You heard wrong
RVS aside, I would like everyone to know that I am rocking out to Bruce Spr
KMD: did you notice the flavor shout out we got?
Even when we destroy each other, our
Why wouldn't someone be serious in the so-called RVS?Anon wrote: Why are you asking if someone is serious in the random voting stage?
Actually, Anon.. THIS^^ is scummy.Ythan wrote:Yes the five posts made by one of the roughly half of total players who have posted so far have been more suspicious than anything else in the last page and a half or so.
I am not interested in your bet, but you are right about the fact that Day 1 will be short. EVERY day will be short, due to this being a quick game.A clergyman with a hoop wrote:Who wants to make a deal? This is an exclusive offer - the first person who agrees to it, gets it. I'm offering a 50/50 bet to control my vote for the entirity of Day 1 (by the way it's going now, it won't be very long). However, if you lose the bet, I get to control your vote.
I roll a 10-sided dice (in thread), and if it's odd I get your vote. If it's even you get my vote. Hurry now!
Making sure you remembered.A clergyman with a hoop wrote:What was the point in posting that?camn wrote: I am not interested in your bet, but you are right about the fact that Day 1 will be short. EVERY day will be short, due to this being a quick game.
ORLY?A clergyman with a hoop wrote:*votescamn wrote: Making sure you remembered.
I don't want to see you flopping yourvotearound Tuesday evening saying "I forgot the deadline was so soon!!"
GOSH!
That is totally part of the case. That, plus the fact that I love riding the edge, are why my vote stays for now. I wanna see how this plays out.Ythan wrote:Has the fact that Nikanor's first post was spent following Kmd's RV been included in the case?Nikanor wrote:Vote: camn.
I've never played with KMD before, but I hear he's a good player. If he hasn't found scum by now, I'd be surprised.
Nikanor wrote: Me not knowing that there was no n0 would be ridiculous.
Nikanor wrote:... I'd have to know if there was a night zero because I'd have to kill somebody.
Wow.Miserable At Best wrote:RAGEEEE.Drippereth wrote:METHINKS IT'S TIME FOR MaB TO GO.
DGB is in charge of voting though.
Wait, didn't Nik propose I go in Day 1? Yeah lets SO go with what scum said.
Unless you're scum with him?
Quick games move quickly... and I think I was pretty clear as to why I was voting you.Miserable At Best wrote: Does anyone care to point out exactly why they're targeting me, or is this how all quick games go on this site? (Serious question, by the way.)
And, apparently, a sleeping-girl molester.Drippereth wrote:Please don't forget that SpyreX is scum.
Haylen wrote:Unsurprised, you spot camn and SpyreX sleeping peacefully in one corner; curled up together, SpyreX's arm was draped over her waist lovingly and protectively.
I actually was trying to avoid my typical night-1 death.Ythan wrote:Yeah no. I was asking her about it and she was being elusive.
I know it is hard to explain your predecessor... but here is the meat of my vote.camn wrote:Quick games move quickly... and I think I was pretty clear as to why I was voting you.Miserable At Best wrote: Does anyone care to point out exactly why they're targeting me, or is this how all quick games go on this site? (Serious question, by the way.)
What you saidwas MAXIMUM scummy, and I don't know who you have been playing with that lets you get away with stuff like that.
Do you want to explain that post?
Nika-scum tried to throw some crap on you. We call that 'distancing' and it is a classic scum move. It could be a scum-double-move, with you as town... until YOU TRIED TO USE IT AS YOUR DEFENSE.
You honestly said (sarcastically i might add) that SINCE scum-nika was distancing from you, you should actually be cleared.
this, my friend, does not fly. Please try again, and keep the sarcasm to yourself.
ALSO, Drippereth is town. (Or she is scum and is going to kill us all, in which case this game is already lost) Voting for someone who is obv-town is no way to convince us you are town.
OK, look dude....Ythan wrote:Are you dead yet? Were you dead earlier when you said you wanted to post your thoughts?Pulindar wrote:And as I said before you were trying to get people to lynch me immediately, that would have stopped me as death kinda stops people. I haven't read the rules, but I think I'm not allowed to post even a BAH post after I die.
We can lynch him just fine by Saturday without you post-bombing him.Ythan wrote:Guy had bad luck replacing in. If he deserves more playing time there are a ton of other games. Inthisgame he is obv scum and should be lynched.
Neither does this.Ythan wrote:This doesn't count as contributing.Parama wrote:Pulindar, just read clergy in ISO. I was going to quote things that were scummy but I ended up quoting half their posts.
1. Ythan is totally knocking this game off track...and I watch in horror.Anon wrote:Camn, why arent you voting for someone?
ISO 33 redeems her though.lolmaeisaccusingsomebodyofactivelurking
I always breadcrumb. Regardless of role. And every time, pointing it out is scummy.A clergyman with a hoop wrote:Camn needs to learn to stop breadcrumbing in the RVS.
ProbAnon wrote:Nikanor wrote:Are you serious when you say Parama is scum, Drip?Vote: Nikanor.
I am that good.
1> I don't explain town-reads.Ythan wrote:camn
-Why is your Parama read town and not null? Is tunneling pro-town to you?
-Is McZ really lurking, or just not around?
-As for your read on me, don't bother doing anything aside from complaining or anything.
Don't bother.Kmd4390 wrote:Guys, stop posting so much.
Guess I should read up.
Not really.Ythan wrote:There is a purpose to the bickering. You'll see.
Ythan wrote:I'm not trying to live longer, I plan on dying tonight.
Can I get an answer?camn wrote:I have a serious question for you Ythan..
Why do you think you will die tonight?
It nags at me that he said that.Anon wrote:What is the point of this question?camn wrote:Ythan wrote:I'm not trying to live longer, I plan on dying tonight.Can I get an answer?camn wrote:I have a serious question for you Ythan..
Why do you think you will die tonight?
So are you, but I don't mind. I like attention!Anon wrote:Camn, you are focusing on a player that is likely town. I dont know what are your opinions on recent events. Care to share please?
I am exploring the possibility.Kmd4390 wrote:Are people suggesting that Dramonic is a scum gunsmith?
But they say a lot more.Ythan wrote:Weaboo has three fewer posts.
Is calling someone stupid who wants YOU lynched any better?Ythan wrote:<snip> parroting it to discredit someone who wants you lynch is just stupid. You're not stupid right?
No, he would just get vigged.Nachomamma8 wrote:<snip> IMO, and if he was vig hunting, I'd think that he'd simply claim vig and get it over with. The chance of him dying without the scumteam learning anything at all would be extremely small...<snip>.
And no.. it is a GREAT argument that if you ARE scum, you are not an investigator.. and your fakeclaim is ENTIRELY fake.. not just kind of fakedramonic wrote:Also, this is a very good point against the people saying I'm vig hunting.
There is no upper limit to that particular variable in my world.Nachomamma8 wrote:But doesn't it sound too ridiculously nefarious and complicated to you?camn wrote:Anyway, theory-wise it isn't weird, it's awesome...
Maemuki wrote:...hai guys. Ahm. Nacho's a lurker lynch isn't he? Can somebody explain me why a lurker lynch is better than another lynch? (Please explain it like you would explain it to a 4 year old.)
camn wrote:Lurking IS scummy.. especially in a quick game like this.
Imagine you are scum.
Imagine there is a giant town-town battle.. like Clergyhoops vs. Drippereth.
What is your optimal play?
OBV. Stfu and let it happen.
Also.. lurkers don't get nightkilled.
Lurkers KILL us in endgame.. because we have no read on them. We have no posts to dig through.
Right now, we are ahead. We lynched one scum and have avoided some nighttime carnage. We can afford to try and hit some lurkerscum NOW.
Convince me, then.Ythan wrote:Would really rather lynch some of the obvious scum today.
What IS your opinion on Nacho?Ythan wrote:I am not convinced and also I already had nachos today.
Can I take that to mean you had TOWN READS on everyone that you did not comment on?Ythan wrote:The rest I have no comment on. I'm not explaining town reads.
OK.Ythan wrote:Old post should have read that I wasn't explaining town OR null reads.
Actually, that would be the opposite, if it were accurate.dramonic wrote: A bit like how you have null or town on everyone in your list?.