for getting him lynched as scum unless the scum are complete morons. And I don't like the "If I'm wrong lynch me tomorrow" things as I don't see how one of you two has to be scum.

Panzer wrote:Anyway, good point N9V.

Did you read that post? It's horrible. And you are just like that voting based on it?

FoS: Panzer

Amb could well be scum I think.

Twito · Post Post #507 (isolation #113) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:25 pm

OverTheUnder wrote:if I was mafia do you think I would've been stupid enough to put the last vote on him?

WIFOM.

Twito · Post Post #509 (isolation #114) » Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:08 pm

Reading posts before you vote based on them often helps quite a lot. But I can see someone being impressed by "an awesome long post" like that and thinking it actually has something in it.

Twito · Post Post #519 (isolation #115) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:14 am

Lowell wrote:Okay I guess no one's buying the theo thing... yet.

unvote, vote Kaleidoscope
for the sheer thrill of aggression.

Lowell wrote:Yeah okay, that sounds better.

unvote, vote AMB

Lowell trying to find alternate wagon to his.

Twito · Post Post #520 (isolation #116) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:22 am

Battle Mage wrote:is the feeling i sense from this post 'relief'?
Well congrats Panzer-you've got one person off your back.
But, why are you sucking up to Twito, if not scum?
BM

I believe I said Panzerjager is likely scum just last page. I'm nowhere near of his back but there are scummier people atm.

Twito · Post Post #523 (isolation #117) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:51 am

theopor_COD about Lowell wrote:I'd also like to see his reaction to Twito/Panzer's discussion.

Actually he has posted after that. Only to join wagons to avoid his own wagon it seems.

The attack on Cheesefan doesn't work as obviously me and KC where the strongest pushers of livingod lynch and he was applying to possibility if livingod turns up town. So basicly he didn't change his mind.

Twito · Post Post #524 (isolation #118) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:54 am

Amb still looks like scum to me actually.. But Lowell is definitely scum.

Twito · Post Post #528 (isolation #119) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:36 am

Riverwind23 wrote:Twito- doesn't your suspicion list ecompass the majority of the remaining players in the game?

No it's quite short actually.
The main ones in order atm: Lowell(Certain), Amb(Very likely), Panzer(with the others), Riverwind(Likely)
Some minor ones in order: Kaleidoscope, scotmany, cheesefan

I think the lenght is very reasonable.

Twito · Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:05 am

Twito · Post Post #543 (isolation #121) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:17 am

How interesting. What in Twito has changed that causes you to vote him? Is it a pure OMGUS? It's not a scumtell, not really, but it isn't useful either.

Twito · Post Post #546 (isolation #122) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:04 am

I'm cool with either Lowell or Amb lynch today. Pretty sure we have scum there.

Twito · Post Post #554 (isolation #123) » Fri Feb 23, 2007 9:09 am

Lacking Twito in the townish makes you scum. Unless you concentrated too much on my game at the beginning of day 2 which wasn't oh so beautiful as usually cuz I kinda forgot the game and my suspects.
Still happy with either Lowell or Amb lynch today.

Twito · Post Post #563 (isolation #124) » Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:26 am

Amb wrote:First of all it is day 1. Given that there was completely nothing to go on, it was a good chance to get rid of a disrespectful player. I have no doubt Twito can play mafia, I simply object to personal insults and needless swearing in a game that is meant to be fun.

How does saying "Oh fuck" for example reduse the fun in the games? Notice that we do not have a system to ban swearing as swearing isn't actually sucking fun out of games.
Determine needfull swearing.

Panzerjager wrote:I don't like how IH said Lowell was townish without giving reasons. I also don't like how he put Lowell under the most protown player in the game. Seems like shoddy scum propaganda to me.

he made up some reasons but looks like shoddy scum propaganda to me too.

IH is giving kinda scummy wibe actually. I would prefer Lowell lynch atm.

Twito · Post Post #573 (isolation #125) » Sat Feb 24, 2007 2:25 pm

IH do you mind if I ask, are you scum? Please answer honestly they won't believe you if you say you are scum and if you say you are town they are just gonna think you are liying. Tell me truth.

Twito · Post Post #576 (isolation #126) » Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:39 pm

Lowell wrote:nd, FTR, IH has me in his "pro-town" list because I'm pro-town.

So some 'authority' thinks you are pro-town or atleast claims to think you are pro-town and you think that makes you obvious protown? I'm not saying you are necessarily scum tho. You are attacking Panzer and I have the feeling he could be.

IH wrote:Duh Twito, I'm town.

Now don't be a lying scum and try to say I'm not.

I'll be watching the kittens tonight if they start crying I know you lied. And you must apologize for it.

And you know I would never be a lying scum. First of all I'm never scum. Secound of all I wouldn't lie if I were to be scum.

Twito · Post Post #685 (isolation #127) » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:26 am

Sorry guys for not being here internet broke on last Sunday and I'm waiting for it to get fixed before I can be active again.
Also had a lot of stuff irl.

Twito · Post Post #719 (isolation #128) » Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:56 am

I think I stick to my earlier suspicions without reading the new stuff. That would be Lowell, Amb, Panzer as main suspicions if I recall correctly. This game has moved so much I don't think I will have time to read it from internet cafe so I'm still waiting to get my internet fixed.

Twito · Post Post #770 (isolation #129) » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:05 am

Lowell, Amb and Panzer still my main suspiciouns. I might like a Panzer lynch the best atm but we are deadlined so... bah.

Twito · Post Post #837 (isolation #130) » Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:02 am

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Interesting...

Unvote
Vote: ~N9V~

I'm inclined to believe that lowel is more townie then n9v, mainly because my 3 main suspect are voting lowel[/quote]
You are scum supporting no lynch.

Twito · Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:03 am

Vote: Kaleidoscope

So obvious scum it's not even funny.

Twito · Post Post #852 (isolation #132) » Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm

It could have been to discredit those on his wagon and make for example Kaleidoscope look good for not voting him.
But I think it might have been a vigilante aswell following towns opinion.

Twito · Post Post #854 (isolation #133) » Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:50 pm

scotmany12 wrote:Maybe it was the mafia, and they killed lowell knowing that scope might possibly be the prime suspect. They could be setting him up.

Not that's just ridicilous.
Kaleidoscope is scum with scotmany12.

FoS: Scotmany
Confirmvote: Kaleidoscope

Twito · Post Post #944 (isolation #134) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:39 pm

Kaleidoscope is scum that needs to be lynched today.

Twito · Tue Mar 27, 2007 12:09 pm

Still here didn't read those long posts waiting for Scope to be lynched.

Twito · Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:11 am

Check the vacation thread.

Twito · Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:59 am

I'm very much here and I want K-scope lynched.

Twito · Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:00 pm

Btw Panzer is indeed very likely scum after watch all this jumping around he has been doing.

Twito · Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:01 pm

BUT K-scope is quaranteed scum and should be lynched immidiately.

Twito · Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:08 pm

theopor_COD wrote:Twito, you think Scope would be that aggressive day one towards his Godfather?

Yes. He wasn't too aggressive at all. And he is quaranteed scum.

Twito · Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:36 pm

I've re-read the day1 like 5 times and I still think K-scope is scum.

Twito · Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:52 am

K-scope is scum. He should be lynched, now.

I'm on vacation another week.

Twito · Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:54 am

I've not seen the case againts Rand Althor and still wish to lynch Kaleidoscope. Has Scope claimed?

Twito · Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:57 am

Can't find a claim let's lynch the bitch.

Twito · Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:13 am

Yep yep. Posts were lost and the downtime was at worst possible time for me.. Anyways that doesn't change the fact that Scope should be lynched.

Twito · Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:28 am

There is this thread about vacation/limited access that should be checked.

Twito · Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:36 am

Get your act together and help me lynch K-scope. Thank me later.

Twito · Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:26 am

I have nothing more to say really before K-scope gets lynched. I don't feel like hunting for other suspects before the absolute scum is lynched.

Twito · Tue May 08, 2007 9:03 am

Me is back from partying. It was great. Like best time of my life. Came back on Sunday but also got sick and am pretty sick atm. I'll try to get back to constant posting now. I'll back in Finland in month and a half so after that atleast my access is truly constant and segure.

Twito · Wed May 09, 2007 9:20 am

Vote: K-scope

Time to finish this scumbag.

Twito · Fri May 11, 2007 5:28 am

I've seen cases where cop got guiltys on 5 people of which only last one was town. The cop was paranoid

And the town understood the cop was paranoid even after all those correct guilty investigation... that was cool.

Twito · Wed May 16, 2007 6:47 am

Been sick, still sick, posting now avoiding prods.

Twito · Fri May 25, 2007 10:21 am

Dun't prud mu.

Twito · Thu May 31, 2007 9:11 am

Hella! I can't bring myself to catch up atm... I'll be back playing active in 2 weeks..

Twito · Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:37 pm

My top 3:
1. Kscope
2. Kaleidoscope
3. K-Scope

Twito · Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:17 pm

Just forget about lynching Twito. He is currently busy getting high and drunk daily. Give him some time and his gonna be back to hunt you.

Twito · Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:19 am

I'm here.

Twito · Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:52 am

The Central Scrutinizer wrote:
vote: twito

Unless someone has an innocent on him, or reveals a guilty on someone else, I'm not moving it. It's time to get rid of this one.

/\
|
|
SCUM!

Vote: TCS

Twito · Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:32 am

No haven't read yet.. sorry.. I'm a bit behind...

Twito · Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:44 am

I wish to continue playing this game. I'll find time to contribute and keep up with the game. If you still wish to replace me please discuss it with me first. I'm here.

Twito · Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:37 am

Currently re-reading. Posting my top 3 suspects as soon as possible.