Daytalk posting is obviously going to be helpful. I like the idea of popcorn style. That, or somebody that knows how to use the dice tags should just start randomly picking somebody.
BM's case, in which Crazy is so obviously scum we're all idiots for not lynching him yet:
BM wrote:Post 162 stands in favour,
Crazy, post 162 wrote:icemanE wrote:
The tell isn't about being experienced, Iceman. It's about being town. And no, I can't justify my statement without revealing what the tell is, but anybody that does realize what it is can easily see how your posts show that you don't know what it is.
Ah, you see, this makes me think
you're
pretending to know what it is. Unless something was missing from role PM.
I know what it is. You don't and are pretending to. Die scum.
Aside from being overly confident, I don't see how this makes Crazy obvscum.
BM wrote:
177=yuck. Crazy is too scummy for words. 0.o
You didn't say what was 'yuck' about it, but here it is:
Crazy, post 177 wrote:Opposed wrote:What I see is Crazy defending adel as town as well as the scumtell. Adel isn't even confirmed town and Crazy is already assuming she is and following the scumtell. Attacking a person for a statement from someone and stating their town is pretty scummy.
This is stupid. Look at it my way:
-Adel knows about said scum-tell and made a point to actually bring it up.
-I have a feeling I know what she is talking about, so a secret scum-tell
does
actually exist.
The only way that Adel is scum is the following:
Adel made up the fact that there is a secret-scumtell and somehow got lucky since there actually
is
one.
I am about 90% sure Adel is town. I am about equally sure Iceman is scum. This post I quoted a second ago really settles it:
Iceman wrote:Or, as you state, it's possible I am thinking of something different. Regardless, the tell I'm thinking of is only possible if the mass-claim doesn't happen for a few days, so I think what I've got in mind is accurate.
Here he says that he has an idea what we're talking about, correct? Yet he's still voting me for pretending that this scum-tell exists. If he
really
has this idea that he states, why would he still be voting me?
Defending someone for a good reason is not scummy. Attacking someone for a good reason is not scummy. You must see Iceman's hypocrisy there. Even if you don't see the tell, you should be able to see that.
Adel wrote:I think it is called buddying up. Is it worth a vote?
I'm not buddying up. I don't even like you.
Perhaps you'd like to tell us what it is you don't like about this post, but if it has to do with Crazy writing off Adel as town, that's already been discussed.
In post 250, Pwnz makes the greatest observation of the game, when he references post 147, in which Iceman reveals knowledge of Crazy and Farside being lovers. Confirm Vote: Crazy
This is not the only instance of somebody guessing lovers. In fact, I don't think Ice was the only one who had those two pegged as lovers, as they were following each other very closely.
BM's last point is about Crazy's self vote. That doesn't sit entirely well with me either, but, it doesn't make for a strong case either way without getting into WIFOM. I don't know why BM thinks of it as martyr talk in relation to Ice, though. Can you explain, BM?
My main question for you, BM, is how these points are so compelling that they outweigh any other arguments to such a great degree. It just doesn't seem that obvious to me, and I'm certainly not the only one. You keep insisting, however, that it is such an airtight case, that you don't even need to read the rest of the game. You say nobody has addressed your points. Well, you had them buried in a quote box, and your points were very generic ("yuck," like that's all you have to say and we'll figure it out).
Thank you in advance for responses.