Agreed. Is it policy lynch time yet?sekinj wrote:@armlx - great. you've gone from irrelevant content to no content. nice.
BM
*PS: Hope he doesn't turn out to be my Lover. rofl!
Agreed. Is it policy lynch time yet?sekinj wrote:@armlx - great. you've gone from irrelevant content to no content. nice.
Well originally i was born in Cleveland, but we moved to Detroit when i was 5, where my papa could get work.armlx wrote:Where did you come from? I'm confused.com
Agreed. We should call Ocean Finance, and consolidate all our existing votes into 1 single, manageable, monthly payment.neko2086 wrote: Why are we still not consolidating votes?
Sleepy Panda? And no, you cant kill me now. I'm an unlynchable Jester lover. Who just happens to lack his role pm at this point.Crazy wrote:BM, who did you replace? And if it was someone scummy can we kill you now?
thanks bud.armlx wrote:BM, I see what you did there.
Apparently not... 0.oSleepyPanda wrote:Hey you. I'm still in the game.Battle Mage wrote:Sleepy Panda? And no, you cant kill me now. I'm an unlynchable Jester lover. Who just happens to lack his role pm at this point.Crazy wrote:BM, who did you replace? And if it was someone scummy can we kill you now?
BM
The Mod asked if i wanted to replace in. I said yes. Simple, no?SleepyPanda wrote:Snifflesniffle.Battle Mage wrote: Apparently not... 0.o
BM
But I don't believe you.
You know why you don't have a role PM? Becauseyou'renot in the game.
Someone else had asked for replacement beforehand, so i offered. Then i was told the place was taken, but i'd be kept on the waiting list. 3 hours later, and SSF drops out, so i figured i'd hop in and help u guys out.WaltWishbone wrote:What time did you get asked to replace BM? SSF asked fror a replacement but it was only a few hours before you posted. It could be for him, I don't think anyone else had asked for a replacement.
Then tough titties. I was here first.WaltWishbone wrote:So, you are not officially in the game? What if SSF has been replaced by someone else as well?Battle Mage wrote:Someone else had asked for replacement beforehand, so i offered. Then i was told the place was taken, but i'd be kept on the waiting list. 3 hours later, and SSF drops out, so i figured i'd hop in and help u guys out.WaltWishbone wrote:What time did you get asked to replace BM? SSF asked fror a replacement but it was only a few hours before you posted. It could be for him, I don't think anyone else had asked for a replacement.
WHERE'S MA LOVER!?
BM
^Battle Mage wrote: I'm an unlynchable Jester lover. Who just happens to lack his role pm at this point.
You do realise that if you use your alleged 'cred' to get me lynched, you will no longer have said 'cred' for future games. If you think i'm worth it, then i'm truly flattered, and far be it from me to question your motives.Adel wrote:speaking of policy lynches, if you don't stop spamming up this game and corrupting the signal:noise ratio I will get you lynched. I burned off some of my townie cred so that newbie-townies would stop following my opinions and start thinking critically about the game, but I know that I have enough cred left to get you lynched.Battle Mage wrote:Agreed. Is it policy lynch time yet?sekinj wrote:@armlx - great. you've gone from irrelevant content to no content. nice.
Vote: Armlx
BM
*PS: Hope he doesn't turn out to be my Lover. rofl!
You have a mature playstyle: use it.
You should both know better. Anyone making references to ongoing games will be taken to the highest court of all!Adel wrote:Sure. Sometimes BM needs a leash.armlx wrote:Adel, would you mind if I referenced that post in future games when this scenario pops up again?
No. Try reading my post, rather than completely misinterpreting me. I'm voting him because:Knight of Cydonia wrote:...You're kidding me, right? You're voting him because he accidentally mis-submitted? Grasping, much?
He might. But there again, he MIGHT be making an extra special effort to make his posts look good because he is scum.Knight of Cydonia wrote:A) He might not be particualrly good at BBcode, and was trying it out.
Why are you so scared of letting people answer for themselves?Knights of Cydonia wrote: B) Um, hai thar. This is real life calling. Some of us do stuff in it, y'know?
Your single reason for a vote isn't something scummy, it's a null-tell, and it's stretching heavily.
It's a perfectly acceptable vote for the moment. Maybe if you stop arguing the toss, i can start reading, and then get a better impression of the game?Knight of Cydonia wrote:BM: there are plenty of better lynches today. If you want to persue Darox, go for it, but it may end up being a wasted vote, today at least.
Sorry, but given my analysis so far: Rofl.neko2086 wrote: Crazy and knight are lovers. Only one of them should have votes.
Lol, this is mere OMGUS i take it? Or are you seriously assuming i have no case for a vote which is not shared with anyone else? You somehow imagine that i expect to get another 10 people to join me in this lynch, without any reasoning? Give me a break.Knight of Cydonia wrote:Also: HP, please, for hte love of God, if you are town (which I highly doubt) post a decent defence, or at least accuse someone else rather turtling. You're being so overly defensive it's hard to imagine you as anything but scum right now.
Also:FoS: BMfor complete and utter failure to present any case whatsoever with his Vote on my sweetheart. Explain.
That's funny. I tend to differentiate between respect and common courtesy. The latter of which, you are lacking with me. Your mother would be ashamed!Knight of Cydonia wrote:I give respect to those who earn it. You have yet to do so.
So, can you repeat this just for the benefit of everyone else?Knight of Cydonia wrote: BM - until you actually post a case, yes, I'm assuming you don't have one.
Maybe it is. Especially given i haven't read the entire game yet. But then, if the case has no merit, you don't have anything to worry about, do you?KoC wrote: Also, the so-called "Crazy case" is more than likely to be a re-hash of all the bull-crap which was explained pretty damn well D1.
*facepalm*pwnz wrote:need replacement, can't keep up, apologies to adel
This will have to be REALLY good...armlx wrote:Reread how he caught icemanE.Armix, I didn't catch this the first time around or think much of it, but how is crazy confirmed town?
link? page reference?Darox wrote:Just read Crazy's scumtell plan and the subsequent reaction of Iceman.
I am. Are you? Your buddy requested replacement after being asked a rather important question. What part of this are you having trouble with?Adel wrote:Fail.Battle Mage wrote:Mod, please Prod Pwnz.
BM
Are you even reading this game?
And? I dont see a rule that says he cant post in the meantime. Adel- sort it please. Or maybe you can answer the question for him from your discussion?Darox wrote:The mod stated in the vote count that Pwnz was being replaced.
lol, you consider it a compliment when someone tells you that you play as textbook scum?Crazy wrote:Now the awesome thing is, I can't be called scum and insulted at the same time. When someone is insulting my intelligence here, they're actually calling me pro-town! When someone is calling me scum, they're actually complimenting me!
Yay! Too bad pwnz had to be replaced.
You're playing this 'we're protown lovers' thing a bit too bad dontcha think? Methinks thou doth protest too much.Knight of Cydonia wrote:LyALu, and 'cause Crazy tole' me to.
unvote; Vote: ThAdmiral
1. Irrelevant- You claimed you were voting simply because Crazy had, which is inherently poor. Do you always vote for the same person as some other player, just because they are confirmed town? Do you really trust Crazy's judgement as much as/more than your own?Knight of Cydonia wrote:1) What, you don't ever agree with your lover?
2) To be honest, ThAd/DBE and cerebus/HP are both fairly good lynches, IMHO.
Methinks thou doth protest too much.
Now can somebody tell me why Crazy isn't dead yet? 0.oCrazy really stinks. Cephrir is not Wolf-scum. I'm undecided on Charter atm. I'm not 100% on Adel's 'secret scumtell' thing. If my suspicion is right, i really don't see what the big fuss is about. Opposed Force is almost certainly town. Not JUST because Adel said he was scum.
Yeh, i'm pretty sure Crazy is scum. 113 makes me think Cephrir is probably town. Cerebus and Charter vouch for Iceman. I’m not sure whether Crazy is likely Wolf-scum. Post 162 stands in favour, and post 163 stands against. 177=yuck. Crazy is too scummy for words. 0.o
180 by Charter just blew my mind.Explanation?
SleepyPanda gives me a mild town-vibe. 192 gets a big ROFL.
Vote: CrazyAnything else would be criminal. Also, Adel as a potential scumbuddy?
220 by Harvey Pew is vaguely scummy. Sekinj gives me town vibes. In post 250, Pwnz makes the greatest observation of the game, when he references post 147, in which Iceman reveals knowledge of Crazy and Farside being lovers.Confirm Vote: Crazy
264 is classic martyr talk, which really makes sense in the context of Iceman’s distancing. 303 by Thadmiral doesn’t sit well with me.
Lol.armlx wrote:He's confirmed town.Now can somebody tell me why Crazy isn't dead yet? 0.o
Ooh, i'm quaking in my boots. Simply put, in case you genuinely havent been reading, i'm pretty damn sure you are scum. If you arent, ill happily take the repercussions. But if you really want me to take you seriously, either respond to the points ive made, or shut up and let the grown-ups talk.Knight of Cydonia wrote:Okay, seriously, either provide some decent evidence for this vendetta, or shut up. We're town, I don't know what you are, but you're doing yourself no favours by attacking a pair of townies so relentlessly.Battle Mage wrote:Lol.armlx wrote:He's confirmed town.Now can somebody tell me why Crazy isn't dead yet? 0.o
No, really. This isn't the time for joking around now buddy. Does anyone have anything relevant to add before we string him up?
BM
I dont get it. And me reading that far might be a long-shot, so if you can explain succinctly now, that'd be helpful.Raging Rabbit wrote:BM, if you'll read past post 300 you'll see why we think he's town. I don't see him as completely confirmed, though.
DGB is the future president? rofl.Darox wrote:Does sleepypanda know that TS is DGB and that DGB is the ruler of insanity, chaos, and Alaska?
In other news,Unvote: Cephrir
join the club.Harvey Pew wrote:No, I'm town that has given up.Toaster Strudel wrote:I'm beginning to think that Harvey is scum that's given up.
This is where i'm at. I dont see alot of point me continuing reading when you're the only person who knows i'm here, and you're not being totally helpful.Battle Mage wrote:well i would apologise for my absence, but it seems i havent missed much. No Lover, No response to my accusation on Crazy/KoC. *cries*
BM
Maybe i'd be able to acknowledge them, if they were specifically addressed to me. Telling me to read the thread is 1 thing, but rarely does a cursory glance at every single post tell you everything you need to know. This is why rereading is no substitute for being around for the whole game. That's why i'd like a specific part area pointed out to me, because clearly it is not the entire thread that you are referring to, and i dont really want to do the whole needle-haystack routine.Raging Rabbit wrote:People will take you more seriously when you're read through and see the same picture we see. Your case on Crazy is perceived as lacking because you don't have the same amount of info we have, and is thus ignored. If you want yourself heard you should acknowledge the reasons we think Crazy is innocent despite his odd behavior early in the game, but it appears you don't even know them yet.
My role is to find scum. I've found it. As far as i can see, i've made a damn good start. Now, i've given my reasoning, and it's the turn of those who disagree to explain WHY.Raging Rabbit wrote:It's not a haysack, it's a game you chose to replace into and I believe it's every replacement's duty to first and foremost go through the trouble of reading the thread. There are some non Crazy-related stuff in there you may find important as well, you know.
Because i've read enough to know that Crazy and KoC are scum?sekinj wrote:or you could whine some more. Really, how can you find scum without reading the thread?Battle Mage wrote:My role is to find scum. I've found it. As far as i can see, i've made a damn good start. Now, i've given my reasoning, and it's the turn of those who disagree to explain WHY.Raging Rabbit wrote:It's not a haysack, it's a game you chose to replace into and I believe it's every replacement's duty to first and foremost go through the trouble of reading the thread. There are some non Crazy-related stuff in there you may find important as well, you know.
BM
BMBattle Mage wrote:TS, i assume you are aware that there are only 2 wolves left, and that this is a game of pairs. As such, you might wanna look at pairs, as opposed to individuals? Just a thought...
Also, here's my thoughts so far. I figure if we are gonna move this day along, i should post this now so we can discuss:
Now can somebody tell me why Crazy isn't dead yet? 0.oCrazy really stinks. Cephrir is not Wolf-scum. I'm undecided on Charter atm. I'm not 100% on Adel's 'secret scumtell' thing. If my suspicion is right, i really don't see what the big fuss is about. Opposed Force is almost certainly town. Not JUST because Adel said he was scum.
Yeh, i'm pretty sure Crazy is scum. 113 makes me think Cephrir is probably town. Cerebus and Charter vouch for Iceman. I’m not sure whether Crazy is likely Wolf-scum. Post 162 stands in favour, and post 163 stands against. 177=yuck. Crazy is too scummy for words. 0.o
180 by Charter just blew my mind.Explanation?
SleepyPanda gives me a mild town-vibe. 192 gets a big ROFL.
Vote: CrazyAnything else would be criminal. Also, Adel as a potential scumbuddy?
220 by Harvey Pew is vaguely scummy. Sekinj gives me town vibes. In post 250, Pwnz makes the greatest observation of the game, when he references post 147, in which Iceman reveals knowledge of Crazy and Farside being lovers.Confirm Vote: Crazy
264 is classic martyr talk, which really makes sense in the context of Iceman’s distancing. 303 by Thadmiral doesn’t sit well with me.
BM
your case on me will start with the fact that i havent posted any reasoning for you and Crazy to be scum, despite the fact i have done so on two occassions- one of which is helpfully in the post above?Knight of Cydonia wrote:...and that's what my D4 case on BM will start with.
Anyone who votes and says "I don't need to provide a case - it's obvious, surely?" is not helping the town. That and I really don't suit suicide. It's just not my thing. Self-harming, yes, going all the way? Heck no.
rofl. Has my daytalk been posted yet?WaltWishbone wrote:Everyone except thead/dbe, bm/clock, and dar/star have replied yes and Darox already posted his daytalk a few weeks back. So all he needs to do is add the date, times and whats been written since. So I think it's pretty much agreed we should proceed.Crazy wrote:All.
Wanna do a random dice roll to see who goes first, then popcorn?
Please include this information... Post number, Day, Time, Author, paraphrased daytalk. For example only:
1.) Sept 1 9:00am WWB - I ask RR why he has not taken out the garbage, why he has not fixed the sink, and why he never sends me flowers anymore.
2.) Sept 2 10:00pm RR - Says hes going to watch the football game and wants me to bring him a beer and shut my mouth.
As far as order, I don't think it matters. It is going to take some people longer than others. I think we should all just start posting it when we finish. I think how quickly it is put together will be a tell as well.
What? when did i reread before paraphrasing daytalk? As far as i can recall, i've done neither to this point.neko2086 wrote:Charter is being even more defensive, yes, and offering terrible appeals to emotion, yes, but BM/CWR are pretty much confirmed scum and should be priority lynch in my eyes. I've yet to see any good reason offered as to why a townie replacement would need to reread before paraphrasing daytalk. Also, I've yet to see anyone even disagree that they're scum!!!
vote: BM
Again, would somebody deign to explain to me why i'm being wagonned here?sekinj wrote:I think we shoudl vote the scummiest each day. I don't think "clearing the thread" is a noble enough cause that it can bump one pair up over another that is scummier. We can lynch the scummiest today (IMO BM), and then if charter is still the scummiest tomorrow, we can lynch him tomorrow. But I don't think we shoudl lynch a less scummy person today just because they are annoying or whatever.
vote: BM
lol. Again see my posting history. Do you really think i'm risking replacement in ALL of my games, and neglecting the game i am modding, in order to build an elaborate meta for this game? -.-sekinj wrote:and I'm not sure if he will post again anyway.Knight of Cydonia wrote:BM - if your next post isn't paraphrase daytalk, you guarantee my vote moving back to you. 'Nuff said.
yes. Thats why i had to get the mod to send me a link to it lol. After a certain point, i just gave up checking it.Knight of Cydonia wrote:BM - is that it? really?
I dont use the Watched Topics feature of the site. I dont have any mafia related things on favourites. My inbox is normally bordering on full, and finding stuff is a nightmare if it isnt recent. Bearing in mind how long ago i replaced into the game, and how many pms ive recieved since then, its hardly surprising that i didnt bother looking.Knight of Cydonia wrote:Okay, here's what I'm thinking: why did BM need to be sent teh link by the mod? As a town replacement, I was sent the link to mine and Crazy's daytalk as soon as I replaced in, and bookmarked it to make sure. Was there some discontinuity between scum and town PMs, in that scum were sent TWO daytalk links - one for team, and one for their lover and them alone?
This may be different to your idea, Walt, but this intrigues me.