It's not if you don't put them in quotes ect and just text only. Because it would be stupid to have it bannable in some circumstances otherwise you would have to reword everything when trying to explain it. My past experiences with mods let me do this. Might be different with every mod so best to ask first.In post 3495, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:No. That would still be against the rules.In post 3492, Garmr wrote:Can you copy and past everything gobby said with out links. So we can work with it.
Large Normal 223 | New Beginnings | GAME OVER
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
hopkirkIn post 3503, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:
??? Who were you addressing with this?In post 3498, Garmr wrote:Also judging by the fact you say I'm confirmed town you have a role added on that's somewhat investigative and confirms me as town?While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Optimal claim is it will help we don't lose anything.
While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Are you dumb as bricks docs already claimed was asking for their target?In post 3515, texcat wrote:
Just a dead watcher. And since there's a backup tracker claimed, there might be a backup watcher too. But no reason for them to claim if they don't have a scum for us.In post 3408, Hopkirk wrote:
There's no claimed watchers for one thing.In post 3406, Hectic wrote:What's the reason for claimed watcher/voyeurs to not reveal results?
-Kork
Why are you still trying to out the doc????
VOTE: GarmrWhile being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I take it that you protected Hopkirk. Why hopkirk over tchill?
I voyoured tchill btw and no one wanted to visit him. No town or scum roles.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Fixed this a bit*In post 3521, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
How exactly am I scum here? And how did Dave move from scum to town literally overnight?
I rethought it from a different angle would scum dave saz be so persistent yesterday also if you read my posts.
In post 3427, Garmr wrote:Judging by the way Dave went ham on me yesterday I started to take it from another angle what happens if scum don't want to touch me yet because It would backfire on them? I mean town are more likely to do do the stupid shit and think crazy outlandish things. Daves scum read on me was really outlandish it could come from town because of his arrogance he ignores so many factors. Scum dave probably wouldn't want to risk being in a bad place in case I flip.
I also thought your post 3447 was scummy like saying don't look into gobbles posts in case it outs scum. Also you reached really hard for reasoning. You said that Gobble was defending me. Gooble mentions me 3 times once once about me talking about mason claim and another about my reaction to tex cat.
At this time I wasn't really being scum read by anyone but tex (maybe quietly davsa but wasn't obvious) and tbh tex no one took their vote seriously (except dav). This just seems like a lazy way for gooble to join in on the consensus and look like they are doing something.In post 2332, gobbledygook wrote:I think this frustration means Garmr is more likely town.
It also looks like you were lazy and isoed gooble to try and find dirt with out looking at the actual context or timing of their post. So that adds scum points as well.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Scum roleblock,the claimed doctor ect.In post 3530, davesaz wrote:
What kind of role did you expect to visit tchill?In post 3527, Garmr wrote:I voyoured tchill btw and no one wanted to visit him. No town or scum roles.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
If we sacrifice Texcat can we have Tchill back?In post 3550, Carcalilly wrote:Er, the Tchill slot anyway. We lost a warrior. High expectations are the upcoming burden for the replacement.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I say we put texcat on the spit and spit roast her as a offering to Tchill.In post 3554, Carcalilly wrote:
Damn, texcat is awesome but Tchill holds copious sentimental value. Ill contimplate this compromise.In post 3551, Garmr wrote:
If we sacrifice Texcat can we have Tchill back?In post 3550, Carcalilly wrote:Er, the Tchill slot anyway. We lost a warrior. High expectations are the upcoming burden for the replacement.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I would say Garmr is Town
While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Big Brain
While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I can finally be confirmed town.In post 1056, Garmr wrote:
Because you never read me right in the numerous games we played. Was waiting for you to vote meIn post 1055, Titus wrote:Why would my read make you conftown?
While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Maybe they noticed the role cop claim by the traitor and scum have a role that is identifiable by rolecop?In post 3602, bob3141 wrote:coudl be there afraid of power roles taht are unkown. We dont have a watcher but what other roles could be lurking on proffi or tchillWhile being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Be interesting if there was a 3rd person who was scum and read your convo believing that he was a gunsmith.In post 3626, profii wrote:It's interesting to note in the neighbourhood, we noted somewhat unusually that there isnt a player list of neighbours
So technically there could be a 3rd neighbour who has lurked the entire game (ps hope you are enjoying my stream of consciousness in there )While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Couple of factors, How i'm reading you,your claim,the fact you would even bring it up, if the thread was just you two talking then I think gobble would of outed his role as traitor to you since he would know your alignment.In post 3628, profii wrote:
Why do you assume that makes them scum, opposed to me scum them townIn post 3627, Garmr wrote:
Be interesting if there was a 3rd person who was scum and read your convo believing that he was a gunsmith.In post 3626, profii wrote:It's interesting to note in the neighbourhood, we noted somewhat unusually that there isnt a player list of neighbours
So technically there could be a 3rd neighbour who has lurked the entire game (ps hope you are enjoying my stream of consciousness in there )
You know like common sense stuff.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
While Titus is a liability to town because she voted me. I am leaning to her being more town.In post 3761, Hopkirk wrote:Next two properties after the scumslip are Titus and Eevee. Everyoneremember.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Like a scum fruit vendor?In post 3765, profii wrote:My guess is either JJD is going to flip as a reflexive role, which explains Cliff's n1 fruit claim or there is another FV somewhere to dilute the power of Cliff's role.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Nah I'm not a narcissist just something about this game that bring out the worst in people. Don't you agree Porfii....
While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Well if your town anyone who votes you is technically a liability because they can cause your mislynch in mylo. The best position as any alignment to win games is if your left alive in lylo and your more townie than the other players. Therefore you have to manage between hunting scum and nipping liability's.In post 3768, AaronFrost wrote:
This makes her a liability how?In post 3764, Garmr wrote:
While Titus is a liability to town because she voted me. I am leaning to her being more town.In post 3761, Hopkirk wrote:Next two properties after the scumslip are Titus and Eevee. Everyoneremember.
There's multiple ways of handling a liability debunking their case and lynching scum before Lylyo if they are stubborn, convincing them your town by hunting scum or debunking their arguments, hoping they get night killed or just lynching them as a last resort if your scum reads not are not going to get lynched and you have compromise and they are a option.
Unlike Profii who thinks it's narcissisticbecause he always assumes the worse in people and can't self reflect. It's just another way to view the game and aim for victory.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Wish you a speedy recovery.In post 3786, Hectic wrote:
That's very kind of you, Hop.In post 3760, Hopkirk wrote:If anyone ever has a problem with hectic later then think about how they don't have one right now. Last chance for scumreads there.
I have a confession to make: I had an accident recently.
Life came along and suckerpunched me, before choke slamming me through a steel chair.
As a result, I am still recovering from the decrease of time I have available.
However, I always aspire to reach above and beyond what I should be capable of.
Therefore, I will be making a GRAND return to the game TONIGHT. Please remain excited and eagerly anticipate my return.
@Hopkirk, Aaron, Carca:
I trust the three of you more than anyone else in the world. I really don't know what I'd do without you, and I would love to hear one (or all) of you briefly summarise what's hapenned the last couple of game-days.
I feel this would give me a better understanding for when I do start catching up, and would allow me to fill in the blanks with incredible efficiency and precision.
Love you,
HecticWhile being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Nah not claim just hammer like you said you would. He was l-1 and both mason were off him...... Don't know where you got the idea I wanted you to claim masons.In post 3791, profii wrote:
au contraire mon amiIn post 3777, Garmr wrote:
Unlike Profii who thinks it's narcissisticbecause he always assumes the worse in people and can't self reflect. It's just another way to view the game and aim for victory.
Your issue lies on your belief that I should have claimed Mason on day 1 to inform the town that the roleblocker(or whatever it was) claim was unlikely
So look at this game- I took your point and revealed I'm the backup tracker after tchill claimed tracker which killed a wagon. It remains to be seen if this stopped a lynch or a mislynch but I assume tchill is town for now so in this example it's all good and we assume something positive has come out of the whole situation
So I can easily point to an example of where I reflected and changed my behaviour based on your feedback despite how stupid I think you look by continuing to try and get say digs in
So why dont you go ahead and get the last word in...
I think you look by continuing to try and get say digs in
Kinda like your narcissistic comment. Like I was even talking to you and dropped it. But you need self awareness to figure that out.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I thought I said it last game but I act confident to slam the point in. If you have confidence in your points then people will question them.In post 3793, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
It shouldn't surprise you honestly, and I'm a bit confused by your reaction. I scumread you the last game you were town when I was town. Theres something about your confidence level that throws me off. Now, maybe you did pick that up. It's also possible that that's not what you think it is.In post 3781, Garmr wrote:@billy
Can I ask why you voted me over JJD. Because I think I was pretty much on point catching Goob trying to tell JJD about his pt.
Hey @Profii was that comment from Gobble around the time that you told JJD you had a pt?
Pedit: Feel better Hectic. Sorry to hear about the chokeslam though a steel chair. Hopefully you can recover and give your problem a stunner.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
FixedIn post 3804, Garmr wrote:
I thought I said it last game but I act confident to slam the point in. If you have no confidence in your points then people will question them.In post 3793, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
It shouldn't surprise you honestly, and I'm a bit confused by your reaction. I scumread you the last game you were town when I was town. Theres something about your confidence level that throws me off. Now, maybe you did pick that up. It's also possible that that's not what you think it is.In post 3781, Garmr wrote:@billy
Can I ask why you voted me over JJD. Because I think I was pretty much on point catching Goob trying to tell JJD about his pt.
Hey @Profii was that comment from Gobble around the time that you told JJD you had a pt?
Pedit: Feel better Hectic. Sorry to hear about the chokeslam though a steel chair. Hopefully you can recover and give your problem a stunner.
Like saying he could be scummy because of reason A I don't know. Is not as effective as saying "I find this scummy (reason a)"
You are going to find quite a few people on this site that portray themselves as confident in their reads.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
As untrue as you claiming I wanted you to claim masons day 1? While you don't always start it I will admit. You did this time and refused to acknowledge it. You have a habit of altering what happened in the past to please yourself.In post 3807, profii wrote:
If you are going to go cough cough profii then expect a response. Dont make out like I start any of this as it's simply untrueIn post 3792, Garmr wrote:
Nah not claim just hammer like you said you would. He was l-1 and both mason were off him...... Don't know where you got the idea I wanted you to claim masons.In post 3791, profii wrote:
au contraire mon amiIn post 3777, Garmr wrote:
Unlike Profii who thinks it's narcissisticbecause he always assumes the worse in people and can't self reflect. It's just another way to view the game and aim for victory.
Your issue lies on your belief that I should have claimed Mason on day 1 to inform the town that the roleblocker(or whatever it was) claim was unlikely
So look at this game- I took your point and revealed I'm the backup tracker after tchill claimed tracker which killed a wagon. It remains to be seen if this stopped a lynch or a mislynch but I assume tchill is town for now so in this example it's all good and we assume something positive has come out of the whole situation
So I can easily point to an example of where I reflected and changed my behaviour based on your feedback despite how stupid I think you look by continuing to try and get say digs in
So why dont you go ahead and get the last word in...
I think you look by continuing to try and get say digs in
Kinda like your narcissistic comment. Like I was even talking to you and dropped it. But you need self awareness to figure that out.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I'm of the opposite opinion we should hammer him and not repeat a kreag.In post 3817, profii wrote:I do think we need to reduce the JJd wagon until we have thought this through properlyWhile being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I have a reason he could of as town. But I don't want to accidentally feed scum a way out again like I did the worst in another game.In post 3829, profii wrote:
I'm not hammering until we know why cliff didnt pursue a guilty yesterday?In post 3826, Billy Pilgrim wrote:@Profii - what the fuck are you waiting on here? I cant see any scum motivation in what you're doing, but its sure as hell weird.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
this will probably get me lynched but I think Cliff is town and was making a gamble. He looked like he somewhat was regretting his actions around the end f the day. If he was scum I would expect a bit more of happy tone when he lynched JJD but all I could see was regret.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Yeah I got the impression he thought he was going to flip town but didn't want himself lynched. If it was scum trading I would expect a more smug response not a Oh fuck moment.In post 3969, AaronFrost wrote:
This actually makes him scummier for me since it felt like a last ditch effort to say "whoops I was wrong I screwed up" when he knew JJD was gonna flip town.In post 3967, Garmr wrote:this will probably get me lynched but I think Cliff is town and was making a gamble. He looked like he somewhat was regretting his actions around the end f the day. If he was scum I would expect a bit more of happy tone when he lynched JJD but all I could see was regret.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Of course dave and carc are town they are confirmed town. Dave by mod and and carc by mason kill. But you are 100% wrong on billy.In post 4007, Cliff Booth wrote:Okay look this is kind of an insane request but given the state town is in right now (very bad imo unless the traitor implies a small number of scum compared to what we might expect)
Can you guys just like assume I am town while you discuss things and lynch me? I NEED to be lynched and you guys REALLY SHOULD just assume we now have 4 conftown because that's the only real benefit I can provide right now. I know it's asking a lot but fuck I dont want to see everyone talking about if I'm scum and what that means for the game when it's not the case. Then this day is just town making cases/associations etc based around WRONG INFO.
I am town and I need to die. Just please trust me enough to assume I'm not lying, dave, carc, billy, and PROBABLY bob are TOWN.
Personally I think there's at least 2/3 scum in dalton, eevee, texcat, garmr, and hopkirkWhile being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Nah dream play is let you hang yourself here. But if you flip town I'm replacing out. I'm tired of this game. I'm tired of this game and some of the people in it.In post 4039, Cliff Booth wrote:I mean honestly it looks pretty obvious that garmr legit knows that billy and I are town and is trying to push the dream play here as scum which is to lynch billy before me and try to keep me around until mylo/lylo
Actually fuck it.
VOTE: garmr
I should still eat rope here but I might as well have my vote on something usefulWhile being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Also if you are a loyal fruit vendor which I don't think you are. I think you are just a normal one and continue to bull shit. If you were a actual loyal fruit vendor You would of been better off sending me fruit and actual because at the moment I'm pretty mislynchable because of my role and you have people literally calling my motivation town in post but using my roleclaim as a point to try and lynch me. It's obvious bob was town and you would have to be fucking dumb to send them a loyal fruit as the real role. Which is why I think you sent a obvious townie fruit.
If this was old me I would of threw my role pm to rub it in the face of the people scum reading me that are town and got myself modkilled but I am not for that anymore.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
case I made earlier. like post 3424.In post 3529, Garmr wrote:I also thought your post 3447 was scummy like saying don't look into gobbles posts in case it outs scum. Also you reached really hard for reasoning. You said that Gobble was defending me. Gooble mentions me 3 times once once about me talking about mason claim and another about my reaction to tex cat.
Like I really can't be fucked if town is acting dumb as fuck. There's at least one dumb town on me.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Tex,dave,titus,Billy,Rick and cliff have thrown dirt scum reads. They can't all be scum and dave is confirmed town.In post 4129, bob3141 wrote:game is certainly on the big side and slow.
Garmr you are aware there is only 2 players voting you and one of them is cliff. People might be scum reading but few have you placed higher than cliff
I can't be fucked dealing with that. Also I voyeured Hopkirk since he was supposed to be a power role that sorted town.
]Did not see anything.
Was my result so scum can't be bothered to place nay role on him if they have one.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
oh forgot that one I'm having a bad day sigh.
While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Can I point out texcats probably scum this game.
Since they joined the game they haven't really stuck their neck out they sat on me using me as a shield. They contributed nothing. They Really haven't voiced a opinion on rick today they just voted me.
No matter the circumstance I can see tex being scum.
Me and cliff town.- Scum motivation is staying off the cliff wagon and getting my mislynch. Also no one questions her vote.
Me town and cliff scum- Trying to save their buddy.
Any scenario where i'm scum (which i'm not but from a outsider pov they don't know) Would be parking their vote on scum mate to get cred and not do anything.
From a outsider pov Tex should be scum no matter what.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
No fruit from anyone also you should take carralilly out the list she's Ascetic and mason.In post 4163, profii wrote:Kop
Rick Dalton
Carcalilly
Garmr
bob
@ Billy - Patience, it's easiest if we go through everyone, then we talk about it.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Yeah hopkirk and no result. I thought because hopkirk claimed to have a investigative role of sorts it would attract a scum role if he wasn't killed.In post 4310, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Actually let me match this a second, then I probably won't post for at least 12 hours.
Assuming 5 scum, we have today and tomorrow to mislynch. I'm basically considering 5 people as conf!town. So theres 4 more townies in that pool of 9 I identified earlier. So we're probably to the point that scum is not gonna kill in that pool unless we give them a reason to, like 1 of them claims a PR. And we have at least 1 town or that can investigate the claimed prs and 1 1 town pr that can investigate the claimed VTs. If we keep Cliff alive, he can investigate at least one of the VT claims.
Assuming we mislynch, scum kill a conf!townie and Cliff gets an inno, then we're at 5 conf!townies and the lynch pool is down to 7 with all five scum there.
If we mislynch, and Cliff gets a guilty, we only have 4 conf!townies, but we have a guaranteed kill for LYLO or we could lynch that that day.
Look, if we trust Cliff (which I do) town can basically PoE this for a win. If we force a mass claim now, i think it enhances our chances.
I think we should mass claim. I already claimed, so did Profii, Cliff, and Garmr. If I have a choice, i want to popcorn to texcat.
On a side note, did Garmr claim n3 target?While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
By no result I mean no one visted him not a action fail just to clarify before a misunderstanding happens. The wording was "Did not see anything."In post 4312, Garmr wrote:
Yeah hopkirk and no result. I thought because hopkirk claimed to have a investigative role of sorts it would attract a scum role if he wasn't killed.In post 4310, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Actually let me match this a second, then I probably won't post for at least 12 hours.
Assuming 5 scum, we have today and tomorrow to mislynch. I'm basically considering 5 people as conf!town. So theres 4 more townies in that pool of 9 I identified earlier. So we're probably to the point that scum is not gonna kill in that pool unless we give them a reason to, like 1 of them claims a PR. And we have at least 1 town or that can investigate the claimed prs and 1 1 town pr that can investigate the claimed VTs. If we keep Cliff alive, he can investigate at least one of the VT claims.
Assuming we mislynch, scum kill a conf!townie and Cliff gets an inno, then we're at 5 conf!townies and the lynch pool is down to 7 with all five scum there.
If we mislynch, and Cliff gets a guilty, we only have 4 conf!townies, but we have a guaranteed kill for LYLO or we could lynch that that day.
Look, if we trust Cliff (which I do) town can basically PoE this for a win. If we force a mass claim now, i think it enhances our chances.
I think we should mass claim. I already claimed, so did Profii, Cliff, and Garmr. If I have a choice, i want to popcorn to texcat.
On a side note, did Garmr claim n3 target?While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I don't think it's about your activity so this doesn't argue much.In post 4354, Titus wrote:I haven't caught up but I really don't like this lynch Titus talk. Seems like a cheap cop out. We know my utility picks up once we lynch scum.
Perfect way to discredit me after Cliff flips scum.
I think the main points are why did you say that I'm town then do a 180 flip and voting me at opportunistic time.
Bob thinks you are the real scum fruit vendor or had knowledge of my it.
There's other points but these ones that are most striking to me.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Are you talking about the doc claim?In post 4430, Cliff Booth wrote:if a certain someone doesn't get NKed soon he needs to be lynched just because scum would never leave that player with that claim alive this long. Especially with the weird fucking tchill kill
the only reason tchill dies there over like 3 or 4 different people is if they thought he was tracking scum (maybe given away in crumb or something. Someone should look into that)While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Don't care do it or not I outed my role and i think most claimed.In post 4447, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
How do you feel about massclaim?In post 4446, Garmr wrote:I don't feel like voting for cliff I'm up for voting tex or titus's slot.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
You never justified a lynch on me or gave any points that's a reason people are scum reading you. Are you going to ignore that to or dismiss by saying you'll be useful latter on.In post 4588, Titus wrote:I'm just feeling stuck but Cliff seems like a good place to Lynch, particularly if I am not getting a Garmr Lynch.While being 100% completely right. I'm just that good. -Garmr (Wasn't Right)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 4593, Titus wrote:In post 1015, Garmr wrote:Hey Titus really important question what do you read my slot as???