SpyreX I am so glad you are town.SpyreX wrote:Yea and that little toss away doesn't do much.
This is one of those SERIOUS BUSINESS starts:
Either we see another PR claim and move from there or we call a dead man a dead man.
Who are we lynching?
SpyreX I am so glad you are town.SpyreX wrote:Yea and that little toss away doesn't do much.
This is one of those SERIOUS BUSINESS starts:
Either we see another PR claim and move from there or we call a dead man a dead man.
I very much agree with this read.inHimshallibe wrote:TOWN
inHim
We're masons, stupid. We should be having this sort of discussion in the QT, not in public.Gorrad wrote:DGB, I want you to claim. I don't care if it's real or fake...
I will join this wagon after I see a vote count.SpyreX wrote:Unvote, Vote: Gorrad
SUMMON LOS ROPOS
K, so you're scum with Xalxe and Antihero? Is it just the three of you, or are there more?iamausername wrote:Xalxe is also scum.
Because he's bus'ing his buddies!Xalxe wrote:Okay, rephrase:
Why is iamausername scum?
You know that laughingDutch one wrote:...but it's an easy tactic to place yourself in the "town" list.
...because you placed yourself in the townie-list, you don't have to prove anyone, and you get away with it.
...but I do think you are trying to make yourself look innocent in a sneaky way.
...If you want to make a list like this that again (with a good intention): "Don't place yourself anywhere in the list".
You guys are killing me.Cyberbob wrote:Dutch one wrote:DGB, I know you are making a list like this a lot (other people say that, so I assume that is true), but it's an easy tactic to place yourself in the "town" list. With making this list you more influence in the lynching system because it makes people almost think they have to prove themself that they are townies. And because it's your list, because you are doing this often and because you placed yourself in the townie-list, you don't have to prove anyone, and you get away with it.
I'm not saying that I think you are scum (not yet), but I do think you are trying to make yourself look innocent in a sneaky way. I think you are just doing this to gain influence.
If you want to make a list like this that again (with a good intention): "Don't place yourself anywhere in the list". You look scummy if you do that. Then you are just waiting for someone to critisize it
IGMEOY: DGBYou know, I actually find myself agreeing with much of this.
Another one? I'm going to need to have my organ of laughter removed if I want to live.Xalxe wrote:I like this one. Can I keep him?!?
Jokes aren't as funny if you have to explain them, but alright. Dutch one is making it sound, emphasizing with repetition, that listing myself as town on MY town list is clever, devilish, devious, influential, and a really powerful ploy. But really, people would have to be complete morons to fall for something that I've done in virtually every game, for years, especially since I never "fooled" anyone with this before. So, I'm just cracking up at the thought of this particular bunch of players having to be the dumbest ever assembled, for Dutch one's argument to carry any weight.Xalxe wrote:...Don't just assume we understand all your criticisms.
WOW... this guyJerbs wrote:@Dutch
Are you scum? If not, why are you lying?
Putting myself on my own town list does that?Cyberbob wrote:I don't think you're scummy for it but, intentional or not, it does kind of create that feeling of "oh gosh I can't challenge DGB what if she ~spontaneously turns on me~" in other people's minds. Not always the healthiest thing.
Are you trying to insinuate that I amChevre wrote:DrippingGoofBall's reaction to Dutch one's post is quite odd. It's as if he's unearthed a truth that DrippingGoofBall just doesn't want to believe.
<3nocase wrote:unvote. vote: chevre.that last post was awesomely indecisive.
Aw, really? Who?Dutch one wrote:@DGB, you are acting so extremely aggresive, you are voting for persons just because of the fact that they voted for you.
I do believe that Jerbs has interrupted his "relentless pestering" of Dutchone to vote you.Chevre wrote:Jerbs is continuing to be relentless in his pestering of Dutch one. Jerbs, could you answer your own questions? They aren't specific to Dutch one, so I figure I should ask them to you as well.
But, case or no case, you're still scum, and you need rope.Torture Chamber
Chevre (blinding us all with Shakespearian English scum-tell, spreading worthless suspicion scum-tell, asking pointless questions scum-tell, reptilian mind scum-tell)
You should come to Goofbash, you're a perfect perfect fit for target demographic!Korlash wrote:It's a flaw that has impeded both potential job opprotunities and chances at procreation my entire life. :Sadface:
I'm not interested to see you try to talk us out of your lynch. Once posted, you scummy words cannot be deleted or unread.Chevre wrote:Can you go further into detail? I cannot really defend against three to four word case points.
Gorrad will be vig'ed.inHimshallibe wrote:PEDIT: OMG HOW DID WE EVER STRAY FROM GORRAD?
Yep, I had a feeling that Chevre enjoys a good wall. A lot of it was filler.farside22 wrote:Because you ignore the case on cheve and call her town based on one long post.
^^^Chevre wrote:Why didn't you read it? Are you not interested in having the town win, which is most effectively done by the comprehension of all information possible?inHimshallibe wrote:Didn't read it, still voting Chevre.
SpyreX, you are like driftwood in the ocean.SpyreX wrote:Actually a decent point has been raised:
@Sera:
What made you jump immediately to 'town wacky hijinks' instead of him lying as scum or telling the truth?
R U C rius?Antihero wrote:OK, well why did you only quote a small portion of the wall Chevre typed?
He's the opposite of you.Chevre wrote:DrippingGoofBall, since you believe so strongly that Jerbs is town, what from his posts gives you that indication? I must not be seeing it, you know, because my vote remains on him.
No, Jerbs is a hive-kicking townie. You need to re-think your assumptions.Dutch one wrote:Sorry DGB, but that doesn't make sense. Just look at all his posts and everything you find is scummie or atleast something a town idiot would do. I don't see anything he posted yet that convinces me he isn't scum.
Right here, I'm going to hold my tongue. I'll just say: "No."Dutch one wrote:And even if he is a townie, I don't think his death will harm the town. So he is a safe choice in my opinion
Yeah, really. He's a nO0b that's never seen how scum operates. He's attacking, taking clear stances, putting his neck under the blade. It just so happens that he would be wise to vote for his town reads. Which gives me an idea.curiouskarmadog wrote:really DGB? really?Dutch one wrote:Sorry DGB, but that doesn't make sense. Just look at all his posts and everything you find is scummie or atleast something a town idiot would do. I don't see anything he posted yet that convinces me he isn't scum. And even if he is a townie, I don't think his death will harm the town. So he is a safe choice in my opinion
You have my attention.Cyberbob wrote:Or not.Vote: CKD, would still be more willing to tell the Antihero story to anyone willing to listen however.
OK. That's your first actual scumtell worthy of the name. Who keeps high profile, and low profile. List please.Dutch one wrote:a scum will try to keep a low-profile.
Someone else educate this kid on Greyhounds.Dutch one wrote:Chevre [...] Se doesn't have many allies/support so I don't think she is scum.
If SpyreX fails to deliver moonbeams, we're just going to have to string him up. So far, my mailbox is empty.Seraphim wrote:Hey, DGB, what do you think of SpryeX?
This looks like a fantabulous lynch candidate to me.Kmd4390 wrote:Wow, all these pages already? Uhh I'll try to get around to it tonight, but my only real chance is probably 3 or 4 in the morning and I don't really have any opportunities after tonight to sleep for a few days. Working 14 hours tomorrow up through midnight, then gotta leave at 5 am the next morning to go out of state for a few days.
Who else fits this description? List please.nocase wrote:xalxe's posts are so cynical and sneakily light on actual scum-hunting-related content that i find it difficult to believe that they're coming from the perspective of an uninformed townie trying to find scum.
^^^^SpyreX wrote:POWER WORDS 9000
Don't worry, your buddy will be replaced before he gets hammered. Calm down.RedCoyote wrote:What? You can't be serious. Lynch someone before they can post?
Someone tell me you two are just pulling my leg, because this is one of the very few absolutes I'd have about the game of Mafia. You don't lynch someone before letting them talk. I mean, what the hell are we supposed to do with the results, regardless of what he flips?
You forgot to vote Gorrad.Xalxe wrote:Again, case or you're talking out of your ass.
Read SpyreX above.Xalxe wrote:What's the case?!? I seriously don't get it. If ANYONE wants me to change my views, you best have backup reasoning.
And the Not-Reading-The-Game Award goes to...DrippingGoofball wrote:^^^^SpyreX wrote:POWER WORDS 9000
MOONBEAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
VOTE: Gorrad
We only have one lynch per day ;_;farside22 wrote:I feel assed out that my Sera suspicious falls on deaf ears.
You can't worry about looking scummy if you're going to hunt scum. Just hunt the scum down. Who cares what people think as long as you help mow down the evil ones?Dutch one wrote:what is kind of scummie, and it will make it harder to jump back at my old vote.
I voted immediately AFTER the votecount.Xalxe wrote:So the mod is wrong then?
Say something about it!