large normal 239. game over

Not Known 15 · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Mon May 23, 2022 6:38 am

In post 7, over90 wrote:I'm a traitor
VOTE: over90

ok.
VOTE: over90

Not Known 15 · Post Post #13 (isolation #1) » Mon May 23, 2022 6:41 am

In post 11, mq.bosco wrote:Self-voting is always anti-town, no?

In this situation, yes. Always, no.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #127 (isolation #2) » Mon May 23, 2022 9:01 pm

In post 124, Nero Cain wrote:I feel like accusing someone of "shade" has prob lost its meaning these days. I and others are accused of "shade" all the time when it's just scumhunting. In this particular case, it was more of a cheeky comment b/c the how many scum are in a particular setup is or should be pretty easy to discern. Now over90 might actually be new and not an alt so I don't hold it against him but hamma's 3 in a 16 is

...perfectly reasonable.
4 in 16 has a vanilla EV of about 12%.
3 in 16 has a vanilla EV of about 24%.
2 in 16 has a vanilla EV of about 43%.

All three of these are possible, with 2 in 16 in a setup with almost no PR's, 3 in 16 in a setup with a low to medium amount and strength of PR's and 4 in 16 in a setup with a very high amount or strength of PR's
5 in 16 by comparison is probably not normal with an about 5% WR.
4 in 13 has 9% and that one is known as extremely swingy and often not normal.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #128 (isolation #3) » Mon May 23, 2022 9:02 pm

In post 125, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 123, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 122, Nero Cain wrote:ok kool. Still think the 3 in a 16 is dumb though.
It is, probably. But who knows, scum might be packin' heat.
I can't even think of what would make 13:3 balanced. Scum vig? Multiple roleblockers? Multiple-shot neighborizer?

You have no idea on what balance is, apparently.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #130 (isolation #4) » Mon May 23, 2022 9:09 pm

In post 129, Nero Cain wrote:yeah, all those 3 scum in a 16 player is a really common setup. get real, NK15

I am merely telling you that you shouldn't dismiss 3 in 16 because it is a perfectly reasonable distribution.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #143 (isolation #5) » Mon May 23, 2022 11:43 pm

In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:Balance here would be offsetting a severely outnumbered mafia by giving them a ton of power. But I doubt it's 13:3.

BS.VOTE: KittyTacky

Not Known 15 · Post Post #156 (isolation #6) » Tue May 24, 2022 3:26 am

In post 155, Nero Cain wrote:that's trash reasoning

Not Known 15 · Post Post #171 (isolation #7) » Tue May 24, 2022 5:50 am

In post 160, KittyTacky wrote:So 13:3 isn't tilted in town's favor? I don't understand what's BS here. Kinda sketchy NGL.

Correct. 13:3 Mountainous isn't tilted in town's favor. It's scumsided.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #173 (isolation #8) » Tue May 24, 2022 5:56 am

In post 7, over90 wrote:I'm a traitor
VOTE: over90

Why did you do this?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #272 (isolation #9) » Wed May 25, 2022 1:08 am

In post 263, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 245, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 240, takotsubo syndrome wrote:I never said I read the game for meta. I also never said I metadived you. So let’s not get too carried away with putting words in my mouth or twisting my thoughts.

I just said it felt off in terms of you casing NC very early.

Yeah that post is just gross. VOTE: takotsubo syndrome

In post 243, SirCakez wrote:Ignore that Nashed quote my phone has a bug
In post 179, takotsubo syndrome wrote:
In post 169, Gamma Emerald wrote:why was your only comment to bring up something someone else mentioned?
I mean I really didn't have much to comment on while catching up. Majority of what has been posted looks like it's been in jest aka the traitor/jester/mason claim.
This just very serious in like a very jokey time & felt very off.
This is such a scum thing to post

VOTE: takotsubo

VOTE: takotsubo syndrome

Not Known 15 · Post Post #284 (isolation #10) » Wed May 25, 2022 5:08 am

In post 282, SirCakez wrote:Do you have anything of your own to add to this vote?

No.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #302 (isolation #11) » Wed May 25, 2022 8:39 am

In post 291, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 272, Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 263, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 245, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 240, takotsubo syndrome wrote:I never said I read the game for meta. I also never said I metadived you. So let’s not get too carried away with putting words in my mouth or twisting my thoughts.

I just said it felt off in terms of you casing NC very early.

Yeah that post is just gross. VOTE: takotsubo syndrome

In post 243, SirCakez wrote:Ignore that Nashed quote my phone has a bug
In post 179, takotsubo syndrome wrote:
In post 169, Gamma Emerald wrote:why was your only comment to bring up something someone else mentioned?
I mean I really didn't have much to comment on while catching up. Majority of what has been posted looks like it's been in jest aka the traitor/jester/mason claim.
This just very serious in like a very jokey time & felt very off.
This is such a scum thing to post

VOTE: takotsubo
VOTE: takotsubo syndrome
Uhh why are you voting here? Seems like you’re just jumping on because of others.

Why's that supposed to be a problem?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #376 (isolation #12) » Thu May 26, 2022 5:31 am

In post 375, RCEnigma wrote:Nk's by a country mile.

Why?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #417 (isolation #13) » Thu May 26, 2022 11:03 am

In post 416, Nero Cain wrote:b/c scum is comfortable in this game state.

Why's the gamestate bad?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #418 (isolation #14) » Thu May 26, 2022 11:06 am

In post 377, RCEnigma wrote:The sheeping, the lack of input,
and the wagon you jumped from to get there.

Explain.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #420 (isolation #15) » Thu May 26, 2022 11:52 am

In post 419, Nero Cain wrote:I'm not sure if scum is being wagoned while scum VD is not being wagoned. Assuming that scererio is true that seems like it's not a good gamestate for town.

Why do you assume that scenario is true? Would you expect scum to push for a competing scum wagon if both are scum?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #429 (isolation #16) » Thu May 26, 2022 2:45 pm

In post 427, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 424, Gamma Emerald wrote:This NK15 wagon feels like it exists solely because people don't like the Tako wagon
Solely? Do you think
we
just rolled a dice and chose someone at random? Tako is eh, but a case based off being awful at metagaming < putting someone who doesn't even seem to be trying to play the game in the spot. I doubt the entire tako wagon will did out just for this and multiwagons help the gamestate I reckon.

What's the "we" doing there?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #448 (isolation #17) » Thu May 26, 2022 10:20 pm

In post 447, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 418, Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 377, RCEnigma wrote:The sheeping, the lack of input,
and the wagon you jumped from to get there.
Explain.
Following your scumread to a wagon isn't a good look. I already thought the kitty vote was showy but not in a way I can justify without context.

That was a minor scumread. Not much more than null. The reasons given for the tako votes looked good for me, so I voted.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #504 (isolation #18) » Sat May 28, 2022 8:28 am

I'll do more tomorrow. For now:UNVOTE:

Not Known 15 · Post Post #525 (isolation #19) » Sun May 29, 2022 2:25 am

In post 6, Save The Dragons wrote:first

Pretty standard post. NAI.

In post 7, over90 wrote:I'm a traitor
VOTE: over90

Self-vote, but... traitors aren't here.

In post 9, takotsubo syndrome wrote:VOTE: Gamma Emerald

RVS vote

In post 10, over90 wrote:deserter to be fair

What did you mean by that, over90?

In post 11, mq.bosco wrote:Self-voting is always anti-town, no?

Slightly scummy because of the way this is phrased.

In post 12, RCEnigma wrote:VOTE: Dannflor

As a psychologist I believe Schadd's fear of bees is actually a euphemism for his stance on work culture in capitalist societies at large.

Not sure here. NAI?

In post 14, RCEnigma wrote:Ooo actually VOTE: mq.bosco

Why?

In post 15, over90 wrote:ppl where are u?
we need more votes

Scummy.

In post 16, Save The Dragons wrote:more votes on you?

Heh. Dunno.

In post 17, over90 wrote:let's make short days (about 1 hour), go go go

A bit over the top here.

In post 18, Enchant wrote:I am in Masonry with MonkeyMan576, Carcalilly and takotsubo syndrome.

Noted.

In post 19, RCEnigma wrote:Monkeymen aren't real.

Interesting phrasing. NAI?

In post 20, Enchant wrote:Oh yeah.

I am in Masonry with Anime, Carcalilly and takotsubo syndrome.

Noted.

In post 21, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: rcenigma
Mod told me they are scum

NAI? I don't like this though.

In post 22, Enchant wrote:
In post 21, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: rcenigma
Mod told me they are scum
VOTE: SirCakez

Cakez looked in role PM to check partners, gg ez

Hmmmm... not sure here.

In post 23, over90 wrote:in mod we trust
VOTE: RCEnigma

This is the first vote after the self-vote and it is RVS style. Not a good look.

In post 24, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 12, RCEnigma wrote:VOTE: Dannflor

As a psychologist I believe Schadd's fear of bees is actually a euphemism for his stance on work culture in capitalist societies at large.
This is clearly sheepable VOTE: Dannflor

Is it?

In post 25, Enchant wrote:VOTE: Dannflor

RVS vote. But an unannounced sheep of a wagon. Is this really NAI?

In post 26, mq.bosco wrote:VOTE: KittyTacky

RVS vote.

In post 27, ItalianoVD wrote:Eh, let me know when things get serious. I’ll be back later.

K. NAI?

In post 28, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 27, ItalianoVD wrote:Eh, let me know when things get serious. I’ll be back later.
We can make things serious? ;D

Good post.

In post 29, SirCakez wrote:
In post 27, ItalianoVD wrote:Eh, let me know when things get serious. I’ll be back later.
Why not make them serious yourself?

Not good post. Scummy.

In post 30, Gamma Emerald wrote:eyes opened wider
no bitterness remaining
vibes are well aligned

VOTE: ItalianoVD
What’s up, doc?

This doesn't look like a RVS post. What caused these vibes?

In post 31, over90 wrote:the most boring start of the game I've ever seen.
I literally fell asleep.

Complaining about gamestate isn't towny.

In post 32, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 11, mq.bosco wrote:Self-voting is always anti-town, no?
VOTE: Bosco yes

Heh. You saw that too, didn't you?

In post 33, RCEnigma wrote:Crazy that 12 people have posted and only 2 are town.

Hmmmmm why's that crazy?

In post 34, RCEnigma wrote:Maybe enchant too.

backtrack. I do not like that.

In post 35, over90 wrote:
In post 33, RCEnigma wrote:Crazy that 12 people have posted and only 2 are town.
who?

Easy question, but not scum indicative.

In post 36, RCEnigma wrote:Me and JV

Hmmm.

In post 37, RCEnigma wrote:Bosco scum might make you town

What why?

In post 38, over90 wrote:who is JV?

In post 39, RCEnigma wrote:Potato

Minimal posting.

In post 40, over90 wrote:don't hurry about bosco

What does that mean? Hurry? That doesn't make a lot of sense.

In post 41, over90 wrote:it was sound like provocation, nothing serious

Panicked scum defending for something that didn't need to be defended?

In post 42, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 29, SirCakez wrote:
In post 27, ItalianoVD wrote:Eh, let me know when things get serious. I’ll be back later.
Why not make them serious yourself?
Eh, but I’m lazy.

Noted. Towny if true.

In post 43, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 30, Gamma Emerald wrote:eyes opened wider
no bitterness remaining
vibes are well aligned

VOTE: ItalianoVD
What’s up, doc?
Yooo what up again?!

Oblivious that that was a real scumread. Hmmm towny?

In post 44, Nero Cain wrote:I was gonna say this game will be lit but it'll prob be a lurkfest. At least I provide my own fireworks.

ItalianoVD

That's not really a firework.

In post 45, Nero Cain wrote:VOTE: ItalianoVD

In post 46, SirCakez wrote:Seems like Nero is pre apologizing for being scum

Where does this line of reasoning come from?

In post 47, Nero Cain wrote:Is that something you actually believe b/c that seems like a silly thought.

In post 48, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 46, SirCakez wrote:Seems like Nero is pre apologizing for being scum
Seems like Nero was trying to read the room, not give a raodmap of his own activity

Scummy post. Don't defend others by pre-emptively answering for them.

In post 49, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 36, RCEnigma wrote:Me and JV

confirmed?

NAI for now.

In post 50, Carcalilly wrote:anyone give me two good reasons why I should make you a double voter and I will

Tsk. Tsk. Anti-town but only time will tell if this is coming from scum.

In post 51, Nero Cain wrote:im town
i responded faster than anyone else

Votegrabbing?

In post 52, DeasVail wrote:That’s pretty compelling honestly

Sus. You don't want others to get doublevotes.. unless they are your partners or your major townreads...

In post 53, Nero Cain wrote:i kikr?

#NC4DV

....what?

In post 54, over90 wrote:VOTE: Save The Dragons

How many scums are here in large?

The mechanics discussion begins.

In post 55, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 50, Carcalilly wrote:anyone give me two good reasons why I should make you a double voter and I will
1) I’m the best at a.c.e.

2) I’m a fun guy

In post 56, ItalianoVD wrote:Are those good enough reasons?!

Seriously?

In post 57, Nero Cain wrote:no

Why say the obvious?

In post 58, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 54, over90 wrote:How many scums are here in large?
check ur pt

Why did you shade here, Nero?

In post 59, over90 wrote:
In post 58, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 54, over90 wrote:How many scums are here in large?
check ur pt
4-5 true?

Hmmmm is this a counter-shade or why did you post this, over?

In post 60, over90 wrote:I think savethedragons is mafia
No good reasons, just feeling

Great, scums favourite type of read.

In post 61, over90 wrote:like force from starwars
I can feel the dark side inside him
and im not a sith, so...

In post 62, Nero Cain wrote:4 in a 16 yeah

In post 63, Gamma Emerald wrote:Could be 3 with low town power
Very unlikely to be 5

In post 64, DeasVail wrote:Oh I’m ascetic

Noted again.

In post 65, DeasVail wrote:We could talk about that if people want

Doesn't like the mechanics discussion. Why?

In post 66, over90 wrote:DeasVail - or maybe this one is mafia

In post 67, over90 wrote:my activity will be low next couple of days

Noted.

In post 68, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 66, over90 wrote:DeasVail - or maybe this one is mafia
Why

In post 69, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 63, Gamma Emerald wrote:Could be 3 with low town power

Nero do you like low power setups?

In post 70, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 68, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 66, over90 wrote:DeasVail - or maybe this one is mafia
Why
prob b/c its pretty basic to be wary of a neg utility claim b/c every once in a while scum do claim one and skate by.

day is young but I already want to kill half this thread. I really am a roman emporer!

This is quite scummy. Shade towards neg utility (Possible vs probable)

In post 71, DeasVail wrote:I should have claimed something more exciting like PGO instead. Damn

Hmmm is this a retracting of the claim?

In post 72, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 70, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 68, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 66, over90 wrote:DeasVail - or maybe this one is mafia
Why
prob b/c its pretty basic to be wary of a neg utility claim b/c every once in a while scum do claim one and skate by.

day is young but I already want to kill half this thread. I really am a roman emporer!
I don't recall asking you. You may have given them a free way out of answering it properly.

Correct. Another reason to scumread Nero.

In post 73, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 71, DeasVail wrote:I should have claimed something more exciting like PGO instead. Damn
Flashbacks to claiming PGO as a SK in my first normal in lategame and getting yeeted bc it isn't normal valid

Fluff. NAI.

In post 74, DeasVail wrote:
In post 73, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 71, DeasVail wrote:I should have claimed something more exciting like PGO instead. Damn
Flashbacks to claiming PGO as a SK in my first normal in lategame and getting yeeted bc it isn't normal valid
Oh no! That’s awful. I can’t keep up with what’s normal and what’s not nowadays. There used to be freedom for mods to put an additional 1-2 roles in. In fact, I think I may have even modded a large normal with a PGO back in the day.

—

Anyway I have a few light townreads so far but no one is really jumping out at me in a negative way. Not getting the same bloodlust as a few others seem to be.

Pocket?

In post 75, over90 wrote:go elim std, i have no other thoughts rn, bc we have almost no info here rn

We don't?

In post 76, DeasVail wrote:I mean, STD is really not inspiring me much either way rn. Limming him would feel pretty premature.

Defending a nullread, overzealous. SUS.

In post 77, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 74, DeasVail wrote:
In post 73, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 71, DeasVail wrote:I should have claimed something more exciting like PGO instead. Damn
Flashbacks to claiming PGO as a SK in my first normal in lategame and getting yeeted bc it isn't normal valid
Oh no! That’s awful. I can’t keep up with what’s normal and what’s not nowadays. There used to be freedom for mods to put an additional 1-2 roles in. In fact, I think I may have even modded a large normal with a PGO back in the day.

—

Anyway I have a few light townreads so far but no one is really jumping out at me in a negative way. Not getting the same bloodlust as a few others seem to be.
Anything reflexive is considered not normal
PGO is essentially a reflexive vig

In post 78, DeasVail wrote:Thanks Gamma. That makes sense!

In post 79, Nero Cain wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

more votes on ItalianoVD

In post 80, Save The Dragons wrote:Why

In post 81, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 79, Nero Cain wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

more votes on ItalianoVD
ok

VOTE: italianovd

his reasons were pretty solid tho ngl

and then you vote italiano regardless?? Why?

In post 82, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 60, over90 wrote:I think savethedragons is mafia
No good reasons, just feeling
looks like a
TMI
to me...............

Possible.

In post 83, Carcalilly wrote:
ItalianoVD

RCEnigma

Dannflor

KittyTacky
Nero Cain
Gamma Emerald
DeasVail

SirCakez

Save The Dragons

over90
mq.bosco
Carcalilly
takotsubo syndrome
NashedPotato
Enchant

pray for the godsnipe readlist

2 of those are totally serious rn actually

Not Known 15

Why am I down there?

In post 84, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 82, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 60, over90 wrote:I think savethedragons is mafia
No good reasons, just feeling
looks like a
TMI
to me...............
In what sense

In post 85, Nero Cain wrote:JV, you are asking the silliest questions right now....

In post 86, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 80, Save The Dragons wrote:Why
y not? its p4 and you are concerned about a wagon on ???? players lol

Good point.

In post 87, RCEnigma wrote:I was gonna ask it as a general q but I guess I'll ask you directly carca. Would scum!you throw that bait out and immediately reel it back in by not scumreading over90?

In post 88, RCEnigma wrote:Nero what do you think about gamma?

In post 89, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 85, Nero Cain wrote:JV, you are asking the silliest questions right now....
I moved account for a reason, please don't call me JV anymore.

In post 90, NashedPotato wrote:And isn't a silly question at all, because if it were TMI it'd be scum leaking another scum which is not what they seem to be reading into considering their attempted "godsnipe" of a read-list.

In post 91, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 82, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 60, over90 wrote:I think savethedragons is mafia
No good reasons, just feeling
looks like a
TMI
to me...............
Wdym

why do you not understand this at this time?

In post 92, ItalianoVD wrote:VOTE: Nero

This is not town!Nero.

Nero is SCUM!!!

A bit exaggeration here...

In post 93, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 81, Carcalilly wrote:his reasons were pretty solid tho ngl
I knew it.

In post 94, over90 wrote:
In post 83, Carcalilly wrote:pray for the godsnipe readlist
I'm a pretty good sniper according to my lore

In post 95, Nero Cain wrote:y is this not town Nero?

Strange question.

In post 96, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: carca
I don't like 82

Nero in response to a few pages ago I was being silly

In post 97, Nero Cain wrote:cakes with the scummy move of voting my dv enabler

why's that scummy?

In post 98, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 88, RCEnigma wrote:Nero what do you think about gamma?
in a not so surprising note, I don't really like him that much.

Didn't really like his soft defense of me in VOTE: 48 and I think his thought that there could be 3 scum is laughable. Would be funny if he was scum that slipped that his team was 3 wich means there'd be a traitor and guy true claimed his traitor role.

Why go for funny? Is this something you believe or not?

In post 99, KittyTacky wrote:I waited so long for this game to start. Exams?

Anyways, I remember playing with a large chunk of the player list.

In post 100, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 26, mq.bosco wrote:VOTE: KittyTacky
You're making a terrible mistake, I'm Jester.

It isn't RVS anymore. Scummy.

In post 101, KittyTacky wrote:Yeah I don't feel this Nero is particularly similar to his town play.

In post 102, KittyTacky wrote:I won't vote him so early, but I'll scrutinize his posts more.

Partners?

In post 103, Nero Cain wrote:?????

joking about being a jester is dumb

Partners??

In post 104, Save The Dragons wrote:I'm a jester

In post 105, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 103, Nero Cain wrote:joking about being a jester is dumb

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 95, Nero Cain wrote:y is this not town Nero?
I know town!Nero And all this right here...

Spoiler:
In post 47, Nero Cain wrote:Is that something you actually believe b/c that seems like a silly thought.
scum!nero patronizes scumreads.

In post 51, Nero Cain wrote:im town
i responded faster than anyone else
town!nero doesn't say he's town.

In post 58, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 54, over90 wrote:How many scums are here in large?
check ur pt
scum!nero shades

In post 70, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 68, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 66, over90 wrote:DeasVail - or maybe this one is mafia
Why
prob b/c its pretty basic to be wary of a neg utility claim b/c every once in a while scum do claim one and skate by.

day is young but I already want to kill half this thread. I really am a roman emporer!
Why are you answering questions not addressed to you? I'm sure I remember you calling this out in games I've played with you. town!nero doesn't
"want to kill half the thread"
!

In post 79, Nero Cain wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

more votes on ItalianoVD
town!nero is NOT lazy!

In post 85, Nero Cain wrote:JV, you are asking the silliest questions right now....
More patronizing?

In post 86, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 80, Save The Dragons wrote:Why
y not? its p4 and you are concerned about a wagon on ???? players lol
And yet more...

In post 98, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 88, RCEnigma wrote:Nero what do you think about gamma?
in a not so surprising note, I don't really like him that much.

Didn't really like his soft defense of me in VOTE: 48 and I think his thought that there could be 3 scum is laughable. Would be funny if he was scum that slipped that his team was 3 wich means there'd be a traitor and guy true claimed his traitor role.
scum!nero thinks everything is amusing. And yet more shade.

...ain't it.

So yeah you are SCUM!! You die today!

Interesting post, but all based on meta without backing it up.

In post 107, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 100, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 26, mq.bosco wrote:VOTE: KittyTacky
You're making a terrible mistake, I'm Jester.
All the more reason for you to get voted fypov.

Eh. Easy post.

In post 108, NashedPotato wrote:Nero & O90 team? :O

In post 109, Nero Cain wrote:you ARE a rauthe alt right?

In post 110, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 109, Nero Cain wrote:you ARE a rauthe alt right?
Who?

In post 111, Nero Cain wrote:VD

In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 95, Nero Cain wrote:y is this not town Nero?
I know town!Nero And all this right here...

Spoiler:
In post 47, Nero Cain wrote:Is that something you actually believe b/c that seems like a silly thought.
scum!nero patronizes scumreads.

In post 51, Nero Cain wrote:im town
i responded faster than anyone else
town!nero doesn't say he's town.

In post 58, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 54, over90 wrote:How many scums are here in large?
check ur pt
scum!nero shades

In post 70, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 68, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 66, over90 wrote:DeasVail - or maybe this one is mafia
Why
prob b/c its pretty basic to be wary of a neg utility claim b/c every once in a while scum do claim one and skate by.

day is young but I already want to kill half this thread. I really am a roman emporer!
Why are you answering questions not addressed to you? I'm sure I remember you calling this out in games I've played with you. town!nero doesn't
"want to kill half the thread"
!

In post 79, Nero Cain wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

more votes on ItalianoVD
town!nero is NOT lazy!

In post 85, Nero Cain wrote:JV, you are asking the silliest questions right now....
More patronizing?

In post 86, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 80, Save The Dragons wrote:Why
y not? its p4 and you are concerned about a wagon on ???? players lol
And yet more...

In post 98, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 88, RCEnigma wrote:Nero what do you think about gamma?
in a not so surprising note, I don't really like him that much.

Didn't really like his soft defense of me in VOTE: 48 and I think his thought that there could be 3 scum is laughable. Would be funny if he was scum that slipped that his team was 3 wich means there'd be a traitor and guy true claimed his traitor role.
scum!nero thinks everything is amusing. And yet more shade.

...ain't it.

So yeah you are SCUM!! You die today!
I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of and I am by no means going to put trust into someone that could very well be scum and just throw off a miselim as "oh guess I was wrong this time".

If this is serious, make a case on them based on the current game as people who do not know nero that much can actually add onto the case, refute some points etc. Actual team style deduction, ya know?

True.

In post 113, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of
you've played with me like 3 or 4 times or was this about VD? Also you seem like you are scum reading me in 108, no?

In post 114, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 113, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of
you've played with me like 3 or 4 times or was this about VD? Also you seem like you are scum reading me in 108, no?
Maybe months, if not nearly a year ago. I had a decent time off of the site, nor do I remember how many people play except those that I talk with on a regular basis and even then I try not to meta-read as it's almost useless to say, nobody is going to follow a read that they also cannot follow and meta is an easy way to just cherry pick information.

It's a terrible route to go down.

Ok...

In post 115, NashedPotato wrote:Maybe as a supplementary case but definitely not anywhere near primary.

Backtrack. Hmmm.

In post 116, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 113, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of
you've played with me like 3 or 4 times or was this about VD? Also you seem like you are scum reading me in 108, no?
As a joke. I believe O90's tone is off so I do think they are scum at this moment

What about their tone is off?

In post 117, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:going to put trust into someone that could very well be scum
ngl but this line seems weird and worrisome to me. You've never expressed any suspicion of VD so it comes across a bit like distancing to me.

A bit evasive, why no push, why is this so toned down?

In post 118, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 117, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:going to put trust into someone that could very well be scum
ngl but this line seems weird and worrisome to me. You've never expressed any suspicion of VD so it comes across a bit like distancing to me.
The line is stating that I'm not just going to believe somebody's word just because they said it. I have no realistic way to verify meta, and thus it's just me either trusting or not trusting their word. Which I am not doing

... which says that you are not townreading them, at least. Why did that one not... hmm scum?

In post 119, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 103, Nero Cain wrote:?????

joking about being a jester is dumb
No u.

In post 120, Enchant wrote:
In post 98, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 88, RCEnigma wrote:Nero what do you think about gamma?
Would be funny if he was scum that slipped that his team was 3 wich means there'd be a traitor and guy true claimed his traitor role.

If you are bad with jokes, i transform in boring language.

Mod directly stated Psychologist, Ninja and Traitor can't exist in this game.

I don't think that those two are aligned as scum.

In post 121, Enchant wrote:... or maybe that's me bad with jokes and Nero trolled me?

hm

In post 122, Nero Cain wrote:ok kool. Still think the 3 in a 16 is dumb though.

In post 123, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 122, Nero Cain wrote:ok kool. Still think the 3 in a 16 is dumb though.
It is, probably. But who knows, scum might be packin' heat.

?

In post 124, Nero Cain wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:I know town!Nero And all this right here...
and yet you didn't vote me until I voted you. If you found my posting scummy prior to 58 why not call me out?

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:scum!nero patronizes scumreads.
Do I? But even if do I don't think I was patronizing cakez.

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:town!nero doesn't say he's town.
pretty sure this is untrue. I mean true, I don't yell I'm town ad nausem but the idea that I don't call myself town as town is ludicrous and I don't think you actually believe this.

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:scum!nero shades

PROVIDING SHADE IS A SERVICE!

but real talk

I feel like accusing someone of "shade" has prob lost its meaning these days. I and others are accused of "shade" all the time when it's just scumhunting. In this particular case, it was more of a cheeky comment b/c the how many scum are in a particular setup is or should be pretty easy to discern. Now over90 might actually be new and not an alt so I don't hold it against him but hamma's 3 in a 16 is

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:town!nero doesn't "want to kill half the thread"!
I'm always bloodlusty as town.

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:town!nero is NOT lazy!
no, I am not. What makes you think the leading poster is being lazy? "zzzzzzzz" is something I post when I think things are boring. For someone that claims to know me, it sure is odd that you didn't know that.

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:More patronizing?
I don't think you know what this word means.

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:And yet more...
it was a semi-serious RVS page 4 wagon with 2 votes on you and STD was making a big deal over it.

Honestly, this feels like a lazy OMGUS case where you just when through my ISO and put down "scumNero does this, scumNero does that."

Good point.

In post 125, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 123, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 122, Nero Cain wrote:ok kool. Still think the 3 in a 16 is dumb though.
It is, probably. But who knows, scum might be packin' heat.
I can't even think of what would make 13:3 balanced. Scum vig? Multiple roleblockers? Multiple-shot neighborizer?

This is way off the mark.

In post 126, Nero Cain wrote:so kitty r u gonna engage me or are you just trying to keep me at arms length?

Don't like this, why should kitty do that? Scummy.

In post 128, Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 125, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 123, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 122, Nero Cain wrote:ok kool. Still think the 3 in a 16 is dumb though.
It is, probably. But who knows, scum might be packin' heat.
I can't even think of what would make 13:3 balanced. Scum vig? Multiple roleblockers? Multiple-shot neighborizer?
You have no idea on what balance is, apparently.

In post 129, Nero Cain wrote:yeah, all those 3 scum in a 16 player is a really common setup. get real, NK15

No, but low power is also not that common in larges.

In post 130, Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 129, Nero Cain wrote:yeah, all those 3 scum in a 16 player is a really common setup. get real, NK15
I am merely telling you that you shouldn't dismiss 3 in 16 because it is a perfectly reasonable distribution.

In post 131, NashedPotato wrote:Can we just not delve into setup spec when we have literally zero information as a whole.

Hates setup spec.

In post 132, RCEnigma wrote:I speak through the potato.

Ok, no setup spec please...

In post 133, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 129, Nero Cain wrote:yeah, all those 3 scum in a 16 player is a really common setup. get real, NK15
This is funnier having been in an Nk15 setup like this.

.... then talk about setup spec? Why?

In post 134, RCEnigma wrote:3in 16 holds more weight if enchant wasn't trolling about their hood. But it's just noise right now.

Weirdly though nk looks sketchy with a good and without.

Huh? Why? What?

In post 135, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 102, KittyTacky wrote:I won't vote him so early, but I'll scrutinize his posts more.
The more people post the more scumreads I have.

It happens.

In post 136, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:town!nero doesn't "want to kill half the thread"!
Just on the basis that I know for a fact this isn't true I'm inclined to say this case has no legs.

Strawman. Scummy.

In post 137, RCEnigma wrote:Idk how to quote from locked games but Find post 190 for reference

In post 138, Carcalilly wrote:ew, metagaming

You don't like meta?

In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 126, Nero Cain wrote:so kitty r u gonna engage me or are you just trying to keep me at arms length?
Do you really expect me to try to case you on page 6? I don't case people this early.

Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 125, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 123, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 122, Nero Cain wrote:ok kool. Still think the 3 in a 16 is dumb though.
It is, probably. But who knows, scum might be packin' heat.
I can't even think of what would make 13:3 balanced. Scum vig? Multiple roleblockers? Multiple-shot neighborizer?
You have no idea on what balance is, apparently.
Balance here would be offsetting a severely outnumbered mafia by giving them a ton of power. But I doubt it's 13:3.

RCEnigma wrote:
In post 102, KittyTacky wrote:I won't vote him so early, but I'll scrutinize his posts more.
The more people post the more scumreads I have.
The cardinal sin of waiting for more posts from a player before seeing whether to commit to a read or not.

Why's that a cardinal sin?

In post 140, RCEnigma wrote:The post only exists to paint Nero in a worse light with no elaboration or catalyst. Dare I say I think that's shade?

But yeah it comes off like "hey I think Nero is shady....so if anyone wants to wagon that for me, that'd be great."

Except it's not great.

In post 141, RCEnigma wrote:I will note I'm doing a lot of Nero defending and I don't even townread them. The slots coming at him are just being slimy.

Why are these slots slimy? What do you mean by that?

In post 142, DeasVail wrote:VOTE: KittyTacky

whynakedvoteslightlysus.

In post 143, Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:Balance here would be offsetting a severely outnumbered mafia by giving them a ton of power. But I doubt it's 13:3.
BS.VOTE: KittyTacky

And it is still BS. But it might come from town that doesn't know balance/mechanics.

In post 144, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:Do you really expect me to try to case you on page 6? I don't case people this early.
no, but you said that you didn't think that this was similar to my town game and you could use words to back that statement up. Odc you can just say you were sheeping VD.

In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:The cardinal sin of waiting for more posts from a player before seeing whether to commit to a read or not.
you are being hesitant. It's also early game and I'm nowhere near elimination range...the whole "I need to see whether to commit" sounds like a fence sit.

True.... but easy.

In post 145, Enchant wrote:HMMH
SK
HMHM

In post 146, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 137, RCEnigma wrote:Idk how to quote from locked games but Find post 190 for reference
Click the PM button on the post
Cut/copy the message contents
Post it in the desired thread

Good effort. Towny.

In post 147, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 133, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 129, Nero Cain wrote:yeah, all those 3 scum in a 16 player is a really common setup. get real, NK15
This is funnier having been in an Nk15 setup like this.
the last 5 large normals have been

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=88987 5/19 (or 4.5 depending on your views on traitor)

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=88192 3/15

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=87720 4/16

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=87368 4/17

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=86774 4/16

Obviously, there are going to be games that buck the trend but more times than not its

3 scum in a 13 player

4 scum in 14-21

5 or more scum in 21+

So I think the safe assumption is that it'll be 4 scum but it's not really an important point

Ok.

In post 148, takotsubo syndrome wrote:
In post 48, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 46, SirCakez wrote:Seems like Nero is pre apologizing for being scum
Seems like Nero was trying to read the room, not give a raodmap of his own activity
This is sketchy.
Feels like you are defending him instead of letting him defend himself.

Yep.

In post 149, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 109, Nero Cain wrote:you ARE a rauthe alt right?
I am. What's that mean to you?

Explain this.

In post 150, Nero Cain wrote:just making sure. Your play just seems so different. Not sure if that's an alt thing or an alignment thing.

Messed up post messes up when quoting.

In post 152, ItalianoVD wrote:Geez I completely messed that up...

Spoiler:
In post 108, NashedPotato wrote:Nero & O90 team? :O

In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 95, Nero Cain wrote:y is this not town Nero?
I know town!Nero And all this right here...ain't it.

So yeah you are SCUM!! You die today!
I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of and I am by no means going to put trust into someone that could very well be scum and just throw off a miselim as "oh guess I was wrong this time".

If this is serious, make a case on them based on the current game as people who do not know nero that much can actually add onto the case, refute some points etc. Actual team style deduction, ya know?

In post 114, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 113, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of
you've played with me like 3 or 4 times or was this about VD? Also you seem like you are scum reading me in 108, no?
Maybe months, if not nearly a year ago. I had a decent time off of the site, nor do I remember how many people play except those that I talk with on a regular basis and even then I try not to meta-read as it's almost useless to say, nobody is going to follow a read that they also cannot follow and meta is an easy way to just cherry pick information.

It's a terrible route to go down.

In post 115, NashedPotato wrote:Maybe as a supplementary case but definitely not anywhere near primary.

In post 116, NashedPotato wrote:
In post 113, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of
you've played with me like 3 or 4 times or was this about VD? Also you seem like you are scum reading me in 108, no?
As a joke. I believe O90's tone is off so I do think they are scum at this moment

A joke? Yeah, no, I'm not buying that. You originally threw him out with over90. What was the reason you did that?

hmmm.

In post 153, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 150, Nero Cain wrote:just making sure. Your play just seems so different. Not sure if that's an alt thing or an alignment thing.
Well Rathe is a complete antithesis to how I truly play, but the foundation has always remained the same.

What does that mean?

In post 154, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 124, Nero Cain wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:I know town!Nero And all this right here...
and yet you didn't vote me until I voted you. If you found my posting scummy prior to 58 why not call me out?

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:scum!nero patronizes scumreads.
Do I? But even if do I don't think I was patronizing cakez.

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:town!nero doesn't say he's town.
pretty sure this is untrue. I mean true, I don't yell I'm town ad nausem but the idea that I don't call myself town as town is ludicrous and I don't think you actually believe this.

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:scum!nero shades

PROVIDING SHADE IS A SERVICE!

but real talk

I feel like accusing someone of "shade" has prob lost its meaning these days. I and others are accused of "shade" all the time when it's just scumhunting. In this particular case, it was more of a cheeky comment b/c the how many scum are in a particular setup is or should be pretty easy to discern. Now over90 might actually be new and not an alt so I don't hold it against him but hamma's 3 in a 16 is

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:town!nero doesn't "want to kill half the thread"!
I'm always bloodlusty as town.

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:town!nero is NOT lazy!
no, I am not. What makes you think the leading poster is being lazy? "zzzzzzzz" is something I post when I think things are boring. For someone that claims to know me, it sure is odd that you didn't know that.

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:More patronizing?
I don't think you know what this word means.

In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:And yet more...
it was a semi-serious RVS page 4 wagon with 2 votes on you and STD was making a big deal over it.

Honestly, this feels like a lazy OMGUS case where you just when through my ISO and put down "scumNero does this, scumNero does that."
I don't care about OMGUS, I think you're scum. Even though there hasn't been much of anything in this game so far, I feel town!you would've done more by now.

In post 155, Nero Cain wrote:that's trash reasoning

In post 157, Nero Cain wrote:and sort of a backtrack? Your case on me was meta and it's been proven wrong and no one besides Kitty is following it and now your case is that I haven't done enough. Where was that reasoning earlier?

In post 158, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 136, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 106, ItalianoVD wrote:town!nero doesn't "want to kill half the thread"!
Just on the basis that I know for a fact this isn't true I'm inclined to say this case has no legs.

In post 137, RCEnigma wrote:Idk how to quote from locked games but Find post 190 for reference
That game had more content, this game, not so much. You've played with Nero, do you townlean him right now?

In post 159, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 155, Nero Cain wrote:that's trash reasoning
No it's not.

In post 160, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 140, RCEnigma wrote:The post only exists to paint Nero in a worse light with no elaboration or catalyst. Dare I say I think that's shade?

But yeah it comes off like "hey I think Nero is shady....so if anyone wants to wagon that for me, that'd be great."

Except it's not great.
The catalyst was Italiano's case.

Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:Balance here would be offsetting a severely outnumbered mafia by giving them a ton of power. But I doubt it's 13:3.
BS.VOTE: KittyTacky
So 13:3 isn't tilted in town's favor? I don't understand what's BS here. Kinda sketchy NGL.

Nero Cain wrote:
In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:Do you really expect me to try to case you on page 6? I don't case people this early.
no, but you said that you didn't think that this was similar to my town game and you could use words to back that statement up. Odc you can just say you were sheeping VD.

In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:The cardinal sin of waiting for more posts from a player before seeing whether to commit to a read or not.
you are being hesitant. It's also early game and I'm nowhere near elimination range...the whole "I need to see whether to commit" sounds like a fence sit.
1. Yeah I was sheeping Italiano for the most part. I'll admit it. Though I also get a different vibe from your play this game. It's hard to explain.
2. What's wrong with just being somewhat cautious this early?

In post 161, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 157, Nero Cain wrote:and sort of a backtrack? Your case on me was meta and it's been proven wrong and no one besides Kitty is following it and now your case is that I haven't done enough. Where was that reasoning earlier?
Probably by your partner RC.

They quoted one thing "town!nero doesn't want to kill half the thread" and threw out the rest of what I posted. Uh uh

In post 162, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 157, Nero Cain wrote:and now your case is that I haven't done enough.
Wrong.

I think Italiano looks like scum looking for an easy mislim(Nero). Their case is built on sand, and not in a way I'd expect from a wrong town. It is just too wrong.

In post 163, over90 wrote:need to wait 2 weeks to elim std....

where's that coming from, nowhere? Scummy.

ok I need to stop re-read for now.
So far:
over90 is scum.
ItalianoVD is scum.
RCE is scum.
No longer seeing tako.
Nero is lhf town.
VOTE: ItalianoVD

@everyone Please answer the questions in this post.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #528 (isolation #20) » Sun May 29, 2022 2:44 am

In post 527, over90 wrote:impressive
In post 525, Not Known 15 wrote:over90 is scum.
nope

i will read it later

Mixed up you with DeasVail, sorry.
You are a very slight scumlean but... not like this.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #531 (isolation #21) » Sun May 29, 2022 3:02 am

In post 530, over90 wrote:why after all my scummy posts (in your opinion) i'm not so scum for you?
explain your thoughts here

You don't fit into the team at all.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #606 (isolation #22) » Mon May 30, 2022 3:20 am

In post 532, over90 wrote:why not? explain the reason in words

ISO'd you four. No idea where I got that from. Not doing these quotewalls again!
D1 limpool is at {over90,ItalianoVD, DeasVail, RCE}
I do not like over90's progression from this incident.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #607 (isolation #23) » Mon May 30, 2022 3:22 am

In post 605, SirCakez wrote:I am behind and can't get caught up until tomorrow but my vote is really stale and this guy needs more pressure

VOTE: dannflor

VOTE: DeasVail
This is a better target for pressure.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #612 (isolation #24) » Mon May 30, 2022 4:22 am

In post 608, Nero Cain wrote:ok, I get it. No voting VD till I get a gulity. ok

VOTE: gamma

why

Not Known 15 · Post Post #634 (isolation #25) » Mon May 30, 2022 9:04 am

In post 624, Enchant wrote:
In post 615, Gamma Emerald wrote: your sorting method seems basic as shit
That's how people long ago in history searched for scum, so i don't think methods are that bad.

... Oh well, yeah they sucked at scumhunting.

What do you mean?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #734 (isolation #26) » Tue May 31, 2022 10:56 am

In post 729, Enchant wrote:Mostly going for no-lim is punisheble, due we losing one miselim for some benefit of PRs which could not happen.

Yeah, this.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #735 (isolation #27) » Tue May 31, 2022 10:57 am

In post 732, over90 wrote:and we also kill to kill townies and town prs, right?

That looks like a post intended for the Mafia PT.
VOTE: Over90

Not Known 15 · Post Post #901 (isolation #28) » Wed Jun 01, 2022 9:30 am

In post 900, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 877, mq.bosco wrote:
In post 861, over90 wrote:and what about nk15, any updates?
No. But have updates about SirCakez and Nero – both scummy. Cakez more.
y am I scummy?

I told you - you are lhf.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #941 (isolation #29) » Thu Jun 02, 2022 10:35 am

In post 937, Nero Cain wrote:There's only 4 scum here

I see TMI.
VOTE: Nero

Not Known 15 · Fri Jun 03, 2022 12:04 pm

In post 941, Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 937, Nero Cain wrote:There's only 4 scum here
I see TMI.
VOTE: Nero

Why is everybody ignoring this?

Not Known 15 · Fri Jun 03, 2022 12:17 pm

In post 1090, Nero Cain wrote:Cakez was also pushing that there was 4 scum and I'd argue that Elsa/Gamma pushing 3 is way more TMI than assuming 4 like is normal. + I was also pushing that there were 4 scum long before my TMI "slip" so just conveniently ignore that?

No, I didn't ignore it. There's a difference between assuming 4/3 scum and what Nero did,

There's only 4 scum here, so if scum is some combination of you, Titus, Elsa/Cara/Mala, Kitty, STD (maybe Deas instead now) What's the difference between me pushing that I think scum are here and you throwing out mostly unexplained or poorly explained reads lists?

treating 4 scum as an absolute certainity

!
This is TMI.

Not Known 15 · Fri Jun 03, 2022 12:29 pm

In post 1096, Nero Cain wrote:nk, why am I TMIing but not cakez?

Show me that supposed TMI.

Not Known 15 · Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:40 pm

VOTE: Titus

Not Known 15 · Post Post #1857 (isolation #34) » Sat Jun 11, 2022 8:53 am

In post 1835, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1130, KittyTacky wrote:There's at least one scum in
Titus
, Bosco, and
NK
.
weird soft bus?

VOTE: Not Mafia

Not Known 15 · Sat Jun 11, 2022 10:52 am

In post 1890, DeasVail wrote:I am sure that NM is town. I am not sure that KittyTacky is town

Why

Not Known 15 · Sat Jun 11, 2022 11:36 am

In post 1894, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I think DV is town btw

I don't.

Not Known 15 · Sat Jun 11, 2022 11:40 am

In post 1892, DeasVail wrote:
In post 1891, Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 1890, DeasVail wrote:I am sure that NM is town. I am not sure that KittyTacky is town
Why
Why not?

Why is Not Mafia town? I have a very good reason to sr that slot. It was mentioned by scum amongst two other town.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #1937 (isolation #38) » Sat Jun 11, 2022 9:01 pm

VOTE: STD

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2074 (isolation #39) » Thu Jun 16, 2022 5:56 am

In post 2071, Not_Mafia wrote:Hmmmmm what should I do with my conftown status?

Get nightkilled?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2141 (isolation #40) » Sat Jun 18, 2022 5:04 am

In post 2135, Malakittens wrote:LETS MAKE IT 3 scum flips in a row.

But voting me

prevents

that from happening.

VOTE: Potato

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2148 (isolation #41) » Sat Jun 18, 2022 5:21 am

In post 2147, SirCakez wrote:Ya Mala has been on fire this game give her credit

Having been right previously can make people overconfident.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2152 (isolation #42) » Sat Jun 18, 2022 8:20 am

In post 2151, SirCakez wrote:I mean it makes a lot of sense that Mala just stopped the kill bc the JKed person flipped scum
Like Occam's razor just says Mala did exactly what we think

Unless it was a bus and Mala is scum!JK. Keep this in mind when the time to massclaim comes and something doesn't add up!

Not Known 15 · Sun Jun 19, 2022 10:06 pm

In post 2249, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
In post 2020, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:NK15 quickhammer came out of nowhere after not talking about StD at all D3
Aside from that quickhammer, pretty bad voting record by voting people who have either flipped town or I believe are town
Weird vote in 1857
Gamma soft defended him in 424, which seems partner-y
Quoting this as a summary why NK15 is scum

In post 1857, Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 1835, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1130, KittyTacky wrote:There's at least one scum in
Titus
, Bosco, and
NK
.
weird soft bus?
VOTE: Not Mafia
Btw, this post seems to imply that NK15 has reason to SR KittyTacky, but that scumread seemed to have disappeared into thin air today.

No, that was an embarassing failure. I somehow had Kitty as flipped scum in my mind.

Not Known 15 · Mon Jun 20, 2022 11:52 pm

In post 2286, DkKoba wrote:
In post 826, Nero Cain wrote:elsa is gamma, VD is not gamma or Elsa. I was scum reading both VD and Gamma. Never was any traction on VD so I stopped vanity voting and started consolidating on Gamma/Elsa

scum nero btw

So... you are scum?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2336 (isolation #45) » Tue Jun 21, 2022 4:23 am

In post 2334, MathBlade wrote:Koba is being annoying by not explaining and just going “I am right.” Repeatedly but that’s NAI

Koba explained it. It has to do with interactions between me and flipped scum.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2338 (isolation #46) » Tue Jun 21, 2022 5:17 am

In post 2337, MathBlade wrote:I think NK15 is a good compromise read between Koba and Mala.

No, that's wrong. Koba only sees a chance for me being scum with Enchant. You are just trying to get lims instead of trying to get scum.
VOTE: Mathblade

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2344 (isolation #47) » Tue Jun 21, 2022 7:02 am

In post 2342, Enchant wrote:Please don't elim me, i have powerrole

Hmm.....
Massclaim?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2347 (isolation #48) » Tue Jun 21, 2022 7:05 am

In post 2346, Enchant wrote:
In post 2344, Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 2342, Enchant wrote:Please don't elim me, i have powerrole
Hmm.....
Massclaim?
I am NEIBHOUR.

And nothing else?
Ok.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2350 (isolation #49) » Tue Jun 21, 2022 7:06 am

In post 2346, Enchant wrote:
In post 2344, Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 2342, Enchant wrote:Please don't elim me, i have powerrole
Hmm.....
Massclaim?
I am NEIBHOUR.

The sort of neighbor known as Mason?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2509 (isolation #50) » Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:19 pm

In post 2431, MathBlade wrote:Busy day with work,

Mala’s last reads were CSF/NK/Koba

I was feeling CSF / Koba end of last night but with Mala dying I am leaning more NK.

I don’t want to do Enchant based on how yesterday went but I might be convinced

I think a PoE of CSF/NK/Koba is where I think scum are.

This does not make sense.
If you were feeling CSF/Koba last night...
and mala's last read was CSF/Me/Koba
why does this make you lean towards me?

Not Known 15 · Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:19 am

Yes, let's massclaim.

Not Known 15 · Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:37 pm

In post 2542, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
In post 2525, over90 wrote:
In post 2523, Not Known 15 wrote:Yes, let's massclaim.
Im vt
U?
Note how NK15 disappears after this

Now, that's some kind of bad shade.

VT.

Not Known 15 · Sun Jun 26, 2022 12:34 am

I see TMI indications and partner interactions from CSF.

VOTE: CSF

So yes, that's fine.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2564 (isolation #54) » Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:11 am

Nevermind. It is just Enchant and Mathblade.

Elsa claimed that the neighborhood had Enchant, Mathblade, herself and Mala on it but Mala didn't flip Neighbor Jailkeeper, just Jailkeeper.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2707 (isolation #55) » Wed Jun 29, 2022 3:08 am

In post 2706, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2704, over90 wrote:In my opinion, last scums should be low active with no huge morale after losing 2 partners... but maybe im wrong and dont understand local people's willing to play in any circumstances
Then NK15+?

VOTE: NK15

Pure opportunism.
VOTE: Mathblade

Can we lim this, please?
Mathblade is just looking for excuses to get people yeeted instead of hunting scum. This is a prime example. Over90 says that they might be wrong because of being unfamiliar with people. Someone like Mathblade wouldn't jump on it like that... if hunting scum.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2717 (isolation #56) » Wed Jun 29, 2022 4:56 am

In post 2713, KittyTacky wrote:VOTE: NK15

I really disagree with the case on Math, and NK15's push seems like, ironically, "Pure opportunism.". NK15 sees TvT, NK15 pushes the attacked townie.

Last 2 scum are CSF and NK15.

That's E-1.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2718 (isolation #57) » Wed Jun 29, 2022 4:59 am

In post 2713, KittyTacky wrote:I really disagree with the case on Math,

Why

?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2841 (isolation #58) » Sun Jul 03, 2022 6:04 pm

These are the votecounts. I edited in red for confirmed mafia, light green for confirmed town, and darker green for me.

In post 218, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.1 !

KittyTacky (3):
mq.bosco, DeasVail,

Not Known 15

mq.bosco
(2):
RCEnigma,
NashedPotato

ItalianoVD
(2):
Gamma Emerald,
Nero Cain

Gamma Emerald
(1):
takotsubo syndrome

Dannflor
(1):
Enchant

Save The Dragons
(1):
over90

Nero Cain (1):
ItalianoVD

Carcalilly
(1):
SirCakez

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

not voting (3):

Dannflor,
KittyTacky,
Carcalilly

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

E

In post 345, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.2 !

takotsubo syndrome (6):
SirCakez, ItalianoVD,
Gamma Emerald,
KittyTacky,
Not Known 15,

Save The Dragons

KittyTacky (2):
mq.bosco,

DeasVail

mq.bosco
(2):
RCEnigma,
NashedPotato

ItalianoVD (1):
Nero Cain

Dannflor (1):
Enchant

Save The Dragons (1):
over90

Not Known 15
(1):
Carcalilly

not voting (2):

Dannflor,

takotsubo syndrome

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

E

In post 459, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.3 !

takotsubo syndrome
(5):
SirCakez,
Gamma Emerald,
KittyTacky,
Not Known 15,
Save The Dragons

Not Known 15
(5):
Carcalilly,

DeasVail,
ItalianoVD, Enchant, over90

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

ItalianoVD (1):
Nero Cain

Dannflor
(1):
RCEnigma

RCEnigma
(1):
Dannflor

not voting (1):

takotsubo syndrome

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

cakez is VLA until monday

deasvail is VLA for two days

In post 577, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.4 !

takotsubo syndrome
(3):
SirCakez,
Gamma Emerald,
KittyTacky,

Not Known 15
(3):
Carcalilly,

DeasVail,
over90

ItalianoVD(2):
Nero Cain,
Not Known 15

Gamma Emerald
(2):

takotsubo syndrome, RCEnigma

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

RCEnigma
(1):
Dannflor

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

Nero Cain (1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (1):
Enchant

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

cakez is VLA until monday

In post 695, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.5 !

Elsa Jay
(3):

Malakittens, Nero Cain,
over90

Malakittens
(2):
Elsa Jay,
KittyTacky

Not Known 15
(2):
Carcalilly,
DeasVail

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

RCEnigma
(1):
Dannflor

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

Dannflor
(1):
SirCakez

DeasVail
(1):
Not Known 15

ItalianoVD (1):
RCEnigma

not voting (1):
Enchant

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 765, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.6 !

Elsa Jay
(3):
Nero Cain, over90,
RCEnigma

Malakittens
(2):
Elsa Jay,
KittyTacky

Not Known 15
(2):
Carcalilly,

DeasVail

over90 (2):
Not Known 15,
SirCakez

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

RCEnigma
(1):
Titus

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (2):
Enchant,
Malakittens

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 854, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.7 !

Elsa Jay
(4):
Nero Cain,
RCEnigma, Malakittens, Titus

SirCakez (3):
Save The Dragons,
over90,
DeasVail

Malakittens
(2):
Elsa Jay
, KittyTacky

over90 (2):
Not Known 15,
SirCakez

Not Known 15
(1):
Carcalilly

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (1):
Enchant

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 1009, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.8 !

Elsa Jay
(3):

Malakittens,
mq.bosco,
SirCakez, Nero Cain

mq.bosco
(3):
NashedPotato, over90, KittyTacky

Titus
(2):
RCEnigma,

Save The Dragons

over90 (1):
Elsa Jay

SirCakez (1):
DeasVail

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

Nero Cain (1):
Not Known 15

DeasVail
(1):
Titus

not voting (2):
Enchant,
Carcalilly

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 1289, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.9 !

Titus
(6):
Nero Cain,
Elsa Jay, Save The Dragons
, over90, SirCakez,
DeasVail

mq.bosco
(4):
NashedPotato, KittyTacky,
Titus
,
Malakittens

Elsa Jay
(1):

mq.bosco

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

Nero Cain (1):
Not Known 15

not voting (3):
Enchant,
Carcalilly,

RCEnigma

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in [PAUZED]

modorator notes

e

In post 1440, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

d1 final vote count !

Titus
(9):
Nero Cain,
Elsa Jay, Save The Dragons,
over90, SirCakez,
DeasVail,

Not Known 15,

Malakittens,
Enchant

mq.bosco
(3):
NashedPotato, KittyTacky,
Titus

Elsa Jay
(1):

mq.bosco

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (2):

Carcalilly,
RCEnigma

with 16 alive, it took 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house.

modorator notes

e

1.3 looks very interesting, two competing town wagons with only 2 non confirmed people out of it and three scum on the wagons.
The business with the ElsaJay wagon and the early double red on Titus suggests that scum didn't want to get a red flip.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2854 (isolation #59) » Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:49 am

Let's see what we get for Koba (Nero Cain) if we paint Koba red.

In post 218, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.1 !

KittyTacky (3):
mq.bosco, DeasVail,

Not Known 15

mq.bosco
(2):
RCEnigma,
NashedPotato

ItalianoVD
(2):
Gamma Emerald,

Nero Cain

Gamma Emerald
(1):
takotsubo syndrome

Dannflor
(1):
Enchant

Save The Dragons
(1):
over90

Nero Cain
(1):
ItalianoVD

Carcalilly
(1):
SirCakez

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

not voting (3):

Dannflor,
KittyTacky,
Carcalilly

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

E

In post 345, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.2 !

takotsubo syndrome (6):
SirCakez, ItalianoVD,
Gamma Emerald,
KittyTacky,
Not Known 15,

Save The Dragons

KittyTacky (2):
mq.bosco,

DeasVail

mq.bosco
(2):
RCEnigma,
NashedPotato

ItalianoVD (1):
Nero Cain

Dannflor (1):
Enchant

Save The Dragons (1):
over90

Not Known 15
(1):
Carcalilly

not voting (2):

Dannflor,

takotsubo syndrome

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

E

In post 459, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.3 !

takotsubo syndrome
(5):
SirCakez,
Gamma Emerald,
KittyTacky,
Not Known 15,
Save The Dragons

Not Known 15
(5):
Carcalilly,

DeasVail,
ItalianoVD, Enchant, over90

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

ItalianoVD (1):
Nero Cain

Dannflor
(1):
RCEnigma

RCEnigma
(1):
Dannflor

not voting (1):

takotsubo syndrome

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

cakez is VLA until monday

deasvail is VLA for two days

In post 577, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.4 !

takotsubo syndrome
(3):
SirCakez,
Gamma Emerald,
KittyTacky,

Not Known 15
(3):
Carcalilly,

DeasVail,
over90

ItalianoVD(2):
Nero Cain
,
Not Known 15

Gamma Emerald
(2):

takotsubo syndrome, RCEnigma

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

RCEnigma
(1):
Dannflor

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

Nero Cain (1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (1):
Enchant

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

cakez is VLA until monday

In post 695, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.5 !

Elsa Jay
(3):

Malakittens,
Nero Cain,
over90

Malakittens
(2):
Elsa Jay,
KittyTacky

Not Known 15
(2):
Carcalilly,
DeasVail

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

RCEnigma
(1):
Dannflor

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

Dannflor
(1):
SirCakez

DeasVail
(1):
Not Known 15

ItalianoVD (1):
RCEnigma

not voting (1):
Enchant

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 765, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.6 !

Elsa Jay
(3):

Nero Cain,
over90,
RCEnigma

Malakittens
(2):
Elsa Jay,
KittyTacky

Not Known 15
(2):
Carcalilly,

DeasVail

over90 (2):
Not Known 15,
SirCakez

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

RCEnigma
(1):
Titus

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (2):
Enchant,
Malakittens

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 854, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.7 !

Elsa Jay
(4):

Nero Cain,

RCEnigma, Malakittens, Titus

SirCakez (3):
Save The Dragons,
over90,
DeasVail

Malakittens
(2):
Elsa Jay
, KittyTacky

over90 (2):
Not Known 15,
SirCakez

Not Known 15
(1):
Carcalilly

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (1):
Enchant

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 1009, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.8 !

Elsa Jay
(3):

Malakittens,
mq.bosco,
SirCakez,
Nero Cain

mq.bosco
(3):
NashedPotato, over90, KittyTacky

Titus
(2):
RCEnigma,

Save The Dragons

over90 (1):
Elsa Jay

SirCakez (1):
DeasVail

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

Nero Cain
(1):
Not Known 15

DeasVail
(1):
Titus

not voting (2):
Enchant,
Carcalilly

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 1289, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.9 !

Titus
(6):
Nero Cain,

Elsa Jay, Save The Dragons
, over90, SirCakez,
DeasVail

mq.bosco
(4):
NashedPotato, KittyTacky,
Titus
,
Malakittens

Elsa Jay
(1):

mq.bosco

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

Nero Cain (1):
Not Known 15

not voting (3):
Enchant,
Carcalilly,

RCEnigma

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in [PAUZED]

modorator notes

e

In post 1440, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

d1 final vote count !

Titus
(9):
Nero Cain,

Elsa Jay, Save The Dragons,
over90, SirCakez,
DeasVail,

Not Known 15,

Malakittens,
Enchant

mq.bosco
(3):
NashedPotato, KittyTacky,
Titus

Elsa Jay
(1):

mq.bosco

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (2):

Carcalilly,
RCEnigma

with 16 alive, it took 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house.

modorator notes

e

This looks unlikely, Enchant.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2855 (isolation #60) » Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:57 am

I think it is Nashed/Andante
It fits with the behaviour of scum Day 1 - Nashed never voted for scum, and other scum never voted for scum.

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2856 (isolation #61) » Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:59 am

Nevermind, Andante was town. I am stupid.

Not Known 15 · Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:02 am

Let me correct this oversight.

In post 218, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.1 !

KittyTacky (3):
mq.bosco, DeasVail,

Not Known 15

mq.bosco
(2):
RCEnigma,

NashedPotato

ItalianoVD
(2):
Gamma Emerald,
Nero Cain

Gamma Emerald
(1):
takotsubo syndrome

Dannflor
(1):
Enchant

Save The Dragons
(1):
over90

Nero Cain (1):
ItalianoVD

Carcalilly
(1):
SirCakez

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

not voting (3):

Dannflor,
KittyTacky,
Carcalilly

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

E

In post 345, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.2 !

takotsubo syndrome (6):
SirCakez, ItalianoVD,
Gamma Emerald,
KittyTacky,
Not Known 15,

Save The Dragons

KittyTacky (2):
mq.bosco,

DeasVail

mq.bosco
(2):
RCEnigma,

NashedPotato

ItalianoVD (1):
Nero Cain

Dannflor (1):
Enchant

Save The Dragons (1):
over90

Not Known 15
(1):
Carcalilly

not voting (2):

Dannflor,

takotsubo syndrome

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

E

In post 459, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.3 !

takotsubo syndrome
(5):
SirCakez,
Gamma Emerald,
KittyTacky,
Not Known 15,
Save The Dragons

Not Known 15
(5):
Carcalilly,

DeasVail,
ItalianoVD, Enchant, over90

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

ItalianoVD (1):
Nero Cain

Dannflor
(1):
RCEnigma

RCEnigma
(1):
Dannflor

not voting (1):

takotsubo syndrome

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

cakez is VLA until monday

deasvail is VLA for two days

In post 577, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.4 !

takotsubo syndrome
(3):
SirCakez,
Gamma Emerald,
KittyTacky,

Not Known 15
(3):
Carcalilly,

DeasVail,
over90

ItalianoVD(2):
Nero Cain,
Not Known 15

Gamma Emerald
(2):

takotsubo syndrome, RCEnigma

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

RCEnigma
(1):
Dannflor

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

Nero Cain (1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (1):
Enchant

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

cakez is VLA until monday

In post 695, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.5 !

Elsa Jay
(3):

Malakittens, Nero Cain,
over90

Malakittens
(2):
Elsa Jay,
KittyTacky

Not Known 15
(2):
Carcalilly,
DeasVail

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

RCEnigma
(1):
Dannflor

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

Dannflor
(1):
SirCakez

DeasVail
(1):
Not Known 15

ItalianoVD (1):
RCEnigma

not voting (1):
Enchant

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 765, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.6 !

Elsa Jay
(3):
Nero Cain, over90,
RCEnigma

Malakittens
(2):
Elsa Jay,
KittyTacky

Not Known 15
(2):
Carcalilly,

DeasVail

over90 (2):
Not Known 15,
SirCakez

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

RCEnigma
(1):
Titus

SirCakez (1):
Save The Dragons

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (2):
Enchant,
Malakittens

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 854, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.7 !

Elsa Jay
(4):
Nero Cain,
RCEnigma, Malakittens, Titus

SirCakez (3):
Save The Dragons,
over90,
DeasVail

Malakittens
(2):
Elsa Jay
, KittyTacky

over90 (2):
Not Known 15,
SirCakez

Not Known 15
(1):
Carcalilly

KittyTacky (1):
mq.bosco

mq.bosco
(1):
NashedPotato

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (1):
Enchant

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 1009, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.8 !

Elsa Jay
(3):

Malakittens,
mq.bosco,
SirCakez, Nero Cain

mq.bosco
(3):
NashedPotato,
over90, KittyTacky

Titus
(2):
RCEnigma,

Save The Dragons

over90 (1):
Elsa Jay

SirCakez (1):
DeasVail

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

Nero Cain (1):
Not Known 15

DeasVail
(1):
Titus

not voting (2):
Enchant,
Carcalilly

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-05 13:31:22)

modorator notes

e

In post 1289, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.9 !

Titus
(6):
Nero Cain,
Elsa Jay, Save The Dragons
, over90, SirCakez,
DeasVail

mq.bosco
(4):
NashedPotato,
KittyTacky,
Titus
,
Malakittens

Elsa Jay
(1):

mq.bosco

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

Nero Cain (1):
Not Known 15

not voting (3):
Enchant,
Carcalilly,

RCEnigma

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house. day 1 ends in [PAUZED]

modorator notes

e

In post 1440, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

d1 final vote count !

Titus
(9):
Nero Cain,
Elsa Jay, Save The Dragons,
over90, SirCakez,
DeasVail,

Not Known 15,

Malakittens,
Enchant

mq.bosco
(3):
NashedPotato
, KittyTacky,
Titus

Elsa Jay
(1):

mq.bosco

Save The Dragons
(1):
ItalianoVD

not voting (2):

Carcalilly,
RCEnigma

with 16 alive, it took 9 to cause someone to be ever so slowly slowly locked up in their own house.

modorator notes

e

1.3 looks very interesting, two competing town wagons with only 2 non confirmed people out of it and three scum on the wagons.
The business with the ElsaJay wagon and the early double red on Titus suggests that scum didn't want to get a red flip.[/quote]

Not Known 15 · Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:05 am

Heh, but the same is true for Enchant. Enchant also never was on a scum wagon.

Not Known 15 · Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:05 am

(day 1)

Not Known 15 · Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:10 am

Nor was Kitty.

Not Known 15 · Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:11 am

Enchant -> Kitty?

Not Known 15 · Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:12 am

No. Kitty->Enchant. Kitty was on me, Enchant was on Mathblade.

Not Known 15 · Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:24 am

In post 2863, Enchant wrote:I am pretty sceptical about Day 1 at all.

What do you mean?

Not Known 15 · Post Post #2880 (isolation #69) » Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:28 am

In post 2875, Enchant wrote:Likee, maybe i am blind and can't see obvious cop tells, but tell me, why in the hell someone checks NM? Literally WHY, only person who would do it is memers. I don't remember cop as memer. I actually don't remember without looking at player list at all, and i am lazy to create new tab, but can bitch about it here.

Why someone cop checks NM? The real question should be why someone doesn't cop check NM. Cop checks are for people who are not easy to read.

Not Mafia didn't hammer me but instead pushed Mathblade.

Not Known 15 · Tue Jul 05, 2022 11:20 pm

Not_Mafia played this pretty decently. Not hammering me but instead voting mathblade was a good idea. Who knows what would have happened after my flip. And as conftown it was probably the best idea to stay in the shadows anyways.

I was right with Mathblade and had the right idea with kitty->enchant but.... oof I was so close to being yeeted multiple times. I didn't do well but at least I managed to convince enough people to yeet mathblade.
Overall this was a good team effort.

Not Known 15 · Tue Jul 05, 2022 11:22 pm

And my analysis of Day 1 votecounts was right - there was not a single bus votecount.