Not necessarily.Noober wrote:If there were two small groups of scum and they got to make kills before day one, wouldn't two people have died?
Coron wrote:vote: der hammer
Not necessarily.Noober wrote:If there were two small groups of scum and they got to make kills before day one, wouldn't two people have died?
Coron wrote:vote: der hammer
Twomz (20) wrote:Indeed, there is of course doc protection/roleblocking (if that's the case, gj people, keep up the good work Wink ). Also, one scum group could kill on even nights and the other on odd (such as no vanilla mafia). If we have a SK, they most likely skipped their night 1 kill so they could claim protown vig later on (or so that we wouldn't think there's a SK in the game) (but, we aren't guaranteed a SK of course).
Go back to which question? "Why only one kill if there might be two scum groups" or "Why not necessarily"?Noober wrote:Now apply Occams razor to that and go back to my question.Vyolynce wrote:Do you not read what other people have posted?
Twomz (20) wrote:Indeed, there is of course doc protection/roleblocking (if that's the case, gj people, keep up the good work Wink ). Also, one scum group could kill on even nights and the other on odd (such as no vanilla mafia). If we have a SK, they most likely skipped their night 1 kill so they could claim protown vig later on (or so that we wouldn't think there's a SK in the game) (but, we aren't guaranteed a SK of course).
Does that look like fishing to anyone else?Twomz (63) wrote:Is there some way you [Machiavellian] know that he [Noober] couldn't have preformed the NK?
Don't expect much of a response. He was prodded in one of the minis I'm in (Mentally Challenged, 316) on Friday and still hasn't posted.Commodore Amazing wrote:Keys has been prodded. I thought I got everyone.Vyolynce wrote:Keys is in this game?Commodore Amazing wrote:Not Voting (4) - Bamboomancer, themanhimself, Keys Myaths
Does he know this?
Considering that you yourself were a replacement for Noober in Cheese Mafia, I don't have high hopes of him answering that prod. (Well, that and he's in both other games I'm in and has disappeared from all of them.)Commodore Amazing wrote:The following people have been prodded: Bambomancer, Glork, Coron, Noober, XGreyJoyX, Quig.
I think I see what Twomz is getting at here. I don't think it's enough to definitively nail Nightfall to the wall -- or even force a claim out of him -- but it's at leastTwomz wrote:@ Nightfall: This is actually one of the few times I think it would be detrimental to the town for me to explain exactly why I think your scum, but I will say that although I don't have a direct cop result on you, I do have enough information to draw the conclusion that you're scum.
I agree with pretty much all of this (except the "what's with the Nightfall Wagon" bit). MoS hasn't actually contributed anything to the discussion other than being one-half of two major arguments (one with GJ, one with Coron) that were both largely crap, then calls armlx on doing essentially the same thing.XGreyjoyX wrote:Heh funny mister "My posts consiste of me voting or FoS and nothing else".Mastermind of Sin wrote:looks like he's just trying to follow the crowd without actually contributing.armlx wrote:/me lurks through the semi-random phase......
FOS Noober
FOS Twomz
One is prolly scum.....
FoS: armlx
MoS has been jumping abord bandwagons all game with no reasons stated.
He does so once agian with Nightfall, at least STD (Unvoted),Glork (Just wants him to contribute, if I understand him correctly),BJ (Seems to want a claim). Provided some kind of reasons regardless of wether or not I agree with them at least they provided some kind of rational.
Which bring me to B)Wow, whats with the Nightfall Wagon?
Also I would love to know why BJ, suddenly demands a claim of somebody who A)Just replaced, B)Is no where near critical mass?
Thus I mustVote:MoS, unless he wants to start doing more then just stopping lurking long enough to vote.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Original Roll String: 1d19(STATIC) 1 19-Sided Dice: (9) = 9
he was a godfather cop, though, so that implies scum.
Totally random vote; no real contribution there.Mastermind of Sin wrote:vote: armlx
Note: Huggle Alliance in full effect el oh el, el em ai oh
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Don't even start with me...
Essentially OMGUS vote on GJ. No contribution.Mastermind of Sin wrote:good idea.
unvote, vote: XGrayjoyX
Mastermind of Sin wrote:That's like saying stubbornness and refusal to amend a modding decision is okay
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Of the 6 people voting you, 2 at most are part of the HA, which has no affect on the way we play the game in the first place, so you just need to stfu about the HA and stop making stuff up. Stupid people like you is what got me forcibly replaced in the last game for no good reason, don't even start with me here.
Non-contributing non-sequitor conversation rooted in the relatively recent stupidity between you and Alexander.Mastermind of Sin wrote:I said peoplelikeyou, and I meant that people like you overreacted to nothing, which CAUSED the decision, whether or not you agreed with it once it had happend.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:roflmao.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:try reading. I hear it's good for the intellect
Mastermind of Sin wrote:cuz saying it's a load of shit without pointing out any examples or saying why is really gonna convince anyone with brains...
Aforementioned scintillating converasion (with Coron) regarding validity/merit of GJ wagon. Looks to me like not actually answering the question and just generally being an ass. Also, first instance of hypocracy as you demand examples from Coron without actually providing any to back up your own case.Mastermind of Sin wrote:well you're not the only one with brains here, so why don't you give a stab at using some logic for once?
Pot meets Kettle.Mastermind of Sin wrote:looks like he's just trying to follow the crowd without actually contributing.
FoS: armlx
No idea what this spectacular piece of insight is in reference to.Mastermind of Sin wrote:wow.
"Helpfully" pointing out a post made by then-slacking Glork; no contribution to any wagon discussion.Mastermind of Sin wrote:look up 2 posts from yours...
No reason given; assumed to be agreeing with Glork and myself re: Twomz's fishing.Mastermind of Sin wrote:unvote, vote: twomz
More overwhelming content. You're right, how could I have missed all this?Mastermind of Sin wrote:dum de dum
Wagon-hopping in response to Twomz's (alleged) information. I guess that's contributing, but I've already given my opinion of the Nightfall wagon.Mastermind of Sin wrote:unvote, vote: nightfall
Your longest post to date; does nothing but correct GJ on some of his omissions -- by pointing out old information with no new insight -- and cast aspersions on him...Mastermind of Sin wrote:You, my dear friend, need to pay attention instead of digging yourself a deeper hole. Had you actually been reading the thread, you would know that Twomz claimed to be a mason with a night action that leads him to be certain that Nightfall (formerly Noober) is scum. Nightfall being a recent replacement has nothing to do with it. Twomz has info, so we're pressuring him to claim. I suggest you hop aboard the wagon before it departs and you don't get a chance to vote your scumbuddy.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:you need to learn how to read.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:it's not a tactic. it's just plain truth. It obviously applied to Coron since he's stopped posting altogether, meaning he hasn't been reading the thread at all. It merely applies to you to a lesser degree. Maybe if you took my advice instead of regurgitating your previous statement, I wouldn't have to say it anymore.
Uh, no... it's because we reached the conclusion that Der Hammer was a cop thatNightfall wrote:I like how in your first post you imply that there was likely two godfathers.. Why would that be? Was it because the one that died wasn't yours?
I'm sorry, were you forcibly replaced for an incredibly stupid reason in another mafiaMastermind of Sin wrote:What the hell did that have anything to do with Alexander? Are you on crack? Perhaps you need to reread yetVyolynce wrote:Mastermind of Sin wrote:That's like saying stubbornness and refusal to amend a modding decision is okayMastermind of Sin wrote:Of the 6 people voting you, 2 at most are part of the HA, which has no affect on the way we play the game in the first place, so you just need to stfu about the HA and stop making stuff up. Stupid people like you is what got me forcibly replaced in the last game for no good reason, don't even start with me here.Non-contributing non-sequitor conversation rooted in the relatively recent stupidity between you and Alexander.Mastermind of Sin wrote:I said peoplelikeyou, and I meant that people like you overreacted to nothing, which CAUSED the decision, whether or not you agreed with it once it had happend.again
Looking at the posts before it on the same page, I still can't see which one you're "wow"ing at. None of those looked "wow"-worthy to me, unless you were possibly wowed by Bacde's suggestion that "only deep confusion could have caused [GJ] to keep his vote on MoS for so long and defend it." This is why we have a "quote" function.Mastermind of Sin wrote:Try actually reading the thread. It's obviously in reference to one of the posts just before it.Vyolynce wrote:No idea what this spectacular piece of insight is in reference to.Mastermind of Sin wrote:wow.
Wrong, and that's Nightfall's biggest (ok... only) point in his favor.Twito wrote:Twomz claimed mason and that he has night investigation result that says Nightfall is scum.
This is true.Nightfall wrote:Vyolynce wrote:Wrong, and that's Nightfall's biggest (ok... only) point in his favor.Twito wrote:Twomz claimed mason and that he has night investigation result that says Nightfall is scum.
Also, if that is the only point in my favour, it is because their theory of Twomz=copt is the only point, even as flawed as it is, that they truely have to go against me with.
That's really the only part of your argument (which was very good and much more useful than "learn to read", btw) I'm having trouble following. Taking a neutral perspective on something Nightfall hit upon during his rant, let's look at the possibilities of what Twomz's targeted ability could be, taking into consideration the only information that Noober gave us -- his questioning of the lack of two kills if there are two killing groups:Mastermind of Sin wrote:based of the information we have, it's better to get more info from YOU than from Twomz at this point.
You didTwito wrote:We can ask for clarification and identity of Twomz mason buddy to clear his role better.
Yes, if you're scum. If you're a townie then you still have to figure out who's lying.Twito wrote:Roleclaims are the best way to get information.
While I agree, I don't think that's quite the case people are making against your claim. I believe their argument is that it is an incredibly convenient claim, not that it's outright unbelievable. And they have a valid point there, but even so, I hardly think that's an excuse to lynchNightfall wrote:Why is it that my Doc/Vig claim sounds too good to be true when, but you see no harm or dificulty in believing that Twomz is a mason/I'm guessing tracker like hybrid?
It is the little things like this that have confused me so much this game.
o_OCogito Ergo Sum wrote:Okay, I'll do a re-read tomorrow and share my thoughts.
Until then,unvote, random vote: Glork.
BabyJesus wrote:fos everyone not voting for the fake doc
Unles you yourself are a doc and believe that you're the only one. But I somehow doubt that applies to all seven of the NF voters who aren't Twomz.Vyolynce wrote:When did voting for a claimed doc on Day One suddenly become the correct play, convenient claim or no?
For me, that would probably depend on the rest of the deaths (if any) that night. For instance, what do you do when a claimed doc livesBabyJesus wrote:What do you do when a claimed doc lives? auto lynch him then?
Which one/ The one where you made a guess as to the exact numbers and variety of scum we have to deal with, citing "expected for a 20-person game" even though we already have a mason/x role out there that by its nature defies expectations, and possibly another doc/vig hybrid role on top of that? The one where you hypothesized that theCogito Ergo Sum wrote:Good job ignoring my post there, Vyotomorrow'slynch.
Max wrote:Oh sorry for not posting I have been reading everything I have been doing lots of revising. Oh Nightfall is actingwierd slightly and I think he is mafia.End this post now
Max wrote:Prod/Replace requests: XGreyJoyX (last post 5/10), Coron (last post 4/28 ), Max (last post 5/8 ), Fritzler (last post 5/10), armlx (last post 5/10)
O.K if you use US date format please state at the begining whether it is english or american as not all members are american thankyou
Since when? I think you're confusing "role cop" with "alignment cop". AFAIK, the latter is the industry-standard, so to speak.Twito wrote:Coz you also have to claim their role. Not just whether they are innocent or not.
I wouldn't suspect that Twomz investigated me at all. It could merely be a matter of him not believing that a scum would so brazenly defend a buddy like I did -- even though I still maintain that I wasn't so much defending NF as I was attacking Twomz's shoddy case against him, but that's just semantics. Anyone wanting to vote me is perfectly justified in doing so, although it would be a shame to break the roll we're on now.viper0933 wrote:That makes me think you targetted Vyolynce last night. I'm not actually so sure about that, but I think it's pretty likely.Twomz wrote:I'llvote: Vyolyncefor now because of his defence of Nightfall yesterday. But,i'm nowhere near as convinced of him being mafia.
What you originally said was this:Twito wrote:Blocking GF blocks the kill if kill is made by GF. Or that's what I'm used to.Vyolynce wrote:blocking a GF may block the kill made by a goon
Which to me looks like "blocking GF = blocking any mafia kill".Twito wrote:Also Godfather normally sends in mafias nightkill and if roleblocked blocks him the kill can be prevented.
No, it's still there.Mastermind of Sin wrote:this was supposed to have a "not" after "reason", but someone seems to have deleted that post.Mastermind of Sin wrote:vote: xGreyJoyxI see no reason to go back to my previous suspicions.
So you're admitting full tracker (mason) now?Twomz wrote:Oh! Before we lynch... I followed Vyolynce and he didn't do anything (could still be a goon that didn't attack though).