Normal 10 (Intrigue Mafia) - Deadline: March 18th 11am.

Green Crayons · Post Post #20 (isolation #0) » Thu Mar 06, 2003 4:05 pm

Vote: No lynch

; though i do hope that all these roles out there are able to find something worthwhile to go on.

As for the night time voting.. eh. Campaigning is worthless, people (well, at least i am) are going to vote for either A) themself, B) someone they trust the most based on previous games, or, if they're scum C) someone that would probably draw attention away from themself in such an important position.

Yeah. I already have my vote in mind. Not quite sure why we started with a day, either.

Green Crayons · Post Post #80 (isolation #1) » Fri Mar 07, 2003 8:25 pm

Okay, well. A lynch today is going to get us bandwagoning person to person, getting roleclaim after roleclaim, until a whole lot of townie roles have been published for everyone to see (and maybe a few false roles thrown in there from some not-to-good people, too).

Whether or not this is good for the town, i dont really know. But seeing as how everyone else wants to lynch today, why not?

Unvote: No lynch, Vote: PolarBoy

. The reasoning behind a bandwagon day one doesn't matter - the avatar reference is total fluff. You're just someone to pick on. Feel lucky; usually the first person bandwagoned day one isn't lynched.

..Sometimes he's killed off the following night, but that's another point altogether.

Green Crayons · Post Post #105 (isolation #2) » Sun Mar 09, 2003 4:48 pm

So, wait. Why are we even talking about all this "organized random" voting? It's not like everyone else can see who is getting voted for, and jump on or off the voting bandwagon (such as in the Themed Anarchy game). It seems to be a total waste of conversation, if you ask me.

Green Crayons · Post Post #123 (isolation #3) » Mon Mar 10, 2003 6:48 am

IM MAFIA, Yay Look at me!!! LolOLOLOLOllol

Yeah, right. I pulled something similiar on Greylabyrinth's Pop and Rock Mafia 2 when i was mafia. Not that this automatically makes you guilty, but it's day one, so it's the best i have to go off on. (As in, his other posts which added absolutely nothing to the conversation didn't strike me as odd.)

Unvote: Polarboy, Vote: RubberDuck

.

Even if it is a good role, it's can't be that useful if he posts like this all the time.

Uhm. The user doesn't make a role useful or not. I dont care if Rubberduck only types "HI! EYE L1K3 F00D! L3TZ PL@Y!" for the first couple of days, as long as he finally comes out with some really important information later on down the road.

Green Crayons · Post Post #136 (isolation #4) » Mon Mar 10, 2003 10:38 am

You'll have to excuse me for not following D8P's math talk, but here:

1) I dont think CS would have made the game so that we could figure out who was bad on day one.
2) You marked me as guilty. ....And, well, i know i'm innocent. So, yeah. There you go, you're theory is off.

Green Crayons · Post Post #152 (isolation #5) » Mon Mar 10, 2003 5:00 pm

I throw my support behind the "i'm going to vote with my gut," at least for the first couple of days. All this tri-random, etc. stuff is simply getting in the way. The same for the positioning of people - all the ideas are out on the table, but it's getting us nowhere.

Rubberduck's claim reminds me of a role that DP put into one of his games. It was a pickpocket guy who could take an item from anyone who said his name, or something like that. However, once he revealed what his role was, it was useless. I don't think CS would allow a player with that role (but obviously much more powerful; unless if i read it wrong, and he can only investigate people who vote for him, and it's not that he automatically gets investigations of everyone who votes for him) actually explain what it is.

Unvote: Rubberduck

, however. And

Vote: Night Stalker

, because he hasn't posted.

Green Crayons · Post Post #187 (isolation #6) » Tue Mar 11, 2003 6:19 pm

While i'll keep my vote where it is, i am curious as to what Duck has to say. It was a pretty "stupid" thing to do, if he is evil. Drawing a lot of unwanted attention, if you ask me.

Green Crayons · Post Post #195 (isolation #7) » Wed Mar 12, 2003 8:36 am

Unvote: Night Stalker, Vote: Warrior4037

, for reasons that Werebear posted. Although, Night Stalker still hasn't posted once.

Green Crayons · Post Post #249 (isolation #8) » Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:31 am

Believable enough, i guess.

Unvote: Warrior4037

Do you have another suggestion for a lynch candidate, then, Werebear?

Green Crayons · Post Post #257 (isolation #9) » Sat Mar 15, 2003 2:47 pm

Your

mom

could be a suicide bomber!

Oh, wait. We're trying to keep our posts reasonable and pertaining to logic, aren't we? Hum. Okay.

I find both warrior and Rubberduck as crap contenders for the lynch, so i'm not going to put my vote on either of them.

Vote: Night Stalker

. ..Basing that on limited personal suspicions.