Mafia 103 - Ktown Mafia (Game Over)

danakillsu · Post Post #563 (isolation #0) » Mon Dec 07, 2009 8:24 am

How do I get into a new game?

danakillsu · Post Post #570 (isolation #1) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:59 am

/confirm

danakillsu · Post Post #571 (isolation #2) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:00 am

did Torqez's vote get transfered to me, or did someone actually vote to lynch me?

danakillsu · Post Post #572 (isolation #3) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:15 am

stupid question: how do I make the text of my post bold?

danakillsu · Post Post #573 (isolation #4) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:16 am

/b like this? /b

danakillsu · Post Post #574 (isolation #5) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:16 am

nope, not like that.

danakillsu · Post Post #576 (isolation #6) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:25 am

b[vote: wicked]/b

He's acting a bit scummy and a little too eager for information...

danakillsu · Post Post #577 (isolation #7) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:26 am

vote:wicked

danakillsu · Post Post #578 (isolation #8) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:27 am

man, it's about time I got that right!

danakillsu · Post Post #579 (isolation #9) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:28 am

of course, this means I

unvote CrueKnight

danakillsu · Post Post #580 (isolation #10) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:42 am

I find it interesting that the only people who would seem to want Scott brosius dead are CrueKnight and Furry. Scott Brosius only posted a couple of times. So actually...

unvote
vote:CrueKnight

danakillsu · Post Post #583 (isolation #11) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:53 am

Thanks for getting me started on some strategy, Rhinox. But what if they think we won't be able to figure out who is mafia based on who is nked so they off whoever they feel threatened by?

danakillsu · Post Post #586 (isolation #12) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:37 pm

scott voted for crueknight before dying. he also disputed with furry

danakillsu · Post Post #588 (isolation #13) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:04 pm

I just joined the game as a replacement. how could I have killed scott?

danakillsu · Post Post #603 (isolation #14) » Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:52 am

My vote is currently on one of them [lurker], in Torquez/his replacement.

Was Torquez a lurker? I'm not quite sure I understand this sentence.

danakillsu · Post Post #605 (isolation #15) » Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:17 am

mod: request prod for malpascp

because he has not posted for a week. we may have to lynch him for lurking soon.

He has already been prodded.

danakillsu · Post Post #607 (isolation #16) » Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:29 am

Thanks, mod. You too, Faraday.

danakillsu · Post Post #619 (isolation #17) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:49 am

Just because there is a deadline does not mean we have to wait for the deadline to come before we do anything.

Agreed. But what is there to do if I've already cast my vote? Anyone who has not voted should.

danakillsu · Post Post #652 (isolation #18) » Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:26 pm

just making sure everyone knows I'm still here.

danakillsu · Post Post #654 (isolation #19) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:06 am

danakillsu wrote:1: He's acting a bit scummy and a 2: little too eager for information...

1: How? Anything in particular?

2: Can you explain where I was doing this? Also, why does it mean I'm scum?

Well, I'm not voting for you anymore, so I obviously thought I could make a stronger case elsewhere.

danakillsu · Post Post #662 (isolation #20) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:56 am

Also, are you saying you don't think I'm scum anymore?

Yep. Absolutely

danakillsu · Post Post #677 (isolation #21) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:06 am

Top three:
CrueKnight
Furry
ummm....Cruelty?

danakillsu · Post Post #687 (isolation #22) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:53 am

Torque replacement (Dana I think)

Because of what Torque said or what I said?

danakillsu · Post Post #689 (isolation #23) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:36 am

I have decided (somewhat abruptly) that cades is much, much more detrimental than wicked. Let me quote his entire contribution to the game.

cades wrote:
checking in

cades wrote:
was Vigilante a townie?

cades wrote:
I'm still here, just watching, waiting.

cades wrote:
post, just checking in.

If we're going to lynch for lurking/non-contribution, let's shift the kunk/mal wagon onto this guy.

well, it's fine with me, but I'm not switching my vote until a couple others agree. I find CrueKnight scummier, but I'm always willing to lynch for non-contribution.

danakillsu · Post Post #705 (isolation #24) » Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:18 am

unvote vote: cades

danakillsu · Post Post #722 (isolation #25) » Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:42 am

Do you think it is better to vote for cades because of his noncontribution so far, or better to vote for someone suspected?

Whats your opinion of voting for noncontribution?

You have any reasons that haven't been brought up for voting anyone?

idk, it's hard. Maybe I should let cades get replaced.

It's almost always a good thing.

No.