Mafia 55: Yakuza - Game over!

rich_25 · Post Post #17 (isolation #0) » Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:45 am

Thestatusquo wrote:
Vote: Rich
. Because he was annoying in our last noob game together.

Annoying how come, it was my first game and I came in as a replacement after the first night, pretty lame reason to vote personally. Oh and Jules no reason for voting for me eh?

rich_25 · Post Post #19 (isolation #1) » Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:53 am

No you're annoying, a bully even ha. However I'm going to refrain from voting for you for being annoying as you did me. At least you gave a reason for voting for me unlike Jules.

rich_25 · Post Post #26 (isolation #2) » Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:16 pm

Keep the votes coming guys.

rich_25 · Post Post #28 (isolation #3) » Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:19 pm

And hello Shadow Lurker nice of you to make me feel welcome.

rich_25 · Post Post #29 (isolation #4) » Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:21 pm

I'm happy for you to get a bandwagon going makes me feel important or as TSQ claims annoying.

rich_25 · Post Post #37 (isolation #5) » Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:48 pm

Yes and gladly so

vote Rich_25

because I'm annoying.

rich_25 · Post Post #46 (isolation #6) » Sun Oct 08, 2006 8:14 pm

Twito your harping on about the past, fact is yourself and the guy I replaced had already pretty much given the game away by the time I joined. TSQ and his townie buddies had more sense than the three of us

unvote

and your fourth vote on me due to me being annoying arouses my suspicions of you here

FOS Twito

rich_25 · Post Post #53 (isolation #7) » Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:29 am

Give a man a break TSQ, you'll break my heart soon and yes I'm a newbie but you're record in your signature suggests you've only completed one game yourself (either that or you don't update it), it is after all a learning process. Therefore we've completed exactly the same amount of games yet your happy to get rid of me on the basis of me being annoying in our first outing.

rich_25 · Post Post #56 (isolation #8) » Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:22 am

Fair enough excuse me for sticking up for myself. Arrogance one of your better traits ;o)

rich_25 · Post Post #58 (isolation #9) » Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:39 am

Ok well I wasn't aware of your knowledge . . still never does any harm to make enemies with the Yakuza.

rich_25 · Post Post #62 (isolation #10) » Mon Oct 09, 2006 3:49 pm

He's out for revenge, blaming me for costing victory him last game. This alas is a new game and without hearing a proper reasoning for his vote then i'm just slightly suspicious. Thing is I'm suspicious of everyone aren't we all?

rich_25 · Post Post #66 (isolation #11) » Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:08 pm

Okay

Vote Klebian

.

Brian McQueso in post 24 thinks BJ is obv pro-town and BJ wants some votes on Klebian so heck why not. Let's hear what Klebian has to say.

rich_25 · Post Post #68 (isolation #12) » Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:33 pm

No quite serious, may aswell keep up my annoying streak. However Twito's continued lack of response is noted. I'd rather be proactive than sit back and not post. We are after all trying to find the scum aren't we?

rich_25 · Post Post #70 (isolation #13) » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:06 pm

Good comeback but wrong. If I was scum I'd tend to be happy to not vote for you act like a sheep and vote for Twito who I actually think is more suspicious than yourself. I'm just trying to fathom out why BJ is coming out making statements like the one "59", alas I haven't the experience at the start of the games, guess I should be keeping trap firmly closed.

rich_25 · Post Post #71 (isolation #14) » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:31 pm

You do however seem more defensive than I expected, sort of like we shouldn't be voting for you just because BJ has picked you as his target. You haven't convinced me that you're not scum and your quick "I'm quite sure now that Rich is scum". I reckon is quite a bold statement and might make you look even guiltier later on.

rich_25 · Post Post #73 (isolation #15) » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:19 pm

Okay gather it's one of his ploys however I'm still not convinced with Klebian. What are we all to do not accuse anyone? And I read the Italian Mafia where BJ played a similar ploy and he turned out to be scum so what do we make of him? Or do we just sit on our hands?

rich_25 · Post Post #83 (isolation #16) » Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:08 am

Twito wrote:
rich_25 wrote:He's out for revenge, blaming me for costing victory him last game. This alas is a new game and without hearing a proper reasoning for his vote then i'm just slightly suspicious. Thing is I'm suspicious of everyone aren't we all?
It's BIG game and random votes in the beginning won't hurt. I might aswell put my "random" vote on person who I don't want in the game. And I don't like inactive ppl.

Fair enough totally agree with the randomness although hasten to add I'm not inactive and won't be. Yes that other game was unfortunate as I wasn't online for a few days and if I was we'd have won and maybe you wouldn't bear such a grudge.

rich_25 · Post Post #101 (isolation #17) » Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:08 pm

Anyone care to shed any opinion on Klebian's response to my putting a second vote on him?

Have to say however Twito and Shadowlurker seem to be quick to jump on TSQ, after all he was only offering advice, even if it was worded a little incorrectly. You could however say TSQ wanted to offer the advice to take the spotlight away from Klebian, TSQ didn't make any comment on Klebian's response or is that a natural thing to do as a townie?

rich_25 · Post Post #111 (isolation #18) » Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:13 pm

unvote

rich_25 · Post Post #116 (isolation #19) » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:55 am

Twito wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Illumina wrote:Still waiting for twito to explain why he finds BJ obviously protown.
scum fishing for info here

vote Illumina

Clear scum here
I think you are on right track here.

FOS: Illumina

hmm so now you've put the FOS on both Illumina and TSQ whilst voting for Bogre on the back of him putting another vote on you due to a bandwagon. Very little of your argument convinces me that your a townie.

Vote Twito

rich_25 · Post Post #130 (isolation #20) » Sun Oct 15, 2006 10:12 am

Save The Dragons wrote:
Lincoln City = Awesomeness.

7 Twito (BrianMcQueso, Mastermind of Sin, ubertimmy, Otaku376, TheStatusQuo, Bogre, rich_25)

2 Bogre (Coron, Twito)
2 ShadowLurker (spectrumvoid, TheStatusQuo)
1 ubertimmy (TheStatusQuo)
1 spectrumvoid (Shadowlurker)
1 Illumina (BabyJesus)
1 rich_25 (Klebian)

16 alive, 9 to lynch!

STD how come TSQ has three votes?

To summarise I'd agree with Otaku's view, Twito may well be a townie but he hasn't offered anything to confirm he is or dispel the notion's that he is scum. I'm happy with my vote on him until he states a more valid reason for not voting for him.

rich_25 · Post Post #157 (isolation #21) » Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:49 am

I'm still here just trying to remember what was posted that we have lost. Although I remember Twito claiming unlike MOS.

rich_25 · Post Post #161 (isolation #22) » Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:37 pm

Twito wrote:
rich_25 wrote:I'm still here just trying to remember what was posted that we have lost. Although I remember Twito claiming unlike MOS.
And why is MOS wanted for claim..? He is not in my scummy ppl list.

I don't want MOS to claim anything; more that he forgot you claimed cop and wanted to continue lynching you.

rich_25 · Post Post #162 (isolation #23) » Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:39 pm

oh and

unvote

as i'm 100% sure that was one of the deleted posts.

rich_25 · Post Post #179 (isolation #24) » Sun Oct 29, 2006 12:45 pm

Jules wrote:I'm back

Fos Illumina
- as far as I can remember, I had a vote on Illumina (just me and BJ I think) but I can't remember what evidence I had

You were voting Illumina for forcing Twito to claim I think something like that. Arguing that with 3 from a lynch it wasn't neccesary where as I recall he was actually 2 from lynch at the time.

As for Twito/Illumina I'm not sure. I tend to agree slightly with TSQ that if Twito was to claim anything as scum it would be cop however being as no counter claim has come forward then I tend to think we should believe Twito for now.