Open 111- Immunity Mafia: Mod abandon

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #7 (isolation #0) » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:30 am

/confirm

Vote: White Caste

obvscum

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #9 (isolation #1) » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:48 am

Simple. We grab your arms and legs, and get the biggest guy to punch you in the balls until you call the boat guy on your intercom. You do want children, right?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #11 (isolation #2) » Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:10 pm

I don't like hamburgers.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #24 (isolation #3) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:56 am

Why? Look at all the other options and features available...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #28 (isolation #4) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:48 pm

I elaborated on the plan...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #31 (isolation #5) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:35 pm

I elaborated on the plan...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #33 (isolation #6) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:48 pm

my name does not include the phrazsez weenerschnitzel. BASTARD FOOL!

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #35 (isolation #7) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:20 pm

Unvote; Vote: Wall-E

For overreaction to my non-overreaction.

Eve isn't going to like you anymore, Wall-E.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #56 (isolation #8) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:49 am

Hm... The guy seems to want a speedlynch. Care giving a better reason? And Wall-E, I'm just messing with you.

Unvote

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #58 (isolation #9) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:55 am

But why add a third vote without reasoning? He could have actually random-voted.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #62 (isolation #10) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:38 pm

I feel safer already...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #64 (isolation #11) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:30 pm

Touche...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #66 (isolation #12) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:29 pm

Any comments on any players you do or don't find scummy, Brock?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #111 (isolation #13) » Sat Jan 31, 2009 3:19 am

Let's see here...

My Wall-E vote was a crazy OMGUS vote intended to bring up some discussion, which it did, by showing that: 1)Dejkha is coming up with reasons to not vote me that I find questionable, and 2)KMD realized that she was starting to get too enthusiastic about getting people on my wagon, and backed off. I repeated my silly post, Mr. Troll, because no one was giving me credit for my escape plan

.

So, in summary:

Zorblag: Town, for taking a logical standpoint and making reasonable questions about me and other players.
Empking's Alt: Unknown
Brocktree: I don't see how a trap set in an open game would be very effective, assuming that the Mafia have some intelligence. Minor suspicion.
don_johnson: Unknown
Wall-E: Minor suspicion for taking a post I intended to be a joke and trying to make it look scummy.
White Castle: Unknown
Light-Kun: Minor scumminess for voting dejkha even though you admitted that the case you presented at the early part of your post was not that good.
Dejkha: Slight Town, but could go both ways, as although he initially looked scummy he responded quite well to questions.
KMD: Slight Town, but could go both ways, as he did actively pressure Dejkha, but a little bit too much, in my opinion.

More later, but for now:

Unvote; Vote Light-Kun

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #114 (isolation #14) » Sat Jan 31, 2009 4:41 am

That's not really a trap, it's a strategy.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #122 (isolation #15) » Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:58 am

He's ignoring dejkha's perfectly reasonable defense. I admit there are several people doing that, but he seems the most close-minded.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #159 (isolation #16) » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:21 pm

dj: Expand on my joke vote? I'm scummy because I'm joking that I'm voting WC because he has a hamburger avatar?
Wall-E: I'm not trying to say everything I've "done" is a joke. But my OMGUS for you and my RV on WC was certainly a joke. You are the one who overreacted, not me.
Light-Kun: Dejkha does have good points. He's been reiterating his FoS reasons a zillion times and no one is noticing that he's making sense. I picked you for my vote largely because you admitted that the reasons everyone else is pressuring dejkha aren't that hot, but you still voted him. It makes no sense.
KMD: I'm not done with my read on people. Hence the "More later" part.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #163 (isolation #17) » Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:06 pm

DJ: Because I thought up the joke after I random voted.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #166 (isolation #18) » Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:30 pm

PRUFT

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #174 (isolation #19) » Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:10 am

Wall-E: Could you elaborate?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #259 (isolation #20) » Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:36 am

Empking is always an anti-town bastard, even when he's town.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #264 (isolation #21) » Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:26 pm

Yes. In most of the games I've seen him in, he acts that way, and I'll try to give you some examples (or someone else can do it), but it's at least three or four. I'm inclined to not find that scummy, therefore.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #308 (isolation #22) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:45 am

I think Empking is trying to get us into WIFOM.

Unvote; Vote: Empking

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #313 (isolation #23) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:10 am

K explained the reasons very well. Quotes are useless if you can't explain them.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #315 (isolation #24) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:13 am

Your meta, and how we should lynch you or not based on your meta.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #317 (isolation #25) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:23 am

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #324 (isolation #26) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:20 pm

ho hum... What's that?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #326 (isolation #27) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:24 pm

Hm... hohum is jumping onto the most convenient suspicion ASAP. Not good.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #383 (isolation #28) » Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:32 pm

I'm voting Empking because he's being annoying and seems to be trying to distract us from possible scum partners. Hohum, I merely expressed how I found that interesting back on page 14.

Next post: Empking says, "Quotes Please"

Wanna bet? I bet you a million zoobucks!

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #397 (isolation #29) » Tue Feb 03, 2009 3:07 pm

This is turning into a WIFOM between people claiming that scumminess = scumtells and people claiming that scumminess = no scumtells. Then of course, you could go into a neverending paradox if you consider that WIFOMing is or is not a scumtell.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #400 (isolation #30) » Tue Feb 03, 2009 3:24 pm

Just an apology? So now you're taking bribes?

FoS: Wall-E

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #424 (isolation #31) » Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:43 pm

Why does it make no difference to you, ho hum? You're giving yourself the ability to switch votes towards wherever the town is heading whenever you please, and I definitely find that scummy. Empking, I don't do quotes. You keep speaking redundant crap to distract the world that you're scum. Dejkha really doesn't seem like scum to me, and I don't get why people think I'm scum for trying to explain why she doesn't seem bad.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #426 (isolation #32) » Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:53 pm

Yes. And your point?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #429 (isolation #33) » Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:45 pm

Brock: You're saying it's bad to make a vote and stick to your reasoning behind it? Don't try to pull the old deadline excuse on me, because it is a stupid overused scumtell.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #431 (isolation #34) » Wed Feb 04, 2009 2:06 pm

I'm standing by my vote.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #433 (isolation #35) » Wed Feb 04, 2009 2:31 pm

Hi ThAdmiral!

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #435 (isolation #36) » Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:23 pm

Why is it a shit case? You're not making any sense.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #467 (isolation #37) » Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:21 pm

Scum vibes, Caboose? It called my attention that Wall-E didn't want to pressure Emp at all. All he wanted was an apology, and poof! no more vote.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #469 (isolation #38) » Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:51 pm

1. Yes
2. Yes/No
3. Yes

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #473 (isolation #39) » Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:29 am

Wall-E, I'm criticizing your initial look at Emp, not what you did after the insincere apology.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #532 (isolation #40) » Fri Feb 06, 2009 1:48 pm

The whole dejkha could be scum because even scum scumhunt in this game idea is major WIFOM. FoS to anyone that supports this case.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #535 (isolation #41) » Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:13 pm

It still promotes WIFOM just by starting discussion on that possibility. You seem to be wanting people to get confused.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #539 (isolation #42) » Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:33 pm

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #541 (isolation #43) » Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:47 pm

No. At light.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #555 (isolation #44) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:06 am

FoS is not a good case to lynch dejkha. And Empking isn't only being annoying, he's distracting the game, and trying to get us into a WIFOM, which is scummier that his usual self.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #558 (isolation #45) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:13 am

I don't like that you condoned lurking at the same time that you criticized Emp.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #560 (isolation #46) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:21 am

No one has posted more scumminess than Emp. That is clear.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #564 (isolation #47) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:06 am

I'd like a votecount please... I don't get what advantage Brock sees in keeping Emp alive.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #572 (isolation #48) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 10:29 am

What the heck is that supposed to mean? I think Mafia would go after the other Mafia first, as it gets them town brownie points and gives them a free kill that is more likely to hit town than scum.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #574 (isolation #49) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 10:52 am

I thought that was what you were asking.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #576 (isolation #50) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:01 am

And your point...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #579 (isolation #51) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:10 am

You sound like a justifier to not lynch scum. This changes my perception of you.

Unvote; Vote: Dejkha

. Also, VC please.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #584 (isolation #52) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:23 pm

You're contradicting yourself, dejkha.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #587 (isolation #53) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:30 pm

OMG. WIFOM. NO. You're whacking my scumdar with a shovel now.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #590 (isolation #54) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:57 pm

PRUFT. I thought dejkha was pretty ok until she came up with this.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #606 (isolation #55) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:37 pm

That must have been the worst votecount in the history of votecounts. Dej, you've made yourself five times as scummy since you started talking about scum scumhunting.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #609 (isolation #56) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:43 pm

Wha? Do you mind quoting? Not too much though, as that would make me a hypocrite.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #616 (isolation #57) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:56 pm

No, it's not fine. He wants to follow scum, and trust them until they finish serving the town's purpose. There are more than a billion ways this could backfire.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #618 (isolation #58) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:59 pm

CONTRADICTION ALERT^^^

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #621 (isolation #59) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:18 pm

Did you not read my second sentence?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #623 (isolation #60) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:27 pm

Scum kills. I fail to see how it couldn't backfire.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #627 (isolation #61) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:39 pm

Scum can't be trusted. It wouldn't work.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #629 (isolation #62) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:43 pm

YES IT IS! You can't just have scum on a leash like that, especially when you don't know who they are! If you find that someone's scum, you lynch them. Period!

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #641 (isolation #63) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 2:45 am

Ugh. Please stop annoying us. I sincerely hope you are replaced soon. Stop flooding the thread with irrelevant information. The WIFOM is you vs. dej. By being so fracking annoying it looks like you're trying to distract us from dej, thus the WIFOM. And STOP SAYING QUOTES PLEASE! You're driving me crazy!

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #645 (isolation #64) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:16 am

Wait. I didn't understand your last post.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #654 (isolation #65) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:31 am

So your brother is the one about to get lynched in Grimmafia... Looks like lynchaliciousness runs in your family. Scum would definitely work together to out town first, and your argument is a bunch of bull fecal matter.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #660 (isolation #66) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:41 pm

Wait. Was that a hammer?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #663 (isolation #67) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:46 pm

Rofl!

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #668 (isolation #68) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:39 pm

If we had gotten Dej to believe he had hammered, we would have gotten a truthful claim. Oh well, that's what happens with gambits.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #670 (isolation #69) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:55 pm

Hammer. Now.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #680 (isolation #70) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 2:23 pm

2 words: LAY MAN'S

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #683 (isolation #71) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 2:25 pm

He is? I didn't notice that.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #688 (isolation #72) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 2:30 pm

Where is our mod anyway?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #692 (isolation #73) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 2:47 pm

I think we're not getting much of use from ThAd for the present.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #694 (isolation #74) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 2:53 pm

I'm eager to lynch dej, because I'm pretty sure he's scum. There's not much more discussion we're going to get from him other than "My theory is good" "No, your theory is bad and a scumtell" and "No, my theory is good. And I'm vanilla."

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #706 (isolation #75) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:52 pm

Well, Caboose just turned jumpy on us.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #709 (isolation #76) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:57 pm

Still seems a little jumpy, though.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #740 (isolation #77) » Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:46 pm

Was that really a hammer? I don't understand Zorblag's argument. Just because I post short things doesn't mean that they're devoid of content. I don't like Kieran for that quick mind switch thing. Dej, what were/are you?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #750 (isolation #78) » Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:06 am

Who found WC interesting yesterday? Was someone mildly rolefishing as to WC's alignment? Who did you notice paid attention to WC's actions? These questions are for everybody.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #766 (isolation #79) » Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:34 am

Hohum is being too opportunistic and looking for someone to find suspicious.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #769 (isolation #80) » Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:35 am

Also, I'm pretty sure there wasn't a doublekill.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #810 (isolation #81) » Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:40 am

Notice that hohum made a freudian slip last page in his response to KMD.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #842 (isolation #82) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:14 am

KMD is using Dejkha's logic, but he knows he's not going to be lynched for it because of yesterday. Scum.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #844 (isolation #83) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:23 am

Unvote; Vote: KMD

Forgot. Sorry.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #847 (isolation #84) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:42 am

Excellent.

Unvote

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #851 (isolation #85) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:03 am

Wow, Brock. I test a player to see if he can defend himself logically and not flailingly and you call me scum.

FoS:Brocktree

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #861 (isolation #86) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:27 pm

Caboose, please elaborate.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #883 (isolation #87) » Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:51 am

I made a mistake, and Brock is voting me. Same thing with don. It's a case by case situation.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #885 (isolation #88) » Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:02 am

Caboose

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #889 (isolation #89) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:25 am

Zorb: I intended to test his logic, and since he gave a good answer, my vote was a mistake.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #891 (isolation #90) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:46 am

"Hey scum, let's form a temporary partnership, shall we?"

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #893 (isolation #91) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:16 am

...and what you said in the post right before mine.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #898 (isolation #92) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:38 am

You implied it.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #900 (isolation #93) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:09 am

Afatchic is very active in another game.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #902 (isolation #94) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:39 am

I'm not.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #905 (isolation #95) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:56 am

I'm not. Did I say anything actually about the game?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #926 (isolation #96) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:00 pm

Emp, please elaborate on my false claims you say I've made, and Caboose, stop taking my mistake as a scumtell.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #928 (isolation #97) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:49 pm

It's called "changing your opinions"

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #932 (isolation #98) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:25 pm

PRUFT

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #934 (isolation #99) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:08 pm

PRUFT

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #936 (isolation #100) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:35 pm

Posted Right Under for Truthery.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #938 (isolation #101) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:44 pm

Bingo.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #967 (isolation #102) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:03 pm

hohum wrote:
Light-kun wrote:Wall-E, as Magua pointed out, what happened to needing a detailed case on how Empking is scummy?

And really, do I have to remind a bunch of players, not just one, that ANTITOWN=/=SCUMMY!!!

Granted, he's an idiot, but I don't see a tremendous case against him that is indicative of scum behavior.
I don't see how you can sit there and say that anti-town behavior isn't worthy of a lynch. I don't see anything wrong with policy lynches. They happen regularly on MS and if used correctly flip more scum than not. There's a good reasons to lynch people who play the way he does:

1) It discourages the behavior. If you're the victim of a policy lynch because of certain behavior, you would stop that behavior; now wouldn't you?

2) If we didn't occasionally lynch it would set a precedent that all scum needs to do is behave this way in order to stay off the radar.

3) He's distracting -- very distracting. Flooding the thread with argumentative nonsensical posts is not only "antitown" it's detrimental. We're going to tie ourselves up into WIFOMy knots trying to figure out whether we should lynch him or not.

These are all also reasons why this sort of behavior is a scum tell, and why the longer it goes on the bigger of a scum tell it actually is.

You prefer policy lynches to scum lynches?

Unvote; Vote: Hohum

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #983 (isolation #103) » Fri Feb 20, 2009 3:02 pm

Empking wrote:Give evidence that I'm not useful.

He should be modkilled for threadjacking.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #987 (isolation #104) » Fri Feb 20, 2009 3:14 pm

penultimate post = angry scum because I uncovered his ploy.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #989 (isolation #105) » Fri Feb 20, 2009 3:41 pm

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #994 (isolation #106) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:06 am

I love it how Empking just starts chomping down on everyone in the game for no reason.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #997 (isolation #107) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:41 am

Aw... I wanted to argue with afatchic.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #999 (isolation #108) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 4:12 am

Interesting.

zwetschenwasser · Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:20 am

At least I'm not as unhelpful as Empking the entire game.

zwetschenwasser · Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:29 am

^can you say arrogant?

zwetschenwasser · Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:05 am

hohum wrote:
hohum wrote:I'm taking a nap for a few days. When you guys are done begging Emp to start contributing then I'll wake up and start posting again. If something else happens in the mean time I'll reread and comment.

I'm sorry that nobody sees that he's just not going to do ANYTHING useful in this game, but I for one am not going to give him a free pass to coast. He's been given enough of a break. It's time to put up or shut up.

Confirm Vote: scumking

I don't like this. Giving an excuse to lurk when the scumhunting is at its peak.

zwetschenwasser · Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:08 am

That doesn't give you a free pass to lurk in this game.

zwetschenwasser · Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:14 am

zwetschenwasser · Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:49 pm

Does no one else see that hohum is obvscum?

Confirm Vote: hohum

zwetschenwasser · Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:06 pm

You are quite mistaken in your generalization. I'm posting uselessness at the present merely because this STUPID DISCUSSION ISN'T GETTING ANYWHERE!!!

zwetschenwasser · Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:22 pm

Sigh. Wall-E, you're not doing much good by making fun of me.

zwetschenwasser · Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:40 pm

Yes I am. I'm doing this because I'm frustrated with the pace of this game. (or maybe it's just Empking screwing with my mind)

zwetschenwasser · Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:09 am

Sigh. Brock, you're not making any sense, you're being close-minded, and extraordinarily rude.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:56 am

Brocktree wrote: You suck.

I think this was uncalled for.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:31 am

What was your question?

zwetschenwasser · Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:49 am

He is distracting.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:07 am

What was your question?

zwetschenwasser · Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:23 am

Where did that come from? Hohum is doing it the worst. He's using it as an excuse to lurk.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:58 am

Because the case is stupid.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:46 am

Touche...

zwetschenwasser · Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:32 am

Massclaim is a horrible idea. Once the doctors and roleblockers claim we'll be easy pickings.

zwetschenwasser · Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:22 am

I support groupclaim.

zwetschenwasser · Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:10 am

Empking, Zorblag is not talking about a massclaim. Did you miss his latest posts?

zwetschenwasser · Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:28 am

I don't think this tangent is relevant to the prevailing discussion.

zwetschenwasser · Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:06 am

Hohum, mind contributing something not blatantly scummy?

zwetschenwasser · Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:11 am

The last two pages. And instead of providing commentary he pretends he's furious again.

zwetschenwasser · Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:37 pm

Protective

zwetschenwasser · Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:26 pm

don looks a little too flipfloppy to me.

zwetschenwasser · Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:44 pm

What's that supposed to mean?

zwetschenwasser · Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:05 pm

Why the contradiction?

zwetschenwasser · Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 pm

It is kinda OMGUS...

zwetschenwasser · Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:32 pm

I don't like this: this is pretty clearly not the case

You can't just say something is obviously wrong because you said so. There is a tinge of OMGUS in your Wall-e vote.

zwetschenwasser · Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:06 am

You're forgetting the possible doctor/roleblocker cross-protect. We can defend powerroles much more easily this way, assuming the hitman doesn't target us because of the investigative abilities.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:28 am

Wall-e, what are your thoughts on hohum?

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:27 am

It'll be really bad if we don't finish this claim.

zwetschenwasser · Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:00 am

I don't understand why everyone's letting hohum slide with declaring intentions to lurk and posting babbling scum furiousness instead of contributing.

zwetschenwasser · Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:25 pm

We don't play this game on my clock either, FYI.

zwetschenwasser · Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:15 am

Where the heck did he lie?

zwetschenwasser · Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:51 pm

I am not against this.

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:31 pm

I wish Natirasha would be this nice in his games...

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:37 pm

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:48 pm

Can we get back to lynching hoscum?

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:01 pm

I'm trying to get people to notice hohum's scummy play, but no one wants to believe me.

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:10 pm

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:16 pm

OIIERRRRROOOAAA...

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:32 pm

I didn't see Wall-e lied. Anyway LAL is craplogic.

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:43 pm

That's not a lie. You didn't answer to the extent he wanted. And I've found LAL fails 99% of the games I've been in, but that's probably just personal experience.

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:46 pm

You didn't explain your answer well enough. Also, I'm not defending him, I'm defending his argument.

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:58 pm

I don't have a question for you.

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:10 pm

HASTUR HASTUR HASTUR

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:10 pm

zwetschenwasser · Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:38 am

Brock, this game isn't going to play itself. You need to reread what's happened, although some of it is fluff posting. I'm still suspicious that you've waited this long to claim vanilla townie. Why did you hesitate? ThAdmiral, LAL is not that amazing, IMO. It depends on the situation, I guess.

zwetschenwasser · Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:55 am

Not okay.

zwetschenwasser · Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:35 pm

shubaduba shubaduba shuba shuba shubaduba...

zwetschenwasser · Fri Mar 06, 2009 3:36 pm

What the heck are you trying to pull with that stupid per ce crap, Light?

zwetschenwasser · Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:35 am

zwetschenwasser · Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:49 am

We need to find out what Light-kun is trying to pull. It screams "framejob" to me.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:19 am

Um.. Read Light-kun's latest contributions and find out!

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:29 am

OH NO YOU DIDN'T!

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 am

We need to lynch hohum.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:14 am

Dej, come on over here!

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:12 pm

Why are you capitalizing names?

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:55 pm

The mod is being replaced in some of his games...

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:13 pm

For unhelpfulness, overreactions, and making up excuses to lurk.

zwetschenwasser · Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:47 am

Add this ^ to my case on Light.

zwetschenwasser · Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:12 am

zwetschenwasser · Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:18 pm

Discussing how to confuse us town in a different quicktopic.

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:33 am

Can we not talk about the mod's activity and talk about lynching hohum?

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:08 pm

No. I have a good reason for voting hohum.

zwetschenwasser · Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:38 am

Is this going to be the new excuse to active/passive lurk? FoS to everyone who is using the "wait for claim" thing to lurk.

zwetschenwasser · Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:52 am

Well, it's pretty clear that our mod has disappeared. Do we have a backuP?

zwetschenwasser · Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:58 am

What are your thoughts on hohum?

zwetschenwasser · Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:04 am

Now people are saying that they'll have a reason for their vote after we get a claim. Does this sound messed up to anyone else?

zwetschenwasser · Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:04 am

He excused himself to lurk a few days ago, and came back only to curse at me.

zwetschenwasser · Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:59 am

And hohum claimed vanilla! He needs to die.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 15, 2009 4:14 am

I <3 all of you!

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 15, 2009 4:29 am

We pressure dj tomorrow. Today we lynch fakeclaiming scum!

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:00 am

I don't think hohum is 7 votes away from a lynch...

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:19 am

My thoughts exactly.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:37 am

L-2. We need MOAR dead hohumfakeclaimscum.

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:07 am

WE NEED A HAMMA!

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:27 am

*facepalm*

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 15, 2009 10:25 am

I WANNA HAMMA!!!

zwetschenwasser · Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:28 pm

*crosses fingers*

zwetschenwasser · Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:35 am

Ha! hohum doesn't know what to say...

zwetschenwasser · Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:02 am

FALALA>>>

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:52 am

OOMPA OOMPA SHA SHA SHA

zwetschenwasser · Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:00 pm

I LIKE TO SING ZE SONG OF LIFE

zwetschenwasser · Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:35 am

Why is hohum trying to hint at something? The worst that could happen is him being a vanilla...

zwetschenwasser · Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:31 pm

zwetschenwasser · Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:03 am

What? Did someone forget to unvote or something?

zwetschenwasser · Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:38 pm

We're waiting on a mod.

zwetschenwasser · Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:18 am

Sigh.